The Americans have been blowing the trumpet of democratic values and freedom in the so called Free World. They touted freedom of choice to choose their political system and leaders, freedom of association, to be friends of who ever they like, freedom to trade, freedom to choose the American version of democracy but nothing else. Only American defined democracy is accepted and allowed to practice.
With the Ukrainian war still ongoing, how many countries still believe in the Free World? Every American ally and lackey were coerced, pressurised and armtwisted by the Americans to sanction Russia, attack and badmouth Russia against their national interests, setting themselves up as enemy of Russia that they did not have to. Worst, behaving like bandits and robbers, seizing Russian assets and funds, including those belonging to Russian citizens living in their respective countries. Such outrageous behaviour and acts were uncalled for, insane and brutish and only inviting trouble, waiting for Russia to hit back.
And these silly countries are not admitting that they have been armtwisted, pressured or coerced by the Americans to behave erratically against commonsense and sensibility. They are behaving like the silly comedian President Zelensky, taunting the Russians to hit back. This is the kind of freedom to be members of the so called Free World, freedom to choose, to act, as directed or armtwisted by the Americans, to do the bidding of the Americans freely but not anything else that the Americans forbid them to do.
The whole of Europe that is highly dependent on cheap Russian oil and gas, would now be forbidden by the Americans to get their supply from Russia. Germany, after spending billions to construct the Nordstream2 oil pipeline has to abandon the whole project and has to seek elsewhere for more expensive oil and gas, very likely from the Americans. This is 'freedom of choice' American style. Now why would the Europeans want to pay for more expensive oil and gas from the Americans? Are they of unsound mind? Don't they have the right to choose what and who they want to do business with under a democratic and open and free system? Do they still believe their freedom shit spread and flocked by the Americans? Or are they still willing to believe in the American fake freedom and fake democracy?
A peaceful and reasonably rich Europe is now pitted against the Russians, their biggest oil and gas supplier, because the Americans told them freely to do so. Europe doesn't want peace, doesn't want cheap oil and gas from Russia?
What democratic freedom is there to talk about when the Americans dictated to them who they can do business with? What freedom is there when they are coerced and fixed by the Americans against their own wishes and interests, to be in confrontation with the Russians and living under the cloud of a nuclear war to extinguish everyone of them when they could live a good and peaceful life, doing good business with the Russians and live happily thereafter?
How many still believe in the American fake freedom and fake democracy and fake human rights, the right to choose how they want to live, who to make friends with, who to do business with?
Europe has woken up from their beautiful dream of democratic freedom to find out that they were subjects of the American Empire, shackled and chained, and have no freedom of choice but to do what the Americans told them to. And Europe is not alone. All the American allies and lackeys are just as enslaved as the Europeans.
The only free people and countries are those that the Americans claimed to be unfree, living under authoritarian states or dictatorship. These free countries have all the real freedom to choose to be with or not with the Americans. They could exercise their freedom of choice according to their national interests without having to make themselves enemies of the Russians. But of course, their free choice would make the Americans very angry with them for not obeying the Americans. The Americans would not allow them the freedom to choose. It is either with us or against us. This is not authoritarianism or dictatorship or hegemony. This is American democratic freedom. Freedom under the dictates of the American Empire.
How free are the countries under the American version of the Free World? And how unfree are those that are outside of the American Free World?
What do you think? Many would still want to hide under the blinkers and keep pretending that they are free countries under the American so called Free and democratic World without wanting to admit that they are in chain and shackled by the Americans. They have no freedom of choice, cannot exercise their democratic right to choose freely.
23 comments:
Never trust the white men. Not with your body. Do not visit them and let them do what they want with your body. They can jab anything they want into it to control you.
Do not be so gullible.
Calls for Australia to INVADE the Solomon Islands, 'engineer' regime change before it strikes a deal with China: 'This is our Cuban missile crisis'
Hegemonic and colonist mentality behind Australia’s threats to invade Solomon Islands
It's ridiculous that Australia, on one hand, has closely followed the US in condemning what it perceives Russia's "brutal and unprovoked invasion" of Ukraine, but on the other, its elites bluntly threatened to invade its neighbor in the South Pacific and foster a regime change.
A Reuters report on Thursday saying that a proposal for a broader security agreement with China that would be sent to the Solomon Islands' cabinet for consideration has caused shockwaves through Canberra. David Llewellyn-Smith, founding publisher of MacroBusiness and former owner of leading Asia-Pacific foreign affairs journal The Diplomat, suggested a day later that Australia "must ready Solomon Islands invasion." Calling the China-Solomon Islands deal "Australia's Cuban missile crisis," Smith said "If it must, the nation [Australia] should invade and capture Guadalcanal such that we engineer regime change in Honiara" to protect Australia's "sovereignty and democracy."
Australian elites threatened to invade Solomon Islands simply because the latter hopes to strengthen security cooperation with China. Canberra has carried out much military cooperation with the US, including signing the AUKUS deal that will help it acquire nuclear-powered submarines. Don't Canberra's actions pose a greater threat to China?
This shows the hypocrisy and double standards of Australia's frantic elites. It also lays bare Australia's ingrained hegemonic and colonialist mentality toward South Pacific island countries. Australia has no respect for the Solomon Islands and other South Pacific island countries at all, instead, it has long regarded them as its backyard, treating island countries in the region as sphere of influence or even vassal states. When these countries hope to expand relations with others, Australia instantly reacts hysterically.
Australia is trying to obstruct the Solomon Islands' normal cooperation with China even with the threat of an invasion. This shows Australia's obsession with hegemonism. Australia has long been seeking to be the "minor hegemon" in the South Pacific region. To this end, Australia maliciously distorted the security cooperation between China and the Solomon Islands.
The bilateral cooperation in law enforcement and security areas in fact is a response to last year's riots in the Solomon Islands during which Chinese nationals there suffered great losses with their shops smashed, burned and looted and their personal safety in jeopardy. Given the presence of Chinese nationals in the Solomon Islands and with the development and expansion of normal ties between the two countries, it's natural for the two sides to beef up security cooperation.
The waning of the Australian influence in the South Pacific region is because of Australia's hegemonic mindset toward those countries. No country in the region would expect Australia, which can easily threaten to invade, to truly help its development.
The crash of MU5735 is not a normal accident. It looked like the aircraft was under the control of someone to crash it violently and the pilots had lost all control over it.
China and all operators of Boeing aircraft better stop flying them. Since 911 they had installed a software to take control of the aircraft from the ground and crash it if they so wanted.
Will principled Vivian speak up against Australian elites' unprovoked threat to invade the Solomon Islands ? Will Singapore sanction Australia ?
Pinkies went to USAss to pay tribute to his master as well as check on his family assets..in case it was mistakenly confiscated along with all russian stuffs..
Sin is getting itself into a corner. It is not going to be pleasant to most others around. There shall be growing snubs against it.
Sigh
Singkies are getting stuck in the mud. There is no way out. Looks like a big changed of rock has just been stuck in between the deep blue sea and a white elephant.
Great feats to see and watch.
Jaimaca & the British Royals:
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a39514515/prince-william-kate-middleton-jamaica-protests-2022/
' Ahead of their arrival in Jamaica, the second stop on their three country tour, a group of 100 prominent Jamaicans signed a letter seeking reparations from the British crown for "crimes against humanity." The letter asked the Cambridges to apologize, and work to "redefine the relationship" between the British monarchy and Jamaica.
"We see no reason to celebrate 70 years of the ascension of your grandmother to the British throne because her leadership, and that of her predecessors, have perpetuated the greatest human rights tragedy in the history of humankind," the Advocates Network group wrote in their letter, published online Sunday.
"We encourage you to act accordingly and just 'sey yuh sorry!'" the letter declared, referring to their online #SehYuhSorry campaign.'
The USA's so called 'Freedom of Choice' or whatever hubris they espouse is a Hobson's choice. The USA dictates, everyone must follow and take it. What hubris is that?
'If you’re in a business arrangement with a party and they very publicly start belligerently violating contracts with another party, and then look at you and demand that you agree with these actions, you’re going to do everything you can to get out of your partnership with that party.'
https://www.unz.com/aanglin/unhinged-american-psychos-condemn-india-for-not-supporting-total-war-against-russia/
Today, after watching Channel News America this morning, for entertainment and misinformation only, I heard the following good and bad news regarding the situation in Ukraine. Hope RB does not mind my regurgitation.
The good and important news is about Putin being slammed by an old lady. (LOL). It was not reported whether Putin was hurt or have any broken bones. Imagine an old lady slamming Putin, a martial arts practitioner. Even Steven Seagal, his friend would think twice about slamming Putin. Now I understand why the Ukrainians are able to push back the Russians, fighting to the last man. It now looks like Ukrainian women are also fighting to the last woman, even old woman. Again LOL.
The other good news (or bad, I dunno) is about Biden calling for the removal of Putin, which in essence means a regime change in Russia. This probably has been the motive of the USA all along, and the old man is just 'showing the horse's leg' to confirm the hidden agenda. Blinken is now just trying to pretend to deny the USA's intention after Biden has let off the test balloon. We all know that is how the USA operates.
Does the USA really thinks doing a regime change on the Russians is going to succeed? They tried that on Iran and failed. They attempted that on Venezuela and failed. They tried to create unrest and take advantage of the situation in Kazakhstan recently to effect a regime change and failed. They instigated riots in Hong Kong and racial division in Xinjiang and failed to use that ostensibly to destabilise China for a regime change as well.
The bad news, for the USA, is that Zelensky is trying to get Russia to agree to a ceasefire by saying he is ready to keep Ukraine neutral. I just wonder whether Putin is going to believe the words of a comedian, whose stance has been changing like the weather. A ceasefire, a talk, an agreement, the withdrawal of Russian troops, the lifting of sanctions are all against the interest of the USA. For one, selling oil to the EU by the USA is practically dashed.
Biden thinks a regime change in Russia is up to the USA to make? He thinks Russia is just like the Vatican City? The Washington and Brussels Gang are really desperate to come up with such a suggestion.
Now Putin is going to burn all bridges talking to Biden. Calling him a criminal was bad enough. Trying to tell Putin that he has to be removed is crossing another Red Line.
In a Freudian Slip, Biden told the American soldiers what they would expect when they are inside Ukraine, ie they are planning to send the soldiers into Ukraine.
The Pentagon is desperately trying to deny this and as good as calling Biden a dementia case.
Has Biden let the cat out of the bag?
The American warmongering savages would stop at nothing but war with Russia in one way or another.
If Blinken claims that Biden does not mean what he says about removing Putin, which amounts to a regime change, is he saying that Biden is just joking? Removing a leader by force is a regime change, clear and simple and no one jokes about that.
But no surprise in that, as USA leaders have been known to say what they do not mean, and doing what they do not say, like breaking and walking away from agreements and contracts unilaterally.
Despite the USA's massive air superiority, and fighting against poorly equipped North Vietnamese, they eventually still had to run away with tails between their legs. At the peak of the Vietnam War they had almost half a million US soldiers in Vietnam. How many are they sending to Ukraine? Why not just send Rambo?
Their warplanes, if they do dare to get involved, will face Russian S400 and S500 anti aircraft missiles, nothing like RPGs and Bazookas used by the North Vietnamese.
The only thing 'free' that I can see is their freedom to print fiat money from free thin air.
The only other 'free' is that with the fiat money they printed from free thin air, they can buy real stuff from China and other countries.
And to add 'free insult' to 'free injury', they can even use the fiat money printed from free thin air to punish others with sanctions. This is the most ridiculous thing that the whole world has been putting up with for several decades.
Isn't it time to put a stop to this foolishness?
Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas criticised on Sunday (March 27) the West's "double standards" that he said penalised Russia over its invasion of Ukraine while ignoring Israel's "crimes" against the Palestinians.
Abbas voiced his frustration to visiting US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in a press briefing with reporters at the Palestinian presidential residence in the occupied West Bank city of Ramallah.
"The current events in Europe have shown blatant double standards," he told Blinken.
And what will Blinken do? He will just blink. With one eye in front of Naftali Bennett. You know what that means!
Abbas passe liao. Saudi, UAE, Israel, Egypt, Qatar, Bahrain all moving on without him. Money talks.
Whatever is happening now, be it dispute, war, natural and man-made disasters, the World is into turbulent time. Blunders from the Humankinds add much to their own sufferings. However, this is the Flaw of Nature which fails to create wholesomeness in the Beings.
Everyone knows that Virtue is desirable but greed and ego over-whelm most and it lead the Humankinds to destroy themselves. Sad but, it is the Reality of the World. No one can change it.
Beings shall fight to extinct themselves. Period.
Aussies - the Bullies in the South Pacific
While hyping rumors and creating fear that China is aggressively expanding its military in the South Pacific region, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is lobbying Pacific Island nations against a draft security agreement between China and the Solomon Islands, desperately trying to maintain its role of "South Pacific bully" under its hegemonic and colonialist mentality.
Morrison held talks with counterparts from Fiji and Papua New Guinea over the Solomon Islands' cooperation with China.
Western media has been saying that the agreement sparked alarm in Canberra, Wellington and Washington, at the same time circulating rumors that the deal could "pave the way for China's ships to be based in the Pacific and to have a naval base."
Australian Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce suggested China was pursuing a base because it was "trying to restrict our capacity of movement and intimidate us."
The normal law enforcement and security cooperation between China and Solomon Islands is sincerely welcomed by the two governments and two peoples. China and the Solomon Islands are two independent sovereign states, and the normal cooperation between the two countries is in line with international law and practice, conducive to social stability and enduring peace and stability, which will contribute to the common interests of countries in the region.
Why are there concerns of the US and Australia? The US has been sending military aircraft and warships to other countries' doorsteps all year round, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of relevant countries, created the militarized clique that brought nuclear proliferation risks to the Pacific, deliberately stoking tensions, creating confrontation and casting a shadow over regional peace and stability.
Australia, which has been sucking the US' nipples, should earnestly respect the sovereignty of the Solomon Islands and the decisions it has made independently, rather than assuming that they are entitled and privileged to define what other countries should and should not do from a condescending position.
Australia is a thorn on the side of Asia and must be removed to free Asia from the bullying of white men.
Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare said the backlash to his country's security negotiations with China was "very insulting".
"We are not pressured in any way by our new friends and there is no intention whatsoever to ask China to build a military base in the Solomon Islands," he said.
He added that Solomon Islands had previously asked Australia to build a naval base and this was refused, because Australia said it was inappropriate given its defense program with Papua New Guinea.
Post a Comment