6/02/2026

Shangri La Dialogue - For who, against who?

It is not just widespread views that the dialogue is to give a platform to the USA to control the agenda. It is the agenda to allow the USA to create more fear and unease in the minds of those 'dull of mind' who attended, brainwashing them to buy into the fear of China. The Chinese know that attending it is of no value. It is just a 'sham' dialogue.

I could not help going over what Pete Hegseth, the drunkard, just said that allies of the USA must spend to take care of their own security. For once I do agree with his slip of the tongue-in-cheek honest revelation.

The Gulf countries had been spending their defense budget leveraging on the USA to defend them, from I do not know who, probably Israel, before the war against Iran, but all that spending has gone into a black hole without the benefits to show. So, I would also say that the Gulf countries must rightly take care of their own defense matters, rather than depend on the USA. Am I right after witnessing what happened over the last three months. I think the message that Pete Hegseth gave, in a moment of drunkard-ness, has opened a can of worms.

The Europeans are also thinking of setting up their own defense architecture instead of being held hostage by the USA, harping all the time to increase their defense spending. All that spending by Europe is just to promote and upkeep the interest of the USA in Europe. Russia is the only target and all the fearmongering fabricated by the USA in Europe is all centered on Russia, while in East Asia, the propaganda of fear is centered all on China. The Warsaw Pact countries have already been disbanded long ago, but NATO is still existing to carry on the USA war mongering show.

ASEAN must also wake up, look around, and find out whether the threat comes from China or the USA.

Out of 193 countries around the world, I would have expected more than 47 countries to attend the Shamgrila Die-lock. I think, just like China, they have already seen the woods for the trees. That tells me it is a dying platform of no consequence to them.


Anonymous

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

At the end of the dialogue, what has been achieved? It is all taxpayer's money down the drain. The came, they enjoyed the pandering and feeding, talk cock and sing song, shit after consuming the food, go to sleep and everything is forgotten the next day. All that talk about security issues never made the world more secure and safer. It is all gibberish and useless posturing.

Anonymous said...

I wonder how much money is spent to hold that dialogue. I know we spent twenty million to host Trump and Kim meeting. Did that achieve anything constructive?