I am furious with Singtel and have just lodged a complaint to them. Below is my complaint that I want it to be sent to its CEO.
''I want this complaint to be sent to the CEO. I will also post this complaint in my blog, www.mysingaporenews.blogspot.sg
I have a data plan for 100MB which is sufficient for my use. I just received a reminder that my usage has exceeded my predetermined limit. On checking I found that 50.56MB was used up by Singtel Apps leaving only 15MB of my data plan unused.
Why is Singtel Apps data charged to me? This is unfair as Singtel could eat up all my data plan with all its Apps. Even if I have a 1GB plan, it can likewise be used up by Singtel Apps if this is allowed to happen.
I demand that the 50.56MB used by Singtel Apps be credited back to my data plan. Singtel must be fair to its subscribers and cannot use up subscriber's data plan this way.
Thanks you.
Chua Chin Leng
2/03/2018
Singapore Dilemma – Should Hsien Loong rule to 70 years and beyond?
This is the new twist to the so called Singapore PM succession dilemma.
Hsien Loong is now faced with a dilemma, to appoint a successor quickly
as prompted by Chok Tong or to continue to rule to 70, thus avoiding the
need to quickly appoint someone risking appointing another dud
orchestra conductor without the privilege of an apprenticeship. The
option for Hsien Loong to rule to 70 looks like the best solution at
this moment, a win win formula.
Let’s look at all the good points for such an extension, looking at one side of the coin. The negative side I will leave it to your imagination. One, without having to rush to appoint a crown prince, a PM designate, Hsien Loong would have more time to observe how they perform and their suitability to be the next PM. A mistake would be very costly, the downward spin towards third world would be faster. Two, 70 year old is still very young. Just look at how healthy Chok Tong is and how LKY continued to serve and watch over the govt till past 90 years, age is no problem. Three, Hsien Loong took 14 years to learn to be a PM, Chok Tong needed 6 years to prove his competence, so on the average, the next PM would need about 10 years to learn the ropes. Given this proviso, 70 year is not enough and Hsien Loong should continue beyond 70 to give the next crown prince a fair chance to learn to be competent.
Four, since the current batch of potentials is not looking that promising, for Hsien Loong to go on beyond 70 would allow the 5G to come in and be in the running as well. The pool would thus be bigger, with the ageing 4G and the youngish 5G competing to be the best man. It would only benefit Singapore if the best man wins. Five, with Hsien Loong’s rule confirmed, it would bring in more stability and certainty, and no one can rock the boat, meaning more foreign companies would come to invest here and more good jobs for Singaporeans. And all wild ambitions would not have a chance to surface.
See, there is no dilemma if Hsien Loong would to rule to 70 and beyond, win win all round. Nowadays I got this strange feeling that my observations and analysis are getting wiser and wiser. Simply brilliant. I am sure the 70% would fully agree with my viewpoints.
What do you think?
Let’s look at all the good points for such an extension, looking at one side of the coin. The negative side I will leave it to your imagination. One, without having to rush to appoint a crown prince, a PM designate, Hsien Loong would have more time to observe how they perform and their suitability to be the next PM. A mistake would be very costly, the downward spin towards third world would be faster. Two, 70 year old is still very young. Just look at how healthy Chok Tong is and how LKY continued to serve and watch over the govt till past 90 years, age is no problem. Three, Hsien Loong took 14 years to learn to be a PM, Chok Tong needed 6 years to prove his competence, so on the average, the next PM would need about 10 years to learn the ropes. Given this proviso, 70 year is not enough and Hsien Loong should continue beyond 70 to give the next crown prince a fair chance to learn to be competent.
Four, since the current batch of potentials is not looking that promising, for Hsien Loong to go on beyond 70 would allow the 5G to come in and be in the running as well. The pool would thus be bigger, with the ageing 4G and the youngish 5G competing to be the best man. It would only benefit Singapore if the best man wins. Five, with Hsien Loong’s rule confirmed, it would bring in more stability and certainty, and no one can rock the boat, meaning more foreign companies would come to invest here and more good jobs for Singaporeans. And all wild ambitions would not have a chance to surface.
See, there is no dilemma if Hsien Loong would to rule to 70 and beyond, win win all round. Nowadays I got this strange feeling that my observations and analysis are getting wiser and wiser. Simply brilliant. I am sure the 70% would fully agree with my viewpoints.
What do you think?
2/02/2018
Yin and Yang – The complementary roles of USA and China
Iraqi PM Haider al-Abadi declared victory over ISIS in December 2017.
According to a Peter Vanburen, an ex staff of US Statement department,
‘there is nothing to celebrate’ for the Americans despite the victory.
The new Iraqi govt is pro Iran and would strengthen the power of anti
American Arab coalition in the region which brews more trouble for the
USA. The ISIS may have been weakened, but the Americans would not leave.
The propaganda position of the Americans is to ensure that ISIS would
not rise again. The unofficial position is just the opposite, to feed
and nurse ISIS to live for more trouble for Iraq and the region. The
Americans decided that they should stay in Iraq, with or without the
consent of the Iraqi govt and Iraqi people. They are treating Iraq as a
semi American colony, colonized after the invasion on the excuse of WMD.
The Americans claimed to have spent US$60 billion fighting the ISIS. And that is not all. The total cost to the Americans, still counting, is 4,500 Americans dead, many wounded, and trillions of US dollars for the invasion of Iraq. And the USA, after destroying Iraq to gain control of it as another American colony, ‘does not intend trying to pay for the reconstruction of Iraq’. This is how great the Americans are today. Ok, according to the same Reuter report, the US did contribute US$265 million for reconstruction since 2014.
This is like after destroying the country and killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, turning their lives into hell, the Americans simply pat their backside and walked away.
But not to worry, the Jekyll and Hyde relationship between the USA and China would come into play. China has started to come in to offer to reconstruct Iraq, to rebuild Iraq from the destruction of the Americans. And you can expect the Americans and western media crying foul, that China is taking advantage of the Iraqi people and constructing buildings for no use and building roads to nowhere, or robbing Iraq of its oil. Now who have been stealing Iraqi oil since the invasion and the fall of Saddam Hussein?
Wherever the Americans conduct wars of destruction, the Chinese will be at their heels to clean up the mess and to rebuild the destroyed countries. This is the Yin and Yang relationship of the USA and China, a destroyer and a builder, a warmonger and a peacemaker, one destroys the other builds.
Who is the bigger devil? China of course, that is the lie the West and the Americans are creating for the daft of the world to read in and to believe in.
PS. In today’s news the Americans again are spreading another lie that the Syrian govt may be developing new types of chemical weapons, to justify keeping their forces in Syria and another invasion of Syria.
The Americans claimed to have spent US$60 billion fighting the ISIS. And that is not all. The total cost to the Americans, still counting, is 4,500 Americans dead, many wounded, and trillions of US dollars for the invasion of Iraq. And the USA, after destroying Iraq to gain control of it as another American colony, ‘does not intend trying to pay for the reconstruction of Iraq’. This is how great the Americans are today. Ok, according to the same Reuter report, the US did contribute US$265 million for reconstruction since 2014.
This is like after destroying the country and killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, turning their lives into hell, the Americans simply pat their backside and walked away.
But not to worry, the Jekyll and Hyde relationship between the USA and China would come into play. China has started to come in to offer to reconstruct Iraq, to rebuild Iraq from the destruction of the Americans. And you can expect the Americans and western media crying foul, that China is taking advantage of the Iraqi people and constructing buildings for no use and building roads to nowhere, or robbing Iraq of its oil. Now who have been stealing Iraqi oil since the invasion and the fall of Saddam Hussein?
Wherever the Americans conduct wars of destruction, the Chinese will be at their heels to clean up the mess and to rebuild the destroyed countries. This is the Yin and Yang relationship of the USA and China, a destroyer and a builder, a warmonger and a peacemaker, one destroys the other builds.
Who is the bigger devil? China of course, that is the lie the West and the Americans are creating for the daft of the world to read in and to believe in.
PS. In today’s news the Americans again are spreading another lie that the Syrian govt may be developing new types of chemical weapons, to justify keeping their forces in Syria and another invasion of Syria.
American Arrogance, Aggression and Imperialism - Part 2
The root source of all Western / American arrogance, aggression and imperialism lies with its militant religious doctrine and its white supremacist doctrine. White men first made use of the Doctrine of Christian Discovery to justify their conquest of the two American continents and their massacre and genocide of the native Americans. The Doctrine of American Manifest Destiny and the Doctrine of Exceptionalism show their arrogance and aggression at it height when USA launched endless wars from 1820s to the present time in its conquest of Mexico and across the Pacific Ocean to occupy Hawaii, the Philippines and Guam.
In the 1930s the doctrines of the Neo-Conservatives was founded by a cohort of American Jews. The founding members were Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, Daniel Bell, Seymour Martin Lipset and Nathan Glazer. Leo Strauss was a German Jewish American political philosopher and his students include Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol, Alan Bloom, John Podhoretz and many more others. All of them were Jews. The Neo-Cons political movement became active in the 1960s and played a role in Ronald Reagan's administration . The administrations of George H.W. Bush, William Clinton and Bush Jr in the 1990s became a hotbed of Jewish Neo-Con operatives where they occupied most top strategic positions in the defense department, foreign office, CIA, the Pentagon, Wall Street, banking and finance.
The Neo-Cons are extremely arrogant and hawkish . They are white supremacists and can be found in both the Democrat and the Republican party. Their new doctrine is Unilateralism and New World Global Order. In the 1990s with the fall of the Soviet Union they feel vindicated of their policies and they proclaimed that the 21st Century will be an American Century and in their Manifesto they pronounced a "Project for the New American Century." The chief exponent of "Unilateralism' and "New World Global Order " is Paul Wolfowitz - a Jewish military strategist and a Deputy Defense Secretary in George W. Bush presidency in 1990s where Dick Cheney ( a Jew ) was the Vice President Ronald Rumsfeld ( a Jew ) was Secretary of Defense. This new doctrine became known a the Wolfowitz Doctrine.
The main characteristics of "Unilateralism" and "New World Global Order" is that it has the tendency to see the world only in its own view of Good and Evil. It has very low tolerance for diplomacy and has a readiness to use military force. It lays strong emphasis on unilateral action. It consists of eleven or more articles with each article emphasizing a specific or fundamental objective.
Below are some of Wolfowitz arrogant and gingoistic doctrines.
1. To prevent the emergence of a rival that poses a threat to US dominance and power,
2. To prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would under consolidated control be sufficient to generate global power.
3. USA fundamental goal is to deter or defeat attack from whatever source.
4. To preclude or prevent any hostile power from dominating a region critical to USA interest and also thereby to strengthen barriers against the re-emergence of a global threat to the interest of USA and its allies.
5. USA must convince potential competitors that hey need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interest.
6. In non-defense areas USA discourage other advance industrial nations from challenging USA leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. USA must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.
7. Unilateralism : The doctrine downplays the value of international coalitions . USA will maintain that the World Order is ultimately backed by the USA which will be an important stabiling factor.
8, Pre-emptive Intervention
USA will have the right to intervene where it is believed to be necessary to address those wrongs which threaten USA's interests or those of its friends or allies.
9. The Russian Threat
The doctrine highlighted the possible threat posed by a resurgent Russia. Russia remains the strongest military power in the world with the capability of destroying the USA.
NB: President Trump has added China as a threat in his first State of the Union address.
10. The Middle East and South West of Asia
USA must remain the prominent outside power in the region and preserve USA and Western access to the region's oil. USA must prevent a hegemon or alignment of powers from dominating the region . USA must continue to play a role through enhanced deterrance and improved cooperative security.
11. On Israel
USA is committed to the security of Israel and must maintain the qualitative edge that is critical to Israel security. USA-Israel strategic cooperation contribute to the stability of the entire
region.
These Neo-Conservatives Doctrine endorsed USA military action in the Vietnam War from 1965 to 1975. It was the deciding factor in USA invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. It played a decisive role in overthrowing President Sukarno of Indonesia in 1965 and the installation of USA puppet Suharto who with CIA and Pentagon's support killed and murdered more than a million Indonesians of Sukarno's supporters. Its next target now is to topple the present government of Iran. However it failed miserably in its plot against Russia in the Ukraine where Putin got the upper hand and annexed the territory of Crimea. It also failed miserably in its clandestine operations in Central Asia whereby the Central Asian states of Ubekistan, Tajhikstan and Kajakhstan joined Russia and China in the solidarity Shanghai Organisation . However the Neo-Cons is now trying to create wars and instability in the South China Sea region by sowing seeds of dissension and mistrust among the littoral states and China.
The Neo-Conservatives are very determined to subdue every country and bring the whole world under American total control and hegemony. All the more the whole world must unite and defeat the Neo-cons and American facism, dictatorship and hegemony.
Southernglory1
Friday, 2nd February, 2018
In the 1930s the doctrines of the Neo-Conservatives was founded by a cohort of American Jews. The founding members were Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, Daniel Bell, Seymour Martin Lipset and Nathan Glazer. Leo Strauss was a German Jewish American political philosopher and his students include Paul Wolfowitz, William Kristol, Alan Bloom, John Podhoretz and many more others. All of them were Jews. The Neo-Cons political movement became active in the 1960s and played a role in Ronald Reagan's administration . The administrations of George H.W. Bush, William Clinton and Bush Jr in the 1990s became a hotbed of Jewish Neo-Con operatives where they occupied most top strategic positions in the defense department, foreign office, CIA, the Pentagon, Wall Street, banking and finance.
The Neo-Cons are extremely arrogant and hawkish . They are white supremacists and can be found in both the Democrat and the Republican party. Their new doctrine is Unilateralism and New World Global Order. In the 1990s with the fall of the Soviet Union they feel vindicated of their policies and they proclaimed that the 21st Century will be an American Century and in their Manifesto they pronounced a "Project for the New American Century." The chief exponent of "Unilateralism' and "New World Global Order " is Paul Wolfowitz - a Jewish military strategist and a Deputy Defense Secretary in George W. Bush presidency in 1990s where Dick Cheney ( a Jew ) was the Vice President Ronald Rumsfeld ( a Jew ) was Secretary of Defense. This new doctrine became known a the Wolfowitz Doctrine.
The main characteristics of "Unilateralism" and "New World Global Order" is that it has the tendency to see the world only in its own view of Good and Evil. It has very low tolerance for diplomacy and has a readiness to use military force. It lays strong emphasis on unilateral action. It consists of eleven or more articles with each article emphasizing a specific or fundamental objective.
Below are some of Wolfowitz arrogant and gingoistic doctrines.
1. To prevent the emergence of a rival that poses a threat to US dominance and power,
2. To prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would under consolidated control be sufficient to generate global power.
3. USA fundamental goal is to deter or defeat attack from whatever source.
4. To preclude or prevent any hostile power from dominating a region critical to USA interest and also thereby to strengthen barriers against the re-emergence of a global threat to the interest of USA and its allies.
5. USA must convince potential competitors that hey need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interest.
6. In non-defense areas USA discourage other advance industrial nations from challenging USA leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. USA must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.
7. Unilateralism : The doctrine downplays the value of international coalitions . USA will maintain that the World Order is ultimately backed by the USA which will be an important stabiling factor.
8, Pre-emptive Intervention
USA will have the right to intervene where it is believed to be necessary to address those wrongs which threaten USA's interests or those of its friends or allies.
9. The Russian Threat
The doctrine highlighted the possible threat posed by a resurgent Russia. Russia remains the strongest military power in the world with the capability of destroying the USA.
NB: President Trump has added China as a threat in his first State of the Union address.
10. The Middle East and South West of Asia
USA must remain the prominent outside power in the region and preserve USA and Western access to the region's oil. USA must prevent a hegemon or alignment of powers from dominating the region . USA must continue to play a role through enhanced deterrance and improved cooperative security.
11. On Israel
USA is committed to the security of Israel and must maintain the qualitative edge that is critical to Israel security. USA-Israel strategic cooperation contribute to the stability of the entire
region.
These Neo-Conservatives Doctrine endorsed USA military action in the Vietnam War from 1965 to 1975. It was the deciding factor in USA invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. It played a decisive role in overthrowing President Sukarno of Indonesia in 1965 and the installation of USA puppet Suharto who with CIA and Pentagon's support killed and murdered more than a million Indonesians of Sukarno's supporters. Its next target now is to topple the present government of Iran. However it failed miserably in its plot against Russia in the Ukraine where Putin got the upper hand and annexed the territory of Crimea. It also failed miserably in its clandestine operations in Central Asia whereby the Central Asian states of Ubekistan, Tajhikstan and Kajakhstan joined Russia and China in the solidarity Shanghai Organisation . However the Neo-Cons is now trying to create wars and instability in the South China Sea region by sowing seeds of dissension and mistrust among the littoral states and China.
The Neo-Conservatives are very determined to subdue every country and bring the whole world under American total control and hegemony. All the more the whole world must unite and defeat the Neo-cons and American facism, dictatorship and hegemony.
Southernglory1
Friday, 2nd February, 2018
2/01/2018
Beware of lightning strike
When the govt says it wants to help the people, be frightened, be very
frightened. There is now another compulsory scheme to force the people
to buy Eldershield Life Insurance using the people’s life savings. The
concept is good but watch the small prints.
Chaly Mah, the review committee chairman said, ‘We want Eldershield to be a social safety net, and we all have a collective responsibility to take care of those with disabilities.’ Well said. But who is the ‘we’ and who ends up paying for the safety net, the govt or the people? I also have a grand plan to save the people of the whole world. I want to provide them with a life insurance, a safety net, so that they need not worry about no money. The only way for this to work is to make it compulsory for the people of the whole world to buy my life insurance, they pay of course. See, I also know how to help the people of the whole world by putting my hand into their pockets. But I must be wary of lightning strike if my scheme is to rob the people of their money to benefit me while giving the impression that I am helping them.
The govt is going to help you, be grateful, be very grateful. We have very honourable and benevolent people everyday scheming, cracking their heads, to help you with their great plans. They have your interest at heart and also your CPF savings. Trust them, they are planning and scheming to help you to take care of you with your own money in the CPF.
Lily Neo was asked what she thinks of the govt overseeing the scheme and she said, ‘ If it were you, wouldn’t you feel safer knowing the govt is taking control of it rather than have it in private hands?’ Do I trust the govt with my CPF money that the govt has full control of it and I have none? I am asking myself this question everyday and shaking my head.
One Chan Chia Lin, chairing the govt administration sub committee said, ‘The feedback was that being a national scheme, it should be administered in a non profit manner.’ Is this compulsory Eldershield scheme going to be the same as the other compulsory CPF schemes, profit making? Who is going to benefit from the profits made from compulsory acquisition of the people’s life time savings in the CPF? Why is the compulsory Eldershield scheme, and other CPF compulsory schemes profit making but the profits did not go to the CPF members who are paying for it when they are supposed to help them? Who is benefiting from the profits made?
It would be a different story if the govt were to say that since they are benefiting from investing the people’s CPF money they would now plough back some of the profits to pay for such schemes, using the profits to benefit the people whose money were used to generate the profits. Tiok boh?
Chaly Mah, the review committee chairman said, ‘We want Eldershield to be a social safety net, and we all have a collective responsibility to take care of those with disabilities.’ Well said. But who is the ‘we’ and who ends up paying for the safety net, the govt or the people? I also have a grand plan to save the people of the whole world. I want to provide them with a life insurance, a safety net, so that they need not worry about no money. The only way for this to work is to make it compulsory for the people of the whole world to buy my life insurance, they pay of course. See, I also know how to help the people of the whole world by putting my hand into their pockets. But I must be wary of lightning strike if my scheme is to rob the people of their money to benefit me while giving the impression that I am helping them.
The govt is going to help you, be grateful, be very grateful. We have very honourable and benevolent people everyday scheming, cracking their heads, to help you with their great plans. They have your interest at heart and also your CPF savings. Trust them, they are planning and scheming to help you to take care of you with your own money in the CPF.
Lily Neo was asked what she thinks of the govt overseeing the scheme and she said, ‘ If it were you, wouldn’t you feel safer knowing the govt is taking control of it rather than have it in private hands?’ Do I trust the govt with my CPF money that the govt has full control of it and I have none? I am asking myself this question everyday and shaking my head.
One Chan Chia Lin, chairing the govt administration sub committee said, ‘The feedback was that being a national scheme, it should be administered in a non profit manner.’ Is this compulsory Eldershield scheme going to be the same as the other compulsory CPF schemes, profit making? Who is going to benefit from the profits made from compulsory acquisition of the people’s life time savings in the CPF? Why is the compulsory Eldershield scheme, and other CPF compulsory schemes profit making but the profits did not go to the CPF members who are paying for it when they are supposed to help them? Who is benefiting from the profits made?
It would be a different story if the govt were to say that since they are benefiting from investing the people’s CPF money they would now plough back some of the profits to pay for such schemes, using the profits to benefit the people whose money were used to generate the profits. Tiok boh?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)