Blinken took to Twitter on Friday to hail Albright, a former US ambassador to the UN and secretary of state under former President Bill Clinton, as a ‘woman of courage’....
His choice of role model struck many as odd. The replies were inundated with the clip of Albright’s infamous 60 Minutes interview with Lesley Stahl, in which Albright said that the deaths of half a million Iraqi children allegedly due to sanctions was “worth it.”Well, I believe you're serious. A great choice as a role model!
The above is quoted from RT.
If killing 500,000 Iraqi children is worth it, made America more respected globally, and this woman is now a role model for Blinken, what kind of people do you think the Americans are? Do you really believe they care a damn about the Uyghurs, a Muslim tribe?
How much more American lies and hypocrisies would it take for the unthinking to finally remove their blinkers and see the Americans as what they really are, mass murderers!
Albright called the killing of 500,000 Iraqi children worth it, Hilary Clinton conveniently called them war collateral, not human beans, just numbers. It is not the point blank shooting of 1 or 2 unarmed Syrian boys by Australian mercenaries called soldiers, it is 500,000 children's lives. Ok, Ok, I must qualify, Muslim children, not white American children. Does it matter if it is Muslim children or white American children or black lives?
'Caitlin Johnstone: The entire world should be laughing at America for pretending to care about Muslims in China....
The US president's preaching about human rights in a nation he wants to undermine have never sounded as hollow as when he speaks about the 'oppressed' Muslims of China. Just ask any Muslim-majority country bombed by the US.' Quoted from RT
21 comments:
The Gods in the Heavens would be crying and shouting "How dare you!!! How dare you kill all my children !!! U hv absolutely absolutely No Right at all!! No right to take away my beloved creations !!!..How Dare U !!!"
Meantime The Heavenly shall do what is right for His Children - These children shall reincarnate to take revenge on these Evils Whites Hypocrites...let's wait & see Karma unto the Evils Ones..
My three sources of such unreported news, real news, comes from RT, Aljazeera and CGTN.
You will find all the dirt about things the MSM never reported and never wanted us to know.
Visitors to blogs like RB should make it a point to tell others of topics such as this to educate other readers.
Cheers!
They are soooo evil.
This is no longer just the msm age. This is the internet, social media age. Hypocritical leaders from the West lecturimg China and 3rd world countries caught with their pants down will receive instant backlash.
When China reply to lies and false accusations China is being accused for engaging in 'wolf warrior diplomacy'.
But how on earth can a term 'Genocide' be so freely tossed about that 2 countries' parliaments, Canada and Nederlands have declared China to be guilty of, relying only on the words of a few anti-China politicians, academics and think tanks. Even Canadian PM Trudeau, himself not China friendly had explained that 'genocide' is too loaded a description without real verified evidence.
China's sanctions against UK is having results!
A UK barristers’ chambers included in Chinese sanctions on Friday that targeted UK politicians, lawyers and academics in retaliation for criticism of China’s mass internment campaign in Xinjiang has sought to distance the majority of its members from a legal opinion written by four of its lawyers that implicated the Chinese government in “genocide” in Xinjiang.
Essex Court Chambers removed a reference to the legal opinion from its website. A statement from the chambers said: “No other member of Essex Court Chambers was involved in or responsible for the advice and analysis contained in the legal opinion or its publication.”
It is unclear if the sanctions apply to all the individual barristers in Essex Court Chambers.
Essex Court Chambers said it has more than “90 barristers and Singapore Members practising full-time as members”, including 44 Queen’s Counsel.
The sanctions created an increasingly difficult position for UK lawyers that are exposed to potentially lucrative arbitration work in China via Hong Kong’s legal system.
“The fact that the chambers put it on their website perhaps invites the retaliation in a way the chambers did not anticipate,” an adviser to Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam said.
The sanctions imposed by Beijing on Essex Court Chambers and others freeze their China-based assets, ban those named and their family members from entering China — including Macau and Hong Kong — and from doing business with Chinese individuals or entities.
Speaking of Trudeau, when is he going to order the death of the 2 Michaels held in China?
Now it is anything you can do, I can do better. Keep up the good work China!
Essex Court has an annex in *Singapore* as well as Essex Court Chambers Duxton, a separate *Singapore* Group Practice, which practices *Singaporean* law in a chambers model and is led by former *Singapore Attorney General VK Rajah SC.*
https://m.globallegalpost.com/big-stories/top-asia-law-qc-leaves-sanctions-hit-essex-court-chambers-13067865/
Lawyers jumping ships - these are sanctions with real pain, not just symbolic.
The Pentagon recently asked Congress for an astronomical $27 billion budget increase to support a massive military buildup in Asia as part of its new Indo-Pacific plan, which calls for a substantially more aggressive military stance against China.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/29/the-real-danger-of-the-pentagons-new-indo-pacific-plan/
RB Morning...
"My three sources of such unreported news, real news, comes from RT, Aljazeera and CGTN..educate other readers"
Correction NO NO! "Aljazeera", Aljazeera is a known extreme China basher and hater... replace with Sputnik or Global Times..
https://www.cgtn.com/channel/english
https://sputniknews.com/
https://www.rt.com/
https://www.globaltimes.cn/index.html
"Speaking of Trudeau, when is he going to order the death of the 2 Michaels held in China?
Be patience please after they executed Robert Lloyd Schellenberg and charged Cheng Lei - she was business anchor on CGTN an Australian spy.. Kind Regards JC
Quite a few politicians in Uk and Canada had used the term " I wear it as a badge of honour" when asked about being sanctioned by China.
Sounds familiar and talk about having some originality?
This is exactly the same words first used by notorious warmonger, China basher, former Trump NSA John Bolton. No wonder they all think alike on human rights in China but keeping mum on the worse perpertrator, the US.
Birds of a feather.
A not-very-happy WSJ editorial March 29 . . .
Anyone who thought the world would warm to U.S. interests once Donald Trump left the scene has received a rude awakening in the last two months. The latest sign is the weekend’s pact between China and Iran, an example of U.S. adversaries uniting to advance their strategic ambitions.
The two sides signed what they described as a 25-year “strategic partnership” that amounts to a significant deepening of ties. China will invest several hundred million dollars in a variety of Iranian projects, including nuclear power, ports, and oil and gas development. In return China will get a steady supply of Iranian oil. The two will also deepen their defense cooperation as China will transfer some military technology.
This is a big deal that advances the strategic interests of both sides—at the expense of the U.S. and stability in the Middle East. The deal helps Iran dodge American sanctions, and the cash infusion will ease economic pressure on the ruling mullahs. Iran will have a long-time buyer for its oil exports that were reduced by U.S. sanctions.
The countries will also form a Chinese-Iranian bank with the aim of evading the U.S. dollar dominance in world trade that gives U.S. sanctions their bite. Breaking the dollar’s hold on global trade and finance is a major goal of Russia, China and Iran.
The deal expands China’s influence in the Middle East, which it wants for access to energy and raw materials as well as to increase its economic sway. China has also been courting the Saudis and Gulf states with economic lures. As the shale revolution has made the U.S. less dependent on Middle Eastern oil, those oil exporters need access to the China market. If the U.S. is seen as unreliable, these countries can hedge their bets with China. American influence in the Persian Gulf is not a birthright.
The more powerful they become in their regions, the more these adversaries are likely to cooperate on a global scale to undermine American economic and security interests.
The world is becoming more dangerous, never mind Mr. Biden’s hopes. North Korea is again firing missiles, China is threatening Taiwan more aggressively, Iran is adding to its nuclear violations, and Russia continues to undermine U.S. purposes wherever it can. While Mr. Biden is preoccupied with “transforming” the U.S. economy, the world is also transforming—and not in a good way.
If Mr. Biden wants to restore the rules-based global order, the U.S. and its allies will have to do it. They can start by dropping illusions about the designs of their adversaries.
'..rules based global order...?
Hahahaha. What a joke! Not April 1st yet. Not fooled!
Don't read the 'War Street Journal'.
Pure propaganda rag!
Xi Jinping's key dual circulation philosophy underpinning China’s 14th five-year plan for 2021-25 calls for making domestic consumption the main pillar of the economy and reducing reliance on external demand. It envisages a future in which China no longer needs to rely on the world but the world cannot continue to spin without China.
In China’s new five-year plan, the country will adopt a “new type of whole-country system” under its socialist market economy to “fight key battles over core technologies” in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum information and integrated circuits. That whole-country approach means that all available resources will be mobilised and concentrated into a few projects perceived to be of vital importance to the nation’s future. China also did this in its development of nuclear weapons in the 1960s, when the country was poor and very much isolated from the world.
The price of greater self-reliance will, almost surely, be slower economic growth. Marshal Chen Yi, one of the founding fathers of the People’s Republic, said in 1963 that China would sell its trousers to raise money for its nuclear bomb programme.
Kong Dan, former chairman of Citic Group, Beijing’s key financing arm, said that China must mobilise all of the nation’s resources in its competition with the US. “What’s the end game in the China-US rivalry? Is the US trying to get money from us, or is it trying to take our life? If it wants money, it’s an issue of development; but if it wants our life, it’s an issue of security.”
China must develop a domestic production and supply system in critical areas so that “we can have circulation on our own at critical moments, and to ensure normal economic operations in extreme circumstances,” Xi Jinping said. In addition to fixing weak links, Xi said China has to develop technologies and products that the world will rely on China for.
"We will enhance the global value chain’s dependence on China and develop powerful retaliation and deterrence capabilities against supply cut-offs by foreign parties,” Xi said.
The same narrative from the West that the world is becoming more dangerous because of China.
Did China sail any warships close to the USA?
China is courting the Middle East with sanctions or threats?
How many wars did China fought over the decades?
Rules based world order? Or is it gangsters ruled based world order?
China's wages are still very low and can afford to move up quite substantially, eg 10% annual increment for all civil servants and uniformed services for the next 5 years. This would boost the purchasing power of the Chinese and also raise the GDP accordingly and can over take the American economy in less than 3 years as the biggest economy in the world in nominal dollar terms.
Compounded percentage increase in the Chinese economy would add 20 or 30% to the GDP! A 20% increase of a $15 trillion GDP is $3 trillion. A 30% increase is $4.5 trillion!
So according to the logic of the WSJ editorial, any trade deal made between the likes of Iran, Russia, North Korea and China among themselves will be dangerous for the world!
Challenging the American gangsters ruled based order is dangerous to them. They want to be the top gangsters forever, to kill anyone they liked.
Post a Comment