American miscalculation in war against Russia and China

Since 2014, after Russia realised the intention of Nato to expand further into Ukraine, Putin and Xi had already started planning their moves in anticipation of what the USA intended to do. The USA had been hyping up their intention to deal with China first, starting with a trade war in 2018, instigating unrest in Hong Kong in 2019/2020, and trying to stir up support from the Muslim world against the Chinese by accusing the Chinese of genocide against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang in 2021/2022. Both the latter two moves failed to take off, with the Xinjiang fabrication unproven.

The whole USA plan to take on China first failed, because Russia made its pre-empted move on Ukraine that prevented the USA from concentrating its attack on China. That the Liberation of Donetsk and Lugansk started right after the February 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing, during which Putin visited Xi, undoubtedly to put their plan into action, was anticipated by the USA, but they could do nothing. All the calculated moves between Russia and China, the diversion of energy towards the East were all worked out well before the USA and the West used the energy sanctions on Russia.

The fact that the USA were dead intent on stopping the Nord Stream 2 from opening up or functioning, even well before its completion, was apparently clear as to what the USA intention was, and you cannot fool a man as astute as Putin. Russia did not panic, having already anticipated this move by the USA and the West by building pipelines to China for energy diversion and probably already have garnered support from India as an alternative energy market, and the Middle East members of OPEC+ and their backup on energy policies.

Moreover, that stipulation that European countries buying Russian energy must pay in Rubles was a masterstroke that the USA and the West did not see. It prevented the collapse of the Ruble into rubbles that Biden was gloating about. Anyway, Biden may not now even remember saying that, so no use reminding him.

It is a no brainer to even think that after taking down China, the USA will not pivot towards confronting Russia by expanding Nato into Ukraine. That had been the USA's intention all along since 2008. Putin and Xi are not as ignorant of the USA's evil motive all over the world.

As long as Russia and China keep up their alliance and solidify on it, any move by the USA against any one of them is not without consequences. Russia has the military prowess, and China the financial strength to weather any conflict that the USA intends to take against both of them together. Not that China is that far behind in military prowess and the USA knows that the window of opportunity to put China down is closing fast.



Virgo49 said...

Good morning Mr RB and All

Today's ST aka Shits Times had a full page article write up from our Mr Tommy Koh who stated that Russia must NOT win the War.

Or else it would be a threat of Sovergnity to any Nation as Whats they the Western Stooges and their cronies perceived to be an agression of Russia.

Wow, in contrast to our Mr Maurenbi talked otherwise.

Who the wiser one?

Bidamn's three hundred millions just no need work and print out currency real working hard like our COEs papers.

No wonder can said will give billions to Urukiane as only have their printers worked overtime.

Anonymous said...

Dumbass Western leaders..

'Mr. Putin has previously said that nobody can win a nuclear war, and it is a war that should never be fought. However, behind the scenes Russia had been furiously preparing to survive just such a war, which they hope to avoid.

Russia has developed and deployed the S-500 and S-550 air defenses which are primarily designed to shoot down intercontinental ballistic missiles in space before they can release their multiple warheads upon re-entry. Each S-500 battery is capable of simultaneously tracking and destroying 10 ICBMs in the early to mid flight stages.

The S-300 and S-400 batteries armed with the new 77N6-N and 77N6-N1 anti-ballistic missiles are also capable of shooting down ICBM warheads after re-entry at shorter ranges than the S-500.

These systems create an onion of defensive rings around key Russian cities and military bases. In the event of a nuclear exchange the S-500 would target the incoming ICBMs while still in space at a range of 600 kilometers, and outside the borders of Russia; and the S-400 and S-300 batteries would target any deployed warheads that managed to get through. Obviously, preventing as many enemy missiles as possible from being launched would improve the chances of successful defense.'

If Russia’s ICBM defenses could take out 90% of 640 incoming missiles, it could survive a nuclear exchange at the cost of absorbing hits from about 50 warheads that got through. Given the smaller modern warheads in NATO’s missile forces, it would do terrible but localized damage. Moscow would probably experience massive damage, but the rest of Russian territory would be fine.

NATO’s nuclear offense forces rely on aging Trident II and Minuteman III ICBMs. The majority of these systems are over thirty years old. This means they will probably have a significant failure rate just to launch. Russia’s modern air defenses and ECM have been designed to defeat these old technologies.

In balance to the effort to perfect defenses against ICBMs, Mr. Putin announced that Russia’s nuclear forces have been 91% modernized. That means that the ICBMs that Russia would fire all have maneuverable hypersonic warheads. US air defenses are currently unable to defend against these.

The spacing of American Minuteman silos was designed for the majority to survive a first strike and launch retaliation. However, Russian maneuverable hypersonic multiple re-entry vehicles nullify this defense if the targeting data is accurate. Russia has to accurately hit 400 ground targets in the first strike to nullify a response.

Thus, if Russia strikes first, it may be able to eliminate the majority of incoming missiles by destroying them on the ground. The 240 submarine launched Trident missiles would be the primary threat to defend against. Thus a first strike could reduce the number of expected retaliation missiles by 62%.

A first strike would make it unlikely that the bombers and refuelers could get off the ground in time to effectively respond.

Russia currently has a window of superiority in both nuclear offense and defense that NATO is rapidly trying to close. It is not in Russia’s interest to allow NATO to close the technology gap in air defense and ICBM offense.

The world is now on the threshold of nuclear war. Russia keeps warning the West. The West keeps ignoring the warnings and doubling down. The immovable object is meeting the unstoppable force.

In the coming weeks Russia’s ally, China, will offer a peace deal which freezes the Ukraine conflict within the current lines of contact, i.e. Ukraine conceding lost territory to Russia.

If the West rejects the offered peace, which seems fairly likely, then all of the conditions for a nuclear war will be in place. All it will take is a new provocation by NATO to trigger a first strike by Russia. Or worse, if both parties realize this is the case, both will have the incentive to strike first.

Link to article:

Anonymous said...

Tommy has gone bonkers. If Russia is defeated, next will be China. When both are defeated, the whole world would come under the control of the evil American Empire.

For American crony states, there is no difference as they are already under the control of the evil American Empire. Arm twisted and coerced to do the American bidding, taking the sides of the Americans in everything the Americans do and told them to do.

Anonymous said...

Did he read China foreign ministry
essay US hegemony and it’s peril
Or just watching CNN news ???

Anonymous said...

He reads Channel News America.

Virgo49 said...

He shaking hands with that Bidamn and also stumble on the stairs and elevators.

Like that Emil Cosain said cannot laugh at old folks.

But some of these are what's he described as Dangerous Olf Folks that harmed the Good Ones into their not time yet early DEATHS.

Virgo49 said...

Why this Tommy Koh did NOT said the UAssA must NOT win their invasions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Vietnam and etc their Sovergnities be respected?

Wars against Terrorisms? As believed and brainwashed by his White Masters?

Who are the Actual Terrorists?

When they killed the Arabs and when the Arabs killed the White Barbarians?

Whites killed Arabs and other coloured peoples Heros!

Others killed the Americunts as Terrorists?


Anonymous said...

Who the f*** is Emil Cosain? I trust Tan Ah Kow more than any chow Ang Mo.

Anonymous said...

They were on leave when the US and Nato invaded Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan etc etc. So they cannot comment on them. As for Syria, the US did not invade but went there to still Syria oil. So no invasion.

Or not reported in Channel News America, so they did not know, cannot comment.

Can't Wait said...

Tommy has gone bonkers. If Russia is defeated, next will be China.

He could be right.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Welcome to the blog, Can't Wait?

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Hi Anonymous,

Several posts I put up were taken off by Blogger. This post from Link to article:
http://thesaker.is/the-dire-significance-of-putins-feb-21-speech/ may also be taken out.

Please take note.