Singapore is a choice country to many wildlife, for work and for play or to escape high taxes. Singapore passport is highly in demand and highly desirable. What do these mean in terms of supply and demand? The simple principle of demand and supply is that when demand is high and supply is low, price will go up and up.
But daft Singaporeans cannot understand this. This is why there is an open leg policy, legs opened so wide for everything to come in, begging every wildlife to come in. It is so cheap and easy for wildlife to come to Singapore and paying pittance for it. Work levy and for PRs and PMETs, almost free. Then there is this silly and traitorious CECA that makes entry to Singapore a breeze and so free.
If there are so many people queuing to come into Singapore for all sorts of reasons, why is the cost of entry so low, so cheap? Why our so clever govt did not turn this into a high revenue source? Or are they satisfied just to collect worker's and maid's levies? Should not they go higher up and collect more from the PMETs and PRs? And why give free scholarships to the tune of hundreds of millions annually when our education system is world class? Should not the demand to study here be so overwhelming and the supply limited that the fees for education here be raised higher for foreigners instead of Singaporeans?
Maybe all the so called demands to come here, all the long queues are fake news. Only the beggars, the cheats, the conmen, the wildlife are queuing, not the real McCoys. Even then there is more reasons to make it more expensive for the cheats and conmen and wildlife to come in as they are not desirables.
When things are in demand, you can charge a high price for it. And when supply is limited, you can charge even higher. But easy immigration only happens in this stupidity has no cure island. No country will make immigration as easy as this silly island. So the supply of easy immigration is also very small.
What do you think?
1/07/2020
Iran and the Arab and Muslim world can make the Americans pee in their pants
Have the Iranians, the Arabs and Muslims, and the rest of the world had had it enough of the international terrorists, ie the Americans? Is it about time that the Arab and Muslim world get their acts together to stop the Americans from killing them at will and then threaten them that should they retaliate or think of taking revenge, they would be bombed again and again and more Arabs and Muslims would have to die and their countries destroyed?
What would happen if the Arab and Muslim world were to issue a fatwa against the Americans? No need any fierce and sophisticated bombs. No need special and high tech equipment. Imagine what the world would be like if every American could be targeted and killed on sight? This is asymetrical warfare. This is guerilla warfare on a world stage, on a world scale. If the Americans think they can kill people freely, what if other people turn around to kill Americans freely? Is it wrong for the Arabs and Muslims to kill Americans as they liked like the Americans killing them as they liked?
In this new asymetrical war against the world's Number One International Terrorists, the Americans would be like the proverbial idiot living in a glass house and throwing stones at other houses. There are Iranians, Arabs and Muslims all over the world. There are Americans all over the world, in the Arab and Muslim world and also in the American homeland. The Iranians, Arabs and Muslims are also in the American homeland. What's is wrong if the Arabs and Muslims hit back?
What would happen to the Americans inside their homeland or outside their homeland or in Arab and Muslim land when they are the immediate targets of Iranians, Arabs and Muslims? How are they going to live their lives, getting around, working, doing business or leisure when they could be killed anytime anywhere?
The Iranians and Arab and Muslim countries may not be able to match the Americans in sophisticated weapons, in weapon drones and cruise missiles, in nuclear weapons. But if every man and woman is a walking weapon, just like suicide bombers, and every American, man or woman, adult or child is a target, life will become very miserable for the Americans all over the world and also in the American homeland. Do the Americans believe that it is their God damn right to kill Arabs and Muslims and the Arabs and Muslims cannot hit back, it is wrong to hit back at the American terrorists that feel so free to kill them?
When the Arabs and Muslims decide to hit back, there will be no where to run and no where to hide for the Americans. This would teach the Americans not to go around killing anyone they disliked and labelled as enemy and then go back to have their beers and hamburgers and sneered at their victims after killing them?
What would happen if the Arab and Muslim world were to issue a fatwa against the Americans? No need any fierce and sophisticated bombs. No need special and high tech equipment. Imagine what the world would be like if every American could be targeted and killed on sight? This is asymetrical warfare. This is guerilla warfare on a world stage, on a world scale. If the Americans think they can kill people freely, what if other people turn around to kill Americans freely? Is it wrong for the Arabs and Muslims to kill Americans as they liked like the Americans killing them as they liked?
In this new asymetrical war against the world's Number One International Terrorists, the Americans would be like the proverbial idiot living in a glass house and throwing stones at other houses. There are Iranians, Arabs and Muslims all over the world. There are Americans all over the world, in the Arab and Muslim world and also in the American homeland. The Iranians, Arabs and Muslims are also in the American homeland. What's is wrong if the Arabs and Muslims hit back?
What would happen to the Americans inside their homeland or outside their homeland or in Arab and Muslim land when they are the immediate targets of Iranians, Arabs and Muslims? How are they going to live their lives, getting around, working, doing business or leisure when they could be killed anytime anywhere?
The Iranians and Arab and Muslim countries may not be able to match the Americans in sophisticated weapons, in weapon drones and cruise missiles, in nuclear weapons. But if every man and woman is a walking weapon, just like suicide bombers, and every American, man or woman, adult or child is a target, life will become very miserable for the Americans all over the world and also in the American homeland. Do the Americans believe that it is their God damn right to kill Arabs and Muslims and the Arabs and Muslims cannot hit back, it is wrong to hit back at the American terrorists that feel so free to kill them?
When the Arabs and Muslims decide to hit back, there will be no where to run and no where to hide for the Americans. This would teach the Americans not to go around killing anyone they disliked and labelled as enemy and then go back to have their beers and hamburgers and sneered at their victims after killing them?
1/06/2020
Killing of Iranian general - Act of international terrorists
Thousands more US troops were ordered to the Middle East on Friday
after the United States assassinated Iran's military mastermind and
Tehran promised "severe revenge."
President Donald Trump said top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was "terminated" when he was on the verge of attacking US diplomats but he insisted that Washington is not seeking to topple Iran's government.
"Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act," Trump said in Florida.
While referring to the key Iranian figure, killed in a US air attack earlier Friday in Iraq's capital Baghdad, as "sick," Trump attempted to lower tensions by insisting that he does not want war with Iran.
"We did not take action to start a war," he said, adding: "We do not seek regime change."
The Washington Examiner called the killing a "great moment for the United States that should be celebrated by all Americans". The Kremlin said the attack "grossly violates international law and should be condemned". The New York Post lead its front page with the headline "Blown Away".
Above from Yahoo News
The world's Number One international terrorists have done it again, with impunity, in the killing of an Iranian general in the name of peace. The justification is that the general was planning to attack Americans in Iraq. This kind of hypocritical reasoning is no different from accusing Saddam Hussein of possessing WMD to invade and kill him. The same kind of reason, if not condemned, would give the Americans the right to kill anyone in any country with such fabrication. Kim Jung Un would be next and so would be his generals and many other generals and leaders the American branded as their enemies.
Could Kim Jung Un and the Iranians attack and kill American generals for the same reason as many are plotting to attack their countries? Could the Bolivians, Venezuelans, the Cubans, the Russians and Chinese do the same, kill Americans for the same reason as the Americans are plotting daily to attack them? The Americans and the western media are reporting this as an acceptable way of killing people without condemnation.
Some western media are applauding this heinous crime, despite some American democrats calling it a war crime, and that it is a time for celebration, like celebrating Thanks Giving for the killing of American natives. And all the American lackeys and cronies either keep mum and quietly support the American evil crime without saying a word. This is how low the world has gone, allowing the American terrorists to start wars and killing people all over the world as they pleased, with no condemnation from the UN.
Killing the Iranian general is to prevent war, but a war has just started. This is a declaration of war by the Americans. Just like the invasion of Iraq, started a war and claiming that it was all for peace.
Want more white lies? Should Iran target all the hideous warmongers in Washington that have Arab and Muslim blood in their hands, from George Bush, Obama to Trump, the Pompeos, the Cheneys, the Navarros, the Boltons etc etc?
After this hideous act, the Americans knew that they are in big trouble and are wetting in their pants. They are asking the Iranians to respond proportionately and not an all out attack on any Americans on sight. Here are a few sentences from Yahoo News,
'After the attack, the Americans “resorted to diplomatic measures… on Friday morning”, Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi told state television that night.
They “even said that if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did”, he said, quoted on the broadcaster’s website....
But Fadavi said the United States was not in a position “to determine” Iran’s response.
“The Americans must await severe revenge. This revenge will not be limited to Iran,” he said.
“The ‘Resistance Front’, with a vast geography, is ready to materialise this revenge,” he added, referring to Iran’s allies across the Middle East.'
In order to stop the Americans from more of such indiscriminate attacks on Iranians and the Arabs and Muslims, the Iranians and the Resistance Front must be able to strike across the world and attack and kill as many Americans as possible. They need to tell the Americans that they can kill Americans as easily as the Americans killed Arabs and Muslims. Only such a message of violence for violence, a tooth for a tooth, would stop the Americans from more recklessness and killings of Arabs and Muslims.
The Americans would not dare to attack the North Koreans knowing that Kim would hit back with all he got. Iran and Arab and Muslim countries must understand this message. Weakness is an invitation for more attacks by the Americans.
As for Iran, without nuclear weapons to strike at US homeland, Trump is threatening to bomb 52 Iranian sites, including cultural heritage. This is how audacious this international terrorist country is. No condemnation at all from the world, and definitely not from its lackeys and cronies.
President Donald Trump said top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was "terminated" when he was on the verge of attacking US diplomats but he insisted that Washington is not seeking to topple Iran's government.
"Soleimani was plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel, but we caught him in the act," Trump said in Florida.
While referring to the key Iranian figure, killed in a US air attack earlier Friday in Iraq's capital Baghdad, as "sick," Trump attempted to lower tensions by insisting that he does not want war with Iran.
"We did not take action to start a war," he said, adding: "We do not seek regime change."
The Washington Examiner called the killing a "great moment for the United States that should be celebrated by all Americans". The Kremlin said the attack "grossly violates international law and should be condemned". The New York Post lead its front page with the headline "Blown Away".
Above from Yahoo News
The world's Number One international terrorists have done it again, with impunity, in the killing of an Iranian general in the name of peace. The justification is that the general was planning to attack Americans in Iraq. This kind of hypocritical reasoning is no different from accusing Saddam Hussein of possessing WMD to invade and kill him. The same kind of reason, if not condemned, would give the Americans the right to kill anyone in any country with such fabrication. Kim Jung Un would be next and so would be his generals and many other generals and leaders the American branded as their enemies.
Could Kim Jung Un and the Iranians attack and kill American generals for the same reason as many are plotting to attack their countries? Could the Bolivians, Venezuelans, the Cubans, the Russians and Chinese do the same, kill Americans for the same reason as the Americans are plotting daily to attack them? The Americans and the western media are reporting this as an acceptable way of killing people without condemnation.
Some western media are applauding this heinous crime, despite some American democrats calling it a war crime, and that it is a time for celebration, like celebrating Thanks Giving for the killing of American natives. And all the American lackeys and cronies either keep mum and quietly support the American evil crime without saying a word. This is how low the world has gone, allowing the American terrorists to start wars and killing people all over the world as they pleased, with no condemnation from the UN.
Killing the Iranian general is to prevent war, but a war has just started. This is a declaration of war by the Americans. Just like the invasion of Iraq, started a war and claiming that it was all for peace.
Want more white lies? Should Iran target all the hideous warmongers in Washington that have Arab and Muslim blood in their hands, from George Bush, Obama to Trump, the Pompeos, the Cheneys, the Navarros, the Boltons etc etc?
After this hideous act, the Americans knew that they are in big trouble and are wetting in their pants. They are asking the Iranians to respond proportionately and not an all out attack on any Americans on sight. Here are a few sentences from Yahoo News,
'After the attack, the Americans “resorted to diplomatic measures… on Friday morning”, Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi told state television that night.
They “even said that if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did”, he said, quoted on the broadcaster’s website....
But Fadavi said the United States was not in a position “to determine” Iran’s response.
“The Americans must await severe revenge. This revenge will not be limited to Iran,” he said.
“The ‘Resistance Front’, with a vast geography, is ready to materialise this revenge,” he added, referring to Iran’s allies across the Middle East.'
In order to stop the Americans from more of such indiscriminate attacks on Iranians and the Arabs and Muslims, the Iranians and the Resistance Front must be able to strike across the world and attack and kill as many Americans as possible. They need to tell the Americans that they can kill Americans as easily as the Americans killed Arabs and Muslims. Only such a message of violence for violence, a tooth for a tooth, would stop the Americans from more recklessness and killings of Arabs and Muslims.
The Americans would not dare to attack the North Koreans knowing that Kim would hit back with all he got. Iran and Arab and Muslim countries must understand this message. Weakness is an invitation for more attacks by the Americans.
As for Iran, without nuclear weapons to strike at US homeland, Trump is threatening to bomb 52 Iranian sites, including cultural heritage. This is how audacious this international terrorist country is. No condemnation at all from the world, and definitely not from its lackeys and cronies.
1/05/2020
Uzbekistan - Target of western smear campaign
Uzbekistan, like all the central landlocked Asian countries are enjoying an unusual economic growth that brought increasing wealth to its people, thanks to the BRI. But such news would not be welcome in the western media. I just saw a brief documentary in CNA, produced by a western reporter by the name of Julia Chapman, highlighting what? Of course not the economic well being and growing prosperity of the Uzbekistanis but the plight of a few rundown villages being resettled and the land being redeveloped.
The main point of the report was that the govt was ruthless and resettled the villages, demolished their dilapidated homes without due care and compensation to them. Is this true? Would any govt moved out their own villagers, demolished their homes without compensation? Even China would compensate its affected residents except that some die die refused to move and had to be moved by minimal force. China must have learnt from Singapore which has been practising resettlement of old settlements in the name of progress. Uzbekistan would only do the same.
Can such resettlements be worse than what is happening in the West Bank, in Golan Height, in Jerusalem? Where were the reports in CNA and western media on the ruthless expulsion of the Palestinians from their historical homeland? Did the Israelis compensate them or care about the welfare of the Palestinians?
Or should the world follow the great examples of the white Europeans when they invaded the Americas and forcefully evicted the natives by killing them and taking over their land, their countries and sent the survivors of their genocide to the wildest land, the poorest land called reservations? How did the Americans conduct their resettlement of the native Indians in America? With tender loving care? Compensating rich fertile land with uninhabitable land, and killing all those that refused to move?
Where were the white conscience, where were the human rights protectors and the crocodile tears?
The main point of the report was that the govt was ruthless and resettled the villages, demolished their dilapidated homes without due care and compensation to them. Is this true? Would any govt moved out their own villagers, demolished their homes without compensation? Even China would compensate its affected residents except that some die die refused to move and had to be moved by minimal force. China must have learnt from Singapore which has been practising resettlement of old settlements in the name of progress. Uzbekistan would only do the same.
Can such resettlements be worse than what is happening in the West Bank, in Golan Height, in Jerusalem? Where were the reports in CNA and western media on the ruthless expulsion of the Palestinians from their historical homeland? Did the Israelis compensate them or care about the welfare of the Palestinians?
Or should the world follow the great examples of the white Europeans when they invaded the Americas and forcefully evicted the natives by killing them and taking over their land, their countries and sent the survivors of their genocide to the wildest land, the poorest land called reservations? How did the Americans conduct their resettlement of the native Indians in America? With tender loving care? Compensating rich fertile land with uninhabitable land, and killing all those that refused to move?
Where were the white conscience, where were the human rights protectors and the crocodile tears?
1/04/2020
Are intangible ethos important or GDP numbers?
“In a troubled world, few societies can devote themselves to such
intangible ideals, much less act upon them. But here in Singapore,
thanks to the heroic efforts of several generations, we can all
realistically aspire to live by these values, and turn our vision into
reality.” Lee Hsien Loong
I am pondering over this statement by Hsien Loong in his latest new year message. He acknowledged that the effort and wisdom of several generations of Singaporeans have led us to what we are today. No doubt Singaporeans have come a long way to this state of affluence and hopefully this will continue to go the way of future Singaporeans. We are still having good times and living in prosperity, with some more prosperous and some less prosperous, and a few being left behind, fallen through the cracks. The latter is unavoidable but could be managed more carefully and could be avoided if there is a determined will to do so. We have the money and resources to do it. (I hope so).
How long would our good fortune last? With the influx of wildlife with different mentality and cultures, many inferior, being forced into our midst, would the new mix of Singaporeans be better off than before, to toughen our will to succeed? Or will the high content of wildlife dilute and weaken the social fabric of Singaporeans and our social ethos? The idiots do not think so, the main reason why they are importing so many without any worries, just to boost up the GDP to justify for the million dollar salaries and high bonuses.
It is very difficult to build to what we have today, like how many families built their fortunes over generations. But it is so easy to destroy everything in one generation or by the irresponsible appearance of a prodigal son. Would Singapore be destroyed by one generation of stupidity of its leaders? We have yet to witness how Singapore would turn out in another few decades ahead and all everyone is saying is that what this govt is doing is good. Really?
The glory of an Empire would burn its last flame, the last flicker could be the brightest, before being snuffed out forever. No empires could see the making of their last days as bad, thinking they were doing their best and everything was right, and the empire would last forever in their good hands. The British Empire in Singapore could not believe that they would be overrun by the Japanese within a few days. The Americans could not believe that they are no longer the uncontested and unchallenged Number One Empire today and are furiously and desperately clinging to their glories for a few more years before being eclipsed for good.
Are we seeing the last few good years of Singapore before the curtain falls? When there are so many wrongs being ignored and even insisted as good, the days of reckoning are near. The moment of death is usually preceded by a few moments of life as if the dying has recovered. The American Empire is in this state of health under Trump, looking like it is great again but could be in its last gasp before the end.
Whither Singapore and Singaporeans?
I am pondering over this statement by Hsien Loong in his latest new year message. He acknowledged that the effort and wisdom of several generations of Singaporeans have led us to what we are today. No doubt Singaporeans have come a long way to this state of affluence and hopefully this will continue to go the way of future Singaporeans. We are still having good times and living in prosperity, with some more prosperous and some less prosperous, and a few being left behind, fallen through the cracks. The latter is unavoidable but could be managed more carefully and could be avoided if there is a determined will to do so. We have the money and resources to do it. (I hope so).
How long would our good fortune last? With the influx of wildlife with different mentality and cultures, many inferior, being forced into our midst, would the new mix of Singaporeans be better off than before, to toughen our will to succeed? Or will the high content of wildlife dilute and weaken the social fabric of Singaporeans and our social ethos? The idiots do not think so, the main reason why they are importing so many without any worries, just to boost up the GDP to justify for the million dollar salaries and high bonuses.
It is very difficult to build to what we have today, like how many families built their fortunes over generations. But it is so easy to destroy everything in one generation or by the irresponsible appearance of a prodigal son. Would Singapore be destroyed by one generation of stupidity of its leaders? We have yet to witness how Singapore would turn out in another few decades ahead and all everyone is saying is that what this govt is doing is good. Really?
The glory of an Empire would burn its last flame, the last flicker could be the brightest, before being snuffed out forever. No empires could see the making of their last days as bad, thinking they were doing their best and everything was right, and the empire would last forever in their good hands. The British Empire in Singapore could not believe that they would be overrun by the Japanese within a few days. The Americans could not believe that they are no longer the uncontested and unchallenged Number One Empire today and are furiously and desperately clinging to their glories for a few more years before being eclipsed for good.
Are we seeing the last few good years of Singapore before the curtain falls? When there are so many wrongs being ignored and even insisted as good, the days of reckoning are near. The moment of death is usually preceded by a few moments of life as if the dying has recovered. The American Empire is in this state of health under Trump, looking like it is great again but could be in its last gasp before the end.
Whither Singapore and Singaporeans?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)