Below is a condensed version of an article by
Thierry Meyssan on the role of the Americans and what they are up to in
their domination of the world. It told what the Americans were saying in
public and what went on behind closed doors. And look at what they are
doing to Syria, violating national sovereignty and international laws to
bomb another country. It totally ignored the UN and did not even bother
to seek any face saving resolutions or consent before striking at
Syria. The Empire is getting more and more arrogant and defiance in the
use of power against other countries.
And where are the gore and blood they were pointing out at the gruesome
beheading of 3 westerners? No, the cruise missiles and bombs would not
lead to any blood shedding. No heads will be severed by the bombs. It is
all a matter of pushing a few buttons. Nothing else happened, no one
dies, no mother and child got cut into pieces, no grandfather and mother
got killed in the process. It is so neat and nice.
PS. I tried my best to shorten this piece but still a bit long. There are so many details of the treachery of the AngloSaxon conspiracy that were revealed and I could not cut it shorter.
NATO intends to prohibit Russia’s and China’s Development
by Thierry Meyssan
The Newport (Wales) Summit is NATO’s largest since the 2002 Prague
edition. At the time, it meant to include new central and eastern
European states within the Alliance. This time it’s about planning a
long-term strategy to contain the development of Russia and China so as
to prevent their competing with the United States [1]….
future of the Anglo-American imperialist project
Since the coup of 2001 [4], the United States is planning a
confrontation with China. With this in mind, President Barack Obama
announced the repositioning of US forces in the Far East. However, this
agenda has been disrupted by economic, political and military recovery
in Russia, which has been able in 2008 to defend South Ossetia under
attack by Georgia and, in 2014, Crimea threatened by the Kiev coup…..
While performing its "pivot to Asia", Washington has exacerbated
tensions between China and its neighbors, especially Japan. NATO, which
historically vassallizes Europe to North America, has thereby opened
itself to Asian and Oceanian partners, notably Australia and Japan,
through association contracts. It has, in passing, broadened its field
of action to the whole world. [5]
In this time of budgetary restrictions, the Alliance, which is not
experiencing the crisis, is building a new headquarters in Brussels for
the staggering sum of € 1 billion. It should be ready in early 2017. [6]
The issue of the Islamic Emirate
This summer, to the preoccupation with preventing China and Russia from
controlling enough raw materials to develop the ability to compete with
the United States was added the issue of the Islamic Emirate.
An intense media campaign has demonized the jihadist organization whose
crimes are not new, but who just attacked the Iraqi people. We have
repeatedly explained that the IE is a Western creation and that, despite
appearances, its action in Iraq is entirely consistent with US plans to
divide the country into three separate states. [7] For a project which
constitutes a crime against humanity because it assumes ethnic
cleansing, Washington has used a private army that could be condemned
publicly while being supported covertly.
The United States would have taken the measure of the Islamist threat
after the IE murdered two of their nationals, journalists James Foley
and Steven Sotloff. However, a careful examination of the videos [8]
suggests that they are not authentic. The problem had already arisen
with the IE when it was supposed to have murdered Nick Berg in 2004 [9].
We have also often stressed that the IE was different from previous
jihadist groups both by its communication services and its civilian
administrators able to manage the conquered territories. So this is a
group which is meant to last. As Alfredo Jalife-Rahme showed, the
Caliphate, even if it is currently active mainly in Syria and Iraq, was
designed to bear arms against Russia, India and China in the long-term
[10] .
The issue of the Islamic Emirate did not therefore have to be added to
the anti-Russian and anti-Chinese agenda. It was already part of it.
Moreover, not wanting to risk that a Member State might express doubts
about this masquerade, Washington shifted the debate to the sidelines of
the summit. President Obama met eight other states plus Australia
(which is not a NATO member, but only an associate) to develop its war
plan. It was later decided to add Jordan to this device.
Summit conclusions
The summit held a hurried morning session to expedite the question of
its long presence in Afghanistan. Certainly, NATO will withdraw its
combat troops as planned by year’s end, but it will retain control of
the Afghan army and national security. The summit even allowed itself
the luxury of calling on the two candidates for the Afghan presidency to
commit to signing without delay the criminal immunity requirements of
the United States, while this election is organized and the ballots
counted by American forces. Therefore, the candidate who does not agree
should not be surprised if he is not considered elected....
In addition, the summit equipped the Alliance with two new tools: a
cyber warfare service to counter Chinese military hackers, and a rapid
response force of 4000 men from 7 countries placed under British
command. Finally, the summit paved the accession process of Montenegro
and, of course, requires member states to develop their military
spending.
Some remarks
Despite accusations from the Ukrainian government - according to which
Russia would have invaded the country ... but with only 1,000 men that
no one has seen, as noted by Giulietto Chiesa [11] -, the summit did not
decide to go to war against Moscow and merely posed a symbolic gesture.
We do not understand therefore why such ostentation was put on display
in Newport.
Unless the important things have been decided behind closed doors at the
meeting of the Heads of State Friday, Sept. 5, it does not seem that
secret wars were discussed at the summit, but only on the sidelines of
the summit with certain allies only. Already in 2011, NATO had violated
its own rules by not assembling the Atlantic Council before bombing
Tripoli. It seemed effectively impossible that all would agree to such a
slaughter. The United States and the United Kingdom therefore met
secretly with France, Italy and Turkey in Naples to plan an attack that
caused at least 40,000 civilian deaths in one week.
The final release is a rare hypocrisy [12]: the Ukrainian crisis is
treated as a Russian aggression, without ever mentioning the coup of
Maidan Square, or the installation of a government including Nazis. The
Syrian crisis is presented as a conflict between “ a moderate opposition
which protects minorities” and at the same time the “tyranny of the
regime of Bashar al-Assad”, and “extremist groups”, without ever
mentioning that the Syrian regime is a republic while the moderate
opposition is paid by the dictatorships of the Gulf, nor that the crisis
was triggered by a secret Franco-British war in accordance with the
Annexes to the Treaty of Lancaster House, nor that President Assad has
just been re-elected by 63% of the electorate, and that the Syrian Arab
Republic is the only one to have protected not only minorities, but all
its citizens, including the Sunni majority. Cynically, the statement
claims that the Alliance has protected the Libyan people, in accordance
with resolutions 1970 and 1973, when in fact it used these resolutions
to change the regime in Libya by killing 160,000 Libyans and plunging
the country into chaos.
Kopi Level - Yellow
6 comments:
"And look at what they are doing to Syria, violating national sovereignty and international laws to bomb another country."
RB
But in the first place, why Syria allow themselves to be bombed?
Why they dare not bomb North Korea?
And as for Sinkies, why is the strongest Sinkie opposition party not ready to be govt?
Why, u tell me lah?
"NATO intends to prohibit Russia’s and China’s Development."
by Thierry Meyssan
Not really lah.
Or else Alibaba would not have been listed on NYSE, tio bo?
Make money, don't bomb, don't behead, don't fight.
And did China fight with US or Japan, although as RB said before in his blog, they may fight?
"And as for Sinkies, why is the strongest Sinkie opposition party not ready to be govt?"
Anon 8:55 am
But in the first place, why only 40% Sinkies allow such a party to be the strongest opposition party?
If it had been 60%, this party would have become the ruling party and regardless of whether they are ready or not, tio bo?
"NATO intends to prohibit Russia’s and China"
- Of cos must stop else they combine efforts and can easily take over usofa and turn the whole world into communistic.
At the rate China is growing and changing, give it another couple of decades and the whole world will want to be in China and be Chinese.
China is no longer communist except for the political structure and forms.
Good thing about this new coalition is that other non Arab countries did not want to be dragged in to kill Arabs and be killed for nothing when IS retaliate in their home countries.
Post a Comment