United States 14161
Singapore 14069
United Kingdom 1905
France 1784
Germany 1523
Australia 779
Turkey 778
Poland 489
Malaysia 419
Russia 222
Weekly page views of mysingaporenews. The US has overtaken Singapore with the most viewerships of mysingaporenews blog. It has 14,161 weekly pageviews against Singapore’s 14069. Third is the UK and followed closely by France and Germany. Quite an achievement for a small little blog of Singaporean bloggers.
Well done guys. You are international.
Redbean
4/01/2013
Programming how Asians think
The West, with its monopoly of English language media and the English literate feeding on it, has been very successful in programming how Asians think. MacDonald, of junk food status, is a fad in many Asian countries, simply by repeatedly telling the Asians how cool it is to eat at MacDonald. But this is merely commercial advertisement.
More serious and deadly, and insulting, is the programming of Asians to hate another country, particularly Iran and North Korea as part of the Axis of Evil. China used to be the number One target, including Myanmar. Today it is all Iran and North Korea.
The daily provocations by the Americans and South Koreans against the North Koreans are turned around to condemn the North Koreans as the provocative one. Major war games simulating a landing and invasion of North Korea on the borders of that country, flying stealth bombers that are nuclear capable, and now stealth fighters in the Korean peninsula were claimed to be normal acts and non aggressive. From the North Korean’s point of view, these are intense and aggravated acts of provocation and acts of hostility.
Then there is this constant barrage of western articles repeating western dismissive fantasies against the North Koreans being written and published almost daily to paint the North Koreans as mad, insane and unpredictable and war like people. Another article appeared in the ST today that said nothing new or good about the North Koreans but with the purpose of reinforcing the message that the West have been painting about North Korea for the innocent and unthinking Asians to read and to sink into their subconscious mind. North Korea is bad, North Koreans are mad…. The repetition of such a one sided distorted message, over time, will programme the Asians to utter without thinking, to regurgitate what the West want them to think and say about North Korea. And many Asian media are accomplices to this act, blindly aiding the West to make fellow Asians think stupid, Asians to hate Asians because the West wants them to do so.
How then could so many Asians hating the North Koreans without knowing who they are and have had nothing to do with them?
Xenophobia a badge of honour?
When one scans the social media today, there is an unmistaken trend developing, a trend that no one could foresee will ever happen in this migrant society, open and international. We are a very open society and people, very cosmopolitan and liberal, some even called themselves international citizens. How could there be a rise of xenophobia or racism? Some angry Singaporeans are claiming that it is a right to be xenophobic, to be racist in a way, against the intrusion of so many foreigners in their midst. On the other hand, the Govt is planning to have more foreigners to reduce the citizen core to 40% in order to strengthen the core. Believe it? I cannot understand the logic when the people are showing their objection openly. So I must be daft.
Singaporeans are familiar with the annotation of CMIO or Chinese, Malay, Indian and Others as the official racial groups of the island. Everyone is one of these four different racial groupings. How then can Singaporeans be racist when they have embraced different races as one of them and living in harmony for years, the envy of many countries? Racial conflicts or riots are things of the past.
Is it racism or xenophobia, is it nationalism or patriotism, or is it simply about the rights and privileges of being citizens, being owners of this island? The rising anger and trend got to do with a little of each and a combination of all. What is the root cause of this ugly development? Many books can be written by the sociologists or political scientists but I will try to put them simply in one sentence and leaving all the big theoretical jargons to the academics. The problem of xenophobia is due to the Govt’s thoughtless policy of flooding the island with foreigners to compete with the citizens for good jobs, housing, cars, schools, facilities, space and a seat in the train.
There are just too many foreigners around and competing with the citizens in many unfair ways with citizens being displaced from top and middle management jobs, being priced out of good housing, being deprived of car ownership, compromising the good life they used to have. The latest revelation that foreigners are ganging up to discriminate and victimise citizens in employment and work place is just about the last thing that the citizens can stomach. There is anger and more anger against foreigners. And the foreigners did not help but add to the burning fire with callous behaviour and talking down on the locals.
In the face of such gross infringement of foreigners everywhere, with the local citizens calling themselves true blue and bred Singaporeans feeling the pressure, the Govt’s White Paper of increasing the population further by bringing in more foreigners was just the breaking point. The rage is unrestrained among the more vocal citizens. The Govt is seen as uncaring and aloof, totally disconnected from the feelings of the common Singaporeans. It is like two persons in the same bed but having different dreams, going separate ways.
How is the Govt going to contain this anger of the people? Or is the Govt going to do something positive to appease the unhappiness of the people? If the Govt fails to rein in the growing anti foreigner tension, the social fabric is up for a bitter test in tolerance. The main media, like the Govt, is telling the angry citizens to be more tolerant of foreigners. Would the affected Singaporeans listen and be swayed? T shirts are being printed to ‘down with the 6.9m population’ and a May Day protest is on the way. Would Singaporeans end up wearing the racist badge as an honour to defend their basic interests as citizens of this island? A point to note is that much of the anger is actually directed at the Govt for its pro foreigner policies and not directly at foreigners per se.
Spend more to win election
On 28 Mar, the ST ran an article ‘Lee Li Lian is by election’s top spender’. It was reported that she spent $65,227 against Koh Poh Koon’s $62,991. The details of what is included in these numbers and what are not would be another area of contention. And she held three rallies instead of the latter’s two. No wonder she won the by election. She must have worked harder and willing to spend more money, altogether $2,236 more than Koh. And her votes won were 16,045 while Koh got 12,875.
Just analysing the statistics will simply say that spending more and working harder is the formula for success. Can we expect all the political parties to be spending more and working harder in the next GE? I think many parties would have problem achieving both as they may be able to work harder, but many would not have the money to do so. Fortunately Li Lian was able to come up with more money on the table. This is quite strange as the PAP was never short of money. Or is it that they thought spending nearly $63k would be hard to beat as the WP, being a workers’ party, would not be able to match the rich elitist party with many millionaires and multi millionaires in their ranks.
This must be WP’s secret weapon, got plenty of money to campaign for election, and must be a big surprise to the PAP. Maybe it was because it was only a by election and its resources were focused on one event. If the WP would to contest in a GE then they may not have enough money to spread around. Fielding so many candidates and running so many rallies would be very very costly. No wonder in GE the PAP always sure win.
If the PAP thinks that the WP only got enough money for a by election by putting all in, then it should not present much problem with $63k per candidate in the GE. With 87 seats, this will cost the PAP at least $5.5m on the average to fight the next GE. If the WP were to contest half the seats, it will be 43 x $65k or $2.8m. Can the WP afford this kind of money?
What if both want to up the stake by adding another $10k or so per candidate, it will be very much more to put on the table. The rest of the smaller parties would have to think twice whether to follow or to fold their cards. Very likely they would only be able to do well by concentrating their limited resources to a few candidates. Winning an election definitely cost money and the stake is getting higher and higher. Do not rule out higher deposits for the candidates.
The higher cost of fielding a candidate is expected as the rewards are also quite handsome. For $63k to $65k, the return at $16k per month for 5 years is $960k, quite close to a million. And then there is the big bonus of becoming an office holder, with a top prize of several millions annually. Spending $60+k is really cheap when compare to the returns. Not a bad investment looking at the odds and the monetary winnings.
3/31/2013
We are hitting 5.5m soon
'Theweek.com, 30
Mar 2013
Singapore
Population: 5,460,302
GDP: $326.7 billion
Tax incentives: Tax rates that max out at 20 percent and no capital gains taxes, according to Reuters.
Foreign cash: Reuters reported that estimates put "the amount of German money moving to Singapore in the double-digit billions," forcing the German government to step in and negotiate more transparent banking standards....'
Singapore
Population: 5,460,302
GDP: $326.7 billion
Tax incentives: Tax rates that max out at 20 percent and no capital gains taxes, according to Reuters.
Foreign cash: Reuters reported that estimates put "the amount of German money moving to Singapore in the double-digit billions," forcing the German government to step in and negotiate more transparent banking standards....'
These are the introductory paragraphs of an article from
Theweek.com dated 30 Mar 2013.
Does anyone notice the population of Singapore
is now 5.460,302 and not 5.3m? Our population has gone up by another 160,000
from the often cited 5.3m.
I believe Theweek must have quoted from a reliable
source. It takes less than 40,000 and we
will be 5.5m. The rate of growth is frightening despite our below replacement
rate of fertility rate. What is happening? Would the population be 5.5m by May
Day?
Paintings of Gods
This is a series of mysterious paintings from my rar art collection. Every one of these paintings is created by Mother Nature. I have enough of such paintings in many different series that can fill up an art gallery in every major city.
The Big Thing in Sin City
In this small little island of millionaires, everything is
big. Even a small little nimrod will think very big and imagining that it is
the most desirable big thing and women will beg to have it in their mouths. I
think we are going to be the biggest customers of the US
in the purchase of the most sophisticated aircraft of the future. It is flying
but will only be ready in the future as it is not flying right yet. The thing
big about this aircraft is the price tag.
I just read an advert that someone paid $147k for a Porsche
911. The Sinkies are so rich that they would not want to buy anything on the cheap.
They would pay for a piece of worthless paper called COE for $100k to give them
the privilege to plonk down another half a million for the same car. Why would
they do that, I dunno. It must be a dignity thing. Things must have a big price
tag to be good. Oh, they just raise the tuition fees for universities and
polytechnics to make them better. The more expensive the better the quality.
Yes, the Big Thing in Sin
City is the price tag. Everything
has to be priced big to be good and saleable. A public housing flat with a 99
year lease, very likely less than 90 or 80 years left, was selling like hot
cakes at $1m or more. And the millionaire Sinkies, I supposed, would
congratulate themselves for such a good buy. The guy who bought the Porsche
would probably get 2 or 3 landed freehold properties for the same price of one
public housing flat. Across the Causeway one could buy several landed
properties too, for that price tag.
And many will save a life time for that final visit to the
hospital to empty their life savings. It must be a final charitable act, to
donate everything to the hospitals and to tip the staff for the good service,
or is it the hospital price tag?
And the citizens are so generous that they are happily
paying their political leaders millions to keep them from corruption. Of course
the leaders are the most dignified and talented people on earth, or at least in
the island. Their forte is to learn from other countries, what other people are
doing before applying what they learnt to the island. And if they failed to
learn anything, they will pay for expert consultants to do the job. Or they may
even ask the people, the ordinary men in the street for answers. The price tag
for the ministers is not only big, but very big. Obama would have faint if the Americans
decide to pay him half the amount being paid to his counterpart here.
Paying big, buying big, getting big pay are the norms here.
The thought of how much to pay for the things we paid here can drive many
people elsewhere crazy. Imagine how many life times will one need to earn a
$100k in many countries. Here it is only good enough to buy a certificate only
to be entitled to buy a car with a bigger price tag.
That is how big our money has become.
When meritocracy is stupidity
The problem of highly qualified Singaporeans unable to find
employment is not only serious but politically unacceptable to a Govt that has
responsibility to its people first and foremost. Silly politicians that keep
harping blindly on meritocracy need to be voted out from Parliament.
Meritocracy and the practice of meritocracy as a country are very different and
complex from practising meritocracy in a well of frogs. In the well, the frogs
are safe from intruders and have only among themselves to see who is more
meritocratic. In the land of the blind the one eye frog shines.
Singapore
only has a population of 3.3m, citizens and PRs. An open door policy to invite
foreigners here to work, with only meritocracy as the criteria, is simply
insane, stupidity at its peak. There are 6 or 7 billion people out there and if
being more talented, or merits, is justification to work here, to replace
another Singaporean, the whole 3.3m people should be replaced, from the
President and PM and to the low down beggars on the street. Sure you can find
millions of people out there that are more meritocratic than a Singaporean or
the PM.
Just because the frogs in the well are protected from
competition, they can throw the meritocracy card at everyone, not good enough
get out, there is always a better foreigner to replace another Singaporean. Why
don’t the frogs allow fair competition and let the more meritocratic foreigners
to replace them? Never, they know too well that there will be many many out
there that will be better than them, every one of them.
In practice, many jobs can be done by a Singaporean. The
education and skill level of many Singaporeans are more than adequate to do the
job. You don’t need someone with 3 degrees or a master’s to be a middle
executive doing administrative work. You don’t need to drive a sports car to
get from point A to B when any good decent car will do. It is a fallacy to pick
the best when the best is ten times over qualified for the job that a
Singaporean is qualified to do? Does this sound complicated?
Who are we kidding, that Singaporeans are not good enough to
fill all the middle management positions with the qualifications they got from
our world class education system and universities? Who are we kidding when many
are employed instead of Singaporeans for all the wrong reasons except being
meritocratic?
The nonsense that is happening in the employment scene must
be made right and it is the duty and responsibility of the Govt to put it
right. It is the Gov’t’s thoughtless policy of opening the door widely to
foreigners with little due consideration to the employment needs of the
citizens that is the problem. Meritocracy without due recognition to country
and citizenship is simply crazy, madness, and idiocy. The whole population
should be moved out and replaced by more meritocratic people from all over the
world. Yah?
3/30/2013
Advertisements are news too
For Singaporeans who have been away for too long, migrated
or simply working overseas, the reading of advertisements in the blog is also
keeping in touch with home. The types of advertisements, the jobs available,
the qualifications needed, the salary offered, the type of companies placing
the adverts, tell a lot about the happenings in the country.
This is also applicable to foreigners who want to have a
feel of the social and economic developments taking place in the country. The
advertisements tell a lot of what is happening here, particularly the job
opportunities and income level of the people, the quality of life and the
vibrancy of the economy.
There are more things to see and understand from just
flipping through the advertisements other than jobs or entertainments or food
etc etc. You will be surprised how much information can be deduced from just
reading the advertisements. So when there are no fresh postings, take a peep
into the adverts.
Chinua Achebe - A tribute to a Nigerian nationalist and hero
He was a gentle rebel who refused to shake the necrotic
outstretched hands of corrupt leaders.
He was an old breed, a wise man from a different generation who could
not stand the wanton looting of Nigeria’s
public coffers.
Achebe would have loved to spend his twilight years among
his own people instead of in America. With the bastardisation of a nation he was
once proud of by kleptocratic military and civilian rulers, the old man had no
country to return to alive.’
The above quote is by a Victor Ehikhamenor in his article on
his Nigerian hero and nationalist, Chinua Achebe. The article is reproduced
from the New York Times in the ST today.
Reading the article allows me to reflect on the situation in Singapore
and I conclude how lucky Singaporeans are for not having the kind of leaders
the Nigerians were blessed with. Our leaders don’t eat their meals atop a heap
of malodorous rubbish for sure. And Singaporeans are definitely not selling
their birth rights away as they are not that hungry. And our nation was not
bastardised by kleptocratic military and civilian rulers and looting the public
coffers.
Thank God we are Singaporeans and we need not have to run
away to live out the twilight years in America.
Singaporeans better be grateful.
Why are Sinkies so sick and shameless?
‘Honestly, how are we the natives expected to react? Smile and behave happily and accept things as they are.
I was in Perth on holiday and my wife was stunned when a white lady ticked her off at a supermarket queue for no reason. She just doesn’t like us I supposed and was mumbling some rascist remarks starring hard at us. I can assure you she is not mad. In Paris in a lift, I witnessed a well dressed white lady yelling at a meek Asian woman asking her to pack off and go back to where she comes from. I can assure you she doesn’t look mad either. What do you make out of these situations?
I guess it is the sense, the feeling of being displaced and having your place taken over that led people to behave this way.’
You notice that he addressed those racist pigs as ladies and their Asian victim as woman. What was so ladylike about those racist bitches to be called ladies? And what was so unlady like for the Asian woman not to be called a lady but just a woman? Too use to call them sir and ma’am and ladies and gentlemen, and too use to be called just man and woman?
This kind of inferior mentality has been subplanted in the mediocre Asian mind that it has become habitual, second nature. Yes Sir, Yes ma’am, but turn around and shout at the Asian women like inferior stocks. If Asians are not going to respect themselves but the West, they deserve to be treated like shit. And if Sinkies could not stand up to foreigners and allow foreigners to ill treat them or discriminate against them in their own country, they deserve it, every little bit of it.
The Europeans are xenophobic for ages. They conquered, robbed and killed the coloured races all over the world and are still stinkingly racists like the examples given. Of course they claimed that the racist bitches are a minority, and they are exceptions. Xenophobia is not a Singaporean thing. And I find it ludicrous for a Tessa Wong to write in the ST today calling for restraints against Singaporeans becoming xenophobic. And Singapore for Singaporeans slogan is xenophobic? Who taught her that?
Xenophobia is practised by foreigners in the work place in Singapore against Singaporeans. Does she know this? If not, go ask Tan Chuan Jin or read the parliamentary reports. The most important issue today is to get rid of xenophobia against Singaporeans in Singapore. The Govt has a duty and responsibility to Singaporeans to stamp this outrageous behaviour out immediately and ‘burn a few on the stakes’. I put this phrase in inverted commas so that no donkeys will take it literally and think it is a call to burn people. It is just an figurative expression ok?
If the govt fails in doing so, and xenophobia continues against Singaporeans and silly Sinkies still think it is the fault of Singaporeans, the anti foreigners cry will get stronger and may get nasty. It is time to nip the problem in the bud by kicking a few foreign butts to mean business. Singapore is for Singaporeans first. There is nothing xenophobic or shameful to say this. There is nothing to be apologetic about it. Or shall we call female Sinkies ‘woman’ and foreign women ‘ladies’ to be respectful and less xenophobic?
3/29/2013
US flying B2s over Korea
Those of you who know what B2s are capable of doing will behave exactly as the North Koreans. These are stealth bombers with the capabilities of sneaking through radar surveillance and defence system, and to drop nuclear bombs on the enemy, in this case, North Korea. By flying over South Korea, a change of heading will see them over North Korean in minutes and there is not way to defend before they drop their nuclear bombs. The Americans denied that they were nuclear armed. Who in his right mind will believe the Americans? As for the North Koreans, a mistake is all it takes to see their country going up in smokes.
The flying of B2 over the Korean peninsula is not only
provocative but a hostile act. The North Koreans should declare a no fly zone
and any B2 crossing that line, which can be 200 km inside South
Korea is an act of war and will be shot
down. That is a reasonable thing to do in the defense of their country.
The Cuban crisis was caused by the Soviet Union
trying to station some nuclear tipped missiles in Cuba
which put the missiles within range of the US
mainland. The US
took that as an act of war, cordoned off the access by sea and air of Russian
ships and aircraft into Cuba
and demanded the removal of the missiles or war.
When asked if the flying of the B2s over the Korean
peninsula was a provocative act, the US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel acted so
innocent and replied that it was a normal thing that countries did to defend
their homeland. No, no, they did nothing unusual. He did not see it as
provocative. And as usual, the western jokers were claiming that the North
Koreans were fetish with their power and wanted to hold the world hostage. They
are totally blind to the provocations by the Americans and the South Koreans,
and condemning the North Koreans as irrational people when the warmongers were
the Americans.
The fact and truth, the North and South Koreans may not be
on too friendly terms, but they were trying to cooperate and live as good
neighbours. It was the continuous provocative acts of the US
in connivance with the South Koreans to conduct war games simulating an
invasion of North Korea
at the Korean borders that raised tension. And now the US
provocatively and threateningly flew the nuclear capable B2 in the peninsula
and claimed that it was an innocent act.
Even an Australian professor could not resist commenting
that such an act was definitely provocative. How about the Russians and the
Chinese flying their nuclear capable bombers along the western coasts of the
American homeland and see how the Americans would squeal their heads off that
such an act is hostile? It is a case of the Americans can go provoking everyone
and is ok but others cannot do so, it’s not okay.
The Americans are trying their best to raise tension in Asia
and in the Korean peninsula in particular, to keep the two Koreans at war to be
used as justification for the stationing of American troops in the Korean
peninsula and also in Japan.
The real losers are the stupid Koreans, being manipulated by the Americans and
Japanese to be at each other’s throat, and the hordes of unthinking Asians
accusing the North Koreans of being provocative and the bad guy. The real
winners are the Americans and the Japanese. The real losers, other than the two
Koreans, are the rest of Asia.
Kim Jung Un has signed an order authorising the firing of missiles on American targets in Korea, Japan, Guam and even the American mainland. And the Americans are worried of a misjudgement and the missiles unleashed. If it does happen, the Americans and the South Koreans have only themselves to blame. They have been the provocateurs of rising tension in the Korean Peninsula. They created it and asked for it.
Kim Jung Un has signed an order authorising the firing of missiles on American targets in Korea, Japan, Guam and even the American mainland. And the Americans are worried of a misjudgement and the missiles unleashed. If it does happen, the Americans and the South Koreans have only themselves to blame. They have been the provocateurs of rising tension in the Korean Peninsula. They created it and asked for it.
What is so frightening about the White Paper
The
indigestion caused by the White Paper is there for all to see. No to 6.9m
population, no to bigger population. Is this so difficult to understand or can
be plainly ignored by the Govt? The Paper was whitewashed by the Govt that has
absolute majority in Parliament. A vote for such a Paper is really a non issue
and to claim that it has been read, debated and passed by Parliament, I really
dunno what to say.
Given
the shocking opposition by an erstwhile docile people, with various polls
conducted officially or unofficially, the Govt is still in a state of denial,
that the people will agree and support the Paper if they have read the details
in the Paper. Isn’t this dangerous?
What
is more frightening is that many on the side of the Govt are saying, it is only
a matter of communication. If the Govt could have communicated better,
explained to the people better, there would be no issue. The people will go
with the Govt. Really ah?
Such
thinking is really lame. It thinks that the people are so dense and could not
understand the implications and consequences of dense population. It also reassures the Govt that actually the
people are just angry for the wrong reasons, nothing to bother about. The people
will get over it in time, will come to their senses. The Govt is always right. Or it is only 4,000 or 5000 people that are
not happy, never mind. The majority of the people will eventually agree to it,
and if better communicated.
Is
this frightening, or something else? What if the 4,000 people become 10,000,
20,000 and then more and more? Would it make any difference?
Raising children is a losing economic proposition
The
cost of raising children here is easily half a million by the time the child
graduated from university, and that is a local university. A foreign university
could add a couple of hundred thousands more, depending on the type of courses
and which country he went to. Just talk economics, as a digit in the GDP number
game, the returns must be profitable for the whole process, minus all the
emotional and other considerations.
For
an outlay of half a million, the child must at least bring in an income of the
same amount just to break even. Then include the cost he/she would need to
incur, excluding his personal expenses to keep him alive, say housing and car,
both items would cost him easily two to three millions more. Simply, the child
must bring in an income of $2 ½ or $3 million to make the whole effort
worthwhile.
Assuming a productive life is 30 years and additional work years are for retirement
expenses, one would need an income of $100k on the average. Anyone earning less
than this amount is a losing proposition, a losing investment. And not having a
child, a couple could save a million or two for their own. Would that be a
better option than to bring up a child or two? If one just thinks economic, the
answer is obvious.
3/28/2013
Kishore Mahbubani - Asia West divide disappearing
In his latest book, Kishore is saying that the Asia West divide, or the poor Asia and rich West divide is diminishing with more Asians joining the ranks of middle class. The dominance of the West will fade and they will have to accept the rise of the East to meet somewhere in the middle, a convergence of sort, so he said.
During a launch of his book in Shangri La he took questions on his book. One question stood out and deemed important enough to be quoted in the ST. NUS Law Dean, Simon Chesterman, wondered why Kishore ‘seemed’ to be ‘too soft’ on the East but ‘approriately harsh’ on the West’s foibles. It was a common and accepted position that it should be the other way. And I like Kishore’s reply. ‘That’s because there is still no level playing field,… and unless you get into the West’s face, you will not be heard.’
The question and the answer told a lot about the biases of the two men, one basically a westerner who still sees the world with the West as the dominant partner and another wanting to tell the West that this cannot be anymore. The West has been talking down to the Asians, lecturing them with their biased version of the truth or what is reality. If you read what is being churned out by the western media, you cannot get away from this simplistic mindset that the Asians are all dull, stupid, belligerent, corrupt, naïve and incapable of looking after themselves and needing the West to save them. And the West will be the master to tell the Asians who is the good guy, who is the bad guy and these will be confirmed by the thrash they printed through their media agencies as intelligent stuff from intelligent or intellectual jokers, a lot from the academia as well.
Kishore said it right. The Asians would have to crawl their fingers through the weaterner’s faces to open their eyes and ears to listen to the Asian’s point of view. They have been drowning out the voices of Asians for too long and thinking that all their rubbish would still be swallowed, hook, line and sinkers. Unfortunately they are still allowed to do so in our media.
Also unfortunately, there are not enough of Asians like Kishore to fill our academia and we are still importing a lot of pseudo western intellectuals and booting out Asians as NG. And we are using taxpayers’ money to pay them generously while our local academics ended up driving taxis. And also unfortunately the realities in the way we pay the western talents as if they are the only talents in this world negates whatever Kishore is writing in his book. The Asia West divide is still there and it is the silly Asians that is making this divide happening by worshipping the Great White Gods. Don’t blame the West, and not so fast, the Asians are still inferior in their thinking and thinking that they are inferior to the West and are happily sucking up to the West. Only one Asian, other than Kishore, would dare to lecture to the West. Also unfortunately he often sees the world like he is a westerner with western world view and interests as the basis for what is good or bad.
Sorry Kishore, your book is a bit ahead of time.
Singaporeans are racists, xenophobic!
I think it will be good to keep hammering the Singaporeans as racists and xenophobic. I do not know who started branding Singaporeans as such and what is their motive? All I know is that Singaporeans just ‘lan lan’ when attacked and be accused of being racists and xenophobic. And they feel guilty about it, like they are really racists and xenophobic.
If this message keeps going for a while, soon many Singaporeans will be hiding in their toilets to avoid being called racists. Soon they will be very apologetic to foreigners. Soon they will invite foreigners to their homes, pull chairs for them, open doors for them and buy them drinks, so that they would not feel guilty about it.
The Sinkies are simply daft. Sorry, I tried very hard not to call them Sinkies but they are so deserving of such a tag. They allowed the racists to hang a label on them and they unashamedly wear it as if it is the right thing to do. Do they think, are they capable of thinking? Are they capable of defending themselves when they are wronged?
Fortunately there were some brave Singaporeans who stood up and blasted the racists for trying to tag Singaporeans as racists and xenophobic. Think what, if this silly and mischievous tag is not removed, people will think Singaporeans are really racists. And after a while the Sinkies will also believe so.
Who are the defenders of Singaporeans? Who are accusing Singaporeans of being racists and xenophobic?
3/27/2013
China fires at Vietnamese vessel
It was reported that Chinese ships fired and chased away Vietnamese fishing boats in the Paracel Islands. This is exactly what a super power should do when little countries tried to be mischievous and to infringe on its territories. The Americans will do so, the European powers will do so, the Indians too will do so. It is a simple and clear message to Vietnam and little countries like the Philippines that China would not tolerate their nonsense and stupid claims against its territories.
China cannot continue not to act in the face of repeated challenges, incursions and violations by these little pesky countries. The more it tries to appease them and restrain itself, the bolder will these countries be and the more incursions will take place. A tight slap is all it takes to put them in their right place. Not doing anything will be seen as a sign of weakness and the Americans and its proxies will say, see, the Chinese are weak, keep going at them.
Big powers must behave like big powers to be respected, if not, to be feared. Only then would China have peace in its islands in the East and South China Sea.
Occupy Singapore Operations Plan
What I am writing is fully fictional, bordering on the side of insanity. So please read with care, better with Parental Guidance, and have a sanity check once in a while before reading on. Some of the ideas were borrowed from the Japanese Imperial Army in the early 20th Century when they formulated the East Asia Co Prosperity Sphere, ie, conquering the whole of East Asia under Japanese rule. But this plan is small in scale and only applicable to small countries or islands. The occupation plan is to take over a small country peacefully, without firing a bullet or a drop of blood.
Let me elaborate. Immigration is the first step. Take advantage of the loose immigration climate and the falutin theory of a borderless world when cross national emigration is encouraged. This is particularly easy when there are countries coveting for other country’s talents instead of developing and nurturing their own. So, encourage your people to work in the targeted country as workers or anything, just get them into the country like claiming a beach head to prepare for the landing of the main force.
When there is critical mass, get the more able to capture top positions in the industries, starting with MNCs. MNCs are easier to infiltrate than national companies. Seize the CEO positions and the HR Dept and start to recruit your own people to fill up top management positions, especially division and dept heads. When these are in place, it will be a systematic replacement of the locals with your own people, but make sure some locals are still around so as not to frighten them and reveal the plan. Ease them out slowly.
After seizing the MNCs, go for the big local or national institutions. These are the choice organizations as they are closely linked to the Govt of the day. Controlling them is like controlling the Govt or at least be accepted as part of the Govt. Take up citizenship if necessary to give the impression that it is another Singaporean taking over the jobs.
On the ground, seize territories by buying up properties, as many as possible. Buy up whole condominiums and streets of houses, form your own enclaves and community networks to self support each other.
Build your own schools to educate your own children so that their national identity will not be diluted by the locals. Send some to the local schools to blend with the locals as one people, to be accepted or integrated.
The final stage is to take over the govt and govt agencies. This one will need more of your people to take up citizenships and claim to be a local, a citizen. When this stage is reached, the take over is complete and the constitution and other govt policies can gradually be amended to turn the country into one’s own country. By then most of the locals will know that it is too late, they have lost their country and will reluctantly emigrate to make way for the new owner.
The plan looks very simple and easy to execute. But two conditions must be present. The first is a daft population that does not think much about ownership of their country and willing to let foreigners in without complaints. A country of migrant origins is very conducive for such thinking. They think they are still migrants and have a soft spot for migrants. Another, the most important, is for a willing govt to collaborate and assist in the takeover. This is possible when the govt thinks that giving foreigners citizenship is as good as the foreigners becoming one of them. They could not see the difference between their own people and the foreigners. All they could recognize and believe is a piece of paper called citizenship. So whether the citizens are new, foreigners or locals, natives, it does not matter. With such govt in place and such mindset, taking over such little countries is a piece of cake.
The whole process can be over in one generation or 20 to 30 years at most. And the local military whose role is to defend the country from being taken over would not even know the difference as the enemy looks exactly like one of them. And the enemy was invited in happily and even integrated with all the assistance and encouragement of the govt of the day.
Of course this is fictional, too easy, and would not happen and definitely would not happen to a well governed country like Singapore when the people have been taught to sing ‘This is my country, this is my home’, and also to pledge to defend the country.
I quote PM Lee Hsien Loong, ‘From time to time, we hear reports of terrorists in our region wanting to attack Singapore…We must never let our guard down.’ With such assurance, Singaporeans can sleep in peace, that their paradise island will never be taken over by a foreign country.
May Day Rally – What is it about?
Gilbert Goh was unable to attract 200 people to his regular talks at the Speaker’s Corner in Hong Lim. Things took a dramatic turn on Feb 16. Under heavy rain and a muddy field, the Singaporeans came, mothers and fathers, little children and all, they came to listen to Gilbert and his friends. Some were just there to give the moral support for a cause that vibrated in their hearts. Why did they come in the most inhospitable circumstances was intriguing.
The White Paper on a 6.9m population was the theme of Gilbert’s Rally. It was all about Singaporeans and Singapore, about Singaporeans wanting to protect their country and the lives of Singaporeans. There was fear, concern, misplaced or whatever, the Singaporeans were worried of their future, the future of their country and their children. There was nothing political about the event. It was a Rally of Singaporeans who came as one people to want a better Singapore for themselves, their children and NOT about foreigners. What is a country or govt when it neglects its very own people?
Subsequently some fuck heads sneered at the slogan ‘Singapore for Singaporeans’ as empty slogans. But no sooner, the MPs were echoing this call in Parliament, calling for more to be done for Singaporeans and protecting jobs for Singaporeans. So, are these MPs also blurting out empty slogans, falutins, like the fuck heads?
Another Rally is being organized on May Day. Gilbert is expecting a bigger turnout this time, 10,000 or 20,000. The events that followed the first rally, the disclosure of more and more foreigners flooding into the island, the high cost of living and the most disgusting issue of all, foreigners ganging up to discriminate and victimize Singaporeans for jobs and in the work place, this last bit must be the last straw that breaks the camel’s back. How could these ugly foreigners come to our country to bully our people, take away our jobs and live better while our very own citizens ended up jobless or under employed, replaced by questionable foreigners?
What would be Gilbert’s main theme for the May Day Protest Rally? Is the 6.9m population a dead issue? Would more Singaporeans turn up and what would they turn up for? I saw the first Rally as a precursor that set the tone for this follow up Rally. The Singaporeans will come to reclaim their country for themselves and their children. This is our country and this is our land. There is nothing about being xenophobic but being owners of our country and our future. No one should take this country from us and give it to undeserving foreigners. Such an act is treason. Any politician that thinks it is ok to bring in the foreigners to replace the less able citizens got to think very carefully in what he says or does. The politicians must be there for the citizens, to improve the lives of the citizens, not for the good of foreigners. The Rally must be one to tell the politicians what the people want, do the people want a 6.9m population, or 5m or 4m, it is the people that should decide. Do they want more foreigners to be here to take over their jobs, to kick the citizens around? The Singaporeans must be at the Rally to make this point clear. They cannot continue to sleep around, boh chap, and let the politicians do as they like.
This Rally must be about Singaporeans and about the kind of Singapore that the Singaporeans want for themselves and their children. This must be the rallying call. It was 4,000. It could be 10,000 or 20,000. And if the Govt is not listening, the next round could be 100,000. But this can only happen if the Singaporeans feel threatened, feel as one people, with the same destiny, to make this country a better place for Singaporeans, not for foreigners. The presence of foreigners must be incidental and must complement the existence of the citizens, to make the lives of citizens better and not worst.
The Rally must make this point clear to the Govt and the foreigners, the latter are welcome, up to a point but not to take the generosity and hospitality of the Singaporeans for granted. Singapore is for Singaporeans. Foreigners can come and share our growth, not to deprive Singaporeans of a better life in Singapore. Foreigners must know their place in this country. There are also OB markers for foreigners and politicians.
3/26/2013
Sleeping your way to the top
I honestly confess that I have not been following the high profile cases in the courts involving great guys and great women, all very successful in their careers. Just by reading the headlines and a couple of paragraphs would give one the full story of how success can be had in this wonderful land of opportunities.
Sleeping your way to the top is now a management secret recipe being shared around by the corporate climbers. Just study carefully and see which guy is able to give one a lift to the top. It doesn’t take much effort, just be more observant and be nicer and more willing to please. That is all it takes to be successful, for the feline kind. It doesn’t need much intelligence, at worst, just pretend to be intelligent is all it takes.
Of course not all dignified ladies with some pride in themselves and knowing their own abilities would want to take a lift from the dominant guys. But the thought is sexy and attractive and many weak minded and unthinking ones will easily subscribe to such a philosophy of success in the corporate world.
Who says sleeping on the job is bad? The squeaky clean image of this uptight city is in need of a rework to fit the new realities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
