12/22/2022

Covid19 - A vaccine is not medicine

 Generally we understand what medicine means. If one is having a pain, treat it with pain killer. If one is getting a swelling, treat it with anti inflammation drugs. The medicine is used to treat and cure an illness.

A vaccine is not medicine in this sense. Or is it called preventive medicine in the medical world? A vaccine is not to treat and heal an illness. A vaccine is actually the source of the illness, ie the virus that caused the infection, but inactivated. The injection of the inactivated vaccine is to induce and prepare the body immune system to deal with the live virus. Once the immune system learns the characteristics of the virus and able to produce anti bodies to fight it, the vaccine has done its job, the body is trained and prepared.

A vaccine that cannot prevent an illness is not a vaccine or an ineffective vaccine. A vaccine that is not meant to heal an illness is not a medicine.

The vaccine does not cure or heal the infection, does not make the infection less serious or less deadly. It is the immune system of the body that fights the virus. The effectiveness of the immune system to produce enough and effective antibodies will determine the seriousness of the infection. There are some drugs that were used to treat the infection, but they are not called vaccines.

When a body is infected by the virus, it is in a way more dangerous to inject the vaccine, ie virus, when the body is already filled with the virus. Having another vaccination by injecting more virus or worse, mRNA, to produce more mRNAs would actually increase the load for the body's immune system to deal with.

Once infected, hitting the body with more virus or mRNA is too late, defeats the purpose of vaccines. I am not a doctor and stand corrected. The vaccine should be injected before the infection to let the body's immune system to familiarise with the virus and how to deal with it. Do not expect the vaccine to cure.

Medical professionals, please correct me if I am wrong.

American's mRNA vaccine is still being pushed when the infection cases in the US has hit almost 100 million cases.  And American deaths have hit 1 million cases. So, is this vaccine effective in preventing infection and preventing deaths?  And the Americans are going to sell this vaccine to China to help China to prevent infection? Can you believe this? 1/3 of the American population has already been infected using this mRNA vaccine.  Effective? And still got people believing in this mRNA vaccine and still pushing it as a vaccine.

The pharmas should re position this mRNA as a cure, as a medicine, though what it can cure is also questionable, just like what it can prevent. Its ability or inability to prevent infection is all in the numbers.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

More like paying for placebo.

Good thing about placebo is that it is cheap and harmless, no side effects.

But mRNA?

Virgo49 said...

Wow Good Morning,

Now headline again China New Wave?

They going to demonize China as the Spreader of the Virus Again?

Called Wolves too many times and will backfired.

The United Nations under the Balls of the UAssA will said so again.

And the Hypocrite UAssA told the World that they can help China.

Hello. Clean your arseholes and backyards first.

Channel News America or Amerika kept broadcasting Zelenskky bravado in the UAssA Senate of Liars.

Giving Patriot Missles? Let Russia bombed them to smittens and their Reserves depleted that now North Korea and Russia and China can wipe them out in their own Scrapyards.

Cheers

Virgo49 said...

Should be WHO! Who? Who?

Who the Idiot and lackey of the West.

Anonymous said...

The demonisation of China over its opening up has begun. Already talking about a new variant in the making due to China opening up. Then there are all the usual horseshit about not having enough facilities to cope with the escalating infections. Is that a problem for the West and their MSM to have to handle, to make them hysterical? Holy shit, what is wrong with the West and India included? Anything China does is not the right way. Only their way is right and caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in India, Europe and more than a million in the USA.

The Indian media, WION, even claimed that China's vaccine is fake. If it is fake, how did China keep its death numbers that low. Oh, forget it, as it is no use arguing with them, because they will say China's death numbers are also fake figures. How about India's own death numbers? Not fake figures under Indian accounting standard? At its peak, the deaths were uncountable and never in the books.

Anonymous said...

It cannot prevent. It cannot cure. It literally succeeded in fooling the whole world. It can be injected as many times as they think fit. It makes big money for big Pharma. It is supported by Governments of the coalition of the willing.

Not a medicine. Not a vaccine that works. What is it?

Anonymous said...

https://rumble.com/v20bgby-governor-ron-desantis-hosts-roundtable-with-surgeon-general-dr.-ladapo.html Florida Senator Ron DeSantis Announces Lawsuit Against Vaccine Mandates

Anonymous said...

Come to think of it, with the numbers of infection and death in America, it is hardly any difference from flu. The flu infection and death numbers are likely to be similar.

Also, if the government did not use the mRNA vaccine or forced the Americans to be injected with the vaccine, ie no vaccination using the mRNA, the number of infection and death could be the same.

If the numbers are the same with or without the mRNA vaccine, then the whole pandemic is just a hoax. It is flu in a slightly different form, maybe a little bit more severe which is normal whenever the virus mutated and caused an initial higher infection and death. After a wild, everything becomes normal when the infection becomes less serious, and life goes on, living with the new virus.

Pharma Bro said...

A vaccine that cannot prevent an illness is not a vaccine or an ineffective vaccine. A vaccine that is not meant to heal an illness is not a medicine.

Auncle RB, suggest you consult a doctor or pharmacologist before writing such posts. It is ok to have a layman's understanding, but once you make a sweeping statement based on that understanding, then you go onto a slippery slope to reach wrong conclusions.

Anonymous said...

Do you understand what Uncle RB was saying?

Anonymous said...

https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article242639465/Wolfgang-Kubicki-fordert-Obduktionen-von-kurz-nach-Covid-Impfung-

Google Translate from German:

Kubicki calls for autopsies of those who died shortly after the Covid vaccination

Published on 12/13/2022 | Reading time: 2 minutes

In an interview with WELT, the Heidelberg pathologist Peter Schirmacher called for more political commitment with regard to research into vaccine side effects. Bundestag Vice President Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) is now campaigning for significantly more autopsies. The Union also wants more commitment.

Bundestags Vice President Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) calls for more intensive work on possible damage caused by the Covid vaccinations. "I think it is essential that every unexplained death that occurs within 14 days after a vaccination is automatically registered as a suspected case with the Paul Ehrlich Institute. This is obviously not the case yet," he told WELT.

In doing so, Kubicki referred to a recently published study by Peter Schirmacher, chief pathologist at the Heidelberg University Clinic . Schirmacher and his team found out that in 30 percent of the people they examined who died shortly after the vaccination, that vaccination was the cause of death.

"We are talking about a relevant number that makes it necessary to approach this problem systematically," said Kubicki now WELT. According to the FDP politician, the health authorities should “regularly” carry out autopsies on all people who died within two weeks of the vaccination: “That also makes sense because the conditional approval of these vaccines took place under enormous time pressure Has."

Tino Sorge (CDU), health policy spokesman for the Union faction in the Bundestag, told WELT: "Two years after the first corona vaccination, it is high time for a more open approach to vaccination side effects and vaccination damage." related to a corona vaccination. "The study (by Peter Schirmacher d. Red.) is worrying - also because it shows how little we know about the risks of the vaccines even after two years."

According to the CDU politician, research and data collection must now be pushed ahead at full speed: there is still a lack of reliable and meaningful data. The findings are of the utmost importance for the benefit-risk assessment. To this end, the PEI should be strengthened, data finally better used and reporting procedures considerably simplified.”

In an interview with WELT published on Monday, the pathologist Schirmacher called for more research to be carried out on the subject of vaccine damage. "There are important unanswered questions that should be clarified either through comprehensive registration of all undesirable effects or as part of further research in the sense of vaccination improvement, vaccination indication and civil protection," says Schirmacher: "Are there any genetic factors or certain previous illnesses - for example Autoimmune diseases - that predispose to severe vaccination consequences?

Vaccination consequences are vaccine-dependent - but which characteristics and components of the vaccine determine this? Do certain types of application play a role?”

For example, there are hypotheses that an unintentional vascular injection could also play a role in serious vaccination side effects, such as myocarditis. Investigations such as those in Heidelberg are only "the beginning", says Schirmacher. He described the current Covid vaccination recommendation as “too broad