3/13/2023

A New Era Has Dawned in World Politics

The agreement announced on Friday in Beijing regarding the normalisation of diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran and the reopening of their embassies is a historic event. It goes way beyond an issue of Saudi-Iranian relations. China’s mediation signifies that we are witnessing a profound shift of the tectonic plates in the geopolitics of the 21st century.

The joint statement issued on Friday in Beijing begins by saying that the Saudi-Iranian agreement was reached “in response to the noble initiative of President Xi Jinping.” The dramatic beginning goes on to state that Saudi Arabia and Iran have expressed their “appreciation and gratitude” to Xi Jinping and the Chinese government “for hosting and sponsoring the talks, and the efforts it placed towards its success.”

The joint communique also mentioned Iraq and Oman for fostering the Saudi-Iranian dialogue during 2021-2022. But the salience is that the United States, which has been traditionally the dominant power in West Asian politics for close to eight decades, is nowhere in the picture.

Yet, this is about the reconciliation between the two biggest regional powers in the Persian Gulf region. The US retrenchment denotes a colossal breakdown of American diplomacy. It will remain a black mark in President Biden’s foreign policy legacy.

But Biden must take the blame for it. Such a cataclysmic failure is largely to be traced to his fervour to impose his neoconservative dogmas as an adjunct of America’s military might and Biden’s own frequent insistence that the fate of humankind hinges on the outcome of a cosmic struggle between democracy and autocracy.

China has shown that Biden’s hyperbole is delusional and it grates against realities. If Biden’s moralistic, ill-considered rhetoric alienated Saudi Arabia, his attempts to suppress Iran met with stubborn resistance from Tehran. And, in the final analysis, Biden literally drove both Riyadh and Tehran to search for countervailing forces that would help them to push back his oppressive, overbearing attitude.

The US’ humiliating exclusion from the centre stage of West Asian politics constitutes a “Suez moment” for the superpower, comparable to the crisis experienced by the UK in 1956, which obliged the British to sense that their imperial project had reached a dead end and the old way of doing things—whipping weaker nations into line as ostensible obligations of global leadership —was no longer going to work and would only lead to disastrous reckoning.

The stunning part here is the sheer brain power and intellectual resources and ‘soft power’ that China has brought into play to outwit the US. The US has at least 30 military bases in West Asia — five in Saudi Arabia alone — but it has lost the mantle of leadership. Come to think of it, Saudi Arabia, Iran and China made their landmark announcement on the very same day Xi Jinping got elected for a third term as president.

What we are seeing is a new China under the leadership of Xi Jinping trotting over the high knoll. Yet, it is adopting a self-effacing posture claiming no laurels for itself. There is no sign of the ‘Middle Kingdom syndrome,’ which the US propagandists had warned against.

On the contrary, for the world audience — especially countries like India or Vietnam, Turkey, Brazil or South Africa — China has presented a salutary example of how a democratised multipolar world can work in future — how it is possible to anchor big power diplomacy on consensual, conciliatory politics, trade and interdependence and advance a ‘win-win’ outcome.

Implicit in this is another huge message here: China as a factor of global balance and stability. It is not only Asia-Pacific and West Asia who are watching. The audience also includes Africa and Latin America — in fact, the entire non-Western world that forms the big majority of world community who are known as the Global South.

Anonymous

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

No English . .

Last week in secret talks in Beijing, where in a sign of China’s growing influence, all parties agreed not to use English in the negotiations, with speeches and documents conducted in Arabic, Farsi or Mandarin, according to people familiar with the talks.

Anonymous said...

That is another slap on the face of the West. In Anchorage, Alaska, Senior Chinese diplomat, Yang Jiechi was reported to have used Mandarin in his retort against Blinken of the USA and he refused to debate in English. Not that Yang Jiechi does not speak or understand English. Even though Yang had his earlier education in China, he later pursued further education at the University of Bath and London School of Economics. He also served as Chinese Ambassador to the USA for several years. Can he not understand and speak English? What do you think and why he refused to speak in English? Days of outright dictating by the USA are over.

When China invited countries to participate in space research after successfully launching its Tiangong Space Station, the USA unashamedly applied. Knowing that it will most likely be rejected, it tried to instigate and demonise China by insisting that China must provide only English signage on the Tiangong Space Station and use English instead of Chinese instruction manuals. It even said that China's Tiangong Space Station must meet its standard in order for the USA to participate.

China categorically told the USA off by pointing out that the USA had nothing of value to add to the research and rejected the USA application. Most of the countries that applied and who were accepted, are now putting their astronauts through a language immersion course in Mandarin to familarise themselves with the language. As I said earlier, the days of USA blatant dictating is now over. China does not recognise the USA's 'Rules Based Order' rubbish.

China must continue to take such a stand and insist on its application in every aspect. What is good for the country must never be hijacked by others out to destroy its culture and heritage.

Anonymous said...

Good that the USA is not participating in the Tiangong Space Station research, otherwise up there they will even instigate a regime change. Or sabotage all the effort put in by the Chinese. Prevention is better than trying to cure a likely disease being allowed unwittingly on to the Space Station.

Anonymous said...

Toshiba was destroyed by the bullying Americans. The founder of Toshiba has moved his business to China and helping China to compete with the Americans in the chip industry.

He wants to have his revenge and would not want to go down as loser forced upon him by the Americans. He is working closely with the Chinese to take on the evil Americans.

Anonymous said...

Sadly, the USA may have succeeded in destroying TSMC as well. TSMC invested in a chip manufacturing plant in Arizona, which categorically is competing against the likes of Intel, Nvidia, Texas Instruments, Micron among many others, all USA entities. When Trump trumpeted his 'America First' doctrine, TSMC should read between the lines. Who do you think all the advantage will go to in the long run in the chip manufacturing sector in the USA?

The USA is not leaving TSMC alone by not luring it to USA, thus hollowing out TSMC's Asia dominance. TSMC even had to provide its dominant technology to benefit the USA's attempt to monopolise the high end chip manufacturing sector. Morris Chang now knows he had been conned, but can do nothing.

Anonymous said...

TSMC would end up like Toshiba. Finito.

All the talents of TSMC except the half baked American talents, would be forming a beeline to joing SMIC and other Chinese chip companies, very soon.

Virgo49 said...

Likewise QinGang now FM and also State Councilor who always made his Speeches and Answers and Interviews in Mandarin.

Not that he cannot speak English

But to tell the World and the West that must he follow their language and demands?

Best yet to come the Indians of India will also speak in their own language and the World's Interpreators will have a hard time to translate and Modi's millions of their own would be around the World as Interpreators.

Wow can demand six figures salaries.

Also as LKY said this one I also cannnot master.

Also best for Top Secret Talks as no ONE can disciper Whats the going on.

Another quite similar one would be the Korean Language quite similar to the Indian One if you listen carefully.

Cheers


Anonymous said...

Modi will speak in Ingrish.

Anonymous said...

Pricktam Singh wants immigrants to Singapore must pass English test . .

Anonymous said...

You must understand Pritam's thoughts and I think he made a big blunder. Indians mostly can speak English, that is why India is the outsourcing hub for the West. If immigrants to Singapore must pass a English test, the Indians will have a big advantage over the Chinese. You go and figure it out.

Anonymous said...

The Indians are so talented and so nice people. Never commit crimes, never cheat, never rape women, so friendly, so desirable. Singapore women are dying to be their mates.

Have more Indians is a good thing.

Anonymous said...

How about kakakakakaka?