Anglo-Saxon colonizers were intent on keeping the colored people they colonized, backward, poor and easy to control

 On the surface NGOs are all angelic entities, set up to provide help to the poor and downtrodden. Why did the USA want to help humankind, when throughout the centuries, the Anglo-Saxon colonizers were intent on keeping the colored people they colonized, backward, poor and easy to control. Is the USA really that humanistic, funding all those NGOs and wanting nothing in return?

The Pilgrims that landed in America were also angelic, with promoting Christianity to Native American Indians supposed to be their main objective. Beneath that angelic religious piety lies a sinister motive. Taking the land of the Native Indians in exchange for the Bible turns out to be their pre-occupation.

What did the Native American Indians gain from religion? What did they lose forever in exchange? The lost their land and have to live in concentration camps to prevent them from threatening the Whites, on the pretext of protecting them.

Abraham Lincoln was said to be the much-admired President that abolished Black slavery. Digging deeper into the act reveals a more sinister motive. The Confederates needed more manpower enlistment to fight the civil war against the North, the Union, and the purpose of ending slavery was to enable the Confederates to gather the enlistment of the Blacks to fight in the war. Slaves do not fight in a war when they have no interest in the land and also, they belong to someone, their master.

However, after the civil war ended, it was reported that the Blacks suffered even worse treatment by the Whites. If Black slavery already ended and they have rights, what other rights was Martin Luther King fighting for? Black rights are also basically human rights. So, does ending slavery really gave the Blacks their rights? Think about it!

Anonymous