The
nature and variety of ADRs reported to the Yellow Card System are
consistent with the potential pathologies described in this paper and
supported by other recent scientific papers onvaccine-induced harms,
which are mediated through the vaccine spike protein product (2,3).
It
is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to
humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required
whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to
investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data
suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease,
immune suppression, autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody
Dependent Enhancement (ADE).
Due to the need for expedience, we have not detailed all ADRs in this preliminary report.
The
existing Yellow Card data covering just under a five-month period
indicate that the extent of morbidity and mortality associated with the
COVID-19 vaccines is unprecedented.
Age and gender specific data,
as well as the time from vaccination, are required to further our
analysis of these data and we have sent Freedom of Information Requests
(FOIRs) to the MHRA in this regard.
In addition, urgent
independent expert evaluation and discussion is required to assess
whether the novel vaccines may be causing gene mutations among
recipients, as suggested by the occurrence of usually extremely rare
genetic disorders, such as Paroxysmal Extreme Pain Disorder (PEPD).
In
addition to the 11 cases of PEPD on the Yellow Card system, there are
currently 12 reports of this extremely rare condition on the WHO’s
Vigiaccess. org database and 10 on the European Medicines Agency’s
(EUDRA) pharmacovigilance database. Are these ADRs occurring in babies
of vaccinated pregnant women, or spuriously among vaccinated adults?
This question needs urgent attention.
As
pharmacovigilance data are known to be substantially under-reported, we
recommend that the MHRA urgently publicises these ADR data and assists
people with their ADR reporting, to facilitate full elucidation and
clarification of the extent of the problem.
The MHRA now has more
than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare theCOVID-19
vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale
up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines
and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects.
As
the mechanism for harms from the vaccines appears to be similar to
COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international
doctors and scientists with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19.
There are at least 3 urgent questions that need to be answered by the MHRA:
1 How many people have died within 28 days of vaccination?
2 How many people have been hospitalised within 28 days of vaccination?
3 How many people have been disabled by the vaccination?
EbMC
Squared CiC remains at your service to assist with further analysis. We
kindly request full access to the Yellow Card database with immediate
effect to enable a comprehensive, independent and accurate evaluation of
the Yellow Card data, which will be undertaken in collaboration with
clinical experts.
Yours sincerely,
Dr. Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, PhD)
Director, Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC
Bath UK.
SSO
12 comments:
Questions that need urgent answers:
1. As pharmacovigilance data are known to be substantially under-reported, it is necessary that all government agencies urgently publicise these vaccines side-effects data and assists people with their side-effects case-reporting, to facilitate full elucidation and clarification of the extent of the vaccination problems.
2. How many people have died within 30 days of vaccination?
3. How many people have been hospitalised within 30 days of vaccination?
4. How many people have been disabled by the vaccination, irrespective of length of duration?
5. How many people have died after the vaccination but cause of death reported as "not linked to vaccination"?
6. How many people have suffered some effects after vaccination within 30 days but reported as "normal"?
7. How many people have suffered pro-longed effects of more than one month after vaccination?
What has happened to the call for transparency? Who are the people that are lying with eyes wide open?
Why not tell the truth?
The liars are exposed! Who can you trust? The white liars?
Those who have not been reporting the facts and data wholly and truthfully on the side-effects of the vaccines presently being used in the national vaccination program are guilty of trying to cover-up.
Those who covered up or brushed aside the potential dangers of the vaccines are highly irresponsible and have committed crimes against humanity.
Those who absolved themselves of any responsibility by making the victims signed indemnity forms or no-claims statements are irresponsible and sinful.
When government officials are paid obscenely high, their lucrative rewards and remuneration become their primary preoccupations in their heart of hearts and mind of minds.
They then strive to please their Supreme Paymaster in all their endeavours, roles and functions in whatever ways they can for fear of losing their jobs.
Hence, they are naturally transformed, in the course of time, into political animals whose hunger for power, prestige, status and easy-wealth is worst than the wild ferocious beasts' hunger for food in the wilderness.
Taking the form of human wild beasts, they do not care a damn about ethical conduct, moral standards, legal requirements and constitutional abiding principles.
Such human wild beasts are extremely dangerous to the well-being of all proper human beans in their own country.
From TRE:
"1) The fundamental belief that the vaccines are safe is because scientists presumed that vaccines will only stay at the injection sites instead of flowing into the bloodstream.
2) Empirical observations of Adverse Events occurring after vaccination indicated a whole wide scope of potential side effects affecting almost all organs and parts of the body. This gives suspicion that contrary to theoretical belief, the vaccines had indeed gone into the bloodstream.
3) Further research and investigations have shown that vaccines have indeed appeared in bloodstream and concentrate at different organs.
4) Such findings have basically debunk the First Premise of Vaccine Safety and thus, there are reasons to doubt the safety of these vaccines in totality.
5) Furthermore, in SG context, the marginal benefits of vaccination as compared to unvaccinated are really small or even negligible , if there’s really any.
6) If we take the official (even when we know these are understated) figures of Vaccine adverse events into consideration, there is basically hardly any advantage in totality.
7) Thus in my opinion, we should really make serious consideration to halt the whole vaccination program especially when there are recent indications that it may harm out [sic] youngsters more and there isn’t any long term data to show it’s long term safety aspects.
Goh Meng Seng"
Self-explanatory, no comment.
Let us wait to see these fakes eating their own words when serious cases appear and cannot be brushed aside, to prove that they have all been lying and speaking against their conscience.
The they will all be walking around like fools.
The government owes the people a fiduciary responsibility to keep us fully informed of the adverse drug reactions and adverse events after vaccination, irrespective of whether they are attributable to the vaccines or not.
The so-called expert committee should always endeavour to present more details of facts and data concerning any adverse reports regarding the vaccines and vaccinations.
They should not be too quick to simply brush aside the seriousness of such a matter by spouting unmeaningful phrases such as "very small risk".
Small or big is a matter of personal situational judgement.
To the direct victim who suffered death as a consequence of allowing the vaccines to be injected into his body, a 0.1% chance of blood clotting is a huge risk, not a very small risk. What happens if that victim was your own father or son? Would you still say it is a "very small risk? If you say "yes", you must be insincere and a hypocrite.
Even if only one death out of a million people vaccinated, it is still a very serious matter. It is still a risk. Big or small, is not for bystanders and unfeeling detached people to say. The needle only hurts, when it has pricked you.
Greatest Scam On Earth
Some background Biochemistry information:
1. RNA, or ribonucleic acid, is a nucleic acid present in all living cells. Its principal role is to act as a messenger carrying instructions from DNA for controlling the synthesis of proteins, although in some viruses RNA rather than DNA carries the genetic information.
2. In 1959, Nirenberg began his investigations into the relationship between deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid and the production of proteins.
3. Anfinsen's work in the late 1960s demonstrated that understanding the chemistry of proteins was essential to understanding the function of ribonucleic acid in heredity.
4. Swine influenza presents a special challenge in genetics because its genome comprises eight segments of ribonucleic acid, better known as RNA.
5. Wheat streak mosaic virus is little more than a genetic snippet of ribonucleic acid.
6. Patients who had developed physical signs or symptoms of liver disease were more likely to have been infected for longer, to be positive for HCV ribonucleic acid, than to have acquired their infections at an older age.
What is mRNA?
mRNA means modified RNA. That means the bio/chemistry scientists have altered the RNA in order to produce the experimental "vaccines" being sold worldwide by Pfizer-Bio-N-tec and Moderna to enrich themselves at the expense of the ignorant public who have been encouraged by their respective equally ignorant national leaders - both gullible and desperate.
Gullible and Desperate
When you are gullible, you are easily conned by cunning unscrupulous and unconscionable people who are in for the quick buck at your expense. And if you are, in addition, also desperate, then you become too easy a target greedy fortune hunters, who by the way have many easy accomplices ready to do their biddings with high undertable rewards.
Bring Con Men To Task
Therefore, be very wary of those who are playing God in this Pandemic. Keep collecting evidence and record them diligently. For when you have sufficient evidence, you are going to bring those responsible for this Greatest Scam on Earth to task.
Another explanation, mRNA, or messenger RNA are made from the spike protein of Covid19 virus. The m or messenger is needed to send a message to the body to produce, not anti bodies, but more mRNAs. When the number of mRNA is substantial, the body will then respond by producing antibodies to destroy them. There is no vaccine involved in the process.
If all mRNAs are destroyed by the antibodies, good. If not, the pharmas said the mRNAs would degrade and disappear from the body. Good. The mRNAs must not remain in the body for long period.
But if the body cannot destroy all the mRNAs, if some remain, isn't it their role as mRNAs, to induce the body to produce more RNAs? This is the problem.
I will post a video tomorrow on this. Dr Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA admitted that not all mRNAs would be removed from the body as they are supposed to be, so no danger to the body. Now what if they remain as free floating and circulating spike proteins in the body?
Hahaha
Experts will not tell. Of course logically experts tell only when they are paid to do so. Or on the reverse are even paid not to tell.
Over the decades so many things are in vogue because experts said so. When the real truth comes out years later, where are the experts who recommended this and that.
Which is which is up to you to decide.
We must keep a record of those experts so that we can bring them to Task when there are enough evidence to show that they lied, covered up, or kept silent when they knew.
If you had noticed, whenever the big Pharmas was trying to cover up the negative side-effects, they usually made use of ONE single scientist or researcher to sell the sound-bite for them.
But whenever they are being exposed, it's usually a group of scientists or a group of doctors who come together to expose them.
What does this mean?
It means there are unscrupulous scientists who are willing to be bought to help deceive the masses by telling half-truths or outright lies against their professional codes of conduct and against humanity.
These unscrupulous scientists must be exposed and banned from the scientific profession and jailed for life for committing crimes against humanity.
Post a Comment