The Angsanas are well known as instant trees in the island.
They are planted everywhere as stop gap measures when instant trees are needed.
They have good foliage and provide good shade under the hot sun. Superficially
they looked good too. But they also snapped or get uprooted quite easily under
strong wings. Maybe it is their nature, or maybe they are just instant trees
with shallow roots. Unlike the hardy local trees that could withstand strong
winds with their deep roots, the Angsanas would always be Angsanas. They will
snap or get uprooted.
What is disturbing is a piece of news this morning about two
old schools, Griffiths and Qiaonan, that have to make way for Angsana. The two
schools with a combined history of 145 years, with many histories and old boys
and girls who were proud to be students of the schools, would have their
memories wiped clean, all because someone decided that Angsana should replaced
them as the name for the new school, but devoid of any history except the fame
instant tree image.
Why would the decision makers choose to have something new
and nothing exceptional to replace our heritage? And why would the MOE and the
Singapore Heirtage Board allowed it to happen? Aren’t they the public
institutions and guardians that believed in our history and heritage? Are these
people obsessed with the Angsanas? Or is there a message that they are sending
out, Angsanas are good and should replace the locals?
The old boys and girls and teachers are all perplexed. They
have all the good reasons to want to preserve the names of the two schools. They
protested. Why would they want to replace the names of their schools with
something like Angsanas? It reminds me of the fetish fad of replacing the PMEs
with their wealth of experience with unknown elements from overseas.
There are a lot of sentiments involved. This is our history.
This is very sad. Our past and memories are wiped out, no more, by this naïve
and simplistic decision. The old boys and girls just want something to remember,
their past, the times they spent in the schools, their alma maters. Why can’t
the new school be called Qiaonan Griffiths to give it some history and a link
to its past golden days? Qiaonan and Griffiths anytime sound better than this
thing called Angsana. And one of the criteria of the Schools Naming Committee
is whether the name resonates with the community? You mean Angsana resonates
with the community better than Qiaonan and Griffiths?
And this Angsana Primary
School is supposed to build on the histories of
Qiaonan and Griffiths! What have they been smoking? Maybe Angsana resonates
with the national policies of bringing more instant citizens into the country.
Every Angsana, every instant tree, is a treasure, a talent, better than the
locals or the Qiaonans and the Griffiths. It is better to do away with Qiaonan
and Griffiths and glorify the new future of Angsanas.
Kopi Level - Yellow
28 comments:
"There are a lot of sentiments involved. This is our history. This is very sad. Our past and memories are wiped out, no more, by this naïve and simplistic decision."
And this is the point that daft Sinkies never understand.
Yes - "This is our history"
But this is not PAPigs' history right?
"Our past and memories are wiped out"
So?
Why would a PAPig care?
PAPigs do not share our past and our memories.
Voting for a PAPig to represent Singaporeans in parliament.
How can it possibly end well?
Have PAPigs ever shown by their actions that they share our Singaporean values and culture?
No mother will want her children to be enrolled into a school with such a name. Sounds like a school in a cemetery.
Next, don't be surprised if they change Raffles Institution to LKY Institution!
The boys and girls in charge would be most comfortable with names like Transformers or Optimus Prime.
CCS said in SundayTimes of today's edition. Forget about our past. The generations that built Singapore and all and the pioneer who served in the armed services are all past and out.
Now the way forward is the new inflow of talented foreigners who are the ones true singaporeans in the new century.
So Angsanas better in the sense sounds like ang mohs. Whites, we are whites.
Need more Angsanas ang mohs to spray paint our trains. They are more robust, cosmopolitan, daring and think out if the trains.
What do you think???
By the way, I be with KBW's safe GRC to be the next seat warming Acting PM before LHL'S beloved son is back to have the seat
Does Singapore belong to Singaporean citizens or PAP citizens?
I think Angkanas sounds more interesting.
People who ignore their past will lose their bearings and becoming like nomads, live aimlessly and very happy to turn the country into a hotel.
These are very dangerous people, 'pai jia zi' or 'puah kay kia'.
Sin City is often confused with a democracy. Nothing can be further from da truth mein fuhrer.
"Every Angsana, every instant tree, is a treasure, a talent, better than the locals or the Qiaonans and the Griffiths."
RB
Of course lah. There must be good reasons why the locals, the Qiaonans and the Griffiths allow themselves to be replaced by Angsanas, tio bo?
Maybe for the same and more good reasons why majority Sinkies allow themselves to be ruled by PAP.
There must also be good reasons why Sinkies choose Teochew Ah Hia party, and not Aung Juan Soon Chee party, to be the only opposition party elected into Parliament.
Please lah.Its others properties so leave it to them to name whatever they want lah.
Many Sinkies even allow their children or grandchildren to names themselves with angmo names and even name their babies before they are born with angmo names.What does Tan Ah Seng got to do with Angmo?No one seems to bother.
Where is their pride?
Why kaypo on how others name their properties when one himselves fail to stop his children from having angmo names.
How many here dare to say their children or grandchildren dun name themselves Richard ,Reuben or Sylvia etc?
Be like me .Proud of my name.
Goh Ah Gong
Goh Ah Gong or Tew Nah Seng.
What's the difference?
What's in a name anyway?
Regardless of name, Pigs are always pigs.
Ya no need to waste time with gong kia. gong gong jiat ti kong.
So many MPs are not true blue locals lah. Vote for angsana and thus the people get angsana.
Ahgongkia 扮猪吃老虎。
He no gong gong chiak ti kong.
All Pappies are good at pretending.
This pappy no different. kay si, kay gong.
@anon3.52,4.50,5.50,6.26pm.
Gonggong chiak Thee kong.
Thee kong thia gong larng.
Thee kong giving me 3 million soon thru toto.
Will Sinkie give me 3 dollar if i anyhow lanngar and end up no money eat?
:-)
I think you have used the wrong 'examples' in the tree analogy. Angsanas (Dterocarpus indicus)are hardy and stand their ground, unlike instant rain trees (formerly Samanea saman, now Albizia saman).
Those angsanas on the Padang were diseased and had to be replaced with rain trees. Even then, the rain trees are dying in the Padang.
There is one 90-year old angsana tree in the compound of the St Joseph's Church in Victoria St.
red bean
can you write a post on the current taipei mayor election, it is ver interesting in the following manner
a. we need a opposition unity
b. a third force from civil society
c. a high handed government and a un-equal society
d. you cannot be either love pap and wp
e. finally is it possible to a ge by election strategy
again
Peppa Pig is a loveable, cheeky little piggy who lives with her little brother George, Mummy Pig and Daddy Pig.
Peppa's favourite things include playing games, dressing up, days out and jumping in muddy puddles. Her adventures always end happily with loud snorts of laughter. Every one in Peppa Pig's world is deliriously happy for the hugh amount of money they are paid by tax payers of the land.
@ losing sleep over a fucking name RB:
Please lah Tambi, too much toddy you are drinking dah.
Vy so much noise you are making? Only a name da. A cha, you are making like Bollywood action movie fighting da, like Tambi fighting in Serangoon Road after togok. Better go Mustapha drink kopi da, then go Desker chod puchee!
Eh kongkek, who cares about a name? The issue is the heritage of two schools gone for a silly name change. All the old boys and girls are like homeless flotsams when there is no need to.
What is so fucking great about angsana to be given the honour of a school name? Why destroy Qiaonan and Griffiths? What is the rationale or agenda?
If there is nothing in a stupid name, prove it.
Change Raffles Institution name to "Papaya Institution"
If the name is Matilah Singapura, who cares?
Hi anon 8:22, not familiar with the Taiwan election. Unable to comment.
A friend from Singapore just sent me this article. Although Sydney is now my place of residence, I still hold fond memories of the many great years I spent at Griffiths Primary School. I still keep in touch with some of my classmates who went to Griffiths with me more than 60 years ago. It is sad ... very sad and I wonder if elite schools like Raffles and Catholic High, SCG etc will soon be renamed "Bunga Raya" or "Tembusu" or "Yellow Flame" or "Raintree" or "Saga"? I doubt.
A friend from Singapore just sent me this article. Although Sydney is now my place of residence, I still hold fond memories of the many great years I spent at Griffiths Primary School. I still keep in touch with some of my classmates who went to Griffiths with me more than 60 years ago. It is sad ... very sad and I wonder if elite schools like Raffles and Catholic High, SCG etc will soon be renamed "Bunga Raya" or "Tembusu" or "Yellow Flame" or "Raintree" or "Saga"? I doubt.
Matilah Singapura will be a National Slogan soon.
Thanks the Man for it and reward him
with tiger and tigress
Post a Comment