Human beans are not flawless. Every human bean is flawed, a matter of degree. If not, he will be as good as God. And this is the most frightening part when comparing AI with human, to assume that human can be completely objective, fair, unbiased, untainted by emotion, political, cultural, religious and racial attachments. When a human bean thinks he/she can be such, he/she can only be a godlike human bean. The flaws in a human bean is as bad as an objective, emotionless AI robot.
There are clear pros and cons for the two to exist in this complex world when objectivity and emotionless judgement are needed against occasions that called for the exercise of humanness and emotions. The emotionless AI is not flawless even in events that need the input of an emotionless AI intervention. For AI is the by product of human beans, be as good as the creator of the AI. Can be programmed to be good or bad, intentionally or otherwise.
On the other hand, the argument that human can be objective and flawless is just as flawed. No human bean can be flawless or free from other influences. To assume that human can be perfect, flawless in making judgements and decisions is itself flawed. Only very conceited human beans would take such a position that human beans are better than AI when human judgement is needed.
We have heard of statistics lie. AI can lie as much if it is programmed to lie. Human by nature, lie and lie for selfish and vested interests. This is being human. If not, then that human is as good as God. Apparently there are many such humans floating around with a halo over their heads.
There is a place for AI and for human to coexist together. Only the wise can balance the two for a better result to fit the moment and situation. Both can be just as good and can be equally bad. It is all about the intent and purpose of a particular situation and the outcome. One can make a case that AI is better and also make a case that human judgement is better. For anyone to take a strong stand that one is better than the other is a big warning sign of danger.
What do you think?
4 comments:
Good morning All
AI aka Artificial Intelligence or AI aka Artificial Insemination both still have yo be performed and created and done by humans!
Garbage IN and Garbage OUT if also created erroneously!
What's the Hype and HooHa on this!
Still have to be performed by Humans!
https://e-paper.sph.com.sg/share/st/14057/2026-06-03/GELQ8FPB.1%2BGHRQR1NP.1?utm_source=web_share&utm_medium=referral
Florida sues OpenAI, CEO Altman over ChatGPT harm to Minors
If even the Pope is worried about AI and its bad effect, what else is there to be said. AI is used for mining all the information, good or bad on the internet, books written, views espoused by experts and analyst that are not always absolutely correct, morally truthful, knowing such views can be skewed and contaminated by monetary rewards. AI cannot differentiate between what is moral or immoral, good and bad and what are truth and lies. If that is so, AI would already have human instincts, human morals to decide what to avoid. The human touch in creating AI is always there and humans are not infallible or all morally saintly.
In time to come, humans may be AI-ed, or 'artificially inseminated' by machines to produce more AI machines, lol.
Post a Comment