8 min clip showing the top Muslim actors and actresses in China. Some of them are Ugyhurs. The Muslims in China, including the Ugyhurs are living very well and some very successful. Many of these Muslim actors and actresses are multi millionaires and very well received by their Chinese fans.
7/16/2025
China needs to stifle India's development? China needs to spy on India, to see how many toilets India is building?
Palki Sharma is again complaining that China is trying to stifle India's development using unfair competition. What global brand has India been showcasing to support her claim that India is indeed competing with China and that China is using unfair tactics to sabotage India.
I think that is a big insult to China trying to put India on the same level playing field. Apple and Foxconn are not investing further in India because China is controlling its supply chain servicing Apple in India. Is that what she is nagging about? Is she talking about China clamping down on rare earth elements exported to India, now that China knows India is reselling them to USA defense contractors making weapons to target China? That incidentally is just collateral damage targeting India's own EV makers and manufacturing, sorry to say, for consorting with China's most bitter enemy.
In fact, China cares two hoots what India does, whether it is trying to become the next superpower, the factory of the world, dominate global EV making, sending rockets to Mars or exploring the sun at night. China does what it does best and does what it needs to protect its interest, nothing more.
Palki Sharma is also trying to demonize China by claiming that China is placing hidden ships spying on India. That must be a joke to say the least. What has India got that China does not already have and even more than what India can hope for? China has its own Beidou Navigation Satellites that can see India's sensitive infrastructures for target practice. India better wakes up and not try to toe the USA line by demonizing China too vigorously and shooting its own foot. During COVID19, India was conned into providing vaccines to counter China's vaccine diplomacy, under the dictate of the USA, that in the end deprived India of vaccines for its own use, resulting in the death of millions. I guess lessons are never learnt by India and consorting with the devil cannot be broken off.
Anonymous
I think that is a big insult to China trying to put India on the same level playing field. Apple and Foxconn are not investing further in India because China is controlling its supply chain servicing Apple in India. Is that what she is nagging about? Is she talking about China clamping down on rare earth elements exported to India, now that China knows India is reselling them to USA defense contractors making weapons to target China? That incidentally is just collateral damage targeting India's own EV makers and manufacturing, sorry to say, for consorting with China's most bitter enemy.
In fact, China cares two hoots what India does, whether it is trying to become the next superpower, the factory of the world, dominate global EV making, sending rockets to Mars or exploring the sun at night. China does what it does best and does what it needs to protect its interest, nothing more.
Palki Sharma is also trying to demonize China by claiming that China is placing hidden ships spying on India. That must be a joke to say the least. What has India got that China does not already have and even more than what India can hope for? China has its own Beidou Navigation Satellites that can see India's sensitive infrastructures for target practice. India better wakes up and not try to toe the USA line by demonizing China too vigorously and shooting its own foot. During COVID19, India was conned into providing vaccines to counter China's vaccine diplomacy, under the dictate of the USA, that in the end deprived India of vaccines for its own use, resulting in the death of millions. I guess lessons are never learnt by India and consorting with the devil cannot be broken off.
Anonymous
China more dependent on America or the other way round?
China arming Iran is indirectly also arming the Houthis in time to come, with Iran now the main supporter of the Houthis. The West can make a song and dance to demonize China about it but isn't that the same as the USA and EU arming Ukraine and Israel. What works for them cannot be denied for China, right?
Sure, the USA can start sanctioning more of China, since Iran is already deep in the USA's sanctions list. Better still, the USA can now completely decouple from China, a move which I believe China is taking in its stride. If China can announce that it is ready for any war with the USA, it shows it has no fear of decoupling from the USA - lock, stock and barrel. Who is in need of what from whom? Rare earth, consumer goods, raw resources are all in the hands and under control by China. China can wash its hands of doing business with USA. But can the USA afford that? Why is the USA not touting about de-coupling, only squeaking about 'de-risking'? People can deduce why the USA is backtracking on decoupling, whatever 'word salad' the USA choose to trot out.
Anonymous
China on the right track towards self sufficiency in advanced tech
Thankfully, China is not buying any weapons from the USA, otherwise it will be used to blackmail the Chinese. China is making its own weapons, fighter jets, aircraft carriers, missiles, satellite navigation system and does not have to depend on the USA or the West. In fact, China's domestic aviation is going to be self -reliant on just the Comac planes, with Boeing and Airbus losing market share in China going forward.
It was reported, just recently, that the USA and its allies, Japan and South Korea had agreed to deny selling high grade bearings for China's high-speed trains, hoping to derail China's runaway HSR construction that is outshining Japan. What they failed to find out was that China had already figured out how to make high grade steel bearings comparable with imported ones from Japan and South Korea for its high-speed trains.
The USA also tried to stop the sale of commercial jet engines to China recently, but we know that China is already well versed in making its own jet engines for its fighter jets. So, what is the problem if the USA stop selling engines for Chinese planes? It just makes China more determined to make everything itself.
Anonymous
It was reported, just recently, that the USA and its allies, Japan and South Korea had agreed to deny selling high grade bearings for China's high-speed trains, hoping to derail China's runaway HSR construction that is outshining Japan. What they failed to find out was that China had already figured out how to make high grade steel bearings comparable with imported ones from Japan and South Korea for its high-speed trains.
The USA also tried to stop the sale of commercial jet engines to China recently, but we know that China is already well versed in making its own jet engines for its fighter jets. So, what is the problem if the USA stop selling engines for Chinese planes? It just makes China more determined to make everything itself.
Anonymous
7/15/2025
Air India's 171 crashed...Fuel control switches were cut off
Fuel control switches were switched from "run" to "cutoff", before an Air India plane crashed last month, a preliminary investigation report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Burea revealed early on Saturday.
Shortly after takeoff, and once the plane reached its top recorded speed of 180 knots, “the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another" within a second, which caused a loss of engine thrust moments after it left the runway, the report revealed.
Shortly after takeoff, and once the plane reached its top recorded speed of 180 knots, “the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another" within a second, which caused a loss of engine thrust moments after it left the runway, the report revealed.
Shortly after both switches had been turned off, they were flipped back into the run position. One of the pilots transmitted "MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY," however, the plane could not gain power quickly enough after it had begun to lose altitude.
The flight lasted around 30 seconds before it crashed.
The report also revealed that, prior to the crash, one pilot could be heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking why the other had cut off the fuel. The other pilot responded that he had not done so. MSN
The report also revealed that, prior to the crash, one pilot could be heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking why the other had cut off the fuel. The other pilot responded that he had not done so. MSN
The most critical moments of an aircraft movement are taking off and landing. When taking off, full power and maintaining full power are crucial for a safe take off. Cutting off fuel by switching off the fuel switches is never done as it would crash the aircraft. Every pilot knows that and would not do that.
Why were the switches turned off? Who turned off the switches? Definitely not the pilot or co pilot unless they did it deliberately to crash the aircraft. In this case this would not happen. Recorded pilot conversation, one pilot asked the other why he switched off the fuel. The other replied he did not. And the switched was in the on position, suggesting the pilot turned it back to on, or was it in the on position all the time?
So, how could the fuel switches turned off on their own? Mechanical problems? Unlikely as no switches would flip on its own unless it is wired and controlled by some software. The switch may be switched off if the software is faulty or being hacked, or being programmed to do so, like a kill switch, or being switched off deliberately by someone other than the pilots. A software or a kill switch that can turn off the fuel is deadly and cannot be allowed in the first place. This kill switch facility must be removed in all aircraft immediate. This function was introduced after the 911 incident to justify ground operators to take control of the aircraft in a hijack situation. Caveat, if there is indeed such a kill switch installed.
If the investigation team does a thorough job, more evidence would be uncovered. By the way, China's Southern Airline had sold all its 787-8 Dreamliners as a safety measure, in consideration of the safety of all its passengers and air crews. Better to be safe than sorry.
Many operators of Boeing 787-8 are investigating the fuel cut off switch, physically and mechanically. The control and problem are the software that controls it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)