The death of Queen Elizabeth II, the UK's longest-reigning monarch for seven decades, has reignited the urgency in many of the 15 British Commonwealth nations on whether it is time to replace the British monarch with an elected Head of State.
This puts the long-term existence of the Commonwealth into question.
There are increasng calls to completely get rid of the remnants of the Colonial Era and embrace Full Independence.
With the Queen's demise, 73-year-old Charles III ascended to the British throne and was proclaimed King at St James's Palace in London on Saturday. He was also pronounced Head of State in 14 other Commonwealth nations, including Australia, Canada and New Zealand and some island nations in the Caribbean and South Pacific.
King Charles was proclaimed at a time when Britain faces multiple challenges, including a new government led by Prime Minister Liz Truss who as Conservative Party leader inherits a huge mess she needs to tackle, from an ailing economy to the cost of living crisis, and growing voices in Scotland and Northern Ireland who desire to leave the UK.
Now, it seems that the Commonwealth nations are at a crossroad.
The long reign of Queen Elizabeth II, whether out of personal image, charisma, or her devotion to duty to some extent stabilized the Commonwealth system worldwide.
After her death, many within the Commonwealth nations have revisited the thought of leaving.
So what should happen now?
We can't continue with an ancient, archaic and old system of Monarchy with the present Democratic, Republican or Parliamentary System. We should not. We must not.
Therefore, to all the Wise Men and Women in the World, it is timely to ABOLISH THE MONARCHY System altogether. It is actually a very wasteful system - paying extremely high for people who functions in ceremonial roles only. This can be easily replaced by a Head of State or Presidency, like Singapore.
So, what do you think?
8 comments:
Hi A-Non-YeS-Mouse
The Brits are so kiaso and kiasee that their so called slavery controlled countries would break away that they had to fast fast installed and crowned that Charles to become King even though the Queen is still NOT bury.
Have to that endless looting and payment of extortion monies to feed them.
Scotland and Ireland are planning to break away from their clutches.
They wanted to be in the E.U. for their own trade and interests.
Just like Sabah and Sarawak which may also break from.West Malaysia soon
Mr. Mouse SG system also very high cost leh
SG system was intentionally made high cost, because the incumbents thought that SG idiots are so idiotic that they will simply pay and pay and pay......
Now that the SG idiotic idiots are feeling the pain of having to food out for the high cost, especially at the G level, the incumbents are trying to make foreigners pay their bills by importing more and more foreigners.
However, this methodology can last for only one generation at the most. People are going to protest sooner or later, irrespective of whether the G has been deterring people from protesting. When the crunch is pushed against the wall, where there is no more way out, the people no matter how obedient they may be, are going to protest.
You can't keep suppressing and oppressing the people for too long. People's power will soon come to sickening Singapore.
High costs of living will always be there, for many reasons. The most common reason is the high cost of government. This is usually caused by 'smart' politicians who want to get rich quick.
The second reason is high cost of petrol and energy. These items usually drive up the high costs of many other items, such as cost of delivery, cost of transportation, cost of doing business, cost of insurance and cost of everything else.
Mr. Mouse then why u still suggest people use the SG system?
Russia and China “stand together for a just, democratic, multipolar world order based on international law and the central role of the UN, and not on some rules that somebody invented and attempts to impose on others without even explaining what they are,” Putin said.
The administration of US President Joe Biden has been using the phrase “rules-based world order” to describe the way it prefers the world to operate.
How many leaders believe in the silly American 'rules based world order'?
128Highstreet
The WEF/Globalists/NWO have been wreaking havoc on the peoples of the planet for generations without much pushback. Now along comes the pesky Russia, China, Iran, DPRK, Venezuela, Hungary, India, South Africa just to rock the boat. These are not weak countries with weak leaders that bend over at the mere suggestion from the collective west. Pushback will be fierce such as what we see in Ukraine. It will only get worse so we better fasten our seatbelts.
Scott Morisson
I notice that in recent weeks neither freaky Joe, or his British and Australian counterparts have been bandying around the term "rules based order" as much as they used to. Perhaps these fools have woken up to the fact that the rest of the world has woken up to what they actually mean.
RTCOM5225
I'm an 80yr old American and love my country to the core. I am totally embarrassed by this idiot White House and their pink panty woke fools trying to tell China to not "do any business" with Russia, don't even think about taking Taiwan or you really make the U.S. mad! - - What fools the the United States has become, what jerks. It was Ukraine/United States/NATO who built Bio-labs and threatened Russia. It was the United States who overthrew the the legitimate government of Ukraine, installing the current puppet clown as the "head" of Ukraine people (mostly Russians). ONE WAY OR ANOTHER AMERICA IS LOOKING TO GET ITSELF DESTROYED. A for what??
Post a Comment