Say what you want, look at it this way, Yang Yin has proven that it is
right to assume that those above 55 years, or in the particular case
above 80, cannot be trusted with their money. Just a bit of give and
take, maybe 65 or 75 years would be just right. The second point that
has been proven is that it is not only the men that cannot be trusted
with their money. No need to go to Batam or Bintan. They can fly here
from China or anywhere to take good care of our oldies … money.
Come to think of it, there is a lot of wisdom in the govt’s policies on
the CPF. Give the govt a Tiger. Whatever came out with this idea
deserves a good bonus. Keep them tight, don’t let the oldies have a free
hand in their money. They would squander it, if not will be cheated of
it. Some will get dementia through no fault of theirs and lose their
money too.
It is action time. How to protect the rich oldies from losing their
monies or being cheated of their monies? Should they be sent to a
holiday camp for oldies so that they will not be in harm’s way? Should
their money be put in a trust of sort and then a stipend be given to
them ala the CPF formula? If there is a need to protect the oldies from
losing their CPF monies which in most cases are less than a peanut, the
multi million dollar assets and cash of these oldies demand more
attention to keep the huge sums of money safe and sound, and to keep the
poachers and looters away.
What do you think? Tiok boh?
Kopi Level - Green
21 comments:
Very sure that there are many
more "yang yin" type of cases
in this small city state with different scenarios.
Do you know why? THINK!
Time has proven it is the oldies who are more prudent with their money. Of course, some are misled by their children into parting with their money, out of parental love or otherwise. There are many factors.
But to equate the misdeeds of a few who lost their money to gambling or mei meis is just using that as a justification to keep as much of Singaporean's CPF money as possible. They never look at the other side of the coin. Did they build the casinos to cement their case for keeping the CPF money? They just make the statistics alarming, but they are stoking the gambling habit with so much easy and convenient access to all forms of 'legalised'
gambling.
The statistics are not alarming. It is the people that went hysterical to make a case out of no case so that they can keep your money.
CPF is the biggest Yang Yin.
Would be interesting to know who recommended him to be a grassroot leader, and to serve in PM's GRC.
He knew who really matters. Did he got help or he just walked into AMK GRC and was warmly embraced?
You are making wild assumptions and very rude.
So... stop the hong lim park shits
Unless u r a desperate old man looking for orals
Papigs know best, love u, care for dafts
Leemember... vote 4 papigs, 60.1% know best, follow the majority
You are making wild assumptions and very rude. Go do your homework.
丈夫照顾富婆5年，为富婆与她分房睡。 Yang Yin and wife sleep separately in rich widow house.
杨寅在富婆面前，把妻子说成是朋友 Yang Yin lied that his wife is "friend".
So what does it show?
What if the government also another Yang Yin and we only know it until PAP become opposition party?
On the same note, it also proved that PAP anyhow recruit people into their grassroot camp.
Piss lah...
PA is not papigs... according to the autholeety.
PA is not a political entity per se, but it's understandable that daft dun understand...
Yang Yin must be losing his face with his picture all over the media. The face of someone who fucks an 87 year old woman. Hahahahahahah! I think the old woman made sure Yang Yin had to do more than intercourse. Yang Yin must be thinking never mind I do all this as long as I get $40 million. But now he won't be getting the $40 million. All he would get would be publicity that he fucked an 87 year old woman for a few years, with his wife and kid under the same roof with his wife's knowledge. PRCs really got no morals and no values.
The Lasting Power of Attorney is a legal document designed to protect people with diminished mental capacity to appoint one or more person to make decision for them.
The talented China man from Hangzhou with no legal traning is able to circumvent the supposedly strict requirements of the lasting power of attorney crafted by the best minds of Office of the Public Guardian and enrich himself at the expense of the rich but senile widow.
The Office of the Public Guardian have lets its guard down!
"PRCs really got no morals and no values."
- Actually many papists are like Yang Yin. Majority of sinkies are also like Yang Yin. They will resort to anything to enrich themselves.
In the end Singaporeans will be left wondering who cheated them.
Is it the protector who acquired, by stealth, the legal rights to keep all the money?
Some day, into the future, we will find out. But it will not be a case of better late than never. It will be too late to matter.
With the LPA, Yang Yin can do anything legally to look after Chung's wealth.
If, as claimed by some commenters here, that Yang Yin had gotten to the $40 millions for been sexually intimate with the Old Lady, he deserves every cent of the $40 millions. HE HAS WORKED FOR IT AND EARNED THE MONEY.
Rb // If there is a need to protect the oldies from losing their CPF monies which in most cases are less than a peanut, the multi million dollar assets and cash of these oldies demand more attention to keep the huge sums of money safe and sound, and to keep the poachers and looters away. //
Rb, pls be more specific ........
What assets YEW talking about?
There are many type of assets in a person ......
For a lady, even herself as a person is an asset ...... if YEW are a man and YEW know what it means unless the man is not a "man" ......
So, how do YEW protect the assets of a woman from potential "looters, poachers, sooters, oops, should be rapists, molesters, cheaters, scammers, " etc?
So RB, if the logic to hold back and lock up, oops, should be "protect" oldies' CPF savings holds true, then a woman's assets also need to be "protected" and "locked up "?
Rb, can YEW write in and suggest to your poster boy ministar to not just look at locking up, oops, "protecting" oldies CPF, the other assets of a woman also need "locked up and protected "?
So that lonely man and woman would not fall pray to scammers if the logic of locking up, oops, "protecting" CPF is supposed to make sense?
But based on track record of all these $$$$$$$$$ -faced Hsien Tao, Char Tao, Char Loong, Bor Lee YEW, 管YOU，is there any value in a woman's other assets?
What?
Did YEW say those other assets cannot be used as "gambling chips "?
No "$$$$$$$$" value?
So no need "chastity belt " to " lock up and protect " such assets?
Wah!
Rb, this garment jing jiat liat?
Everything $$$$$$$$ faced........?
Ya I forgot about chastity belts for oldies.
Post a Comment