The world is under threat. Free trade and globalization under threat. And out came Joe Biden and Xi Jinping in Davos to speak up in defence of free trade and against protectionism. Trump’s America are going to raise trade barriers and protectionism, threatening the very institutions the Americans were championing in the last 7 decades. China benefited from the existing world order but Trump is out to dismantle it, claiming that the Americans are losers and he needs to make America great again by breaking down the global system that was built by the Americans.
China is protesting and leading the world leaders to tell the Americans and Europeans that free trade and globalization are good for them and they cannot run away from them. Xi Jinping promised that China would keep its economy open to the world. Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, WEF, hailed Xi’s key note speech, as a ‘very important speech at a historic time’. The free world of the West returning to isolation is raising fears of trade wars.
Joe Biden in his dying days as the Vice President of the USA, joined Xi Jinping to call for the preservation of free trade and globalization. His last few words before his expiry as Vice President spoke volumes on the dire consequences when Trump moves into the White House.
What is happening? Where would Singapore stand now, siding with its old allies that are now against globalization and free trade or standing on the side of China to promote free trade and globalization?
What if the USA raises trade barriers against Singapore imports? What if both China and USA closes their doors to Singapore? Would Singapore take its principled stand on free trade and globalization and joined the Philippines and Malaysia to be on the side of China against the anti free trade and pro protectionism Trump America?
A normal kopitiam at night in Singapore. Typical night life of the average Singaporeans in a govt built housing estate.
1/21/2017
1/20/2017
How poor or how rich are Singaporeans?
Leong Sze
Hian quoted some numbers from the MOM. Let me quote below:
Median gross income of all employed residents (excluding employer CPF) is much lower?
However, if you look at the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) Yearbook of Manpower Statistics 2016 – the median gross income of all employed residents (excluding employer CPF) is much lower, at $3,125.
407,400 earn less than $1,500?
There were 407,400 residents (about 19.4 per cent of the total workforce of $2.1 million) whose median gross income was less than $1,500 monthly.
After CPF = less than $1,200?
If we deduct the maximum employee CPF contribution of 20 per cent – the net take-home pay may be less than $1,200.
Arguably, most of the 407,400 people with take-home pay of less than $1,200 may be struggling to make ends meet.
47,000 earn less than $500?
Median gross income of all employed residents (excluding employer CPF) is much lower?
However, if you look at the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) Yearbook of Manpower Statistics 2016 – the median gross income of all employed residents (excluding employer CPF) is much lower, at $3,125.
407,400 earn less than $1,500?
There were 407,400 residents (about 19.4 per cent of the total workforce of $2.1 million) whose median gross income was less than $1,500 monthly.
After CPF = less than $1,200?
If we deduct the maximum employee CPF contribution of 20 per cent – the net take-home pay may be less than $1,200.
Arguably, most of the 407,400 people with take-home pay of less than $1,200 may be struggling to make ends meet.
47,000 earn less than $500?
I am stunned
by a few numbers from the above stats. 407,400 or 19.4 per cent of the
residents earned less than $1,500. This
is not much different from the pay of our top cleaning supervisors. My God, so
many earned the same salary as cleaners! And after less CPF, the take come
salary is only $1,200, the salary of ordinary cleaners.
This is jiat
lat man. How to survive in this most expensive city in the world, or among the
top few most expensive cities in the world? But there is one comfort, the govt
has made home ownership so cheap. With $1,000 they can buy a 2 rm flat to stay.
At least this is a consoling point, got a roof over the heads. Not sure how
much left for food and other necessities.
But aren’t
Singaporeans the richest people in Asia? Very high income, asset rich, highest
quality of life. Putting the two together, this must be another Singapore
miracle. Earning less than $1,500 and can afford to live well in one of the
most expensive cities in the world when some complained that their family life
would be affected if they did not earn more than millions in annual income. I
really respect and admire those earning less than $1,500 pm and living well. I
am still wondering how they could do it? They must be switching to eating fish
when meat becomes too expensive.
1/19/2017
Duterte telling Abe go fly kite
Abe went to
the Philippines and wanted to sell submarines and missiles to Duterte. Yasay said the submarines too expensive and
politely turned down the offer. Duterte simply told Abe no one is going to
attack the Philippines. No need for the missiles. Philippines do not want a
Third World War on its islands.
This is a
piece of wisdom that Duterte could teach the rest of the stupid Asean
countries. Why keep on buying weapons and pay hard currencies for war machine
just because the Americans hyped that China and North Korea are going to attack
them? The sillies and unthinking in little Red Dot believe in these threats
whole heartedly and everyday worrying that China and North Korea are going to
attack the Red Dot. Go look at all the countries neighbouring China, anyone
worrying about China attacking them? The only country that is claiming that and
building ICBMs is India, just like the West, hyping that China is planning to
invade India when China was there and pulled back without staying a day longer
after they defeated the Indian Army in the 1962 border war. What, China want to
attack or invade India? What for?
This is the
21st Century. Conquering or invading another country is no longer
acceptable, permissible or the thing to do. Colonialism is no longer feasible
as the Americans have proven many times, that they could not conquer and rule a
country by force anymore. But the Americans
have not learnt their lessons well and still stationing Americans troops all
over the world thinking of war.
Who would be
the most likely aggressor country to conduct and engage in wars? China, Russia
or America? Who have military bases and troops all over the world? The
Americans have been accusing Russia, China and North Korea as the threat to
peace when the real threat to world peace are the Americans. They are the
trigger happy gangsters that have been engaging and still engaging in wars
everywhere.
China going
to attack Singapore, North Korea going to attack Singapore or the Philippines?
Stupidity has no cure. Let Duterte teach them how to think clearly. Duterte is
going to send all the American troops back to the USA. The American troops are
in the Philippines to defend against who, or to hold on to the Philippines as a
semi colony, like Japan and South Korea? Die die also would not leave.
The
Americans are hyping all the threats to frighten the silly Asian countries to
allow them to station their troops in their countries as semi colonies of the
American Empire, to control them and to buy more American weapons. Can understand that?
Stupidity
has no cure.
PS. The
Philippines filed a mild protest to China for putting anti aircraft and anti
missile weapons in the SCS islands. The Americans were hoping to drive a wedge
in the warming relations between the Philippines and China. The Pinoys are not
stupid. These are defensive weapons, not offensive weapons like aircraft
carriers, tanks and nuclear bombers. They would only be used against anyone who
intrudes into Chinese territorial waters to challenge the Chinese. And the
likely intruders would be the Americans or maybe the Japs and the little
sheriff in Australia.
The
defensive weapons are not to attack the Philippines, but to defend Chinese
islands. What is there to protest?
$12 million for Korean comfort women, debt settled
Abe is
insisting that the South Koreans removed the statue of a comfort woman placed
in front of the Japanese embassy in South Korea. The Koreans cannot remind
themselves of this insulting crime against their women but the Japanese can
continue to remind themselves of their war criminal heroes in Yasukuni Shrine
when Japanese leaders regularly went there to pay homage, respect and to honour
these war criminals.
And this is
what Abe said, ‘Japan has already paid 1 billion yen($12 million) as we
sincerely fulfilled our obligation. This statement by Abe is belittling the Koreans even more and a new insult to them as a people. I think it is now South Korea’s turn to
show sincerity in an unwavering manner.’
Why were the South Koreans furious and wanted the statue to be there
again when it was removed earlier. They were provoked by Japanese ministers
visiting the Yasukuni Shrine to honour the criminals that abused the comfort
women. But the Japanese would not want to understand this. Now Abe is accusing
the South Koreans of insincerity.
Mind you,
the $12 million was what the Japanese believed is the worth of the hundreds of
thousands of South Korean women forced to be prostitutes to satisfy the sex
starved Japanese soldiers that invaded their countries. And the payment was not
to repay a debt but just an obligation! What, an obligation?
The Japanese
and the Abes all thinks alike, that the abuses and crimes against the South
Koreans can be repaid by a few million dollars. The insults, the humiliation,
the rape and looting of both Koreas are nothing. The payment of a few million
dollars, oops, not payment, but some handouts are just obligations that they
owed to the Koreans.
Can this man
be trusted? Is this man, Abe, and the Japanese be trusted and are they
honourable people? After what they had done to the Koreans and the rest of
Asia, no remorse, no repentence. They believed that they have paid for their
crimes. Maybe some quarters in Singapore would think it is over, water under
the bridge, and even think the Japanese are honourable and trustworthy people.
How many
here believe so? How many believe that the rape and insult and humiliation of
the South Korean comfort women is worth only $12 million dollar, debt settled?
Unlike SE
Asian countries, the Koreans are not going to forget the invasion, colonization
and humiliation of their country and people so easily. The rootless people of
SE Asia would not mind the massacres of their forefathers as they could not see
any link to their past. They have no past, no cultural roots to look back to.
1/18/2017
Jennifer Granholm – Ignorance is no blessing
The ex
governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm, has told Trump to look at Singapore as
a role model for creating jobs. As they said, ignorance is bliss but not when
national policies affecting the livelihood of Americans are concerned. The
recommendation by Jennifer to use Singapore as a role model is at best out of
ignorance, a lot of superficialities, and at worst, shallowness.
The situation
and conditions in Singapore are so far from what she thinks they are. She came
to the conclusion by talking to a few ‘business roundtable of CEOs’ that
recommended Singapore to her. I would agree if I were an American or foreign
CEO looking for a job in Singapore. The point is that Singapore is so lack of
top talents that anything that walks on two legs, and is foreign, is good to
become CEOs in Singapore. And many foreigners are enjoying this fascination and
attention in Singapore. The Pinkerton
Syndrome is thriving today with renewed enthusiasm in the heads of boys and
girls in charge. It is thus only natural that Singapore is a goldmine to these
CEOs.
The
realities in Singapore are very different. Other than the silly obsession with
anything western or foreign, Singapore is creating good jobs for foreigners to
the tune of more than half a million managerial, executive and professional
positions but with its own people increasingly losing their jobs, especially
the Singaporean PMETs to foreigners. The myth that foreigners are here to
create jobs for Singaporeans is receiving all the cynical comments by the
thousands of Singaporeans losing their jobs and ended up as taxi drivers.
Is this what
the Americans want? Is this what Trump wants, bringing in more foreigners to replace
Americans and making more Americans losing their jobs? Didn’t Jennifer know that Trump rose to the
Presidency promising not to bring in more foreigners and to create jobs for
Americans? Is she recommending to Trump to follow Singapore, to bring in more
foreigners to take jobs from citizens?
A little
knowledge is dangerous. This is a case of superficiality out of ignorance and
talking to the wrong messengers. Trump would blow his top if this
recommendation is put up to him, together with TPP is good for the Americans.
PS. This Jennifer should note that Singapore created more than half a million good jobs for foreigners. How many good jobs did foreigners create for Singapore, or causing more Singaporeans to lose their jobs?
PS. This Jennifer should note that Singapore created more than half a million good jobs for foreigners. How many good jobs did foreigners create for Singapore, or causing more Singaporeans to lose their jobs?
Mahathir playing the race card again
The racist
politics of Malaysia today has it origin in Mahathir. When racism or whatever
serves his interest, Mahathir will take it to the extreme. Today he is stirring
racist hate again, this time attacking Najib and the Sultan of Johore.
Investment by China is bad, Chinese investment is bad. He has set up another
party and wondering how many non Malays would join his party or form a coalition
with him to take on Najib by playing with the race card all over again.
The Sultan
of Johore is not going to allow Mahathir to stir anti Chinese sentiment in
Johore. The Chinese are pouring money into Malaysia to the tune of hundreds of
billions. It is not just benefitting Johore alone, Selangor, Malacca, Pahang,
Trengganu and Kelantan are all beneficiaries to foreign Chinese investments,
all negotiated fairly between Malaysia and China, unlike the days of
colonialism when the British put a gun at the sultans and said, sign here.
Malaysia is
enjoying an economic boom it has not seen before. No western countries or Arab
countries are willing to invest that kind of money in Malaysia like the Chinese
did. There is no gun boat diplomacy, no coercion, strictly business. But
Mahathir is angry because the investment is from China.
What
Mahathir is doing is like what Sultan Ibrahim said, ‘this is a clear case of
economic sabotage and racial instigating…If investors wish to pump money into
Johor Baru, do we say “no, no, if you are from China, you cannot come”…Dr
Mahathir thinks it is easy to play up race because these investors happen to be
from China. This is utterly disgusting”’.
The
realities of today is that every country is now independent and is best placed
to seek investments and negotiate the best deals they could get, unlike the
days of colonialism when all deals favoured the colonial masters. Every
economic and commercial deal is sealed when both parties agreed to the terms
that they deemed are favourable to them. No more one sided colonial terms.
Najib and the Sultan would not allow that to happen.
Oh, some
unthinking western cronies would blindly agree with Mahathir, anything Chinese
is bad, must bring in the western companies to balance the Chinese investments.
What about the days when all investments were British, why no calls for Asian
investments to balance western investments? And what if no western company is
interested, no Arab company is interested, wait for the coconut to fall?
Investors with the money will go wherever they are welcomed. Every country is
putting up their best terms to attract foreign investors.
The world
today is different. Every country, every leader would want the best for his
country and would get the best deals for his country. No leaders would sell out
their countries to foreign interests or to sell out the interests of their
people to foreigners. Najib and Sultan Ibrahim are smart enough to get the best
deals for Malaysia and Johore. Mahathir is only stirring shit and will stir all
kinds of shit for his personal agenda.
1/17/2017
The USA must start to behave as a responsible stakeholder
No more regime change, no more proxy wars, no more invasion of countries, no more support for terrorist organizations, cut down on nuclear weapons, stop inciting and provoking wars to sell more weapons. Stop building military bases every where, stop building military alliances, these are the things the Americans are doing irresponsibly and contributing to a more dangerous world.
It is time the United Nations start to behave as a responsible world organization of peace and to rein in this evil Empire from threatening the world with its military might, with its nuclear arsenals of more than 7,000 nuclear warheads and its more than 10 carrier groups armed with nuclear weapons.
What is the purpose of having more than 7,000 nuclear warheads and building more nuclear warheads? What are the Americans up to, what are their intentions to have so many nuclear warheads, and building more? For peace, for aggression, or for the destruction of Mother Earth? When is the United Nations going to table a resolution to curb the wildness of this evil Empire from possessing more nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers to threaten the world? When is the United Nations going to condemn this evil Empire for conducting regime change, for invading small nations, for threatening small countries recklessly with false and fake excuses? Or the UN is only good at bullying small countries or at the behest of the US to attack small countries?
The United Nations must give notice to this evil Empire that it should stop building military bases around the world, close down existing military bases to make this world more peaceful and stable. The world will be a more peaceful place without the evil Empire labeling countries as enemies, as hostile, as belligerent when the one that is hostile and belligerent and the enemy of the world is the evil Empire. It is so used to tell the world which country is bad, evil, and to sanction or threaten those countries so branded by the evil Empire, to even attack them.
The countries of the world, the United Nations, must stand up to the evil ways of the evil Empire, charge its evil leaders for war crimes, for crimes against humanity. The evil Empire must not be allowed to get away from its evil acts, from its crimes against humanity with impunity.
The United Nations should push for sanctions against the evil Empire for supporting and funding terrorist organizations, for threatening to use force against small countries, to disarm and destroy its nuclear arsenals. Obama talked about a world free from nuclear weapons but approved and committed more trillions of American dollars to build more nuclear weapons.
What nonsense, what hypocrisy!!!
The world would be a safer place with no nuclear weapons. Why is the United Nations condoning the Americans and on the side of the evil Empire in imposing sanctions on Iran and North Korea that possessed only a handful of nuclear weapons but did not have the ability to deliver them but keep quiet and allowed the Americans to hoard the biggest nuclear arsenal in the world, that could destroy the world many times over?
This is hypocrisy at the highest level. The United Nations must take the evil Empire to task, to rein in its warmongering activities around the world, to denounce and condemn the evil Empire for conducting wars, for being trigger happy, for killing millions of innocent people every where.
My ranting would not do any good, but at least it tells the world the whole truth, honest and truthful, not dishonest politicking. The world must face the truth, the reality, that the evil Empire with its hoards of nuclear weapons and aircraft carrier groups are threatening world peace and the destruction of civilization. The American Empire today is not for peace but for world hegemony, world domination, existing for the sake of the Empire and would do anything to any country that shows sign of taking a chip off the Empire. The American Empire is behaving exactly as the evil Empire in the Star Wars series.
UN Resolution and the Rule of Law
The UN recently passed a resolution telling the Israelis to vacate the occupied land belonging to the Palestinians. The US abstained and the resolution was passed by 14 votes to nil. Now, is this resolution now a law, an international law, a law passed by the UN?
This resolution is not the so called ‘UN backed’ ruling by an arbitration court in The Hague that acted more like a kangaroo court. This is the UN itself passing the resolution. This resolution has very serious implications for small states. It is about the rule of law and about the UN passing laws to protect the interests of small states.
The Israeli govt is opposing this resolution and declared that they would not abide by it. The USA is also not going to abide by it and its congress is going to rule against it, to throw it out. The USA and Israel are not going to abide by a UN resolution or law. They are not going to follow international law, they are not going to abide by the rule of law.
What would Singapore govt’s position be on this? Would Singapore shout at the USA and Israel to abide by the rule of law, by the UN resolution? What is our principled position on this? If Singapore finds the rulings of the arbitration court, a NOT UN backed organization so important, would a UN resolution be even more important to uphold?
Or would Singapore compromise its principles and look the other way because USA and Israel are our close allies?
1/16/2017
Terrex - Who bullies who?
I have been flattered by some readers for the fictional pieces that I wrote. I am glad that they enjoyed them, like fine wines with full bodies and a lasting after taste. Maybe I should write something more serious to give a clearer picture on the Terrex Incident.
Many commentators have responded angrily that China reacted and seized the Terrex APVs. Many simply pointed the fingers at China as a bully, a super power bullying the peesai of the world. Just think carefully at the two words, 'reacted' and 'peesai'. Peesai is quite easy to understand, an insignificantly little piece of shit in the nose, too small to mean anything.
'Reacted' tells a story by itself, just like the word, 'returned' to honest politics. 'Reacted' means it is a reaction to something, to some action or many actions, and these caused a reaction. A bully does not react. A bully acts at his whims and fancy. A bully always makes the first move, to bully someone he thinks he can bully and get a way with it. This could be a definition of bully in the context of the Terrex Incident.
Before China reacted, what happened? What did Singapore do for China to react? And would China have reacted, seized the APVs if Singapore had done nothing against China? Think slowly and carefully. Don't over react impulsively. The ferrying of the APVs and training in Taiwan have been going on for many decades and China closed one eye, pretending not to see. Now, does the word 'react' becomes clearer, that everything could have gone on as per normal if there was nothing for China to react?
China was our good friend, so said Vivian, but no one else. No one else dares to say or is saying China was our good friend. What did China do to harm this relationship? Zilch, absolutely zero. Ok there was this Suzhou Industrial Park thing that Singapore and Singaporeans are unhappy about. But there are many levels of relationship going on, both sides benefitting from them and wanting more. There were many delegations visiting both sides and trade numbers were going up year by year.
Ask this simple question, what had Singapore been doing all these years towards this good relationship that China was prepared to look the other way over the One China Policy and Starlight? Think carefully and slowly to recall the things that Singapore had done that were not very friendly to a good friend and our top trading partner. Think of the derogatory jokes in Washington. Think of the very serious comments about asking the Americans to bring their military forces here to balance China. Think about the persistent calls for China to follow the rule of law in the SCS. Think of the accusation that China was applying the divide and rule to divide Asean. Think of the insistence for China to accept the kangaroo court rulings in The Hague. Think of the principled calls on freedom of navigation in the SCS as if only Singapore is concerned about it and no one else. And if Singapore did not tell China so, they would be no freedom of navigation. Think of the frequency of negative articles about China in the media, almost daily bashing. Think of the walkout by our FM at the Asean Summit in Laos. Think of the pushing for the SCS issue to be included in the Non Aligned Movement statement in Venezuela and the theatrics of the Singapore Ambassador in Beijing. Think of what Singapore had been doing to poke at China, like a peesai poking at the eyes of a dragon and thinking it could get away with it. These were only a few of the things better not said. There were others like TPP, no Middle Kingdom, Americans operating from Changi to harass China in SCS etc etc.
When all these things were happening, the arrogance of it all was that the little peesai thought it was punching above its weight and nothing would happen. The big 'bully' could not do anything while being bullied and poked by a little peesai over and over again. And the height of arrogance was that the little peesai thought that things would be normal, Starlight could continue going on and on, the big 'bully' would continue to be bullied and would continue to look the other way, afraid to show that it was angry, fearful of the little peesai punching above its weight and using the big 'bully' as the punching bag.
Now the big 'bully' said enough is enough, and reacted. The big 'bully' reacted! And the little peesai screamed, bully, bully, bully!
Who is the real bully? Who is bullying who? Who has been bullying who? No, never poke leh! I am an angel. Honest, trust me, I swear I never poke at China.
Many commentators have responded angrily that China reacted and seized the Terrex APVs. Many simply pointed the fingers at China as a bully, a super power bullying the peesai of the world. Just think carefully at the two words, 'reacted' and 'peesai'. Peesai is quite easy to understand, an insignificantly little piece of shit in the nose, too small to mean anything.
'Reacted' tells a story by itself, just like the word, 'returned' to honest politics. 'Reacted' means it is a reaction to something, to some action or many actions, and these caused a reaction. A bully does not react. A bully acts at his whims and fancy. A bully always makes the first move, to bully someone he thinks he can bully and get a way with it. This could be a definition of bully in the context of the Terrex Incident.
Before China reacted, what happened? What did Singapore do for China to react? And would China have reacted, seized the APVs if Singapore had done nothing against China? Think slowly and carefully. Don't over react impulsively. The ferrying of the APVs and training in Taiwan have been going on for many decades and China closed one eye, pretending not to see. Now, does the word 'react' becomes clearer, that everything could have gone on as per normal if there was nothing for China to react?
China was our good friend, so said Vivian, but no one else. No one else dares to say or is saying China was our good friend. What did China do to harm this relationship? Zilch, absolutely zero. Ok there was this Suzhou Industrial Park thing that Singapore and Singaporeans are unhappy about. But there are many levels of relationship going on, both sides benefitting from them and wanting more. There were many delegations visiting both sides and trade numbers were going up year by year.
Ask this simple question, what had Singapore been doing all these years towards this good relationship that China was prepared to look the other way over the One China Policy and Starlight? Think carefully and slowly to recall the things that Singapore had done that were not very friendly to a good friend and our top trading partner. Think of the derogatory jokes in Washington. Think of the very serious comments about asking the Americans to bring their military forces here to balance China. Think about the persistent calls for China to follow the rule of law in the SCS. Think of the accusation that China was applying the divide and rule to divide Asean. Think of the insistence for China to accept the kangaroo court rulings in The Hague. Think of the principled calls on freedom of navigation in the SCS as if only Singapore is concerned about it and no one else. And if Singapore did not tell China so, they would be no freedom of navigation. Think of the frequency of negative articles about China in the media, almost daily bashing. Think of the walkout by our FM at the Asean Summit in Laos. Think of the pushing for the SCS issue to be included in the Non Aligned Movement statement in Venezuela and the theatrics of the Singapore Ambassador in Beijing. Think of what Singapore had been doing to poke at China, like a peesai poking at the eyes of a dragon and thinking it could get away with it. These were only a few of the things better not said. There were others like TPP, no Middle Kingdom, Americans operating from Changi to harass China in SCS etc etc.
When all these things were happening, the arrogance of it all was that the little peesai thought it was punching above its weight and nothing would happen. The big 'bully' could not do anything while being bullied and poked by a little peesai over and over again. And the height of arrogance was that the little peesai thought that things would be normal, Starlight could continue going on and on, the big 'bully' would continue to be bullied and would continue to look the other way, afraid to show that it was angry, fearful of the little peesai punching above its weight and using the big 'bully' as the punching bag.
Now the big 'bully' said enough is enough, and reacted. The big 'bully' reacted! And the little peesai screamed, bully, bully, bully!
Who is the real bully? Who is bullying who? Who has been bullying who? No, never poke leh! I am an angel. Honest, trust me, I swear I never poke at China.
1/15/2017
MacDonald reviewing its non halal food policy
Read about this on the news and recalled another piece of news about this policy over the weekend. Cakes or food that is not halal cannot be brought into MacDonald restaurants. I felt guilty as I used to buy takeaway char kway teow or roast pork for dinner and then queued at MacDonald restaurant to buy hamburger, or actually beef burger with the takeaways in plastic bags. I did not know that MacDonald has such a policy and that I had unintentionally violated this policy. My apologies, would not do it again.
For MacDonald to announce that it has such a policy is a good thing so that its customers would know and would not break the policy unknowingly. MacDonald as a business should have its right to have whatever policies to make its customers happy. Just make the policy known, put up big banners at the main door so that no one could miss it and would not bring non halal food into the restaurants.
Now, why is MacDonald reviewing this policy? I have no problem with MacDonald having no halal food in its premises policy. I either don’t bring non halal food into MacDonald or just don’t patronize MacDonald. No big deal. There are other choices available.
What is the point of making a policy public and within a week and starts to talk about reviewing it? We used to have the very popular Banquet Food Court that sold only halal food. It was their policy and preferred choice of doing business. I used to patronize the Banquet Food Court too. Unfortunately all closed down.
Let the restaurants make their policy choice and the customers make their own choices who to patronize or where to eat. Everyone happy. Singapore is a multi cultural and multi religious country with plenty of choices for everyone with each free to do what he pleases.
For MacDonald to announce that it has such a policy is a good thing so that its customers would know and would not break the policy unknowingly. MacDonald as a business should have its right to have whatever policies to make its customers happy. Just make the policy known, put up big banners at the main door so that no one could miss it and would not bring non halal food into the restaurants.
Now, why is MacDonald reviewing this policy? I have no problem with MacDonald having no halal food in its premises policy. I either don’t bring non halal food into MacDonald or just don’t patronize MacDonald. No big deal. There are other choices available.
What is the point of making a policy public and within a week and starts to talk about reviewing it? We used to have the very popular Banquet Food Court that sold only halal food. It was their policy and preferred choice of doing business. I used to patronize the Banquet Food Court too. Unfortunately all closed down.
Let the restaurants make their policy choice and the customers make their own choices who to patronize or where to eat. Everyone happy. Singapore is a multi cultural and multi religious country with plenty of choices for everyone with each free to do what he pleases.
1/14/2017
Assholes – The CPF is the people’s life savings
Stop having more designs on the people’s life savings. The money is saved by the people over a life time for retirement. Do not think that it is your money and you can suka suka anytime decide what it should be used for without the people’s consent. Just take and take.
First you have compulsory CPF Life and then Medishield Life. Now what, compulsory Eldershield Life? Who the fuck do you think you are to decide for the people how to use their life savings? Don’t you think you have taken enough of the people’s money through the sale of HDB flats, the minimum sum schemes and the two compulsory CPF Life and Medishield Life Schemes? Not enough, now wanting to take more in another compulsory Eldershield Life Insurance Scheme?
The oldies did not have anything left for you to take. They need to eat and pay bills, and the few dollars left are all that they have. They no longer have incomes to feed your million dollar salaries. Spare the old folks. Stop having more designs on their money. If you really have a heart, cough up some money from the state coffer or divert the excess premiums collected from the other compulsory schemes for the oldies.
Remember, if your intention is ill conceived, you will have to answer for it one day. Don’t mess around with the blood, sweat and tear money of the hapless oldies. All these compulsory schemes were not part of the contract of CPF savings to start with. The people put money in the CPF for their retirement, not for you to do as you pleased. Their life time savings are not for you to take, not for you to spend. It is very easy to take the money from the defenceless oldies. Remember, there is no free lunch, what you take you must pay back in some ways.
Taking the people’s life saving like sing songs, no need to ask the people’s permission, just legislate it. Go and find out what is the meaning of ‘chek ark’. There is no good reason to take the people’s money against their wishes. It is as good as daylight robbery.
First you have compulsory CPF Life and then Medishield Life. Now what, compulsory Eldershield Life? Who the fuck do you think you are to decide for the people how to use their life savings? Don’t you think you have taken enough of the people’s money through the sale of HDB flats, the minimum sum schemes and the two compulsory CPF Life and Medishield Life Schemes? Not enough, now wanting to take more in another compulsory Eldershield Life Insurance Scheme?
The oldies did not have anything left for you to take. They need to eat and pay bills, and the few dollars left are all that they have. They no longer have incomes to feed your million dollar salaries. Spare the old folks. Stop having more designs on their money. If you really have a heart, cough up some money from the state coffer or divert the excess premiums collected from the other compulsory schemes for the oldies.
Remember, if your intention is ill conceived, you will have to answer for it one day. Don’t mess around with the blood, sweat and tear money of the hapless oldies. All these compulsory schemes were not part of the contract of CPF savings to start with. The people put money in the CPF for their retirement, not for you to do as you pleased. Their life time savings are not for you to take, not for you to spend. It is very easy to take the money from the defenceless oldies. Remember, there is no free lunch, what you take you must pay back in some ways.
Taking the people’s life saving like sing songs, no need to ask the people’s permission, just legislate it. Go and find out what is the meaning of ‘chek ark’. There is no good reason to take the people’s money against their wishes. It is as good as daylight robbery.
1/13/2017
The evil Empire has declared war on China
According to a Bloomberg report filed by Isabel Reynolds, Rex
Tillerson, the State Secretary designate, said these: ‘China must be denied access to artificial islands built in the
disputed waters…a failure to respond to China’s actions had allowed it to
"keep pushing the envelope" in the South China Sea. "We’re going
to have to send China a clear signal that first the island-building stops and
second your access to those islands is also not going to be allowed,"’
This kind of irresponsible statements
coming from the trigger happy evil Empire is trouble to the world. China would
not budge and would put up a fight. So what do the Americans think they want to
do? This is no longer a game of chicken. China would confront the aggressive American
military head on, might with might. Once the Americans make the first move, it
is all the way, come what may.
And this cock American said
this, ‘They are taking territory or control, or declaring control of
territories that are not rightfully China’s.’ Did this cock Tillerson remember
that their forefathers invaded America, killed all the native Americans they
called Red Indians and robbed their land, now called the USA? Was the continent
of North America, inhabited by hundreds of millions of native Americans,
rightfully the land of the European Americans?
This cock thinks that China
would sit there and wait to be pushed out of their islands. China though still
trying to be diplomatic, would be sending all their military weapons and
reinforcement to the islands and hardened their defences and in waiting for the
Americans to come ashore. This is not 1492 when Columbus landed in America and
with all the weapons in hand, went about killing the poorly armed natives that
died fighting the European invaders. The
Americans must be prepared for the sinking of a few aircraft carriers if they
are mad and reckless enough to try this game again.
Tighten your seat belt for a
rough ride with the world’s Number One warmonger rattling its sabre and calling
for war. They failed to get the Aquino
govt to do the fighting, now they have removed the veil and showing their hands
behind all the tensions in the SCS. They are going to do the fighting
themselves as no Asean country would be stupid enough to want to die fighting
for the American interest. Oops, I stand corrected as there could be some silly
ones out there thinking that they could fight on the side of the Americans and
don’t mind looking like dead heroes.
SCS is not the only region
that is going to see high tension and threats of war. The Americans are also raising temperature in
Europe by sending troops and tanks to the Russian border to confront Russia.
Now, how many silly Asians still stick to their unthinking view that the
Americans are peaceful people, for world peace when they are raising tensions
and threatening wars everywhere? Oh, it is the fault of the Russians and the
Chinese, and the North Koreans, and the Iranians and the Arab countries that
the Americans have to go to wars with them, murdering Gaddafi and Saddam
Hussein like a past time.
Stupidity has no cure.
1/12/2017
Honest dishonesty at work
I saw this
runner on the TV screen. ’99.9% O level students passed at least one subject’.
Wow, what a great achievement. Our education system or the teachers have done
well, very well. Or is it the students have done exceptionally well? 99.9% passed! Wait a minute, passed at least one
subject? What does this mean? Passed one subject also passed? I have left
school for so long and I know that in my time passing one subject is as good to
repeat in Sec 4. Passing 3 subjects also considered failed in my time. You need
to pass at least 4 or 5 subjects and with some decent grades to pass and get a
Grade 3. Now passed one subject can already, passed?
I am out of
touch. Is this the reason why the employers have no faith in our education
system when passing one subject is considered passed and something to rejoice,
to shout about? What is the truth? Would the student with one or two passes go
home and announce to papa and mama, ‘I passed, one subject’ and get rewarded?
The
statement is very honest or very dishonest or honest dishonest? Ok, there was
another banner that stated something like 84.3% passed at least 5 subjects.
Though we must not embarrass or discourage those that did not do well, but we
must be honest with them, that one pass does not qualify to pass the whole
examination. Or maybe nowadays there is no such thing as pass or fail an
examination. Just count the number of passes good enough. What a merry world of
semantics and make beliefs. Yes, say the right things and hear the good stuff.
The world’s Number One nuclear power threatening North Korea
The world’s
Number One nuclear power, with more than 7,000 nuclear warheads that can turn
the world into Stone Age, is threatening North Korea for wanting to test fly an
ICBM. It is saying that they can have all the nuclear weapons but no one else
can. They murdered Saddam Hussein and burnt down the whole country of Iraq, on
the excuse that Iraq had WMD. Now it is alleging that the North Koreans are
dangerous because they had a handful of unsophisticated nuclear weapons and
demanding the world to take action against North Korea, claiming that North
Korea is going to throw their nuclear weapons at everyone, including Singapore.
And many silly bananas believe this myth. Why, because the Americans told them
so.
Do they know
why Iraq was invaded but not Iran? Because Iran has nuclear weapons and can hit
back with nuclear weapons. That is why Iran is safe but not Iraq. Iraq could
not hit back. Now North Korea too has nuclear weapons and is safe from being
attacked by the Americans. Any country that wants to be safe from American
attacks must possess nuclear weapons.
And what is
Trump saying despite having a monopoly of nuclear weapons? The combined nuclear
weapons of the rest of the world are not even half of what the Americans have.
And Trump is saying that because of North Korea, America must ‘greatly
strengthen and expand’ its nuclear capabilities. What kind of American
silliness is this?
What kind of
shitty heads did the silly Asians have to accept this kind of cowboy logic?
Americans have the right to own all the nuclear weapons and to threaten every
country with nuclear weapons and the rest of the world cannot have nuclear
weapons and no one is telling the Americans off for threatening smaller
countries with war and destruction?
No wonder
the Americans are ruling the world. The silly Asians accept this as the
inevitable reality, to be ruled and controlled by the Americans. And the best
part, they love it, and happily accept this state of affair. But not the North
Koreans, they are going to show their middle finger to the Americans.
Who is the
stupid one? Who is the mad one? When is the UN going to tell the Americans to
reduce their nuclear arsenal for a nuclear free world that Obama was talking
about? Or a nuclear free world is one where no one can have nuclear weapons
except the Americans, to rule and threaten everyone with nuclear annihilation?
Ask the
Americans what is the purpose of having 7,000 nuclear warheads and increasing?
For peace?
1/11/2017
Singapore is the beacon of political honesty
As I said, I
am going to write something honest about Singapore. I am going to say the
darnest thing about political honesty. Tharman has said his peace and everyone
is aroused by what he said and getting very excited. If you missed it, here it
is, ‘To tackle social and political issues, return to 'honest
politics’. The whole social media is abuzz by this statement. This is the most
politically honest statement coming from Tharman.
And I agree with Tharman that we must return to ‘honest
politics’ when tackling social and political issues. Singapore is what it is
today because of such honesty. Singapore moved from Third World to First World
because our politicians and political system are honest. Wait, wait, don’t throw eggs at me so early.
Let me justify my case ok?
Honesty is an inherent trait in Singaporeans and more so in
our politicians. Some may say not so sure about opposition politicians. My
claim is based on a few assumptions, oops, a few fundamental facts. We have the
most well educated population, not counting the foreigners who came here with
degrees from genuine degree mills and well respected and recognized as
genuinely good. The system has acknowledged their goodness that now they are
saying degrees are not important. Honesty is infectious and the foreigners have
also become honest like us, and for that we accept their degrees with grace and
generosity. No need to check any more to embarrass them. Also our educated population is educated from
world best universities and world best education system, so must be good and
can tell the difference between honesty and dishonesty.
With such a clever population, there is no way dishonest
politicians can bluff the people unless the people are really daft, a congenital
defect. Being dishonest is bluffing, lying, cheating and even conning the
people. The very fact that the people continued to vote the politicians into
power speaks for itself. The people, all so well educated, cannot be so stupid
and cannot tell the difference between honesty and dishonesty. They believe in
an honest govt made up of honest politicians saying and doing all the honest
things. The whole world must be envious of our politicians. The only element
that could undermine an honest govt, money or corruption, has already been
taken out from the equation. For that, the people or at least 70% have voted
and confirmed that we have an honest govt and honest politicians. This is an
indisputable fact.
And our politicians are so honest that they often spoke
their mind, honestly. They did not have to hide or lie to tell people they are
more than the lesser mortals. They believe that dignity comes from having a big
salary. See how honest they are, no need to bluff. They honestly said they need
millions or their lifestyle would be affected and would not want to sacrifice
their privacy to be politicians. They also believe that if the govt pays good
salaries, in the millions, you will have honest politicians or at least no
politician will be dishonest with money matters. Town council management or
some town council management may be an exception. At least they all started as
angels but they cannot be angels all the time. This is honesty.
And honesty is how all the social and political problems are
solved here. The latest is the amendment to protect children under police
investigation. There is also the urgency to have a minority president and this
is done quickly and honestly. It has
absolutely nothing to do with Tan Cheng Bock. The Terrex Incident is also a good
case of honesty and how it should be handled honestly for the good of everyone.
I am waiting for them to produce the declaration forms in the media as proof on
what was actually declared. Honesty will dispel all the speculations and
guessing, everything will be transparent and honestly declared.
And honesty means that when they made mistakes they own up.
Even when mistakes of hundreds of millions of dollars or billions of dollars
were made, they put it on public records.
Our govt is so clean and so honest. This is something the people must be
proud of. When they want to fix things they also said so. This is true honesty
of the highest level in politics.
I dunno when they said Singapore belongs to everyone is an
honest statement or not. But when they said Singapore needs 6.9m population I
am sure they are honest about it, that it is only a planning parameter.
I can go on and on about political honesty with many more
examples. Singapore would not have come this far if politics and social
problems were tackled dishonestly. It
cannot be. Anyone or any politician that is dishonest would be caught with his
pants down in an honest system.
It is time to return to honest politics. What, have we gone
somewhere or fell asleep and must now return to honest politics? My apologies,
just a Freudian slip. It is good and an honest thing to do to return to the
right path should one go astray.
1/10/2017
Another Little Brown Brother got insulted
It has to
take a Duterte to wake up the Pinoys that no matter what, they are just Little
Brown Brothers to the Americans, to be used to serve the Empire’s business, to
fight proxy wars, to challenge the enemies of the Empire with the masters
shouting from behind, providing arms and vocal support.
Indonesia
just found out, my goodness, they haven’t woken up yet, that the literature and
military doctrines of the Australians used them as enemies and were insulting
their Pancasila, including their belief in God and inciting Indonesian Papua to
be independent from Indonesia. Quoting an Agencies’ report ‘Indonesian military
spokesman Major General Wuryanto said, “all forms of cooperation”, including
military exercises and education and exchange programmes, have been suspended
indefinitely.’
Who do the
Indonesians believe were the ‘enemies’ in the Australian military exercise materials?
China? The Australians rehearsing all their military exercises in anticipation
of a Chinese attack on their territories? But it is not all in vain. Indonesia
has started to question the increasing presence of American forces stationed in
Australia, for what purposes, to prepare for an invasion of China?
Little Brown
Brothers must always remember that they cannot morph into anything else, not
into white brothers. The historical experience of the Australians meddling in
Indonesian affairs, particularly in Timor, in Papua New Guinea, would not go
away and would be repeated at the opportune moment.
This little
deputy white sheriff is meddling too much in a region that it should not and is
not behaving like a little sheriff, thinking that it is a big regional power.
One day it would be overrun by Indonesia to put it in its rightful place.
Behind the headlines, looking inside the skulls
How would Trump
deal with a trigger happy North Korea? Jeremy Koh
To tackle social and political issues, return to 'honest politics': DPM Tharman
To tackle social and political issues, return to 'honest politics': DPM Tharman
Above are two headlines
in Channel News Asia on 8 Jan 17. In the first headline, the mindset of the
author, Jeremy Koh, is that Kim Jong Un is a trigger happy man, or the North
Koreans are. How did he come to this conclusion? What did the North Koreans did
to be branded as trigger happy? Did they go to war, commit terrrorist acts? Or
they were testing their missiles and nuclear weapons? If testing missiles and
nuclear weapons are considered trigger happy, would the USA be branded as
trigger happy, the most trigger happy as they have tested the most missiles and
nuclear weapons and possessed the most and threatened to use them in the most
occasions? Or is conducting military exercises considered trigger happy? Which
country is conducting war games all over the world? North Korea?
What about countries
engaged in wars under the slightest provocations or fabricating false
information like WMD, would they be considered trigger happy? Which country has
been conducting wars all over the world? Not trigger happy?
Or North Korea is
trigger happy because the Americans said so? A little critical thinking and
common sense would easily identify who is the real trigger happy country. No
prize for the correct answer.
Singaporeans are not
called daft for no reasons. Their daftness is legendary.
The second question is
an eye opener. Returning to honest politics. Who have been indulging in
dishonest politics and who needs to return to honest politics? See the
halo over my head?
Ok, let’s not engage in
speculations, allegations or name calling. Let those honest people engaging in
dishonest politics to start to change to honest politics. No need to ask them
to own up and confess that they have been engaging in dishonest politics. That
would be asking too much.
All those engaging in
dishonest politics please kee chiu.
Thank you Tharman for
saying the darnest thing. I know that you are referring to the international
players and this is not meant for domestic consumption.
PS. Any cat wants to
declare it does not eat fish and wants to turn vegetarian?
1/09/2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
