The human body is made to reject foreign tissues, matters, virus or bacteria etc etc. This is the main problem of tissue rejection in transplant cases. But the body will not reject whatever it produces as the tissue or matter would have its own genetic or DNA code that the body would regard as its own, no rejection means no antibodies produced to destroy them.
The basic assumption of mRNA vaccine is to introduce spike proteins of the coronavirus into the body during vaccination. The mRNA, the messenger would then trigger the body to produce more spike proteins. Next the body would have to produce more antibodies to destroy all the spike proteins, introduced into the body or made by the body.
The part about the body producing antibodies to attack the foreign spike proteins introduced into the body is an accepted and acknowledged natural process. What is questionable is the body producing antibodies to attack the spike proteins it produced when triggered by the mRNA. Is this the case? Biologically this should not be the case as the spike proteins produced by the body would not be seen as a foreign tissue. The big difference, foreign spike proteins are foreign. Spike proteins produced by the body have the body's genetic code, ie not foreign. There is no tissue rejection problem.
If this is medically and clinically correct, the mRNA vaccines would only be effective in the first phase, ie, the body producing antibodies to fight the foreign spike proteins. The second phase of antibodies fighting the 'body produced' spike proteins could be redundant, might not happen at all, same body tissues.
What could happen is that the foreign spike proteins would be destroyed, but the spike proteins that the body produced could continue to live inside the body, co exist as part of the tissues of the body. The question is, would this be continuously produced by the messenger RNA and accumulate in the body? If it does, what then, would the spike proteins be causing mischief in the body?
The logic of the body attacking its own tissues, in this case body produced spike proteins, is a moot point. Would it, does it? The body does not attack and destroy its own tissue unless it goes berserk. If not, would the spike proteins produced by the body be harmful to the body if not destroyed? The only exception so far is malignant cancerous cells, cells that have gone berserk. But the body's defence system against cancerous cell is weak, maybe for the same reason, own tissues.
The body produced spike proteins may be harmless to the body that produced it. But it is still spike proteins, and if not destroyed, could be spread to others. And other bodies would reject and fight it as infection, covid virus. This could be the reason by vaccinated people are more dangerous and carriers and spreaders of the virus, with body produced spike proteins, not destroyed by the original host body but still spike proteins of the virus. Logical?
3 comments:
The glaring question staring straight into the face of all government so-called experts is this:
How can the body produce a fake spike protein and then produce antibodies to kill it?
This is totally illogical, isn't it?
To them, the Logic is 以毒攻毒 to use toxin to destroy poison vice-versa.
It does work like Serum and TraditionalVaccines using De-activated organism.
mRNA Vaccine is new, un-provened and experimental. To use it as though it is a sure bet is not comforting. In fact, the Contrary is manifestly evident in its many side and adverse effect and fatality.
As there are traditional, orthodox and less damaging vaccines available, these should be the Better Option for Prevention of getting infected and hence transmission.
Cheers
Vaccination-differentiated measures kick in at hotels, institutes of higher learning and indoor sports facilities
Vaccination-differentiated safe management measures kicked in at hotels, hostels and serviced apartments; institutes of higher learning (IHLs); and indoor sports facilities on Tuesday (Feb 1), further expanding the scope of settings that unvaccinated persons will not be able to enter.
Such measures are now also applicable for media conferences, work-related events as well as funerary memorial events.
This means only those who are fully vaccinated; those medically ineligible for Covid-19 vaccines; people who have recovered from the virus; as well as children aged 12 and below will be able to enter such settings.
However, agencies and ministries have further clarified previous guidelines for hotels and IHLs.
Previously, vaccination-differentiated measures at hotels were to apply to leisure guests only. Now they will apply to all guests and visitors.
In an updated advisory for hotels released on Monday (Jan 31), the Singapore Tourism Board said that while unvaccinated or partially-vaccinated individuals may enter the hotel premises, they will not be allowed to enter areas where sleeping facilities are provided, such as guest floors and guest rooms.
Advertisement
Just before 3pm, the usual check-in time at many hotels, there was a steady stream of guests seen entering several hotels The Straits Times visited in the Orchard and Marina Bay area on Tuesday. No guests were seen to be turned away.
Vaccination-differentiated measures also kicked in at IHLs - including Institute of Technical Education (ITE) campuses, polytechnics and universities.
According to updated guidelines on the Ministry of Education website, unvaccinated visitors will not be allowed to enter their campuses.
But part-time students will now be exempt from vaccination-differentiated measures, alongside full-time students pursuing Nitec/Higher Nitec, diploma or undergraduate degree qualifications.
This is a change from an initial guideline that said that all students other than full-time ones - such as those on part-time programmes - and visitors will need to be fully vaccinated to enter IHL campuses from Tuesday.
The guidelines for other sectors where vaccination-differentiated measures took effect on Tuesday remain the same.
Among them are indoor sports and fitness facilities. Such facilities, that ST spoke to last week, said that it would be business as usual for them.
Agencies such as Sport Singapore, which operates 26 swimming complexes and 24 fitness gyms around the island, have implemented vaccination-differentiated measures for higher risk activities like indoor mask-off activities at gyms since August last year.
The number of settings that the unvaccinated segment of the population can enter continues to be tightened.
Currently, vaccination-differentiation measures are applicable for everything from dining in at food and beverage establishments, to entering attractions, cinemas and shopping malls. They are also applicable for all congregational and worship services.
As at Sunday (Jan 30), 92 per cent of the eligible population has completed the full vaccination regimen, while 91 per cent of the total population has received at least one dose of the vaccine. 58 per cent of the population has received their booster shots.
Post a Comment