1/17/2020

Kim calling Trump -- No more meetings

By Humeyra Pamuk and Jonathan Landay

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday said Qassem Soleimani was killed as part of a broader strategy of deterring challenges by U.S. foes that also applies to China and Russia, further diluting the assertion that the top Iranian general was struck because he was plotting imminent attacks on U.S. targets.

In his speech at Stanford University's Hoover Institute, Pompeo made no mention of the threat of imminent attacks planned by Soleimani. It only was in response to a question that he repeated his earlier assertion that pre-empting such plots was the reason for the Jan. 3 American drone strike on Iran's second most powerful official.

His speech, "The Restoration of Deterrence: The Iranian Example," focused on what he called an administration strategy to establish "real deterrence" against Iran following earlier Republican and Democratic policies that encouraged Tehran's "malign activity....

On Sunday, Defense Secretary Mark Esper said he had seen no intelligence forewarning of imminent attacks on embassies.

Trump on Monday added new fuel to the controversy by saying "it really doesn't matter" whether Soleimani posed an imminent threat.

Pompeo said there was "a bigger strategy" behind the killing of Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force, Iran's elite foreign espionage and paramilitary force.

"President Trump and those of us in his national security team are re-establishing deterrence – real deterrence ‒ against the Islamic Republic of Iran," he said."

The above comments were from an article in Yahoo News telling the world how this international terrorist country is going to kill leaders of other countries at their whims and fancy, they called it a new strategy of assassinations. Kim Jong Un better be very careful.  All that is needed is for these rogues to fabricate some intelligence threats and then kill him. And yes, the American terrorists also said this applies to China and Russia, which means any other country in the whole wide world.  China and Russia should do the same and kill those Americans that are plotting to create unrest in other countries especially in Hong Kong. Just kill them in the name of national security.

What would the UN say? What would the western countries say? What would the cronies and lackeys of the evil Empire say? The USA is a law abiding country, respects International Law, a rule of law country, good and deserving to be the policeman of the world especially in South China Sea?

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ah Kim: Hello R u the Dotard tat I knoe?
Trumpet: Of cos pal.
Ah Kim: Why did u bomb the Iranians Gen?
Trumpet: Hey Pal, he is planning to kill us and our people.
Ah Kim: u mean planning is wrong? And shall be terminated.
Trumpet: Yeah of cos. What's wrong with tat?
Ah Kim: In tat case, our friendship shall end, good bye.
Trumpet: hey pal u misunderstood us, I tot our friendship will last? Dun be a fool to listen to Ah Ci he is fox in disguise.
Ah Kim: Then u r a tiger disguise like a red hair Pussy, go fxxx lah.

Chua Chin Leng aka redbean said...

Kim: What about the so many joint military exercises with South Korean armies to attack North Korea? Can I then send my missiles to kill you or your generals?

New Norms Of Engagement said...

Premeditated murder of top foreign leaders has become the Evil US Empire's strategy to replace invasion and uprising for regime change.

All that is needed is to send in the drones or guided cruise missiles to murder any country's leaders (military and non-military) by the order of the Evil US President (de facto self-appointed Emperor of the Planet Earth).

So convenient and cheap:

No US casualties.
No laws to abide.
No moral high-ground required.
No ethical issues.

Ruthlessly and unscrupulously brilliant.

This is the New Norm for International Relationship and New Rule of Engagement, as decreed and dictated by The Evil Emperor Trump of the Pussy-Grabbing Fame (a new book I am going to write).

Anonymous said...

.
Hi 857am

Hahaha Hahahahahaha ������

Virgo 49 said...

Wow, now so many StandAlone Talk Shows.

Must be very Popular nowadays in earning big incomes.

Many will start talking about Dotard, Kim and Company.

Cheers

Anonymous said...

China and Russia should do the same and kill those Americans that are plotting to create unrest in other countries especially in Hong Kong. Just kill them in the name of national security.
RB

Hahahahahahaha.

Not so simple lah, or else China and Russia would have done that already.

What works for Trump may not work for Xi Jinping or Putin, u know.

RB and others can kpkb about Trump but Trump doesn't care.

And for the same reasons what works for PAP may not work for Sinkies. That's why Sinkies always kpkb about PAP but PAP don't care. LOL

Anonymous said...

Ha..ha...ha...hey dude the world juz get excited becos of yah..I really love it! Let's finish it off & till death do us part! Ka..poo..yee ha...

Dr Talk Alot said...

Can POFMA Withstand The Three Tests Of A Fair And Just Law?

Teat 1: Devoid of subjective, self-interest, personal biases in any way, at any time, by any authority when the law is applied upon the citizenry.

The first test of POFMA has failed miserably because the POFMA law, in application, has been left to each of every individual minister to prosecute, judge and decide based upon each Ministry's self-interests to decide what is public interests instead of commoners' take on public interests.

The inherent subjective biaises have been displayed in the first four cases of Correction Orders issued.


Test 2: All controversial, contradictory, opposing and critical ideas, views and arguments, for and against, must be exposed to all parties, to the common folks, to the general public and to the world at large. Nothing should cast even an iota of doubt caused by court-imposed secrecy and/or limitations.

The second test of POFMA has also failed miserably. The High Court has refused to let the people vs ministry for manpower case, brought up by SDP, to be heard in the open court. In other words, it dares not let the public know the details and intricasies of what is going on. It has decided to hear the case in chambers (meaning behind closed doors). This is a clear indication of POFMA's inability to withstand widespread public and global scrutiny.

The argument given for being afraid of letting SDP's case be heard in the open court is that there is no "special" reason for it to be heard in open court. "Public interests" is not a good reason for it to be heard in open court.

"Public interests" should be of Paramount Importance in this first case before the court because it will set the Precedence for all subsequent cases.

This really got me baffled. To me it is unacceptable. There is no logic to say that a special (meaning, an exception to the rule) requirement can over-ride the wider "public interests" requirement.

BTW, what is special requirement? Why is this special requirement so special? Who determines the special in the special requirement? A single presiding judge? What if the judge has erred?


Test 3: Any judgement by any court of law at every level must be seen, heard and felt by the people, citizens, commoners, masses and public to be fair and just.

Now that the very first case of its kind can only be heard behind closed doors (in chambers) there is no way the people, citizens, commoners, masses and public are going to know whether it is to be fair and just, unless someone leak out the details of the hearing under the court-imposed secrecy.

So, it seems that Test Number 3 is likely to fail miserably too?

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

@ ongoing entertainment:

If someone made fake Tweets insulting Trump from fake accounts appearing to be from ASEAN leaders like LHL, Dr M and Duterte maybe Trump-the-Gullible-Fool will send drones to take them out with Hellfire missiles.

Oh what fun. Assassination as ENTERTAINMENT!

Anonymous said...

Hahahahahahaha.

Not so simple lah, or else China and Russia would have done that already.

What works for Trump may not work for Xi Jinping or Putin, u know.

RB and others can kpkb about Trump but Trump doesn't care.

And for the same reasons what works for PAP may not work for Sinkies. That's why Sinkies always kpkb about PAP but PAP don't care. LOL

January 17, 2020 9:35 am


For American cronies like you, when the Americans say fuck you, you say ok, come, its my pleasure!

Anonymous said...

@All,

Killing generals has been VERY GOOD for my War Stocks!!!

Talk all you like ... 10,000 years of recorded human history --- shows that wars & killing are natural part of humans. WHY NOT MAKE PROFITS FROM SOMETHING NATURAL & ORGANIC?!?!?!

BETTER THAN EATING ORGANIC FOOD!!! LOL!!!!!

War Stock 1

War Stock 2

War Stock 3

War Stock ETF for those too scared to buy individual stocks

WSG

Anonymous said...

Hey dude u seems to rejoice on ur war stocks gaining. Remember wat goes around comes around. When u r kapooped one day, do u think these war stocks gains gonna to b of any use to u ?

Anonymous said...

Evils always rejoice at evils. What's new?

Anonymous said...

Better to kapoop rich than to kapoop poor.

Everybody make fun & joked when Old Fart up lorry. But he still enjoyed life everyday until the second he kicked the bucket.

You think she prefer to have those War Stocks or not? LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

Can you write a book on matilar based on some suggestions by a poster last time,?

Club Holiday said...

Hi, Perfectly written and it will be really helpful to travelers. For Information on click Phuket Tour packages