Afraid of being exposed, the PAP IBs have gone underground, using Anonymous as their moniker.
Unable to see daylight, they behave like shaddy, cowardly, slimy creepy creatures of the dark.
Without
the guts, integrity nor honour to show their identity, they hide under
Anonymity because they know that they are without any credibility and
their words can never to taken seriously by the public.
Worst of
all, they don't even have the ability to make any sensible statement. So
much so, they resorted to plagiarism, cut and paste wholesale articles
from the mouth pieces of the PAP, and from other people's Facebook
postings, lowering their own integrity, dignity and credibility even
further.
Such is the poor, pathetic and tragic state of affairs with the useless pest-like PAP IBs.
Whatever
money spent on them are solely and soullessly wasted. If the money had
came from public funding through annual budget allocation to a certain
statutory board organisation, then this is not only wastage of public
funds but probably criminal too.
What do you think?
SSO - 1 November 2021.
11/02/2021
The Pathetic And Tragic State Of PAP IBs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
Yes, if there is an abuse or misuse of public funds for PAP's own agenda, it is a criminal offence. It has to be investigated by CPIB and charges made if and when the money from allocated annual budget have been abused or misused.
These PAP pests are making a bad name for their Master instead of helping to defend their Master's indefensible bad deeds and blunders.
Is using public funds for upgrading to win votes while denying such upgrading for Opposition held constituency, unless they vote for the ruling party, not tell us something is morally wrong with that?
RB must have been quite busy getting rid of pest and mosquitoes targeting this blog. Keep up the good work of sanitising this blog from getting polluted.
It is a conundrum to CPIB. Being put directly deliberately under the PM, who happens to be Secretary General of PAP, any investigation on the PAP would likely be blocked by the CPIB's Boss himself. I don't think it can even proceed. Whoever utter a word about investigating the PAP may find himself become a Grab driver or Food Pander delivery man.
"Yes, if there is an abuse or misuse of public funds for PAP's own agenda, it is a criminal offence. It has to be investigated by CPIB and charges made if and when the money from allocated annual budget have been abused or misused."
As long as it is PAP, ownself check ownself , ownself power ownself, there will never be criminal offence for them. Since when they ever investigate themselves meticulously ? It is always the little people that take the blame to deflect the actual culprit.
Same goes for electoral where that joker himself has full control of gerrymander and have first access to those plan he and his team cook up with since the electoral committee is never independent.
All it takes is covid for Singaporeans to wake their nonchalant idea that we should not have our right taken away day by day by a government who themselves are business owner of Singapore Incorporated. Business entity if left unchecked and has unfettered power will always be corrupted at some point, don't even doubt about it. The case of party whip where PAP mp majority aya to whatever PAP's policies dish out already tell you so, some ministers may wayang not to vote, because their small flies already make up the number to have law and policies approved. To PAP, only money is right, anything else is plainly wrong.
Take away all the untruths, what's left of her story?
Pritam(Pretend) Singh appears to be unwilling to deal with the truth that a lie took place.
The pertinent questions are: Did WP know it was a lie? Did WP only just know that it was a lie? Did WP make any attempt to ascertain the veracity of her story in the face of public outcry? If not, why not? When did WP know it was a lie?
Until Raeesah's admission, WP had kept completely silent.
First case of deliberate lying in Parliament: Bertha Henson
Anecdotes have been shared in Parliament but this is the first case of deliberate lying in Parliament that has been found out.
MPs often use anecdotes of anonymous people to make their point. A recent example was when WP Sylvia Lim and Pritam Singh shared the same anecdote of a resident who had to sell his/her flat at a loss of $100,000. As it turned out, the anecdote was inaccurate and the facts were clarified by Minister for National Development Desmond Lee.
Parliament is not a place where you can spout all sorts of nonsense because people will take you at your word, said Bertha Henson in a Facebook post.
Raeesah Khan has painted a picture of herself as a crusader who accompanied a rape victim to the police, said Bertha.
Bertha noted that this was in a prepared speech and not some quick response to an ambush question.
As it turned out, she did not accompany the rape victim to make a police report. It was a ‘sharing’ at a rape support group.
Her story has changed too many times, mainly under the guise of ‘confidentiality’ and ‘consent’, in her responses to requests for details - and people rush to agree that confidentiality and consent are important to observe. Even AWARE says so.
This is not an innocuous anecdote as fingers are pointed at the police for being so unsympathetic towards victims. This anecdote had repercussions and we must expect the police will go find out which police station and which cops.
Now, we know that most of it is not true. I say ‘most’ because I am hoping that RK’s anecdote of the rape victim’s experience is at least a true account of what the person said at the support group. If the person had been reading the news reports and could identify herself in them, I wonder how she feels about being made a subject of the news. If I were the person, you can bet that I would be telling RK off for bringing up the issue without my consent, and worse, lying about accompanying me to the police station as if we were BFFs.
RK says that she felt embarrassed to say that this surfaced at a rape support group, so she changed her story. She did not want people to know that she is a ‘survivor’ of an assault abroad when she was a student. That’s wierd because I thought it was a ‘housemate’ abroad who was a victim, as she said in an FB post. In any case, there was still no need to embellish the story by making herself out to be the do-gooder
The problem is that when people talk about rape victims, it is politically incorrect to ask questions about the veracity. We give them the benefit of the doubt and wouldn’t think that they were making up stories. We nod our heads at words like confidentiality and consent - without thinking that they might be covers for something else. It is hypocritical of RK to talk about confidentiality and consent when she didn’t observe either. She really knew nothing more about the case - in fact the victim might not even have said which police station she went to at the sharing!
What RK has done is to destroy this ‘benefit of the doubt’ we give to victims. That’s the great disservice she has done for the cause of women. Not to mention degrading the standing of MPs by blatant lying.
RB and All,
The above posts just proved my points, isn't it?
The IBs now not only stooped so low as to plagiarise by cut and paste wholesale from other's articles, without permission, but also resort to vulgarity and hooliganism.
"Balls2U said...
Argue what point, SSO? Where is the proof that there is a PAP IB other than your stupid claim? First provide the proof, then we can argue. Can't talk about the others, but I have no links with the PAP. Abbreviated vulgarity has never been a problem on this site if if comes from RB or his carriers. Balls2U."
If one behave and act like IB, does it matter if it is whether they are real IB or not ? They still being treat as IB
SINGAPORE — Shortcomings by all (three) parties — the employer, the dormitory operator and the Government — led to an incident last month at Westlite Jalan Tukang dormitory, where riot police were deployed, Senior Minister of State for Manpower Koh Poh Koon said on Monday (Nov 1).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/jurong-dormitory-unrest-followed-shortcomings-operator-employer-govt-koh-poh-koon
To whom you may concern, "Balls2U":
1. Where is the proof that you are not connected to PAP in one way or another? Any claim that you are not connect does not prove that you are not connected.
2. Show your identity first and than we can talk.
3. Your characteristic hooligan tactic is being displayed again for a second time. This substantiated SSO's point beyond any doubt.
4. Irrespective of whether you are an IB of any party or not, if you behave like a pest-like IB, you are going to be considered and treated like a pest-like IB.
Thanks RB, for removing that hooligan from your blog. That is a perfect bad example of an uncouth and badly brought up brat. Feel sorry for his parents for having such an uncivil hooligan as a son.
They think that the more they tried to demonise the WP over the RK issue, they are going to gain ground in the next election in Sengkang GRC. I think that may be a mistaken belief.
When former WP MP, Yaw Shin Leong in Hougang SMC, was accused and did not respond over his extramarital affairs, the PAP had a field day, calling for him to resign from his MP position and calling for a by-election in Hougang. Yaw was expelled in the midst of all the bombardment carried out by the PAP against him, both in and outside Parliament.
The PAP had hopes of capitalizing on Yaw's relinquishing his MP position in Hougang, thinking they can now retake Hougang. The WP replaced Yaw with Png Eng Huat, who was to win the by-election convincingly. The demonization of the WP had been dented in Hougang by the voters there. In Hougang the motto is 'Come one kill one, come two kill a pair'. No PAP big guns dared to contest that SMC, even from the very top.
Interestingly, right after Yaw's episode, the PAP's Michael Palmer in Punggol East SMC also suffered the same fate as Yaw over his extramarital affairs and had to be removed. and in the by-election the WP won that seat as well.
Another interesting point to note is that after Punggol East SMC went back to the PAP, it disappeared because of it's tarnished image for the PAP. It is the same with constituencies that evoked bad memories for the PAP, like Hong Lim, Anson and Cheng san GRC, with their chequered history, now consigned to history and lost from memory of those younger voters.
As of note, I would venture to think that Hougang and Aljunied GRC will suffer the same fate, more so for the Hougang WP bastion, if they were to be retaken by the PAP. They will disappear for good.
Those were interesting days indeed!
What they should have done is walk the talk, by providing the opposition wards the same benefits given to PAP wards, before they can say no double standards. Was that done? No!
anon November 03, 2021 6:46 pm,
you are replying to the same IB who post garbage here. We know when the logic does not match the ground.
Post a Comment