Singapore is in damage control mode after being complicit by a CNN
report that it is a party to the American’s anti China policy in the
region. CNN claimed that the purchase of F35 fighter jets was
‘indicative of growing concerns within Asia regarding China’s regional
ambitions’. The report ‘also suggested that the acquisition carried a
message to China as Singapore will become “the fourth American ally” in
the Pacific region to won F35s, after Australia, Japan and South Korea”.
It also made it a point to magnify ‘Singapore as a “close and long time
US ally” that even hosts a US Navy facility’.
With all the praises of how close Singapore is in the American camp and
with the American pitching against the Chinese presence in the region,
Singapore has been dragged into the deep pit of the American design to
contain China, in the camp opposing China. This message to China is what
the Americans are putting into Singapore’s mouth to compromise
Singapore’s position and forced Singapore into the American camp and
unable to extricate itself. With friends like the Americans, who needs
enemies?
Singapore is now furiously trying to dispute this allegation. Mindef has
came out strongly to deny this and that the acquisition of the F35s ‘is
for Singapore’s own defence deterrence and not directed against or to
align itself with any particular country… and Singapore is not a treaty
ally of the US’.
After being tarred and feathered deliberately by the CNN as an American
lackey, would the explanation by Mindef makes any difference in the eyes
of China? Would China really believe that Singapore is not anti China,
and not to forget with so many anti China articles in the Singapore
media, not only written by foreigners but also written and produced by
Singaporeans?
How would China view Singapore with all these developments? How would
Singapore convince China that it is not anti China? Is there anything
that Singapore can do to tell China that these are all white lies,
Singapore is innocent?
Is Singapore in deeper trouble with China now? As they said, jump into
the Yellow River also cannot cleanse oneself. The Americans are hyping
this purchase as confirmation that Asean countries wanting the presence
of the Americans in the region. It is not so simple as buying 4 F35s.
The Americans are exploiting Singapore’s purchase to fix Singapore as
anti China.
Better send Chan Chun Sing to China as a special envoy of Hsien Loong to
explain Singapore’s real position. Not sure if it would make any
difference.
3/12/2019
3/11/2019
The unthinking bananas can only parrot the western narrative
CNA Insider - China's chequebook diplomacy in Cambodia a double-edged sword creating resentment By
Desmond Ng and Elizabeth Zachariah
Tensions rise as locals worry about the threat of Chinese-owned businesses and enclaves to their livelihood, homes and rights, as the programme Insight discovers.
SIHANOUKVILLE, Cambodia: Billions of dollars have been flowing from China into Cambodia, turning parts of the once war-stricken country into modern cities. The economy is booming, jobs have been created and the market values of land have gone up.
All of these should make tuk-tuk driver Ngieb Rem a happy man. Instead, he finds himself working harder than before in port city Sihanoukville, as an influx of Chinese tourists has driven out many local and Western holidaymakers.
“We can earn about the same amount, but we’d spend longer hours,” complained the 38-year-old. “They’d surely ride with their own people (Chinese-run tuk-tuk). They won’t ride with us.”
Transformed by Chinese investment, the pace of development in Cambodia has left many locals like him reeling from shock and anger in several ways, as the programme Insight discovers. (Watch the episode here.)
A country that had once struggled to keep up with its Southeast Asian neighbours is now one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. But has it truly prospered from China’s money?
Or will the investments trap it in a debt that would turn it into a client state? (The authors must be thinking this last sentence is a very clever statement to make. A politically correct statement and music to the westerners. Sooo clever, sooo intellectual! To me totally lack or orignality, just like unthinking parrots of the West.)
Read more at
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/cnainsider/china-chequebook-diplomacy-cambodia-investments-resentment-debt-11311662
It
is in the interest of Singapore to stop badmouthing China to please the
West or to speak and think like the West to smear China. It is for our
own good to shut up and go quietly doing our things and not being
busybody unless Singapore wants to make an enemy out of China. In that
case, keep doing this kind of things and have more anti China articles
written by the West and our very own bananas in our main media, written
or visual.
When are the bananas going to grow up and remove the colonial yoke and western coloured lenses and start to think for themselves.
PS. The more Singapore media publish this kind of anti China articles, the more would China distance itself from Singapore. The latest report by CNN on why Singapore is buying the F35s is the American way to undermine Singapore's position vis a vis China and the USA. Singapore is cooked.
Tensions rise as locals worry about the threat of Chinese-owned businesses and enclaves to their livelihood, homes and rights, as the programme Insight discovers.
SIHANOUKVILLE, Cambodia: Billions of dollars have been flowing from China into Cambodia, turning parts of the once war-stricken country into modern cities. The economy is booming, jobs have been created and the market values of land have gone up.
All of these should make tuk-tuk driver Ngieb Rem a happy man. Instead, he finds himself working harder than before in port city Sihanoukville, as an influx of Chinese tourists has driven out many local and Western holidaymakers.
“We can earn about the same amount, but we’d spend longer hours,” complained the 38-year-old. “They’d surely ride with their own people (Chinese-run tuk-tuk). They won’t ride with us.”
Transformed by Chinese investment, the pace of development in Cambodia has left many locals like him reeling from shock and anger in several ways, as the programme Insight discovers. (Watch the episode here.)
A country that had once struggled to keep up with its Southeast Asian neighbours is now one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. But has it truly prospered from China’s money?
Or will the investments trap it in a debt that would turn it into a client state? (The authors must be thinking this last sentence is a very clever statement to make. A politically correct statement and music to the westerners. Sooo clever, sooo intellectual! To me totally lack or orignality, just like unthinking parrots of the West.)
When are the bananas going to grow up and remove the colonial yoke and western coloured lenses and start to think for themselves.
PS. The more Singapore media publish this kind of anti China articles, the more would China distance itself from Singapore. The latest report by CNN on why Singapore is buying the F35s is the American way to undermine Singapore's position vis a vis China and the USA. Singapore is cooked.
3/10/2019
More instant trees needed in Singapore football
'But Singapore-based AFC Pro Diploma holders have, rather ironically,
moved on to other Asean countries, probably because of a lack of
home-grown appreciation, such as Micheal Wong (Technical Director,
Laos), V. Sundramoorthy (Head Coach, Laos), P. N. Sivaji (Technical
Director, Hantharwady United FC, Myanmar) and Robert Lim (previously,
youth development in Thailand & Vietnam). Other prominent names out
of town are AFC “A”-Licence holders Aidil Shahrin (Head Coach, Kedah,
Malaysia) and Stephen Ng (Head, Youth Development, Brunei)...
Another former national coach, who declines to be named, says the “top-qualified coaches should be pushed to the S-League clubs which is the pinnacle of Singapore football”. He adds: “The answer is not always with foreign coaches as we’ve experimented with so many from Trevor Hartley, Micheal Walker, Burkhard Ziese, Jan Poulsen, Barry Whitbread, Raddy Avramovic, Bernd Stange, Slobodan Pavkovic and Michel Sablon”.
Jan Poulsen, the ex-Denmark coach who was with the Danes’ Euro 1992-winning team, says: “Basically I agree with Vincent Subramaniam. In order to get football to progress you must have a good infrastructure, good coaches, a good youth development structure (competitive leagues) and a common philosophy – the Singapore way...'
Oops, I think the above is from thenewpaper or Today. Misplaced the source.
What is the Singapore way? More Singaporeans or more foreigners, more instant trees? By the look of it, the Singapore way is about replacing Singaporeans with foreigners. They are now looking for another national coach. Are they going to bring in another foreigner to do the same again? For so many years, have they not wasted enough money on the foreign myth, that a foreign coach could turn Ah Meng into a football star? Stupidity is about repeating the same mistake over and over again.
Very likely until today they still have no clue why the Singapore football is in the current state of affair, going no where. And they are desperately hoping that a foreigner could tell them what is wrong and how to turn half baked footballers into world beaters.
Bet you, another foreigner is likely to be on the way here to collect his big fat pay for another few years and Singapore football would be where it is from today until he left laughing to the bank.
The football fraternity are completely lost in coming out with a solution other than repeating the same old trick over and over again. In this case, perhaps you need to bring in a bunch of system engineers, completely clean heads, with no historical baggages, to take a fresh look at the problems and try something new. The same old heads and minds would not be able to see through the veil they covered themselves and no breakthrough is likely to come about.
Maybe a super talent politician could do the trick. It is possible to spend a few billions, like buying the F35s, to buy a complete international team to win football matches. Or at least it would awe the competition that we have the best money can buy.
Another former national coach, who declines to be named, says the “top-qualified coaches should be pushed to the S-League clubs which is the pinnacle of Singapore football”. He adds: “The answer is not always with foreign coaches as we’ve experimented with so many from Trevor Hartley, Micheal Walker, Burkhard Ziese, Jan Poulsen, Barry Whitbread, Raddy Avramovic, Bernd Stange, Slobodan Pavkovic and Michel Sablon”.
Jan Poulsen, the ex-Denmark coach who was with the Danes’ Euro 1992-winning team, says: “Basically I agree with Vincent Subramaniam. In order to get football to progress you must have a good infrastructure, good coaches, a good youth development structure (competitive leagues) and a common philosophy – the Singapore way...'
Oops, I think the above is from thenewpaper or Today. Misplaced the source.
What is the Singapore way? More Singaporeans or more foreigners, more instant trees? By the look of it, the Singapore way is about replacing Singaporeans with foreigners. They are now looking for another national coach. Are they going to bring in another foreigner to do the same again? For so many years, have they not wasted enough money on the foreign myth, that a foreign coach could turn Ah Meng into a football star? Stupidity is about repeating the same mistake over and over again.
Very likely until today they still have no clue why the Singapore football is in the current state of affair, going no where. And they are desperately hoping that a foreigner could tell them what is wrong and how to turn half baked footballers into world beaters.
Bet you, another foreigner is likely to be on the way here to collect his big fat pay for another few years and Singapore football would be where it is from today until he left laughing to the bank.
The football fraternity are completely lost in coming out with a solution other than repeating the same old trick over and over again. In this case, perhaps you need to bring in a bunch of system engineers, completely clean heads, with no historical baggages, to take a fresh look at the problems and try something new. The same old heads and minds would not be able to see through the veil they covered themselves and no breakthrough is likely to come about.
Maybe a super talent politician could do the trick. It is possible to spend a few billions, like buying the F35s, to buy a complete international team to win football matches. Or at least it would awe the competition that we have the best money can buy.
3/09/2019
Mahathir trying to influence Duterte against influx of foreigners
Mahathir
went to the Philippines to teach Duterte to such eggs, warning ‘the Philippines
against letting in foreigners who could “disturb” the country’s domestic
political stability’ in view of the influx of Chinese workers. During an interview this is what Mahathir
said, ‘Foreign direct investment should not involve brining huge numbers of
foreigners to live in the country, because that might disturb the political
equations in the country,…If huge numbers of any foreigners (come) to live and
stay in the country…you have to do some rethinking as to whether it is good or
bad, of the limits that you have to impose on them.’
Duterte
has different considerations based on the Philippines own situation. Last month
Duterte said that ‘Chinese workers should be allowed to continue staying in the
country as Beijing also hosted hundreds of thousands of Filipinos.’ This kind
of reciprocity is not in the thinking of Mahathir. To Mahathir it is one way,
can only benefit Malaysia and not the other party, like China pouring money
into Malaysia but must be according to Malaysia’s term and interest and China
must be the Santa Claus. Duterte sees it differently, win win for both parties.
Why
doesn’t Mahathir share his warning with the Singapore govt but only to the
Philippines? Singapore would likely show him the middle finger, other than
telling him to mind his own business, not to influence Singapore's policy making, Singapore would tell him that the more
foreigners the better, and Singapore woud be most happy to give citizenships to foreigners, not
just staying and working here. Mahathir probably did not know that Singapore is
now not a country but a hotel for everyone who wants to be here. Everyone can
come here and own Singapore, no problem. A hotel is not a country and has no misgivings about losing a country to foreigners. Singapore is
happy to share this piece of rock with anyone that comes here to work. Citizens
are now called locals, just like the foreigners living here as PRs, NOT citizens. In fact citizen is a bad word, 'local' is the new favoured word for those living in the island.
This
is a new model of state corporation, not nationhood, except that it has not
been officially spoken in this way. All the sensitivities and things like
disturbing the political equations in the country are none issues here.
Singapore does not see any problem with changing the political equation or
demography of the country. There is no
race issue here, everyone is Singaporean. Any race can become the majority and become the Prime Minister or President. Singapore can be taken over by any
race, no problem.
This is better than the theory of black cat or white cat as
long as it can catch mice it is a good cat. I am waiting for our political
leaders to utter this great catch phrase as the new Singapore slogan to the locals. Singapore simply loves to have foreigners, the more the merrier, wildlife also can.
3/08/2019
Wildlife attacked 77 year old man in nursing home
A 77 year old man with dementia was punched up several times by a
wildlife, Bernardo JR Perdido Ramos, 36, when the latter knocked into
his bed accidentally. The older man sat up from his bed and asked who
had disturbed him. It was reported in the ST that Ramos replied, ‘Why?
Me!’ ‘The older man responded by hitting Ramos once on his chest and
Ramos retaliated by punching the man ‘four or fives times on the face’.’
After another nursing assistant intervened, Ramos hit the old man at
least one more time as reported.
Oops, I used the wrong phrase again. It should be foreign talent attacked 77 year old man in nursing home. These wildlife aka foreign talents are very nice people, really. It is so surprising that this one was so fierce, not hiding his wild character and hitting a 77 year old man to show off his brutality.
The court gave this wildlife 12 weeks of jail sentence for hitting ‘a vulnerable victim with severe dementia and Ramos had abused the trust placed him as a nurse’. I am just wondering whether the sentence is too harsh for such a nice wild animal that discredited the good name and profession of nursing. I am also wondering how many such nice wildlife are hiding in nursing homes and yet to shower their basic animal instinct on the patients. Come to think of it, if there are such wildlife in nursing homes, nursing homes can be a very dangerous place for their patients.
Would they do more screening, with more cameras to monitor the wildlife in the name of safety for the patients? Just because a person puts on a uniform be it a nursing uniform or a security guard, it is not automatic that that person is a changed person, becoming a nurse or a security guard as expected of the uniform. We must also accept the fact that it is very difficult to verify the character and nature of the wildlife as they came from places that made verification difficult. It is something that we have to live with if we want to welcome more wildlife here as if they are indispensable to our life and economic well being. Suffer a bit at the hands of the wildlife is tolerable, bearable. Let it be, never mind, we need more wildlife to help us. No need rethinking.
Oops, I used the wrong phrase again. It should be foreign talent attacked 77 year old man in nursing home. These wildlife aka foreign talents are very nice people, really. It is so surprising that this one was so fierce, not hiding his wild character and hitting a 77 year old man to show off his brutality.
The court gave this wildlife 12 weeks of jail sentence for hitting ‘a vulnerable victim with severe dementia and Ramos had abused the trust placed him as a nurse’. I am just wondering whether the sentence is too harsh for such a nice wild animal that discredited the good name and profession of nursing. I am also wondering how many such nice wildlife are hiding in nursing homes and yet to shower their basic animal instinct on the patients. Come to think of it, if there are such wildlife in nursing homes, nursing homes can be a very dangerous place for their patients.
Would they do more screening, with more cameras to monitor the wildlife in the name of safety for the patients? Just because a person puts on a uniform be it a nursing uniform or a security guard, it is not automatic that that person is a changed person, becoming a nurse or a security guard as expected of the uniform. We must also accept the fact that it is very difficult to verify the character and nature of the wildlife as they came from places that made verification difficult. It is something that we have to live with if we want to welcome more wildlife here as if they are indispensable to our life and economic well being. Suffer a bit at the hands of the wildlife is tolerable, bearable. Let it be, never mind, we need more wildlife to help us. No need rethinking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)