I had a dream. We built a great and prosperous city nation in 3 decades.
I had a dream. We lost our great city nation in half the time.
I had a dream. Our President, PM and cabinet ministers were all foreigners.
I had a dream. We were flying a different flag and singing a different anthem.
I had a dream. Our top civil servants, military officers and police officers were foreigners.
I had a dream. Our children were maids and taxi drivers.
I had a dream. The true blue Singaporeans were turned into the dalits of the land, the untouchable, stupid and uneducated.
I had a dream. We were not called Singaporeans anymore. We were not called Sinkies either. We were called Stinkies.
I had a dream. We lost our great city state and were reduced to stateless people.
I had a dream. The people running our country were foreigners we warmly invited to be our citizens are now our masters.
I woke up in fear. It was so real that I have to slap myself several
times to know that it was just a dream. And I wonder, could the
Singaporeans be so stupid to lose their country? Could my dream comes
true? Could this really happen or is already happening?
Chinatown hawker centre. Hawker Centres are a national heritage, selling a wide variety of food at very reasonable prices. They are spread across the whole island and is part of the Singapore way of life.
1/27/2014
1/26/2014
Only 300 Sinkies against fare hike
Gilbert Goh’s protest gathering at the Hong
Lim Park
only drew a miserable 300 protesters. How to read this? One way is to declare that
only 300 Sinkies are unhappy with the fare hike. The silent majority are
supportive of the fare hike. Tiok boh?
It is so lucky that 300 turned up. If only a handful, then
it could be safely concluded that no one is protesting and the fare hike must
be reasonable and welcomed by the commuters.
When the first protest movement of more than 5000 people turned
up at Hong Lim against the PWP, it was hardly reported in the main media.
Yesterday’s protest was reported and with photos too. What is the sublime
message? Go figure.
Do not underestimate the power of the media.
A news headline can be taken seriously
Take this headline in the Straits Times for discussion,
“Briton and family leave for Perth
amid threats”?
What would the readers think if they did not have the full
story? Would they think that this City state is not safe for foreigners and
foreigners are being threatened with serious harms and forced to move out for
their own safety? If one is a foreigner in the US
or UK or Australia,
and planning to come here as a mercenary, to find paradise on earth, would one
be having second thoughts?
Would the embassies be sending out travel warnings to their
citizens to warn them of the risk if they come here? Or this is intentional, to
tell the foreigner not to come here?
This is a very interesting and controversial headline
indeed. Maybe a bit of sensationalism but with selected truth. It is true that
Anton claimed that he was threatened. Anyone done any investigation that this
is indeed true? What kind of threat, life threatening, serious, genuine, or
some bloggers sputting nonsense in the net using Anonymous like the hackers?
Still a good headline to catch the attention of the
readers. Maybe I shall write an article
with a headline, ‘Xenophobic Sinkie hordes threaten life of talented expat to
run for his life from Paradise’? Would this be
sensationalism, a bit of half truth?
Top Indian university students are brilliant
"Students in the top universities of India
are brilliant. India
is a world leader in many areas particularly in low-cost engineering. We have
to learn a lot from India,"
said Peter YH Pang, assistant vice-president (university and global relations)
NUS during his visit. Peter Pang was reciprocating the visit of the Indian
academic team led by NIT-T director Sunderarajan in October last year to NUS,
to explore the possibilities of academic collaboration.’…The Times of India
This kind of statement generally is applicable to all
countries as their best students must be in their top universities, otherwise
the country will not progress. The only exception is the USA
where many rich families could buy places in top universities for their D grade
scions.
Low cost engineering is definitely a niche in India.
This has nothing to do with the low cost labour we have here that India
is exporting. India
is able to do a lot of engineering stuff cheaply, like cheap cars and equipment.
This is the forte of India.
NUS is looking like embarking on an academic collaboration
with Indian universities to introduce low cost engineering into our university
syllabus and soon we will be opening up a new industry for low cost engineering
stuff. Singapore
could then have two Science Parks, one for leading edge science and engineering
and another for low cost engineering. We can dove tail our economic growth
strategy with two engines of growth.
This is like having the best of both worlds. And our
industries that are relying on low cost labour will become even more
competitive with low cost engineering products.
What a way to go. Come to think of it, it is like a first
world city with a third world vitality. The future of Singapore
is getting brighter.
Power of the internet took its first scalp
Do not ignore the power of the internet and the voice of the people, even if they are daft Sinkies. At times, in the most unusual of places, they can strike and get their target down. Think Punggol East.
Over the last few days, the uproar in the internet over an
insult to Sinkies brought things to bear on the trespasser. It was a public
lynching of sort on an unsuspecting victim who thought of nothing like the
foreigner cyclist threatening a woman Sinkie driver in broad daylight, or those
that beat up Sinkies to let off steam. The angmoh cyclist got to walk away like
a world boxing champion and strutting his stuff with a big ego. Beware you
asshole, the next time you try that on a Sinkie it could be very different. The
govt may not come out to defend the rights of Sinkies and their dignity, but
the netizens will be very unforgiving.
Kindness begets kindness, as a minister said. And shits will
beget shits. Or is it that whatever the
Sinkies do it will only beget shits? There is a new mood in the air. Call it
xenophobia, yes, I think it is. It was xenophobia of the rich elite in cahoots
with the foreigners to spit at poor Sinkies, thumping poor Sinkies as daft and
wuss. The poor Sinkies will not take that lying down anymore and will turn it
around to the foreigners who attempted to do so.
This is people’s power in a non violent way. Sometimes it
works, sometimes it doesn’t. But don’t bet on it that it doesn’t work all the
time. It would be too late to say sorry.
While this event has aroused the daft Sinkies to be more
assertive, the Ah Q mentality of the meek Chinese is resurfacing again. In
today’s Sunday Times, an article by Chua Mui Hoong tried to justify the Anton
Casey episode the way Ah Q would do to claim some psychological consolation
after being kicked in the ass. The argument goes like this, ‘…by showing
contempt for and mocking ordinary people, Mr Casey has insulted and
disrespected himself more than he has Singaporeans. By his own hand, in his own
words, he has shown the world what an intolerant person he is, chockful of
conceit.’
Singaporeans that are being beaten or shitted on by
foreigners should recite this everyday and they will feel much better, that
they are superior to Mr Asshole, just like Ah Q. This dismissive trait of the
Chinese to address their attackers respectfully is a very silly thing and they
duly deserved to be treated that way no matter how much dignity money can buy
them.
Remember what LKY told his young PPS, that he had to look
them in the eyes or they would not respect him. How does this compares to the
Ah Q’s way of dealing with his bashers? Would Ah Q gain more respect from Mr
foreigners by being meek and consoling himself with more silly justifications
short of saying thank you?
Kopi level - Yellow
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)