1/23/2014

Foreigners: Treat them as’ you want to be treated’

‘Singaporeans should treat foreigners the same way that they want to be treated when travelling overseas, said Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen on Friday night.’ Asiaone online
The heading above is quite misleading as the meaning is not very clear. Is it a message to foreigners or to Sinkies reminding them to treat ‘them’ well if they want to be treated well? Take it as a message to Singaporeans, that they must treat foreigners well if they want foreigners to treat them well. Is there a meaningful relationship? Ahem, should ask an Angmoh for his opinion.
 

Eng Hen in the same article when he addressed NUS staff and students also added that Singaporeans are extremely generous to the foreigners here. Iif his theory is correct, than the foreigners should reciprocate by treating the Singaporeans well. The truth is that the foreigners despised the Singaporeans, insulted the Singaporeans, threatened and even beat up Singaporeans when they felt like it. Not only that they took the jobs from Singaporeans, they cheated and conspired to get rid of Singaporeans in the workplace so that they can bring in their village friends.
 

Why is it that Singaporeans are so generous to foreigners here and still kena bashed and discriminated by foreigners? If foreigners could treat Singaporeans so badly in Singapore, what are the chances of them treating Singaporeans well overseas? Would some Ph D students want to conduct a research on this to prove that this theory is workable, that this is a quid pro quo thing? Or shall I conduct a survey to ask the experience of Singaporeans when they were overseas or their interactions with foreigners here? How many Singaporeans have had bad encounters with foreigners here and overseas?
 

Singaporeans have been most gracious and kind to foreigners to the extent of being seen as meek and stupid. That is why they deserved to be walloped and threatened by foreigners right in their home country. And for those who lost their jobs to foreigners and been cheated or discriminated by foreigners they deserved it for being so extremely generous to foreigners. They deserve to be boat people, to be booted out of their own country. The elite of this island would be mainly foreigners if they keep giving all the top jobs to foreigners.
 

The foreigners are not the saints that they are made out to be, and neither are they more talented. They would not treat you well because you treat them well. Superficially yes, but when come to their vested interest, they will not hesitate to put a knife in the back of Singaporeans. They don’t call Singaporeans daft for nothing. It is a national character of a people brought up to be stupid no matter how high are their educational levels.
 

The SPGs are nothing. They only sleep with the foreigners. The most serious ones are the SPBoys. They brought in the foreigners to screw everyone here and pay them handsomely, look to them like gods.

Kopi level - Green

24 comments:

Veritas said...

I think its the other way. Foreigners should treat us what they want to be treated especially mother fuckers FT Indians.

Go Citibank CBP you see how FT Indians ship in their village and make us dalits.

Anonymous said...

They are treating this island as their country. Don't blame them.

Anonymous said...

We have been saying Singapore is a hotel for a long time. Sinkies are to play the part of waiter and waitresses. To be screwed and scolded by the hotel guests.

Anonymous said...

Ideas that made Singapore success were outmoded and obsolete in today internet era? 3rd World count coming up?

Communist abandoned socialist ideas in East Europe became democracy, if they continue the old ideas their standard of living will continue to drop?

You can't control info, it is vital for the country survival, business need to made constant decisions and they are nimble, they will go to a country that they can get fast and latest info?

The invention of internet reduce the distant of the world?

One of the major causes of Arab Spring is inflation?
http://outernationalist.net/?p=2939?
People can't cope with rising price? One party system?

China with its leaders mistake of like a ostrich buried head in the sands, as Marco Polo learn everything from China, went back and keep innovating from the ideas it learn from CHina?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_Rebellion?

Lead to a vast improvement in life in Europe with better and better technology?

Lesson learn it better to have oppositions parties like the Nordic and Swiss, rather then impede their progress?

As technology progress and competition intensify, which drive down price and make faster and easier to get info, handheld devices soon will be the source of info and news for the mass?

Main Stream Media, soon will be made obsolete like other old technology, which offer only one way traffic only.

Now younger population prefer to use internet to give feedback and solutions?

Technology viral info fast, unlike the grandfather era, where the old man can only get their info from the govt owned medias?

In 2000, people used only the MSM the main party got 70 percent of the votes, with no alternative sources of info, mostly walkover due to the GRC system?

At that time is might still ok to use one party system, which degenerated to today state of low birthrate, high incomes disparity, continue lower standard of living for the mass?

Then as internet improve 2006 the main party support drop to 66 percents, after a few recession, it decide to introduce 2 casinos as Singapore dependent on cheaper and cheaper workers no longer work?

After it introduce the 2 casinos straight way it rise it pay 25 percent despite the protest of many?

Almost immediately the hawker food rise 25 percent, one minister got the cheeks to go around asking hawkers not to raise price, which cause by his party raising their salaries?
Increase use of internet and handheld devices the main parties votes continue to drop to 60 percent if not for the TP walkover 57pc? And the profit sharing scheme?

Recent by election at P.E. dropped to 43 pc which made them panic?

Innovation and competitions had make many technology obsolete, like the walkman now people use MP3 much smaller and cheaper.

Typewriters almost no longer in use people prefer email much faster? MSM 2016 could be obsolete as more and more people use internet enable devices?

The same as MSM could be made obsolete in 2016 as majority get the news and info?

Anonymous said...

Red Bean

I have actually wanted to rebut what Limpeh had said on his blog towards EK Tan but I chose to do it here instead cause it will at least bring some more kopis to you.
This is exactly what sinkies are like, we say but don't do, on one hand we want unity from sinkies and curse if attendance gotten is not enough...on the other hand we laugh when mistakes are made....so what if it's the wrong or right employer, at least he has the balls to write in to do it.

Such mind-set are for the monkey's that the sinkies have and that is what the minority will always remain the minority, that FT has landed and planted a big pile of shit on our heads but what we do is bitch amongst ourselves, it's damn freaking sad that those that reads and actually commented are just as bad as that Limpeh.

The facts are there right in our face, face it sinkies, we just can't hold unity to the FT's because we can't see beyond our dick head ego, treat them as we wanted....shit, we can't even treat our own people the same.

Knn.

Anonymous said...

Red Bean

I have actually wanted to rebut what Limpeh had said on his blog towards EK Tan but I chose to do it here instead cause it will at least bring some more kopis to you.
This is exactly what sinkies are like, we say but don't do, on one hand we want unity from sinkies and curse if attendance gotten is not enough...on the other hand we laugh when mistakes are made....so what if it's the wrong or right employer, at least he has the balls to write in to do it.

Such mind-set are for the monkey's that the sinkies have and that is what the minority will always remain the minority, that FT has landed and planted a big pile of shit on our heads but what we do is bitch amongst ourselves, it's damn freaking sad that those that reads and actually commented are just as bad as that Limpeh.

The facts are there right in our face, face it sinkies, we just can't hold unity to the FT's because we can't see beyond our dick head ego, treat them as we wanted....shit, we can't even treat our own people the same.

Knn.

Anonymous said...

Modelling against Nordic:
January 23, 2014 at 9:09 am (Quote)

Singapore aims to have:

1) Higher birth rate like the Nordic with 1.8 replacement?

2) Low Gini coefficient or low income disparity?

3) High standard of Living? If there is over increase in population leading to overpopulation, the general standard of living will go down. See Hong Kong, many living in cage houses with overpopulation of immigrants.

With oversupply of cheap, less educated labour Singapore productivity keeps going down.

Most of Singapore’s brightest left about 300K, Singapore will be in serious trouble if more brain drain.

Singapore needs to channel money to develop its own people and not be too reliant on foreign ‘talents’.

Those ministers’ salaries, bonuses, pensions, allowances should be reduced to provide free education or technical training until graduate.

Singapore should not overtax with the indirect taxes like COE, GST, Levies. GST and other indirect taxes are used to pay its leaders, these will make the businesses more reliant on cheaper foreign labour to mitigate the high cost of doing business here.

Singapore should have multi party system, likely in 2016, as the main party vote keeps sliding.

The salaries of ministers should be competitive to those countries with similar population so as not to heavily burden the population.

Keep increasing foreigners can deprive the locals and new citizens of jobs and depress income.

Singapore needs to seriously consider the Nordic model and modify it to suit its own country.

Singapore just can’t continue to solve its problem by increasing foreigners. Singapore is an island, already many of the negative effects from the sixties are coming back, it will get more serious.

Of course Singapore needs some foreign labour to complement, not so excessive that it pushes up the inflation, lower the productivity.

If Singapore doesn’t solve the 3 problems above, why keep giving excuses?

Within another generation it is likely locals will be gone with around 1.2 replacement rate, Singapore will be faced with more serious challenges later.

What Singapore wants is locals to be innovators, inventors, discoverers and designers to power the local SME to be world class companies.

Singapore should not continue the easy way of keep using cheap labour and cheap foreign labour intensive investments to solve the problem.

Singapore needs to make and design better products through innovations and more efficiently and reduce wastage.

Singapore can’t afford to pay its leaders too high. Why not a wage that’s comparable to advanced nations like the Nordic, Swiss and New Zealand?

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Thank you knn. Dunno who is limpeh and what limpeh said.

I only know one Lim Peh. Yes that's her name.

Anonymous said...

hmmm...

Sorry i don't believe "What do you think" minister says or offers up to others.

Someone who is so empty headed and not a original thinker asking others to think for them...better go to a mirror and ask your self in the mirror "What do you think"...

Nuts.

Anonymous said...

With 15 GRC systems? One won by Opposition?

If base on the single seats equivalents?

Out of 40 percent of the 35 seats out of 87 seats? 28 seats are back door MP? Many backdoors MP had lots of appt. simply don't have much time for the common people?

These bad door MP deprived of the common populations voices, as oppositions need to represent their of 40 percents or 35 seats.

But only 7 went to oppositions, can come into the parliament? Which lead to sorry state of Singapore affairs?

Many of the bad door MP to tired to attend or sleep during parliamentary proceedings?

Oppositions 7 MP attend all the Parliamentary proceedings?

Average of 14 GRC 2 MP from the main party could be given votes by the those with the higher votes? The are not likely to be able to coming in without the vote from the higher vote MP?

On average one GRC pull in an average of 2 MP through votes passing around?

Those 6 GRC system as much as 3 MP could be pull in through the back doors?

With this type of arrangement, can Singapore continue don't slide, Singapore can always make to look good, but inside, when people look further behind most know what happen to SIngapore in a sorry state of affairs?

Anonymous said...

That why in a third Democratic system GRC systems, see you can see the Tin Tins, LBHs, the Maraboro Tans, the Heng Hengs, the tooth picks master or some called him the Zoro king & the Baey Nasi Padang types coming in parliament?

Or through the back doors?

Out of 40 percents or 35 seats, which 28 seats should went to the oppositions went to the main party?

Without the GRC they can come in? No wonder one lady MP called them Crowns?

We could be disgrace to the world, which called ourself first world system, in fact we are worse then the 3rd world at least they don't claim to be 1st world?

With this type of standard no wonder our position in the world continue to slide, unlike in the 80s and 90s with first generation of leaders?


If more people around the world know more of our sad states of affairs? Many of our citizens will dare not tell people we are Singaporean and hold our head high? Like one young lady said in the Karaoke contests?

Anonymous said...

Foreigners should come to Sin City and gain instant fame around the world.

All they need to do is to spit on a Sinkie.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

The first thing LKY said to his PPS, is that when he met a foreigner he must look them in the eyes or they would look down on him. This was what Lim Siong Guan said during an interview by CNA.

Anonymous said...

Boo, hoo, hoo,...I treat the foreigners so well, invite them to my country, let them take my jobs, live in big houses, drive expensive cars, let them have our women, let them cheat us with false qualifications and now, boo, hoo, hoo, they said we are smelly whoa. They don't like our stench whoa.

We got stench meh?

Anonymous said...

Some claim Singapore is one of the richest nation in the world? They are joking?

But you look behind, if you compare to the Swiss, New Zealand and the Nordic?

It because some very rich expat live here at the high end lots of rich people which bring up the average?

You see behind casinos, gambling, loan shark, credit companies, suicides, divorces, drug addictions, prostitution & drunk is growing? With so many credit companies coming Singapore can hardly call rich?

You see those Swiss , Nordic and New Zealand these type of problems are rare?

With the massive influx of foreign workers the low half or the population likely going worse the better, later like the Hongkies sleeping the street or cage houses?

https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=hong+kong+homeless&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&hs=MrZ&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=OLPgUuafBaLoiAeh-IEY&ved=0CEkQsAQ#newwindow=1&q=singapore+homeless&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbm=isch

Many live for hand to mouth, with the massive influx of foreign workers or (talents). Many live in one room rental flat on social welfare?

At night you can see many coming out sleeping in the street and the beach?

Many old people got to work as cleaners to survive, some picks cans and cardboard as a living?

With those flawed or one side policies? And the medias owned by the government of course they prefer pick and choose and show those statistic that fit their agenda?

Anonymous said...

Ist world or fourth world system?

At least third countries they admit, but Singapore system not even a third countries, with this sorry state of affairs?

Can Singapore benchmark against the advanced nations?

The is proper way in a major system that certain criteria or standard need to be achieved, in the advanced nation democracy?

With the GRC vote passing of the higher vote to the lower votes candidates like the 6 candidtes GRC system?

Profit sharing schemes during elections?

Importing of foreigners to be voters as their votes keep sliding with the internet?

Anonymous said...

Singapore already transform to a service industries, from 8 millions tourists to 14 millions?

The next thing it need to improve its innovations, and design and branding of its SMC?

Singapore should not lower majority of population standard of keep importing people?

It should try to be competitive it wages with the Nordic, so that it don't have to look for everywhere to support its highest pay, allowances, bonuses & pensions etc?

Dismantle the GRC system, let in more oppositions to improve its feedback as 40 percents opposition votes, represent the common people voices?

oldhorse42 said...

On Pg A9 "TOP OF THE NEWS" section of the straits times, there is a photo of our Minister for Law and Foreign Affairs under the caption " Minister holds dialogue with foreign workers"
What strike me is not the dialogue with the foreign workers that rioted in a foreign land that treated them far far better than their own motherland.
But that our minister look just like the foreign workers himself!

Anonymous said...

It is important to have oppositions because, some of the feedback, genuine ideas came from the oppositions like the Nordic or Swiss multi parties system?

With a single party system, many of the MP would not like to offend their leaders, so they might not provide, feedback the genuine on the ground, it is naturally in any societies?

So it is crucial to have oppositions and not to curtail them?

Oppositions provide important check and balances? The complement what the main party lacks?

They perform important roles They are the co drivers to wake up the main driver when they are asleep?

If the GRC not formed, Singapore would not degenerate into today sad state of affairs?

Profit sharing schemes should not be given at the elections?

Less foreigners to be imported as citizens?

b said...

with traitors controlling the governments, sinkies will be controlled by foreigners soon. however, sinkies have only themselves to blame for voting in the traitors party.

Anonymous said...

What do you call a Chinese guy working for the Japanese Imperial Army in World War Two?
Do you call him a Chinese Traitor?

Would you want to trust a political party founded by a Chinese Traitor?

Do you think you will treated better than a Foreigner by this political party that was founded by a Chinese Traitor?

Anonymous said...

Apparently this fucker cunt differentiate;

going there for holidays n boosting the economy there

And foreign assholes cuming here to take over singaponang jobs, destroying life's and families

Knnccb... fucking bastards papigs... may your descendants reap the karma u created.
N kuan yew live long to witness them

Matilah_Singapura said...

Jim Rogers says it all:

Jim Rogers - Should You Move to Singapore?

I think people should be free to adopt anything their feeble, insignificant minds can conjure up. If they want to be assholes to foreigners, go right ahead.

Me? I adapt myself to what the potential for profit is. A general rule: being nice in the REAL world is good for business.

Being a cunt online, on the other hand, is mega, smokin' good FUN :-)

Unspoken rule in the REAL world in Singapore:

1. angkat the foreigners
2. shit on the locals

This "philosophy" is guaranteed to produce many more years of COMEDY and ENTERTAINMENT for students of human history, and the human condition. It also provides ongoing fodder for fuckers like redbean to write shit everyday.

Kopi level: Black, no sugar.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Thank you for feeding on my shit. you are welcome.