12/19/2015

Sitting on stolen lands, acting as sheriff and deputy sheriff


The Americans and Australians are sitting on stolen lands that belonged to the indigenous people of North America and Australia. They seized the lands from the native people and claimed it as their own, with the power of the gun. Now they called these two continental size land as theirs, as America and Australia and hushed up on the protests by the natives and their claims for the return of their lands in the United Nations.

Today we are seeing the two nations built on stolen lands sailing into the South China Sea and appointing themselves as the sheriff and deputy sheriff of the region, carry guns again to stamp their authority. Indirectly they are staking their claims on the South China Sea and the islands under the pretension of protecting freedom of navigation. Their war ships and war planes are here, to control the South China Sea as their playground.

After stealing the continents of North America and Australia, they are eyeing the South China Sea and the islands and the resources below, wanting to claim them as theirs as well. Would they also be thinking of the Asean countries and revive the concept of colonialism or the Doctrine of Christian Discovery?


When are the Americans and the Australians going to return their stolen lands to the indigenous people of the respective lands? What audacity they have in appointing themselves as the sheriff and deputy sheriff of the South China Sea?

12 comments:

Ⓜatilah $ingapura⚠️ said...

>> The Americans and Australians are sitting on stolen lands that belonged to the indigenous people of North America and Australia. They seized the lands from the native people and claimed it as their own, with the power of the gun. <<

Yes, they CONQUERED the indigenous races. This is fair game---one side has steel, guns and high tech, and the other running around half naked throwing around rocks and sharpened sticks.

The lands were not STOLEN. They are spoils of armed conflict. i.e.: one side won the other lost. (The US also lost some: The Alamo, Custer's last stand....and one might argue, Saigon)

>> What audacity they have in appointing themselves as the sheriff and deputy sheriff of the South China Sea? <<

Well, none of the ASEAN fuckers will do it, so it is up to Whitey and his merry band of armed warriors (as usual) to play "policeman" against the big bad Chinese. If not the US and the Aussies now, at some future date the fucking United Nations will come in and make bigger mess.

Relac lah. Geo politics. China needs to shoot one plane down and let it “fall from the sky”. Just one. Then see what happens.

Anonymous said...

Without US I can guarantee that S'pore will become proxy state of China. PAPies are damn pragmatic one. PLA airforce and navy will be invited to be based in Paya Lebar and Changi. Rotating division of 20,000 PLA army troops will train & base in SAF camps. M'sia & Indo will shit their pants and KPKB but basically suck thumb. BTW US airforce and navy are already basing off S'pore for 50 years liao, just that these things are not publicised. As for US troops, they come in every 3-4 months via aircraft carrier battle groups. They normally have a couple battalions of marines and besides R&R they also have field exercise & wargames with SAF. I trained with these US troops 2X during my NS says.

Anonymous said...

Yes !

Winner takes All.

Why the Indigenous Tribe
lost to the Invader ?

Becos they failed to defend
themselves. They were weak
and backward.

Anonymous said...

LoL, as expected the comments is full of anti-China BS.

As what you expected from western mainstream media poisoned zombies parroting what the west think is right and what is wrong.

Anonymous said...

Don't be deceived by their colours, they are descendants of angmohs.

Hermit said...

RB blaming the West forces, yet make no mention about China's hostile action on Spratly is like blaming the rogue vigilante citizen who guns down the crook who beat up an old man to rob him.

China is no angel in this sad episode yet is not given an ounce of blame in the South China conflict.

Anonymous said...

Please Mr RB lah. Stick to poking fun of pap govt. The communist China is no angel. Enough bashing the western powers. China occupy Xinjiang,Tibet,Mongolia. Build an island in the middle of the international sea and claim it is their land. If everyone reclaim island, then how?

Anonymous said...

To redbean,
this thingie of american stealing land from red indians. If i am not wrong in those days the red indians could be found mostly in west side of USA possibly 99%. Many parts of east are not populated. So it is Finders keepers. And the american has to fight british and french bitterly to steal the lands found by them. There was a big war with british i think. The key issue is finders keepers. 100% of The land including east USA, does not automatically belong to red indians, if 99% of them are conCentrated in West of USA...

Hermit said...

The early Americans did steal land from the Red Indians. They were not satisfied with being on the East. They ventured westwards and started eating up land of the Red Indians and displaced them. The Red Indians were virtually wiped out.

Anonymous said...

Finders keepers. The continent of America got indigenous people and some here are saying finders keepers, ignoring the natives. And some jokers are saying China cannot find the islands in South China Sea that have no natives. No finders keepers.

Anonymous said...

Yes i agree that Americans did steal land from red indians on west side. But redbean is trying to say 100% of land from present day california coast to florida seep south to newyork, humbalang belong to red indians, just because 100,000 red indians live in west side. It is a bit extreme.

Anonymous said...

Anon 8:30, stop being silly. Go and read up American history before commenting.
Your ignorance is embarrassing.