The vile unilateral arrest of Huawei’s CFO by the Canadian govt under
instruction from the Americans compelled the Chinese govt to act against
the Canadians and the Americans. This is an arrest of a Chinese
national on transit and who has not committed any crime in Canada or the
USA. The alleged crime is a violation of an American sanction on Iran
that was unilaterally imposed by the US and nationals of other countries
need to comply unless they are operating in the USA.
If the Americans can imposed their domestic laws on foreign nationals in
other parts of the world, it would mean the American laws are
international laws or the USA is the Empire of the world and every
country would come under American laws.
China or any country would not subject their nationals to American laws
and jurisdiction. This is a violation of the rights of other nationals
and China must act or its govt would loose the support and respect of
its citizens and countries of the world. After several stern warnings,
the Canadians still refused to release Meng Wanzhou from custody. The
latest, she has been allowed bail. This is not enough. The bail
conditions were atrociously prohibitive, $10m bail, electronic tag, and
the cruel hand and leg cuffing of a dignified and highly educated female
top executive were incomprehensible. Only a rogue regime could ever do
such wicked things.
It has been reported that China has arrested an ex Canadian diplomat
Michael Kovrig in China. Kovrig is now working with an International
Crisis Group in Hong Kong. If the Canadians and the Americans deemed
fit to address Chinese nationals for not breaking any of their laws,
China can do likewise in return for the rogue behavior of these regimes.
The Americans got the cheek to tell China to respect human rights and
to release the Canadians. And they have issued warnings to Americans not
to visit China for fear of arrest. This must be expected. China cannot
sit idly by and allow Chinese nationals to be arrested anywhere in the
world by rogue regimes when they did not commit any crimes against those
countries. Kovrig must be treated under the same conditions as Meng,
handcuffed, leg cuffed and paraded in court. The bail conditions should
be no less than Meng.
More arrests of Americans and Canadians are on the card if Meng Wanzhou
is not released. Both can play the same dirty game. If the Americans and
Canadians want to play international kidnappers, China too can do the
same. If China does not act to arrest the Canadians or Americans, then
the Americans and Canadians would be embolden to arrest Chinese
businessmen anywhere, anytime they so chose. This fear would stop
Chinese businessmen from travelling outside China and must be removed at
once. With the arrest of the Canadian, China is telling the Canadians
and Americans that they too are subject to be arrested by China at will
anywhere, anytime. The boyish PM Trudeau cannot pretend and act so
innocently over this kidnapping of Meng, that it was a legal matter and
has nothing to do with him or politics. Now his little balls are being
caught between China and the USA and other Canadians are going to pay
for his childish prank on China. He is being taught a lesson not to
meddle with the men in the game of politics. And Canada is now know
throughout the world as a dangerous country of kidnappers. They would
arrest anyone under instruction from the US, even innocent people who
did not commit any crime in Canada. Beware when travelling to this terrorist
country.
While the American’s main intent was to kill Huawei, China has banned the sale of all Apple iPhones in the whole of China.
PS. There is a rumour that Kovrig has secret information on North Korea
and North Korea is asking China to repatriate him to serve jail time in
North Korea : ) How’s that for tit for tat? Wait for more Canadians to
be arrested in greater China.
12/13/2018
12/12/2018
Desperate Evil Empire Resorts to Commercial & Financial Terrorism
The audacity of this criminal act of kidnapping a Chinese national, the Chief Financial Officer of Huawei, Meng Wanzhou goes beyond the norms of human conduct in international relations. By prefabricating and trumping up fake charges against Meng Wanzhou, US shows that it is a desperate country that has become wild and mad totally devoid of reason and logical thinking.
The Evil Empire thinks by its desperate criminal act it can hold back China's development of 5G by its international renowned company Huawei. China's success in developing 5G shows it is leading the world in the latest fifth industrial revolution which is not only good for China but also for the entire world. Why must US and some of its Western allies look at China's success in 5G with jaundiced eyes? It is really shameless, illogical and totally wild and mad for US to tell China to stop its 5G development just to give America time to catch up with it.
China is many years ahead of US and its Western allies in 5G development. The 5G system will be fully functional in China from 2019 and in many Asian, European and African countries by between 2020 and 2025.
When USA is unable to compete with China in a level playing field it resorts to using dirty underhand methods to try to stop China's technological advancement. By kidnapping and retaining Meng Wanzhou the Evil Empire thinks it can extort billions of dollars from China under its wild illicit sanctions. So far the Evil Empire has earlier gone away with extorting two billion dollars from another Chinese firm ZTE under the same illicit sanctions.
America has been cheating and swindling the whole world with its control of the PetroDollar. It has weaponized the PetroDollar and using it as a monetary and financial weapon to bully and threaten countries big and small to achieve its political and military aim of world domination and hegemony. With its full control of the PetroDollar the Evil Empire has been able to abusively using sanctions arbitrarily and indiscriminately to extort billions of dollars from other countries. This extreme abuse of using sanctions base on America's nefarious and illicit rules is tantamount to using mafia tactics to arm robbery and arm twisting to force designated victims to pay illicit extortion money.
Moreover US sanctions on Iran is illegal as it is against the decision of the United Nations and has been strongly objected and rejected by Germany, England, France, Italy, Russia, India, Japan and China.
The illegal kidnapping and retention of Huawei's Chief Financial Officer, Meng Wanzhou is a dastardly criminal act which must be strongly denounced and condemned by the whole civilised world. The retention of Meng Wanzhou is clearly part of this shameless America's rogue tactic to browbeat and terrorise the world. Huawei and its Chief Financial Officer , Meng WSanzhou had done nothing wrong or illegal. The rogue Evil Empire must hence quickly release Meng Wanzhou without conditions.
If the USA resorts to commercial and financial terrorism and wrongful and illegal retention of a company's executive officer other countries will not be long to learn the precedent set by America and the Evil Empire will soon find itself in the receiving end.
Southernglory1
Wednesday, 12th December, 2018
The Evil Empire thinks by its desperate criminal act it can hold back China's development of 5G by its international renowned company Huawei. China's success in developing 5G shows it is leading the world in the latest fifth industrial revolution which is not only good for China but also for the entire world. Why must US and some of its Western allies look at China's success in 5G with jaundiced eyes? It is really shameless, illogical and totally wild and mad for US to tell China to stop its 5G development just to give America time to catch up with it.
China is many years ahead of US and its Western allies in 5G development. The 5G system will be fully functional in China from 2019 and in many Asian, European and African countries by between 2020 and 2025.
When USA is unable to compete with China in a level playing field it resorts to using dirty underhand methods to try to stop China's technological advancement. By kidnapping and retaining Meng Wanzhou the Evil Empire thinks it can extort billions of dollars from China under its wild illicit sanctions. So far the Evil Empire has earlier gone away with extorting two billion dollars from another Chinese firm ZTE under the same illicit sanctions.
America has been cheating and swindling the whole world with its control of the PetroDollar. It has weaponized the PetroDollar and using it as a monetary and financial weapon to bully and threaten countries big and small to achieve its political and military aim of world domination and hegemony. With its full control of the PetroDollar the Evil Empire has been able to abusively using sanctions arbitrarily and indiscriminately to extort billions of dollars from other countries. This extreme abuse of using sanctions base on America's nefarious and illicit rules is tantamount to using mafia tactics to arm robbery and arm twisting to force designated victims to pay illicit extortion money.
Moreover US sanctions on Iran is illegal as it is against the decision of the United Nations and has been strongly objected and rejected by Germany, England, France, Italy, Russia, India, Japan and China.
The illegal kidnapping and retention of Huawei's Chief Financial Officer, Meng Wanzhou is a dastardly criminal act which must be strongly denounced and condemned by the whole civilised world. The retention of Meng Wanzhou is clearly part of this shameless America's rogue tactic to browbeat and terrorise the world. Huawei and its Chief Financial Officer , Meng WSanzhou had done nothing wrong or illegal. The rogue Evil Empire must hence quickly release Meng Wanzhou without conditions.
If the USA resorts to commercial and financial terrorism and wrongful and illegal retention of a company's executive officer other countries will not be long to learn the precedent set by America and the Evil Empire will soon find itself in the receiving end.
Southernglory1
Wednesday, 12th December, 2018
Fandi being replaced by foreign coach for the national team
Just a few months into the job Fandi is being replaced yet by another
foreign coach. Has Fandi failed doing what he was supposed to do, raise
the standard of the national football team? I would say yes and no. He
failed because there was little improvement, a kind of more or less the
same situation. No, because with the present team, no wonder coach can
do anything to make them better. Can the new foreign coach do better,
maybe, maybe not? If he is going to keep the same team, nothing will
change.
There is a Chinese saying, change the water without changing the medicine. If the players are the same players, no wonder coach can make them better. Many foreign coaches had come and gone, collecting their fat pay without any improvement. And the administration cannot see anything wrong and also failed to understand what was wrong and keep on changing coaches like changing underwear and expects miracles by a new coach to turn a bunch of mediocre players into world champions. If this could be done, it would have been done long ago. Stupidity is to keep on doing the same and expect something new to happen.
What is wrong with the players, yes, what is wrong with the players, not the coaches? Look back and reflect on the past glorious days of Singapore football and try to see the differences between then and now. Where were the Rajagopals and the Quah Kim Songs? Today we have a homogenous team of wannabe Fandis, even a new generation of Fandis. And they still could not deliver without the Rajagopals and the Quah Kim Songs.
Get the message? Forget about changing the coaches. Put Fandi back and change the players if they want the national team to improve and deliver the results. Picking the right players is more important than training them to play well. Choo Seng Quee picked Fandi from the mob because he was good at talent spotting. You need good coaches with this instinct and skill to pick good players, not players that looked good but cannot deliver.
This is a disease, that anything foreign is good. Pick a foreigner to head an organization and let him pick all the foreigners to replace the Singaporeans. Let him eventually replace all Singaporeans in Singapore with foreigners. How to destroy Singapore or Singaporeans? It is as easy as ABC. Let the foreigners do as he wants, hire as he wants, using Singapore’s money to spend on bringing in more foreigners and paying foreigners in the millions. A bland cheque to hire and hire foreigners.
PS. The Malaysian team was at its best when Towkay Soh Chin Ann was in charge with Santokh Singh in defence.
There is a Chinese saying, change the water without changing the medicine. If the players are the same players, no wonder coach can make them better. Many foreign coaches had come and gone, collecting their fat pay without any improvement. And the administration cannot see anything wrong and also failed to understand what was wrong and keep on changing coaches like changing underwear and expects miracles by a new coach to turn a bunch of mediocre players into world champions. If this could be done, it would have been done long ago. Stupidity is to keep on doing the same and expect something new to happen.
What is wrong with the players, yes, what is wrong with the players, not the coaches? Look back and reflect on the past glorious days of Singapore football and try to see the differences between then and now. Where were the Rajagopals and the Quah Kim Songs? Today we have a homogenous team of wannabe Fandis, even a new generation of Fandis. And they still could not deliver without the Rajagopals and the Quah Kim Songs.
Get the message? Forget about changing the coaches. Put Fandi back and change the players if they want the national team to improve and deliver the results. Picking the right players is more important than training them to play well. Choo Seng Quee picked Fandi from the mob because he was good at talent spotting. You need good coaches with this instinct and skill to pick good players, not players that looked good but cannot deliver.
This is a disease, that anything foreign is good. Pick a foreigner to head an organization and let him pick all the foreigners to replace the Singaporeans. Let him eventually replace all Singaporeans in Singapore with foreigners. How to destroy Singapore or Singaporeans? It is as easy as ABC. Let the foreigners do as he wants, hire as he wants, using Singapore’s money to spend on bringing in more foreigners and paying foreigners in the millions. A bland cheque to hire and hire foreigners.
PS. The Malaysian team was at its best when Towkay Soh Chin Ann was in charge with Santokh Singh in defence.
12/11/2018
What we Cannot Defend Do Not Belong to us.
A Singapore Lesson
Déjà vu 2002. A young Singapore National Service Army Reservist
(NSman) packed his uniforms and military gear into his car, ready to report and
fights the war for which he had been trained for and been on standby for over
15 years earlier. He had hoped that war
will never come; but he remembered Sun
Tzu’s 1st Principle in The Art of War - “Do not assume that the
enemy will not come, but be prepared for his coming”.
2018 last week, 16 years on; the sons of
Singapore’s earlier NSmen braced themselves as they stood their ground for the
potential armed conflicts which none of us actually wanted but prepared for.
In 2002, a Malaysian gunboat had
intruded and dropped anchor in Singapore waters in the vicinity of Pedra Branca
Island where Horsburgh Lighthouse stands.
This unannounced provocative action followed Malaysia’s arbitrary claim
of sovereignty and ownership over the Island and the Lighthouse, which was built
by the British in 1851, without producing any basis for her purported
legitimacy. Singapore
had operated the Horsburgh Lighthouse on the granite island for more than 130
years without protest from its neighbour Malaysia (formerly Malaya), who
actually acknowledged in a 1953 letter
that “Johore (Malaya’s Southernmost
State) does not claim ownership of Pedra Branca”.
For over more than a few days in 2002, the Singapore
Navy encircled the Malaysian gunboat as our elite Commandos secured the
Lighthouse, on the soccer-field size Island, with machine gun positions and
other defensive weapons. The standoff
was tense and intense. Elsewhere, 14 km
away on the Singapore mainland, I had enjoined several thousand other NSmen
readied to be deployed for the Mission which we were operationally-ready and
trained for – to
protect and safeguard the sovereignty of Singapore.
Then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew knew that the Petra
Branca situation should not be allowed to fester and remain. A Malaysian political party had already
called for the invasion and occupation of the Island and Lighthouse. PM Lee ordered the Malaysian gunboat to leave (by
a specified deadline) or “be sunk”! The ultimatum was quickly relayed through
diplomatic channels to Malaysia. To
shorten this narrative, the Malaysian gunboat left long before PM Lee’s
deadline as promptly as its unwelcomed arrival. Everyone knew that PM Lee was a man of action
who meant every word, warning and threat. And sovereign is not a game to ‘play, play’
(in Singlish) or to be trifled with.
“WHAT WE CANNOT DEFEND DO NOT BELONG TO US!” – The Key Lesson.
The dispute over Petra Branca was finally resolved by
the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
at The Hague in 2008. The ICJ recognized
and ruled that Singapore has sovereignty over Petra Branca. Status
update: In February 2017, Malaysia applied to the ICJ to overturn
its 2008 decision, citing new “facts”.
Malaysia subsequently withdrew her application in June 2018, after these
new “facts” were examined and found to be immaterial and irrelevant to support
any review of the 2008 ICJ decision.
Fast-Forward 16 years to October-November 2018. Malaysian
Government vessels, presumably including some armed naval ships, blatantly and
deliberately intruded and violated Singapore Territorial Waters off Tuas on
more than 14 occasions. Like in 2002,
the latest intrusions were not responding to any Singaporean provocations. They followed the 25 October 2018 unilateral Malaysian official declaration to extend
her Johor Port Limits arbitrarily beyond even their 1979 self-declared maritime
boundary into our de facto, longstanding and established Singapore territorial
waters.
The extension of Johor Port Limits makes no economic or rational sense and is a deliberate provocative action since
Johor Port activities had also slowed down and reduced considerably because of the
recessionary Malaysian economy due to domestic
unrests, falling palm oil and petroleum prices. So,
why the need to increase the Johor Port Limits? The 2 Johor Ports of Pasir Gudang and
Tanjung Pelepas also handled less than
9.5 million 20-foot equivalent container units (TEU) compared to Singapore’s 34
million TEU, which is second only to Shanghai’s 40 million TEU. Even
so without the Port volume, Why Extend Them Into Other Country’s Territory?
In fact since 1999 or earlier, all ships of every
nationality, including Malaysia, have recognized and respected Singapore’s
territorial jurisdiction of the violated waters eg regular patrols by the
Singapore Navy and Police Coast Guards, and seeking our permission to enter
them. The shipping community was therefore
baffled and confused by the 11 Nov 2018 Malaysian Port Circular and 22 Nov 2018
Notice to Mariners.
Like in 2002, Singapore protested the Malaysian
intrusions through the usual diplomatic channels, but the provocative
intrusions continued unabated almost daily.
The Singapore Navy intercepted the
Malaysian vessels and warned them to leave our territorial waters.
Singapore declared at a Press Conference on 4 December
2018 that the unilateral and arbitrary extension
of Johore Port Limits “violated Singapore’s sovereignty”. Several Singapore Ministers, all NSmen
themselves, including the Defense Minister, have also publicly warned Malaysia
to “cease and desist” her provocations or face their natural consequences from
the full might of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).
“WHAT BELONGS TO US, WE WILL FIGHT AND DEFEND AT ALL COSTS!”
– The NSmen
Response.
There is no ambiguity in a unified Singaporean response to the latest Malaysian provocations
and violations of Singapore sovereign territory. Even the leading opposition political party in
Parliament, many also NSmen themselves, issued a Press Statement in full
support of
“our men and women in all our security and
enforcement agencies who have been activated to deal with the incursion of
Malaysian vessels into Singapore waters”.
The
Singapore Port Limits are now extended to
the boundaries of our own Territorial waters.
Know that more than 1,000 ships use the Singapore Port on a daily basis.
Last Friday, even after Singapore’s public warnings in
all the news and social media, at least 3 Malaysian ships made further illegal incursions
in violation of our waters. Lucky for
them, they were spared from total annihilation within seconds by our Harpoon Missiles only by the well-disciplined restraint of the Singapore
Navy.
Malaysians and Singaporeans must understand that the
return of Dr Mahathir as Malaysian Prime Minister a few months ago means also
embracing the baggage of Dr M’s past bitterness with Singapore during his first
tenure as
Prime Minister from 1981 to 2003. In
addition to his
own failure in building a better Malaysia, Dr M's personality and feelings
of lower self-esteem and inferiority to former Singapore Prime Minister
Lee Kuan Yew explain his driving motivations when dealing with Singapore. We should not be stupid or foolish enough to
be suck into any war due to someone’s inability to adapt and adjust to his
current surroundings.
In Sun Tzu’s 2nd Principle in The Art of War, he said: “When
the enemy attacks, he must be met (or crushed) with unassailable and invincible
force”. Singapore
wants to be a friend to all countries.
We have always regarded Malaysia to be a close friend and often good neighbor. DO NOT
MAKE US YOUR ENEMY.
Tin pot dictators with tin can brains
The western media are having a field day demonising and discrediting
China and its BRI projects as one that would turn countries into debt
owing to China and in worse case surrendering the projects to China in
the end. It is all China’s fault and it is all China’s scheme of things,
to make these countries in debt?
Is this true? How many countries and their leaders would want to be debt ridden willingly without a gun pointing at their heads and with all the time in the world to use their best men and best brains to negotiate a project to their benefits? China’s BRI projects and infrastructure investments in foreign countries are projects that were negotiated between two willing parties that have seen the goodness of the projects to go ahead. Only sick and idiotic leaders would sign away their national interests to China willingly. The terms and conditions of such projects were carefully negotiated on an equal paper terms.
This is unlike imperialism and colonialism of the West when they came, they saw and they conquered. The locals and natives have no say. The West came and decided what they wanted and took everything they wanted, even enslaving the natives and ruled over them. How is this compare to the present China BRI and infrastructure projects? China bullying the unwilling partners into submission, into debt? How many fools believe in this western myth?
Every leader of an independent country that agreed to participate in the BRI or infrastructure projects went in with their eyes wide open and has carefully thought through before signing on the papers. China can only offer to invest, to build and to finance at terms that are favourable to the other party and the projects must be seen as beneficial to the other parties.
The western poisonous narrative is that these leaders are idiots, cannot think and easily duped by China or simply blind. So they were taken for a ride by China. There are some other possibilities like corrupt leaders that think of their own pockets first and country last. There are also tin pot leaders or dictators with brains made of tin cans, empty and making a lot of noise when rattled. When you have leaders with a tin can brain, can you blame China for failures in the successful management of the projects or failure to finance the projects they wanted and signed with China?
Big infrastructure projects involved big capital commitments and these can only be recoverable over many years or decades. In China, many projects would be loss making initially and would only breakeven over several decades. Not many countries can build huge infrastructure projects and finance them with ready cash. It is like buying a property, it has to be financed over 30 or 50 years. And there are projects that would at best breakeven but their real contributions are in other areas and industries like highways and railroads.
The logic and reasoning of Mahathir over the debt of Malaysia incurred by Najib are simply hogwash. These projects are meant to be long term and financed over the long term. And the benefits are there over the long term, especially the Malacca port that would serve the same purpose as the Gwadar port in Pakistan and Piraeus port in Greece. It benefits Pakistan, Greece and China. Only tin pot leaders would think China or any country would pour in money to build and finance projects that would benefit other countries and not China or themselves. Najib’s big plan could be compromised by the falling oil prices as that was where his money was coming front to finance these projects. Did he have other contingency plans should oil prices fell drastically and unable to finance his projects? Did he over budgeted?
The cancellation of the east coast high speed train would scuttle the reasons for the Malacca port and the huge train manufacturing plant in KL. They are all inter related as part of the BRI. Pulling off one big piece would bring down the whole plan. Tin pot leaders would not be able to understand the complexities of big plans except one at a time. They called this single factor analysis. They cannot grasp anything more than 1 when they have tin cans as brains.
So, is it the fault of China or countries that failed to do their sums right to have joint projects with China in the BRI? Or is it the fault of tin pot brain leaders? Even tin pot leaders would not be stupid enough to willingly sign contracts with China or anyone else that would not benefit their countries, unless their arms are twisted, beholden and a colony or semi colony like Japan and South Korea and several others of the American Empire.
Indonesia and the Philippines are going ahead with multi billion dollar projects with China and clearly know the consequences to avoid a debt trap. This can only happen if they did their sums and financing right. They cannot come back and blame China latter when they mismanaged or done their sums wrongly in the future. At this moment both govts are very happy with the deals with China, fair and square. How else could it be for them to sign if the deals are not favourable to them and did meet their needs and interests?
But the West would be sounding for alarm that these two govts are running themselves into debt traps set by China. Are these govts made of fools?
PS. After the foolish Mahathir cancelled China’s high speed train and other major projects linked to the BRI, Malaysia has gone back to China for help to make Malacca the port of call for China’s merchant fleet and be the centre of the BRI in the region, replacing Singapore. This is after the recent spat with Singapore over the sea dispute. Would China say yes when the other projects that were part of the BRI were cancelled that would make the Malacca port irrelevant, a misfit? Tin can brains and tin can thinking.
Is this true? How many countries and their leaders would want to be debt ridden willingly without a gun pointing at their heads and with all the time in the world to use their best men and best brains to negotiate a project to their benefits? China’s BRI projects and infrastructure investments in foreign countries are projects that were negotiated between two willing parties that have seen the goodness of the projects to go ahead. Only sick and idiotic leaders would sign away their national interests to China willingly. The terms and conditions of such projects were carefully negotiated on an equal paper terms.
This is unlike imperialism and colonialism of the West when they came, they saw and they conquered. The locals and natives have no say. The West came and decided what they wanted and took everything they wanted, even enslaving the natives and ruled over them. How is this compare to the present China BRI and infrastructure projects? China bullying the unwilling partners into submission, into debt? How many fools believe in this western myth?
Every leader of an independent country that agreed to participate in the BRI or infrastructure projects went in with their eyes wide open and has carefully thought through before signing on the papers. China can only offer to invest, to build and to finance at terms that are favourable to the other party and the projects must be seen as beneficial to the other parties.
The western poisonous narrative is that these leaders are idiots, cannot think and easily duped by China or simply blind. So they were taken for a ride by China. There are some other possibilities like corrupt leaders that think of their own pockets first and country last. There are also tin pot leaders or dictators with brains made of tin cans, empty and making a lot of noise when rattled. When you have leaders with a tin can brain, can you blame China for failures in the successful management of the projects or failure to finance the projects they wanted and signed with China?
Big infrastructure projects involved big capital commitments and these can only be recoverable over many years or decades. In China, many projects would be loss making initially and would only breakeven over several decades. Not many countries can build huge infrastructure projects and finance them with ready cash. It is like buying a property, it has to be financed over 30 or 50 years. And there are projects that would at best breakeven but their real contributions are in other areas and industries like highways and railroads.
The logic and reasoning of Mahathir over the debt of Malaysia incurred by Najib are simply hogwash. These projects are meant to be long term and financed over the long term. And the benefits are there over the long term, especially the Malacca port that would serve the same purpose as the Gwadar port in Pakistan and Piraeus port in Greece. It benefits Pakistan, Greece and China. Only tin pot leaders would think China or any country would pour in money to build and finance projects that would benefit other countries and not China or themselves. Najib’s big plan could be compromised by the falling oil prices as that was where his money was coming front to finance these projects. Did he have other contingency plans should oil prices fell drastically and unable to finance his projects? Did he over budgeted?
The cancellation of the east coast high speed train would scuttle the reasons for the Malacca port and the huge train manufacturing plant in KL. They are all inter related as part of the BRI. Pulling off one big piece would bring down the whole plan. Tin pot leaders would not be able to understand the complexities of big plans except one at a time. They called this single factor analysis. They cannot grasp anything more than 1 when they have tin cans as brains.
So, is it the fault of China or countries that failed to do their sums right to have joint projects with China in the BRI? Or is it the fault of tin pot brain leaders? Even tin pot leaders would not be stupid enough to willingly sign contracts with China or anyone else that would not benefit their countries, unless their arms are twisted, beholden and a colony or semi colony like Japan and South Korea and several others of the American Empire.
Indonesia and the Philippines are going ahead with multi billion dollar projects with China and clearly know the consequences to avoid a debt trap. This can only happen if they did their sums and financing right. They cannot come back and blame China latter when they mismanaged or done their sums wrongly in the future. At this moment both govts are very happy with the deals with China, fair and square. How else could it be for them to sign if the deals are not favourable to them and did meet their needs and interests?
But the West would be sounding for alarm that these two govts are running themselves into debt traps set by China. Are these govts made of fools?
PS. After the foolish Mahathir cancelled China’s high speed train and other major projects linked to the BRI, Malaysia has gone back to China for help to make Malacca the port of call for China’s merchant fleet and be the centre of the BRI in the region, replacing Singapore. This is after the recent spat with Singapore over the sea dispute. Would China say yes when the other projects that were part of the BRI were cancelled that would make the Malacca port irrelevant, a misfit? Tin can brains and tin can thinking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)