According to the Swedish Medical Products Agency, as of last week, the Scandinavian nation had received 31,844 reports of adverse reactions linked to the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines. Sweden is currently offering three variants of the drug. There are currently 2,103 reports of side effects from the Moderna shot, while the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been associated with 9,117 health issues. But the number of suspected adverse reactions from the two shots seems relatively small when compared to the 19,961 reports linked to AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria.
The most common side effects for all three drugs were fever and headache. Other reported adverse reactions included nausea, joint pain, and dizziness.
Notably, the AstraZeneca shot only accounts for about 26% of the roughly 2.7 million vaccines that have been administered so far in Sweden, but makes up around 63% of the side effects reports....
In March, Sweden was one of several nations to temporarily suspend the use of the AstraZeneca jab, following reports of abnormal blood clotting in recipients. AstraZeneca, as well as the European Medicines Agency, have insisted that the vaccine is safe after it came under scrutiny.
Since then, new reports have linked the drug to severe medical episodes, and even death. Earlier this month, a 35-year-old female medical worker in Vietnam died from anaphylaxis after being injected with the jab, in what has been described as a “very rare” case of adverse reaction to the vaccine.
The above is from RT. Is this fake news or alternative truth or truth that some did not want people to know?
In today's context, many major media sources, used to be perceived or believed as objective and factual, have exposed their political biases and in all intent and purpose, pushing out news for political agenda with twisted narratives or simply lies as accomplice of propaganda of nation states.
15 comments:
SINGAPORE: There may be a "very small risk" of heart inflammation after the second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, said the government-appointed expert committee on COVID-19 vaccination in Singapore.
In a media release on Friday (Jun 11), the committee said it is closely monitoring international reports that the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with a small risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in young men.
Advertisement
Myocarditis and pericarditis are inflammatory conditions that affect the heart muscles and the outer lining of the heart respectively.
Increased occurrences of myocarditis and pericarditis after the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations have been observed in Israel and the United States, and in adolescents and young men younger than 25 years.
Singapore uses the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines for its national vaccination programme. Both are mRNA-based vaccines. CNA
So, small risk or increasing risk?
'People are gullible to believe whatever’s told to them': Inside the mind of an ex-scammer
Microsoft News
Singapore expurts want Singapore to open its border early
Singapore — Former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Calvin Cheng has taken to Facebook to urge Singapore to open its borders soon.
He mentions at the start of his post that infectious disease experts have identified dining out as our weakest link and that it is one of the riskiest activities. He also says that areas that were most severely impacted by the pandemic kept dining spots closed the longest.
He admits that dining out is an activity that many Singaporeans like to partake in.
However, he says, “We should be very careful about relaxing eating out activities. I would suspend rent, continue job support, and encourage f&b to do takeaways a while longer.”
Instead, Singapore should focus on opening borders to allow others in.
Mr Cheng suggests that the stay-home notice (SHN) period should be lowered back to 14 days. He also suggests that vaccinated people from other nations and regions should be allowed to visit Singapore without having to be quarantined.
He emphasises that the time to open borders has come and that Singapore will suffer the consequences if restrictions continue to be so tight.
You can read this expurt's comments in Microsoft News.
Not to worry. As usual they call all these adverse effects as 'rare'. Calling it 'rare' means one in a million or so, therefore no need to be alarmed.
Not much is also reported on MSM anyway, as they want to keep the lid tight in the family, like the British Royals. The less people know about it, the better for their prestige. If China's vaccine caused so many adverse effects, you can be sure it will be advertised as widely as possible, even to the Moon and Mars.
So, not well reported in the MSM is nothing to worry about. Have faith. It is your life after all and any loss is just collateral damage.
Years down the road, they will come out to admit their lies, like Johnson and Johnson baby powder, canola oil and margarine among others. But they already laughed all the way to the banks, feigning ignorance.
And years down the road, these perpetrators would have already descended into hell. They definitely cannot go to heaven, even using the short cut method taught by their White religion.
Multiply all official reports by at least ten times. Usually, it is about 50 to 60 times under reported.
Experts want Singapore to open it's borders early. Never, ever trust the experts, because nowadays experts can be found a dime a dozen. Even with fake credentials!
They are like the worms on the seabed, hanging out their heads when there is a need for them to open their mouths to provide justification for doing things, but when things go wrong they slither into their hole and leave those who followed their advice in the lurch.
Remember:
1. All official reports are not facts.
2. Official reports are merely incomplete information, meaning raw data.
3. Data can never be 100% complete.
4. Data can be mis-perceived, mis-calculated and misinterpreted.
5. Accuracy of data is highly dependent upon the system of information collection, as well as the skills of those who are collecting the data.
Q o' H
The US CDC report that the mRNC vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna are showing higher than expected risk of heart inflammation for young men after investigating the Israeli cases of the link with the Pfizer vaccines.
Our health authorities have dismissed it as a small risk.
When you consider that millions and millions of such vaccines have been administered around the world, "higher than expected" and "small risk" is actually hell of a lot of difference.
Or is it just semantics?
typo error mRNA iso of mRNC for post 11.57
Singapore health authority is no authority. Why?
1. Those who really have authority do not need to call themselves "authority".
2. It is never proactive but reactive, always two steps behind, waiting for the Covid-19 virus to tell it what to do next. And it always follow the instructions of other authorities, such as the WHO or the CDC of USA.
3. The number of blunders they have made during this Pandemic show us that it does not even know what is is saying or doing. How can it advice the public not to wear masks, against common sense?
4. It does not inspire confidence. Instead, it creates more doubts than facts.
The 157 suspected serious adverse events were part of the 4,704 suspected adverse events reports that the HSA had received as of May 23. This translates to 0.13 per cent of administered doses.
Both percentages are consistent with the percentages that had been reported by the authority earlier last month.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/157-serious-adverse-events-reported-out-nearly-37-million-doses-covid-19-vaccines-given
ONE serious ADVERSE event is ONE TOO MANY.
Some more it is 4,704 events. Not SUSPECTED only. If they are "SUSPECTED" events, then the doctors and scientists are doing things based on SUSPICION. That means, they are unprofessional, just laymen, just like you and me.
If they behave like unprofessional people, then their words cannot and must not be taken seriously. So, their "small risk" must be more of a politically motivated deliberately chosen words.
From what we gathered from various sources, none of them have used the words "small risk". Most of them either said they are "higher than expected", or "beyond expectation", or "we made a big mistake", words to that effect.
These fxxkers are trying to bluff us. Bluff aslo don't how to bluff.
Yes, those idiots bluff also don't know how to bluff. They think by the mere use of the word "experts", people will just take their words on face value. They forgot that the collective brain power of the masses is exponentially more powerful than a few conceited "experts".
Over using the term "experts" has made it become a dirty word. People are now so sick of reading or hearing to the word "experts" or "expert committee".
Experts who tell us "You don't need to wear a mask if you are not sick. Wear a mask only when you are unwell!" are no experts but idiots.
If political hacks masquerading as experts tell you that there is little risk, you had better be very afraid.
These politically motivated irresponsible idiots cannot be trusted. Period.
Post a Comment