3/22/2022

COVID-19 Likely Originated in United States

 

In late Dec 2019, Wuhan was first to report a pneumonia never seen before that spread rapidly locally. Before that, an unexplained pneumonia broke out swiftly in the US. Over the past 2 years, there've been many different theories and assumptions on the origins of COVID-19. The connection between the 2 bizarre outbreaks in China and the US remains a mystery.

What's puzzling is that the WHO has adopted a completely different attitude towards China and the US. On one hand, the WHO has sent international experts to China twice to carry out origins-tracing joint studies. On the other hand, the organization has repeatedly turned a blind eye to the US, where new evidence is constantly being discovered, as if its hands are tied, completely ignoring the true origins of COVID-19.

2 years into the pandemic, scientists and research institutes around the world continue to discover new signs of COVID-19 spreading within their own country even earlier than the outbreak identified in Wuhan. Among the most shocking revelations, US National Institutes of Health announced that COVID-19 has been spreading within the U.S. ahead of Wuhan due to antibodies found in local human samples collected by the end of 2019. The finding helped Americans explain the "strange pneumonia" they got in 2019. The mayor of Belleville, New Jersey said that he showed clear symptoms of COVID-19 in November 2019, and tested positive for the COVID-19 antibody in early 2020. In May 2020, the Florida Department of Health announced that as of Jan 1, 2020, there were 171 local COVID-19 cases that had no travel history to China. Among those cases, some showed symptoms in late 2019 and tested positive for COVID-19 antibody in early 2020.

After conducting research and review in China and finding no evidence leading to a "lab leak theory", the WHO expert team came to the conclusion that lab leak in Wuhan is extremely unlikely. However, across the Pacific Ocean, Fort Detrick, a military base that had the highest safety level biological labs shut down due to severe leak accidents right before the pandemic, has managed to stay out of the limelight repeatedly.

As a former biochemical weapon research base, the military base still experiments on a list of high-risk contagious viruses categorized by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as "a serious threat to the public, animal or plant health, or plant or animal products", including the coronavirus.

In May, 2018, the wastewater treatment plant at Fort Detrick had a malfunction and unsterilized wastewater leaked into the compound, which led to a mandatory shut-down of facilities. Upon review, the CDC found that the highest-security labs causing accidents did not have "sufficient systems in place to decontaminate wastewater", and thus issued a "cease and desist order" in July 2019. However, the CDC refused to disclose to the public what the biological agents involved in the leak were, citing "national security reasons".

Right afterwards, the neighborhood surrounding Fort Detrick began to report a type of lethal respiratory disease. From July 1 to 11 in 2019, a nearby apartment building "Garden Ridge" reported 54 cases of respiratory diseases that caused 18 hospitalizations and 2 deaths. On July 15, a community 15 miles away from the initial site reported another similar respiratory disease outbreak. In the same month, outbreaks of a mysterious "e-cigarette disease" began in Maryland, where Fort Detrick is located, and its neighboring state Wisconsin, where patients developed pneumonia of unknown origin. Ever since COVID-19 was diagnosed in 2020, the occurrence of the mysterious "e-cigarette" pneumonia went on a steady decline and its area of occurrence was basically consistent with the area where COVID-19 first appeared in the United States, which seems to reveal that the great number of "unexplained pneumonia" cases could very likely be COVID-19.


According to the phase-one origins-tracing report released by WHO, more than 80,000 animal samples were collected in China and no positive result was identified for COVID-19 antibody or nucleic acid soon after the epidemic broke out in China. The intermediate hosts and animal origins not being found have been used as proof by lab leak theorists to insist on investigating the Wuhan Institute of Virology over and over again. However, perhaps this is showing that international research has been looking for the source of the virus in the wrong place.


The virus has been widely spread among white-tailed deer in the United States, and a case of antibody was also found in serum samples collected from white-tailed deer in the northeastern US in 2019, according to a new study published in the journal Nature. Whether the infection of the North American white-tailed deer was caused by an animal virus spillover or leakage from a local laboratory, the earliest existence of the virus once again points to the United States.

The earliest virus variant, type A, come from the US

In April 2020, the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) published a research finding that among the earliest COVID-19 virus, there were three earliest variants: type A, B, and C. The genealogical analysis revealed that type B and C developed from type A.

And type A is mainly found in the US and Australia, while type B mainly emerged in China and East Asia and type C is mainly discovered in Europe and Brazil.

Conclusion: the Coronavirus pathogen definitely originated in the U.S. ! 

 Anonymous 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where COVID originated certainly matters. However and most importantly now that the Whole World is affected is, will the World be resetted to be better, why and how ??

Anonymous said...

The COVID19 conspiracy was hatched by the USA in an attempt to put the blame on China. This happened a year after the trade war started by Trump, which did not bring China to it's knees. Was COVID19 the follow up plan? Besides attempting to demonise China, it obviously failed to reap the desired result, which was to decimate the Chinese population.

Now it is hatching another plan and it involves the Taiwan issue. The USA knows it has to cripple China at all cost, now or never. Biden already said that he will not allow China to overtake the USA during his watch. What is his intention?

Desperate intentions call for desperate measures and it will not be good. China should be wary of a sneak nuclear strike, which had secretly been on the minds of the Neocons for decades. This could be it. Hopefully saner minds would prevail! For China only two words - Be Prepared!

Anonymous said...

There was also the attempts to create chaos in Hong Kong and using the sinister narratives to capitalise over the Muslim radicalisation issue that China was trying to address. In fact, the USA were using Muslim radicals to create instability and unrest in Xinjiang, which China clamped down eventually. That China thwarted their plan was a hard pill to swallow.

What followed was sanctions imposed on Xinjiang products that basically was punishing the Muslim Uyghurs instead, with job losses and survival issues resulting from those sanctions. It literally backfired and embarrassed the West. It failed to turn the Muslim world against China. But rest assured they will continue to flog the dead horse when Ukraine is settled.

Anonymous said...

In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan

“I totally resent the lie you are now propagating.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared to be channeling the frustration of millions of Americans when he spoke those words during an invective-laden, made-for-Twitter Senate hearing on July 20. You didn’t have to be a Democrat to be fed up with all the xenophobic finger-pointing and outright disinformation, coming mainly from the right, up to and including the claim that COVID-19 was a bioweapon cooked up in a lab.

The immediate target of Dr. Fauci’s wrath was Senator Rand Paul, who was pressing the nation’s top doctor to say whether the National Institutes of Health had ever funded risky coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Based on new information disclosed by the National Institutes of Health, however, Paul might have been onto something.

On Wednesday, the NIH sent a letter to members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce that acknowledged two facts. One was that EcoHealth Alliance, a New York City–based nonprofit that partners with far-flung laboratories to research and prevent the outbreak of emerging diseases, did indeed enhance a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans, which the NIH letter described as an “unexpected result” of the research it funded that was carried out in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The second was that EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms of its grant conditions stipulating that it had to report if its research increased the viral growth of a pathogen by tenfold.

The NIH based these disclosures on a research progress report that EcoHealth Alliance sent to the agency in August, roughly two years after it was supposed to. An NIH spokesperson told Vanity Fair that Dr. Fauci was “entirely truthful in his statements to Congress,” and that he did not have the progress report that detailed the controversial research at the time he testified in July. But EcoHealth Alliance appeared to contradict that claim, and said in a statement: “These data were reported as soon as we were made aware, in our year four report in April 2018.”

The letter from the NIH, and an accompanying analysis, stipulated that the virus EcoHealth Alliance was researching could not have sparked the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, given the sizable genetic differences between the two. In a statement issued Wednesday, NIH director Dr. Francis Collins said that his agency “wants to set the record straight” on EcoHealth Alliance’s research, but added that any claims that it could have caused the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are “demonstrably false.”

EcoHealth Alliance said in a statement that the science clearly proved that its research could not have led to the pandemic, and that it was “working with the NIH to promptly address what we believe to be a misconception about the grant’s reporting requirements and what the data from our research showed.”