What this
Shigeru did not want to mention is that the United States were the one that set
the precedence of ignoring the verdict of The Hague when it ruled against the
US in the past. The US even committed an act of contempt of The Hague by
tearing to pieces the verdict in full media coverage. What Shigeru also refused
to disclose is that The Hague has no jurisdiction over territorial issues under
the UNCLOS. And what Shigeru also did not disclose is that the US refused to
sign as a signatory to abide by the rules of UNCLOS. The US is NOT a signatory
of UNCLOS or is not willing to abide by the laws of UNCLOS. This is the biggest
American hypocrisy, demanding other countries to abide by UNCLOS rules when it
refuses to do so.
So is USA more
suitable as the world cop? Or is Japan more suitable as the world cop? The
Japanese must remember the crimes and atrocities committed by Japan in WW2
against the whole of Asia and South East Asia by their invasion to conquer and
rule over these countries. On record at
least 24 million people were killed by the Japanese, not counting the wounded
and maimed and the destruction to their country’s economies and the lives of
their people. And Japan is everywhere pitching to be a peacekeeper and
potential world cop. And some stupid Asean leaders agree that it is alright for
this beast of a nation to be a peacekeeper when their people were massacred by
the Japanese, their countries conquered and colonized by the Japanese. They got
to thank the Americans for dropping the two atomic bombs in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki to end the war and save their skins.
By the way,
China is not interested in being a world cop and has no desire or intent to be
a world cop. The term world cop in reality is more like an international
gangster, using might to control and intimidate smaller countries, to conduct
regime change and to provoke and conduct wars. How virtuous is this
international gangster to be called a world cop? How many thousands or millions
of innocent lives have been killed or destroyed by the current ‘world cop’ and
the world cop aspirant in Japan during the invasion of Asia?
Both are the
most unsuitable candidates to be world cop when bullying and conducting wars
are their modus operandi, their way of conducting international relations. They
conduct wars instead of keeping peace as a cop should be doing. And no need to
bother about China wanting to be world cop. China is not interested. Only
aggressive warmongering nations would want to assume the role of ‘world cop’ to
rule over other countries, to bully countries that refused to toe their line.
The world
does not need a self appointed world cop. If there is to be one, it should come
under the banner of the United Nation, not the United States of America.