Chinatown hawker centre. Hawker Centres are a national heritage, selling a wide variety of food at very reasonable prices. They are spread across the whole island and is part of the Singapore way of life.
"In a recent
Pennsylvannia Senate Republican lawmaker public hearing into claims of
election fraud, retired army colonel Phil Waldronm, who had served in
cyber warfare units, said : “The voting systems in the US and in
Pennsylvania were built to be manipulated. They’ve been used in
elections around the world, in stolen elections around the world, in
Venezuela, Italy, Argentina, Singapore, Bolivia as close as two
weeks ago.” The colonel has cast aspersion on the integrity of our
election system and it behoves on our government to make a public
statement to clarify the matter to Singaporeans. None was forthcoming on
a matter so serious. Our national reputation has been blemished but
instead of a strong rebuttal, we are treated to the circus of a prime
minister protecting his personal reputation in 2 simultaneous libel
cases in the courts. Or perhaps, with their superior cyber intel, the US
knows something and a rebuttal may open up Pandora’s box."
The above paragraph is taken from Chempost published at TR Emeritus today (10 Dec 2020).
1. Is Singapore's voting system the same as, or an adaption of, any of the US's voting systems?
2. If so, when did Singapore started using this US voting system?
3. Is it true that the votes can be manipulated?
4. If so, how are votes manipulated, stolen?
5. How much votes (%) can be stolen at any one time, so that suspicions won't be aroused?
6.
Does this revelation warrant a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to
thoroughly and unbiasedly investigate into the truth, or the extent of
truth, and/or falsehood?
7. Would the Elections Department care
to respond by declaring that this allegation by the US cyber warfare
unit army colonel Phil Waldronm is not true and totally baseless?
8. Is this not a matter of national interest?
9.
What are the views of all the political parties' leaders? Why are they
keeping so quiet? In this issue, silence is not golden.
Silence means consent or non-commital, both of which are not in good light.
Pfizer Vaccine - Full Exposure And Revelation Required
1.
The public has the basic and common right to have the full exposure and
revelation of facts and findings of the Pfizer vaccine, or any other
vaccine, before they are given the vaccination.
2. Advertising
and recommendations, by words of mouth or written, through manufacturer
or third parties, must not hide any inconvenient truth, or any facts,
from the public whatsoever regarding any vaccine.
3. All vaccines have side-effects, ranging from mild to severe, and from drastic to fatal.
4.
If anybody only talked about a particular vaccine's effectiveness
without revealing its side-effects, such a vaccine must be viewed with
conscious suspicion and great caution.
5. More data is needed to understand the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine fully, without an iota of doubt.
6. To what extent will it be dangerous to pregnant women, to children, to the aged, and to people who are immuno-compromised?
7. Does the vaccine provide long-term immunization to those who have taken it? If not, how long will it last?
8.
Has it been proven, through mass testing, to determine exactly the
extent of its efficacy and detriments? How large was the group tested?
9. What percentage of failure-rate and how severe were the failures in terms of human life, health and well-being?
10.
Are the clinical test reports made available to the public in full
voluntarily, without having to be asked for? If not, why not?
11. Has the manufacturer of the vaccine, deliberately or otherwise, hide any fact or data from the public?
12.
Please think hard and do the necessary. Millions of human lives are
involved. Human life is precious. One fatal casualty is one too many
already. Just imagine that fatal casualty is your ownself or your loved
ones.
Be responsible. Be fully responsible!
1984 George Orwell - 15 Dec 2020.
PS:
The Pfizer vaccine is singled out because it has been adopted by the
Singapore government for mass vaccination usage across the country, even
though other vaccines are also available. Moreover, it has only been
approved by the US Health Authority for Emergency Use Only, not for
everyone anytime. It is, therefore, clear that the US Health Authority
has exercised great caution in the application of the Pfizer vaccine,
whilst the Singapore "Experts" seem to have failed to consider this
aspect.
International Criminal Court chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said on Friday that a "broad range" of war crimes were committed in the Ukraine since 2014, as she pushed for a full investigation.
Hague-based ICC prosecutors launched a preliminary probe in 2015 after Kiev gave it the green light to look into alleged crimes committed during the pro-EU Maidan demonstrations, which came to a head in February 2014 when pro-Moscow president Viktor Yanukovic was ousted.
Ukraine, which is not an ICC member state, later also gave Bensouda permission to broaden her scope and go beyond February 2014 to include the deadly conflict that has since wracked the country's east.
Bensouda said her initial probe had now finished.
"My office has concluded that there is a reasonable basis at this time to believe that a broad range of conduct constituting war crimes and crimes against humanity within the jurisdiction of the court have been committed in the context of the situation in Ukraine," Bensouda said. AFP
Steady lah ICC, working so fast and so hard to conduct war crimes probe in Ukraine. Why not war crimes prosecution of Australians in Afghanistan when the evidence is already available? Why no war crimes investigation of American and Allied Forces in Iraq, Libya and Syria, and of course Afghanistan? No reasonable basis to believe there were war crimes in these war theatres? Or is it becomes the investigators would be attacked, blacklisted and even killed by the war criminals' countries?
Or is it the that the American and Allied soldiers were soldiers from heaven, all wearing a halo on their heads and would definitely not conduct crimes against the people and soldiers they are attacking? No war crimes in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib prisons?
Who is controlling the ICC and setting the agenda?
MOSCOW
(Reuters) - Russia should consider revising the terms of its
participation in the International Space Station, a Russian space
industry executive said on Thursday, because it wants to focus on
forming its own orbiting outpost after 2024....
"We
have to reconsider the terms of further participation in the (ISS)
programme and focus on the implementation of orbital station
programmes," Vladimir Solovyov, deputy head of Rocket and Space
Corporation Energia, was quoted as saying by the Scientific Russia
internet portal.
The
state-run company oversees the Russian segment of the ISS, which was
launched in 1989 by the Russian and U.S. state space agencies....
He said a lot of the equipment on the ISS was starting to
age and that it needed to be replaced. He said there would be an
"avalanche" of broken equipment there after 2025.
The ISS is used
for space and Earth exploration by 14 countries, including Japan, Canada
and members of the European Space Agency. International agreements on
its use are valid until 2024. Reuters
Russia was
conned by its arch enemy, the USA, to joint develop the ISS thinking
that the Americans were more advanced in space technology only to be
duped. Finally they have found out that the Americans were far inferior
to the Russians, and the moon landings were but a big hoax. Other than
cheating on the Russians, the other major interest of the Americans was
to shut out the Chinese from the space programme. After cooperating with
the Americans for the last 30 years the Russians now know that the
Americans could contribute nothing but taking the Russians for a ride,
depending on the Russians to bring American astronauts to the ISS.
Without the Russian rockets the Americans could only land in the Arizona
desert.
The Russians are now pondering on going it on their own
in the next ISS when the current ISS's lifespan comes to an end in 2024.
In fact it should end this year, 2020 but being stretched for another 4
years risking the lives of the astronauts and cosmonauts in the expired
ISS.
When the Russians pulled out from the next ISS completely,
the American would be left dangling in the air, in hot air and nothing
else, unable to build their own space station and their astronauts got
no where else to go. Maybe they should repeat their moon landing feats
in the Arizona desert and with the latest digital technology and
Hollywood, put up another big fake man landing on the moon with Trump
and Pompeo as the astronauts.
Meanwhile the Chinese Space Station
is taking shape and should be open for business this year or next. But
the Chinese has already put up a sign, 'No Americans Allowed' on the
door of CSS. The rock that the treacherous Americans rejected is now the
corner stone of a new space church built by China.
Good
riddance to fake technology. Well, they can prove it this time with
their new attempts to land man on the moon. If they can do it, they
should if they had done it so many times with old technology. If they
can't, then it all goes to prove that they had not done it before. Here
is the latest announcement.
'CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida: NASA has named the 18 astronauts - half of
them women - who will train for its Artemis moon-landing program.
The
first woman and next man on the moon will come from this elite
group....“The history is awesome, but we’re here to look toward the
future,” Acaba told reporters after the announcement. .' AP 10 Dec 20
Yeah,
prove it or it would become a big embarrassment. This time the rest of
the world will be watching and the Americans cannot produce whatever
fake news and images they want to con the world. The world has the
technology to monitor the flight to the moon, no more fakes or Hollywood
stuff.
This statement speaks a lot about the awesome history of
America's moon landing missions. '“We are dreamers, but even more so,
we’re doers," McClain said.' How can the Americans still be dreamers,
dreaming, when they claimed they had done it so many times in the past.
Their dreams already fulfilled, a reality in the 1960s! Isn't that the
truth? Or is this the first time they are going to the moon? Why are
they still dreaming of men landing on the moon today as a damn big thing
when it was chicken feat then, 60 years ago? They had been to the moon
umpteen times, so they claimed. They should be sneering at anyone
wanting to go to the moon today as Johnny comes lately, nothing new to
achieve, nothing great. They have done it long long ago.
PS. The
Americans claimed to have brought back 382kg of moon rock but now asking
China for samples of moon rock taken back by Chang e 5. Why?
SINGAPORE - Singapore's competition watchdog is seeking public
feedback on whether a proposed cooperation pact between Singapore
Airlines (SIA) and Vistara for flights to and from India could adversely
affect passengers.
The application for collaboration between the two airlines, submitted
to the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS) in
November, could merge 16 routes that the two airlines now ply
separately, including flights from Singapore to Indian cities including
Mumbai, New Delhi, Kolkata and Hyderabad.
Concerns that the reduction in flights could affect ticket prices and seat capacity can be submitted to the CCCS till Dec 21. ST
If this pact is seen as important enough to ask the public for their opinions, not just for show, do you think the bailing out of a failed Indian bank, Lakshmi Vilas Bank, involving at least $460m is more important and warrants a similar opinion from the citizens whose money are at stake? Don't say it is not the people's money, any big losses someone has to bear and it will go down to Singaporeans bearing it. And Singaporeans are feeling cheated when their CPF savings did not seem to belong to them when all kinds of schemes, supposedly good for the Singaporeans, are introduced to take money from their CPF accounts, by legislation, without their consent or even asking them if they agree to it like this SIA Vistara pact.
We are all watching how the bailing out of the failed Indian bank going to turn out and how much of public money is going to go down the drain if it fails. Looking at all the sharks lining up to make claims against DBS India is frightening and shocking. Were these claims and lawsuits taken into consideration before plonking $460m into the exciting deal? If the creditors succeed, is there a bottom line to pay for the debt of Lakshmi Vilas that have nothing to do with DBS?
Why no asking of public opinion on such a big sum of money being spent? Oh, ok, commercial decision. But then, how much time were put in before this decision was made? How much due diligence?
