11/12/2021

Covid19 - Raving about experimental vaccines

 When the Americans rushed out their mRNA vaccines, a totally new way to produce vaccines and still under trials, they claimed that the efficacy to prevent infection was 95%, or was it 96%? And the suckers were drooling that this magic silver bullet would save them from the pandemic...without happy to think, no thinking needed because the American gods said so. And they bought lock, stock and barrel, threw their money at this experimental drugs that many experts and scientists were shouting caution because of the many unknowns and potential risks in the future. 

Even when the drug pushers insisted on secrecy in the sales agreement, no responsibility for side effects of deaths from use, no rights to claim compensation, no rights to sue the manufacturers, no one think that these were dangerous warning signs.

After a year of use worldwide by the suckers and believers of white gods, and the words of white gods as unquestionable, blasphemy to cast doubts on the words and claims of these white gods, the facts are staring down the face of the suckers and believers.  The vaccines did not work as they claimed. The infections continue to spread, people continue to die. But did anyone raise any alarm, any question on the original claims of efficacy? Not the believers. In many countries, it would be a slap in the face if doubts were raised on these experimental vaccines. Many deaths and serious side effects were brushed away as due to underlying medical conditions of the victims in spite of many young and healthy people also dying in their 20s and 30s that otherwise would still be alive.

Not only that they would not raise any alarm or pause in the use of these vaccines, they even made it compulsory despite the protests from the doubters. It is like since they have been suckered and jabbed with the vaccines, it is good to have others to be jabbed as well and share the benefits or ill side effects. We are all in and no escape.

Now Pfizer is coming out with oral vaccines and claiming 89% effective, just short of 90%. This time they learnt their lessons and would not dare to claim 95% or more than 90%. But 89% of what? 89% to prevent serious illness or deaths. Mind you, not prevention of infection. They know that this vaccine could not prevent vaccines, proven, so better not claim such fictitious efficacy. This is Pfizer's claims reported in the www.statnews.com.

'An experimental antiviral pill developed by Pfizer reduced the risk of death and hospitalization by 89% in patients who were newly diagnosed with Covid-19 in a large study, the company said Friday.

The development of oral medicines that can be used to treat Covid early on could blunt the impact of the pandemic.'

 How large is the study group? How did they defined death and hospitalisation? Would people that took the vaccines, get hospitalised or died be excluded because they have underlying medical conditions?

Nahid Bhadelia, the founding director of the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Policy & Research at Boston University, called oral antiviral pills “incredibly important” because existing treatments such as monoclonal antibodies must be given intravenously or as shots.

And many suckers are already queuing up for this experimental vaccine again like adolescents queuing up for the latest pop fad. Would they still be made to sign secrecy clauses and no claims against side effects and deaths? Would they ask a few simple commonsensical questions about the claims of Pfizer? Or it is all over again, cheated once not shy, and happy to be cheated a second time and throwing their money at questionable experimental vaccines?

Hooray another new white hope, or another white dope?

20 comments:

Queen of Hearts said...

When something appears to good to be true, it is.

Vaccines normally has about 60% to 75% efficacy. When someone tells you that the vaccine that he produces is out of the normal range of efficacy, 95%, you had better think twice. The alarm bells are already ringing. But if anyone is so dull, dumb and daft as to believe in that snake oil seller's claim, the he/she is to be blamed.

Tehsi said...

For more infor. on local suffering adverse effects from the vaccine:

https://t.me/SGVaxInjury

SSO said...

This is the biggest fraud and drug trafficking crime in the history of mankind.

Yet so many countries' governments are not only complicit but also openly and financially contributed and supported the criminals, and advertising for them, covering up for them. Some even went all out to intimidate, coerce, threaten, force and blackmail their own citizens to take the Risks of letting themselves to become guinea pigs of this global experimental scam.

This COVID-19 Pandemic has really drawn out the most ugly and heinous aspects of many leaders and politicians, as well as the scientists, researchers, viroligists, doctors and the so-called experts who give legitimacy to the words of the politicians.

And we must not forget the greedy, opportunistic investors who quickly seized the opportunity to make a fast buck at the expense of the other people's health and lives.

Worst of all, they hide themselves behind a facade of do gooders.

Coming from people in authority, influence and power, this is really despicable and unscrupous.

Anonymous said...

Suckers are born everyday.

But there are salesmen that are capitalising on this to make more suckers out of ordinary innocent people. This is criminal, exploiting the innocent using a lie to make more money.

Anonymous said...

Pfizer is also using its affiliated media especially American ones including WSJ, NYT Reuters to put down its Chinese competition.

You can read lots of articles casting doubts about the effectiveness of the Chinese vaccines that are widely used in third world countries. None of them has written negatively about the American vaccines. MOH perhaps based on these reports to say there were lots of problems with the Sinovac vaccines.



Anonymous said...

MOH hanchos are blocked heads. They have one track mind. One size fit all solutions. Die die must follow the biggest crook of the world. Die die don't want to say good things about Chinese vaccines that deserve to be mentioned.

This kind of attitude and behaviour does not reflect well for themselves.

The people are not blind. The people are not stupid.

The collective wisdom of the masses is greater than the sum total of all the jokers at MTF with its Expurts Comedians.

Anonymous said...

1.4b Chinese are using Chinese vaccines and the pandemic is being controlled in China and China is working towards zero Covid19 in China.

On the other hand the virus is losing control in US, UK and Europe, including Singapore, all using mRNA so called vaccines.

These are facts, not fake news.

Anonymous said...

Lying about vaccines, spreading fake info about vaccines, pushing fake news to sell vaccines, etc etc, are not just criminal but could cause a lot of unnecessary deaths. This is evilness.

Anonymous said...

Covid-19 ICU patients who chose to be unvaccinated could face median bill of $25,000 before subsidies: MOH

Covid-19 patients who are unvaccinated by choice and end up in the intensive care unit (ICU) could be looking at a bill of around $25,000 before subsidies.

With subsidies, the amount payable is significantly lower, the Ministry of Health (MOH) told The Straits Times.

The $25,000 is the median acute hospital bill size for those who require both ICU care and Covid-19 therapeutics, MOH said.

"Means-tested government subsidies and MediShield Life coverage can reduce the bill to about $2,000 to $4,000 for eligible Singaporeans in subsidised wards."

Covid-19 patients can use their MediSave balance to help fund this remaining amount, said an MOH spokesman.

The authorities announced recently that from Dec 8, those who are unvaccinated will have to foot their own medical bill if they become ill with Covid-19.

These are the people who can get vaccinated but choose not to do so. They form a big group of the Covid-19 patients who end up in the ICU.

If these people are sent to a Covid-19 treatment facility, the bill there is expected to be around $4,500 for a seven-day stay, the MOH spokesman said.

"For Singapore citizens, after subsidies and MediShield Life where applicable, the co-payment is around $1,000."

Depending on the severity of the patient's condition and the type of Covid-19 facility where care is rendered, the bill size would vary, said the spokesman.

There are also community isolation facilities (CIFs) here. Currently, travellers and short-term visit pass holders are charged for CIF stays.

"At the moment, unvaccinated persons who are Singapore citizens, permanent residents and long-term pass holders and have not travelled in the last 14 days are not charged for CIF stays, should a CIF stay be required," the spokesman said.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/covid-19-icu-patients-who-choose-to-be-unvaccinated-could-face-median-bill-of-25000

Anonymous said...

The Taiwanese health authorities have suspended the administering of second doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid vaccine for children aged between 12 and 17, citing concerns about an increased risk of heart inflammation.
Nov 11, 2021

Anonymous said...

Against the Constitution of Singapore.

Against our National Pledge.

Against Ethics.

Against Moral.

Whatsoever the case may be, whoever gave the order for this inhuman wayward discrimination must be taken to task and be charged in the Highest Court of the World, not in Singapore courts.

SSO said...

Pfizer must be investigated with the aim of establishing fraudulent manipulations of the world governments in purchasing their highly questionable, unconfirmed, unsubstantiated, experimental new mRNA technology drug (cannot be called a vaccine because it does not function fully as a vaccine).


Anonymous said...

mRNA is a drug, NOT a vaccine.

Anonymous said...

This is getting very irresponsible and evil. Suppressing favourable news and effects of Chinese vaccines and playing up the negative news of this vaccine, ie telling lies.

On the other hand suppressing the ill effects of mRNA vaccine and putting up fake news about its positive effects. A good example was the claim of 95% efficacy that had been proven as a lie. Then there is the intentional suppression and non admission of serious cases and deaths and putting the blame on underlying medical conditions, totally not related to the injection of the mRNA vaccines, a clean break that is simply unconvincing and unacceptable.

Anonymous said...

The long term effects of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA drugs (claimed as vaccine but not vaccine) are starting to surface.

Soon, more and more cases of negative and detrimental effects of their mRNA drugs (pseudo vaccines) will surface.

Those 80% who have allowed themselves to be injected with the Experimental mRNA Pseudo Vaccines had better keep their fingers crossed.

Now, we know why the government refused and still refusing to declare the Vaccination Compulsory.

Queen of Hearts said...

Only vaccines that are safe are those produced without profit motives, purchased without investment motives.

The only vaccines that are safe are those produced according to medical and ethical standards.

The only vaccines that are safe are those produced by traditional vacancies production methods.

The only vacancies that are safe are those with very little side effects and no long-term effects.

The only vaccines that are safe are priced very cheaply, so that they will not cost you a bomb.

The only vaccines that are safe are those that do not need endless number of shots.

In the final analysis, only vaccines that are safe are those produced by China.

SSO said...

As COVID-19 Ravages, More Singaporeans Go Hungry

The coronavirus pandemic has left more people in Singapore, the world's 4th wealthiest country, struggling to feed themselves.

After being let go from his part-time job as a waiter last year during the pandemic, Danny Goh hit rock bottom.

For eight months, he struggled to find work to support his wife and four young children. The family survived on instant noodles, bread dipped in coffee, and biscuits, getting by on the goodwill of relatives and church friends.

While Goh has found a new commission-based job getting people to sign up for government skills upgrading and training courses, his income fluctuates between 800 Singapore dollars ($594) and 2,800 Singapore dollars ($2,078), which is barely enough for their large family.

He perpetually finds himself cash-strapped.

To save money, the family has started eating only two meals a day – simple dishes like chicken soup with rice or potatoes.

Goh often skips meals or eats once a day so that his children can have two meals a day.

Where their fridge used to be stuffed with fresh fruit, chicken, pork and beef, soft drinks and snacks, all of this is now a luxury, and eating out is out of the question.

“It’s a huge pay cut, and honestly it’s one of the hardest and most demoralising periods of my life. Times are really tough,” said the 61-year-old who rents a two-room public housing flat in the northern part of the island.

In a food paradise and wealthy city-state like Singapore, food insecurity exists primarily behind closed doors. But as elsewhere in the world, COVID-19 has hit the disadvantaged the hardest, typically the lowest earners in precarious jobs, who have few safety nets and insufficient wage and no labour protections.

Earlier this year, a six-month study by local charity Beyond Social Services found that the median household income of families who sought the group’s help had plunged from 1,600 Singapore dollars ($1,187) before the COVID-19 pandemic to just 500 Singapore dollars ($371).

More worryingly, a second study, which detailed the effect of the Pandemic on people renting government-owned flats between July and December 2020, found food insecurity was increasingly prolonged.

Residents told Beyond that they sometimes coped with the lack of food by filling themselves up with liquids or starches, buying cheap and filling items, and making choices based on financial considerations rather than nutritional value.

For instance, some families would eat only one meal a day or give their children coffee creamer in hot water because they could not afford formula milk. The report warned the issue could escalate into a serious public health matter, with links to increased mental stress and the development of chronic health conditions.

In 2019, Singapore ranked as the world’s most food-secure nation in the Global Food Security Index.

However, one in 10 Singaporeans experienced food insecurity at least once over 12 months, reported a study by the Singapore Management University’s Lien Centre for Social Innovation. Out of this, two in five experienced food insecurity at least once a month and many of these households did not seek food support, citing embarrassment, being unaware of what was available and the belief that others needed it more than themselves.

To a regular Singaporean, food is a national pastime. But many do not realise how poorly others are eating, how they have to make difficult choices for each meal, and how food is just a necessity to sustain them.

The pathetic Singapore stories go on and on....while Singapore ministers and top civil servants keep asking for more increase in their already obscene multi-million dollars salaries and more annual bonuses.

SSO.


Source: Al Jazeera

Anonymous said...

It has to happen about Singapore's discrimination against the Chinese vaccines.
The comparison of the ground effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against the Sinovac vaccines on youtube channel "Difference Frames the World"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmvDbhspo1c
This may be a pro-China site, but they got a point.

How would the authorities respond to this. Again on the trial effficacies when the ground data are saying otherwise?

Anonymous said...

Coronavirus: Hong Kong vaccine experts do not rule out fourth jab for some residents

Professor David Hui says fourth booster shot may be needed for those who had earlier taken Sinovac jab, as antibody levels may be lower
Professor Wallace Lau raises idea of annual jabs, also citing waning antibodies

Hong Kong government vaccine experts have said they do not rule out the possibility of a fourth Covid-19 jab for residents, with the city rolling out third shots under its booster programme next week.

The idea, raised by Professor David Hui Shu-cheong, a government pandemic adviser, came on the heels of official advice issued by the Macau government last week, indicating that the third dose should be given at least 28 days after the second shot, while the fourth should come six months following the third jab.

https://amp.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/health-environment/article/3155113/coronavirus-hong-kong-vaccine-experts-do-not-rule

Anonymous said...

Matilah is still working very hard searching for articles written by Anti-China news outlets to smear China every day, without fail.