Covid19 -Bivalent vaccines, how would it impact the people?

Additionally, the government is currently working to bring in bivalent Covid-19 vaccines, which are Covid-19 vaccine boosters that target both the "ancestral strain" of Covid-19 and the Omicron variant.

The bivalent vaccines will thus offer broad protection against Covid-19 and better protection against the Omicron variant, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Bringing in bivalent vaccines to Singapore

Speaking in Parliament, Ong shared that the bivalent vaccines are provided for in Singapore's agreements with pharmaceutical companies.

As vaccine formulations improve, the government will continue to update its National Vaccination Programme.  CNA

I am sure everyone must still have vivid memories of the 96% efficacy claim of mRNA vaccines and felt cheated and stupid for taking the claim for at face value without asking what this 96% efficacy meant. Superficially it must have been taken as 96% effectiveness in preventing infection. But apparently this is not true and no one is wiser what it really meant. And knowing how pervasive and widespread are the infection in the USA and countries using mRNA vaccines, it can simply be ruled out that the vaccines are anything but effective in preventing infection. So, its seems that the narrative is now about preventing severe illness and death or something like that ah. Even this is not clear. What did the vaccines really prevent or protect? How effective against severe illness and death? Anyone got any idea other than hearing some wild claims and motherhood statements that it is effective and must be jabbed and boostered many times, the more the merrier, oops, the more the better?

 

What about complications, what about brain damages and other illnesses that are being reported in alternative media but not a whisper in the main media? Why are main media so quiet to the point of not wanting to report anything about adverse effects of the infection and the vaccines? There are now so many questions that needed to be answer, so many suspicious things happening that are causing alarm to those infected and those vaccinated by mRNA vaccines.

The above report has one assumption, everything is fine with mRNA vaccines and the new derivatives, including the bivalent vaccines, and children would also be fine when boostered by the new bivalent vaccines. There is nothing to worry about. Ok, the experts said so. Who are the experts? Politicians or medical professionals or pharmaceutical operators? Who is deciding that the bivalent vaccines are safe even for children and children must be boostered?

Also, look at the above two phrases that I have highlighted in bold, 1, offer broad protection against Covid-19 and better protection against the Omicron variant, 2, Singapore's agreements with pharmaceutical companies.

 

 

Anyone understand what is the meaning of broad protection against Covid19 and better protection against Omicron variant? It sounds like motherhood statement without any details. You want to know what this really meant? The 96% efficacy is as good as what the koyote man said. 

 

Also, what agreements did govts signed with the pharmaceutical companies? Is the idea of boosting the children part of the agreement with the pharmaceutical companies?   Hope it is not and the decision would be made independently by medical experts and not by pharmaceutical companies.

 

The agreements are secret? If it is secret, what is it that the public ought to known but unable to know because it is secret? The vaccine trial results were supposed be locked up for 75 years. When would these secret agreements be made public? Would the American public also pursue this, to make the secret agreements no longer secret? Oh, not sure if the American govt signed such secret agreements with the pharmaceutical companies.

What do you think?

Putinator and the Asian Bretton Woods :

'The financial war between Russia with China’s tacit backing on one side, and America and her NATO allies on the other has escalated rapidly. It appears that President Putin was thinking several steps ahead when he launched Russia’s attack on Ukraine.'

'We are seeing the west enter a new round of European monetary inflation to pay everyone’s energy bills. The euro, yen, and sterling are already collapsing — the dollar will be next. From Putin’s point of view, so far, so good.'

'Russia has progressed her power over Asian nations, including populous India and Iran. She has persuaded Middle Eastern oil and gas producers that their future lies with Asian markets, and not Europe. She is subsidising Asia’s industrial revolution with discounted energy. Thanks to the west’s sanctions, Russia is on its way to confirming Halford Mackinder’s predictions made over a century ago, that Russia is the true geopolitical centre of the world.

There is one piece in Putin’s jigsaw yet to be put in place: a new currency system to protect Russia and her allies from an approaching western monetary crisis. This article argues that under cover of the west’s geopolitical ineptitude, Putin is now assembling a new gold-backed multi-currency system by combining plans for a new Asian trade currency with his new Moscow World Standard for gold.'

'As put forward in Russian and EAEU media, the new currency is to be comprised of a mixture of national currencies and commodities. A weighting of some sort was suggested to reflect the relative importance of the currencies and commodities traded between them. At the same time, the new trade settlement currency was to be available to any other nation in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the expanding BRICS membership. The ambition is for it to become an Asia-wide replacement for the dollar.

More specifically, the purpose is to do away with the dollar for trade settlements on cross-border transactions between participants. It is worth noting that any dollar transaction is reflected in US banks through the correspondent banking system, potentially giving the US authorities undesirable economic intelligence, and information on sanction-busting and other activities deemed illegal or undesirable by the US authorities. Furthermore, any transaction involving US dollars becomes a matter for the US legal system, giving US politicians the authority to intervene wherever the dollar is used.'

So it seems we are moving into the post USD world and without the USD hegemony, we'll see the end of Western Colonism.

Full article at: https://www.goldmoney.com/research/an-asian-bretton-woods

Anonymous

Monarchy - Time For The Change To New Order

The death of Queen Elizabeth II, the UK's longest-reigning monarch for seven decades, has reignited the urgency in many of the 15 British Commonwealth nations on whether it is time to replace the British monarch with an elected Head of State.

This puts the long-term existence of the Commonwealth into question.

There are increasng calls to completely get rid of the remnants of the Colonial Era and embrace Full Independence.

With the Queen's demise, 73-year-old Charles III ascended to the British throne and was proclaimed King at St James's Palace in London on Saturday. He was also pronounced Head of State in 14 other Commonwealth nations, including Australia, Canada and New Zealand and some island nations in the Caribbean and South Pacific.

King Charles was proclaimed at a time when Britain faces multiple challenges, including a new government led by Prime Minister Liz Truss who as Conservative Party leader inherits a huge mess she needs to tackle, from an ailing economy to the cost of living crisis, and growing voices in Scotland and Northern Ireland who desire to leave the UK.

Now, it seems that the Commonwealth nations are at a crossroad.

The long reign of Queen Elizabeth II, whether out of personal image, charisma, or her devotion to duty to some extent stabilized the Commonwealth system worldwide.

After her death, many within the Commonwealth nations have revisited the thought of leaving.

So what should happen now?

We can't continue with an ancient, archaic and old system of Monarchy with the present Democratic, Republican or Parliamentary System. We should not. We must not.

Therefore, to all the Wise Men and Women in the World, it is timely to ABOLISH THE MONARCHY System altogether. It is actually a very wasteful system - paying extremely high for people who functions in ceremonial roles only. This can be easily replaced by a Head of State or Presidency, like Singapore.

So, what do you think?

A-Non-Yes-Mouse 

What is Colonialism? Definitely nothing good.

...the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.

Colonialism is a practice or policy of control by one people or power over other people or areas,^[1][2][3] often by establishing colonies^[4] and generally with the aim of economic dominance.^[5] In the process of colonisation, colonisers may impose their religion, language, economics, and other cultural practices. The foreign administrators rule the territory in pursuit of their interests, seeking to benefit from the colonised region's people and resources.

Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another.

Colonialism is the practice of one country taking full or partial political control of another country and occupying it with settlers for purposes of profiting from its resources and economy.

Above are a few definitios or meanings of Colonialism found in the internet.  Notice that the definitions are so mild, nothing evil, nothing wicked, not cruel, nothing about massacres, genocides, oppression, suppression, atrocities, looting, plunder, slavery, torture, imprisonment, violation of human rights, etc etc.

These versions of Colonialism are what the white men, the practitioners of Colonialism, would want the innocents to believe. It is just control, domination, subjugation and occupation of other people's land only.

Nothing was mentioned about invading the land, killing and massacring the people, plundering and looting the land, no, they definitely did not rape the womenfolk or kill the young and old.  They just walked into a land and took control of the people peacefully, the people would not resist, would not fight for their freedom and their way of life, or to protect their land and wealth. The people just surrendered to be ruled by the Colonialists...happily?

What is real about Colonialism is the attacking of another people by military force, weapons of war, to kill and subjugate the people and take control of their land, their possession and their freedom as human beans. The colonialists were the warlords, gangsters, the bandits, the robbers, the killers, murderers and rapists, many were blood thirsty savages.

Only after they have subdued their victims by force, when the victims became hapless, unable to fight back anymore, would the invaders, the colonialists start to rule with some semblance of peace, when there was no more need to kill, to suppress, repress, to torture or to commit atrocities and fear. The victims would by then have become the sheep, to be herded everywhere, to do the chores of the colonial masters like slaves, lucky to be paid a pittance or fed, if not for free labour. The land and everything belonged to the colonial masters aka the gangsters and bandits. See how elephants and beasts of burden go quietly doing their chores for their masters in peace, after they had been broken in? See how the sheep and pigs were marched into the abattoir without resistance when their time come? Consequences of Colonialism and coercion.

Before this state of forced tranquility is arrived at, many would have died, massacred or raped. Just like after WW2, the Americans were the victors and ruled the world in 'peace' with the Americans as the unchallenged rulers. But once the ruled are able to stand up to challenge the rulers and their 'rules based order', the rulers aka colonial masters, would bring out the whip or the guns to keep the unhappy to remain quiet, like sheep.

Under Colonialism or the Empire, the rest of the people are just docile sheep, living under the mercy of the colonial masters, the king or queen or the Emperor. There would be peace, with a ruling race, and the rest as sheep. Some may be happy under such an arrangement, like the Hongkies, so happy to live in peace under the British rule, as second class citizens if they are lucky. The people of Africa and many parts of the world would not accept the colonial masters 'rules based order' when they are second class to the colonial masters or the Empire. They have pride to want to live as free people, under their own laws, not the 'rules based order' of the Empire.

See how the Americans are trying to oppress and suppress the Russians, the Chinese, Iranians, North Koreans, the Latin Americans and Asians and South East Asians, the Arabs and Muslims, so that they remain the dominant race, the dominant power, the ruling class? There will be peace under the Pax Americana, when the Americans are the rulers, the superior race, bossing around with the ruled. 

How many people would want it to be this way, to be ruled by the Americans under the American 'rules based order'? It is just another kind of Colonialism, when there is a ruling race benefitting from subjugating and controlling the other races.

Colonialism is an oppressive way of the strong controlling, bullying and oppressing the weak, started by killing and massacring them to rob them of their land, properties, human rights etc etc. It is something that cannot be treated as neutral or good. It was a white men's way to conquer and dominate the coloured people, another form of slavery at the national level.

Leaked Documents Reveal Serious Quality Issues

 Continues.....

The finding that the mRNA in the shots was of questionable quality was revealed in a BMJ feature investigation article2 published in March 2021. As explained by the author, journalist Serena Tinari, cyber attackers retrieved more than 40 megabytes of Pfizer COVID jab data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020.

The hacked data was subsequently sent to journalists and academics worldwide. It was also published on the dark web. Some of the documents show European regulators had significant concerns over the lack of intact mRNA in the commercial batches sampled.

Compared to the clinical batches, i.e., the shots used in the clinical trial, 55% to 78% of the commercial shots had “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species.”

In one email, dated November 23, 2020, a high-ranking EMA official noted that the commercial batches failed to meet expected specifications, and that the implications of this RNA integrity loss were unclear. In response to the findings, the EMA sent a list of questions and concerns to Pfizer.

While we do not know if and how the EMA’s concerns were actually addressed and corrected, the EMA authorized Pfizer’s COVID jab December 21, 2020. According to its public assessment report, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (COVID-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”

Intact mRNA Is Essential to Its Effectiveness

Curiously, when The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, CureVac and several regulators to specify the percentage of mRNA integrity considered acceptable, none replied with specifics.

Even a minor degradation reaction, anywhere along a mRNA strand, can severely slow or stop proper translation performance of that strand and thus result in the incomplete expression of the target antigen. ~ Daan J.A. Crommelin, Professor of Biopharmaceutics

According to the British Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the FDA and Health Canada, the specification limit on RNA integrity is “commercially confidential.” What we do know — and the EMA has acknowledged — is that intact mRNA is essential for efficacy. As noted by The BMJ.


As noted by Rogers, Pfizer’s bivalent booster against Omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5 was tested on a total of eight mice, and only to check antibody levels. Moderna also used mice to ascertain antibody responses, but have not disclosed the number of mice used.

That’s the extent to which these shots were tested. The original COVID jabs are the most dangerous drugs ever released to the public, and these newer boosters may turn out to be even worse.

As explained by Rogers, the shots “imprint” your immune system to respond only to the antigen in the shot, while simultaneously impairing your immune system so that it’s less capable of protecting you against other pathogens. Another term for this process is “original antigenic sin.” It essentially explains why those are jabbed are getting infected and sicker than those who avoided the jabs.

Rogers predicts we’ll be faced with a winter of severe illness and death among those who have gotten the jabs. All the rest of us can do is stand back, avoid the shots at all cost and “let the mainstream system self-destruct.” Hopefully, he’s correct in his other prediction, which is that the vast majority of Americans will reject these boosters.

Originally published September 12, 2022 on Mercola.com

A-Non-Yes-Mouse