The other telling remark he made was why did he apologise for the downing of the Russian helicopters that resulted in the death of 13 of the crew. Now, would someone leading a mutiny apologise for taking down military hardware of the other side? I believe it was an accidental mistake.
Again, is Putin the kind of leader who would pardon someone leading a mutiny so easily? That is a big giveaway. Many are now guessing that this was a ruse to move Prigozhin to Belarus and the mutiny was staged in order not to alarm Nato and let them believe things are happening in their favour and give them a false sense of hope that Putin is losing control.
Moreover, Nato must now have found something amiss by calling on the grouping to increase security 'now that Prigozhin is in Belarus'. Why such a call by Nato? And the full absorption of the Wagner mercenaries into the Russian army is going to give the USA/Nato and Ukraine more to worry about than a celebration. These are mercenaries being inducted into the Russian army, whose professionalism is never in doubt.
Anonymous
5 comments:
Putin 71 yrs, Lukashenko 68 yrs and Prigozhin 62 yrs. All were good buddies since young. All are Grand Father already. Don't expected to beat these old foxes gang so easily.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ysbOupXtsCY?feature=share
Latest by George Galloway's with Scott Ritter.
Main reason of Prigozhin's sort of awakening and protests to Putin.
Too slow in annihilating the Urukians.
Putin is too soft to deal with Zelenskky.
That's why his Generals are obeying his orders not a full assault.
Prigozhin's men are doing the main assaults and died the most in their battles.
Whereas the Russians are behind lines with mainly in supports and Arty and Airs and He is angry with the Generals that they are supporting his demands for more arsenals.
Putin is trying to still have some connections and goodwill NOT to completely destroyed Urukiane and also to avoid a Major War with NATO.
That's why he acted with caution and slow and that frustrated Prigozhin.
His men are dying the most and he wanted to end the conflict fast.
So actually also not blame the Generals which Prigozhin is angry with them.
This is the main reason for the so called rebellion and couple.
Now Putin has to do the Real Thing.
Also an interesting confession by that Murderer George Bush with millions of Iraqis Ghosts haunting him that he gave a speech that Putin committed a murderous invasion of IRAQ which meant him instead of Urukiane.
MAD DELINE Albright alreday in HELL and he i.e.Bush and Bidamn and all his cronies will go in soon to join her.
The USA is again spitting rubbish by saying that big countries (presumably talking about Russia and China) must not bully small countries. The USA is the typical big country that is bullying all smaller countries around the world for decades, and for it to speak about bullying is so clearly hypocritical in its behavior by spouting such nonsense.
Throughout the duration of its rise to superpower status, it had only bullied 'big' countries like Cuba, Panana, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, North Vietnam, Syria, the Pacific Islanders, and many many more in Africa and Latin America. Now even trying to portray itself as victim by claiming that China is bullying them. That must be the Mother of all revelations.
All those USA leaders, past and present, who spouted and are spouting such lies must have been asleep under the carpet, and just woken up, not realising they are totally making a fool of themselves. After all that they have done to smaller countries, the USA has literally no moral right or authority to talk about bullying. As they say, let those who have not sinned cast the first stone. The biggest sinner itself is now the only one casting stones and making a fool of itself.
In fact, bullying is so outrageously committed in so many ways by the USA, that even allies are not spared. What the USA is doing is non other than bullying the EU countries by forcing them to tow the line as proxies to sacrifice themselves, and in the process doing harm to their own economy.
The other area of bullying they have employed successfully is using veiled threats against leaders of smaller countries by 'inviting' them to Washington, with the veiled threat that there will be consequences if they do not attend. This has been revealed by one African leader who went to Washington last December to attend the USA/Africa summit. To add insult to injury, each African leader was only given five minutes to talk. If this is not bullying, I rest my case.
What about the other well know bullying tactic they employed? I mean the 'You are either with us or against us'. Not threatening?
Post a Comment