Mean white men and their white lies

 This is the way Journalist, with a biased mentality, work their way around unsuspecting readers, by first planting the doubt in the minds of those reading or watching their interviews with a negative question, then pretend they are neutral.

This is the tactic with the behavior of the USA, weakening the other side first with snide attacks before meeting them. Before setting up a meeting with the Chinese, they often try to create the impression that they are going to the talks or negotiation in a position of strength, by making comments to unsettle the other side. That has now been found to have negative effects and failed.

So, what is the new modus operandi they are adopting? They desperately needed a chance to meet, talk nicely first to say what they want, then turn around to denigrate the Chinese. Lessons have been learnt and China no longer invites them for talks and they are worried about what the Chinese are thinking. Now they are inviting themselves to visit China, which the Chinese will not decline according to protocol. But China will not extend the kind of welcome that it accords to friendly countries and their leaders. That is China's method of dealing with unfriendly countries and leaders, and the world is not blind to such treatment by the Chinese. A gentlemen snub it is, to give the other side something to think about.

On a seperate slate, it is amazing that the MSM is still planting the narrative that Putin is now getting more isolated, and that Zelenskyy is still capable of conducting a counteroffensive and most of all, take back all occupied lands. The fact that they expect people to believe in their lies is really flabbergasting. I think they are starting to believe in their own lies. Oh yes, lest I forget, Yoon of South Korea is sending help and Zelenskyy is celebrating. Russia must be taking careful note and will deal with this Chiwawa.

Now that Wagner has moved to Belarus, basically opening up a new front for Putin, while the Chechens and Russians are holding Eastern Ukraine, Zelenskyy faces the prospect of fighting on two fronts. That makes fighting to the last Ukrainian becoming a real prospect, with Zelenskyy the only one left standing. That will be fun to watch. But he is a Jew, not Ukrainian.

There is also the news that the USA is now reluctant to send F16s to Ukraine. According to a top official from the USA Defence Department, the ground conditions, eg the runways prevailing in Ukraine right now are not conducive to operate the F16s, a view already espoused by many. Moreover, the USA is wary of existing Russian air defence capabilities in Ukraine and fear that those planes may not be of much use, meaning they are easy targets for the Russians.

Now, what is next in the USA's 'game changer plan' in Ukraine? Putin is waiting for USA troops on the ground, and body bags returning to the USA as in Vietnam. The former Soviet Union is famous for fighting grinding wars of attrition, which the USA is least capable of doing. They fled Vietnam and Afghanistan, just like Hitler and Napolean being given a taste of the meat grinder feeling in their war against the former Soviet Union. Russia is even more capable than the Soviet Union in those times.

Anonymous

Chinese and Russian Militaries Now as Close as Gum and Teeth, Eyes Conflict with US and Japan

China's Ministry of National Defense announced Saturday that Russia will dispatch naval and air forces to participate in "Northern/Interaction-2023" drills in the central region of the Sea of Japan organized by the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Northern Theater Command.

The event marks Russia's second time participating in the PLA annual strategic drills, and also a first that Russia has dispatched both naval and air forces to participate in similar events. Such military drills would be carried out with strong and clear purpose of safeguarding the national interests of both sides in key passages of the Sea of Japan waters.

The drills are themed "safeguarding the safety of strategic maritime routes" and are designed to further elevate the coordination capability of the two militaries and strengthen their capabilities of jointly safeguarding regional peace and stability, as well as responding to various security challenges.

A spokesman at the Academy of Military Sciences said that the China-Russia joint exercises, as a normalized and institutionalized military cooperation arrangement, serve as a substantive manifestation of the China-Russia strategic partnership of coordination in the military field.

The Sea of Japan is an important strategic passage for both China and Russia. The three straits in the Sea of Japan, namely the Soya Strait, the Tsushima Strait, and the Tsugaru Strait, are all related to the national strategic security of China and Russia. Especially if hostile American and Japanese forces want to create trouble in this area, it would pose a significant security threat to China and Russia.

Via the exercises, China and Russia will further enhance cooperation in the traditional security field. The exercises will include subjects such as air defense, anti-missile, anti-ship, and anti-submarine scenarios.

Since it is joint exercises between China and Russia, the exercise design should include scenarios where one side's vessel is damaged and the other side participates in rescue efforts, highlighting the high level of integration and cooperation between the two countries and their militaries.

Such exercises can further enhance the actual combat capability of China and Russia to maintain the security of maritime strategic passage, in order to ensure the national security of both countries in unstable situations and even in the event of conflict with the United States and Japan.

Anonymous

Palestine Peace - A cheeky article telling the truth but misleading the readers

Can China push the US out of the Palestine-Israel peace process?

Following successful forays into settling other Middle Eastern disputes, Beijing is inserting itself into the region’s most challenging conflict

Chinese President Xi Jingping and his Palestinian Authority (PA) counterpart, Mahmoud Abbas, announced that the two had signed a strategic partnership, with Beijing offering to mediate between the PA and Israel in addition to facilitating unity between rival Palestinian political parties. China’s recent push towards further involvement in the Middle East’s central conflict will invite the ire of Washington, whose power is waning regionally....

Is China a neutral broker and can it achieve peace?

Although it could be argued that China is biased due to its investments in Israeli infrastructure or its rhetoric towards the cause of Palestinian statehood, it is clear that there is somewhat of a more balanced approach to this issue than what is coming from Washington. The US has viewed Israel as its Western outpost in the Middle East since 1967, and the American’s are so incredibly committed to Tel Aviv that US President Joe Biden has repeatedly stated that he subscribes to the nationalist ideology behind Israel’s creation – Zionism.  RT

The article by Robert Inlakesh, a political analyst, journalist and documentary filmmaker currently based in London, UK, is posted in RT. Though the article correctly explained the biased treatment of the Palestinians and the pro Israeli stand of the Americans against a more neutral position of China's relations with the two parties, a casual reader could easily be misled by the two headings that I have embolden above. 

Can China push the US out of the Palestine-Israel peace process? gives a hint that China is unlikely to succeed to replace the US as the peace maker. Oops, it assumed that the US is really a peace maker, while meddling in suppressing the Palestinians and siding and approving the Israelis genocide of the Palestinians and stealing their land for several decades...with no end of peace in sight, but the gradually taking over of the Palestinian land and massacring the Palestinians using the same Europe formula against the Red Indians in North America. 

The second headline, Is China a neutral broker and can it achieve peace? implies and questioning, that China is not a neutral broker.  To a casual reader that just flip through the pages, or glancing the headlines, the impression would be quite negative against China, that the Americans are the sincere peace maker that China is trying to displace and China is biased, not neutral to the Palestinians.

What is the purpose and intent of the author? I must say that the author is a very experienced and crafty analyst. I have not read his previous writings so not able to judge his intent and where he is coming from.

US to deploy sea mines in Yellow Sea and Pearl River Delta against China

An article by Commander Victor Duenow of the US Navy published on the website of the US Naval Institute said that the US should pursue offensive mining capabilities against China in the Yellow Sea and the Pearl River Delta.

DPP secessionists of the island of Taiwan also commissioned additional minelayers in January 2022 to "defend" against the Chinese mainland, the Associated Press reported at the time.

Hence, the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy in a recent sea mine countermeasure exercise deployed minesweeper drones alongside a manned minesweeper. The unmanned vessels can enhance efficiency and lower casualty risks to counter US deployment of sea mines against China.

A minesweeping detachment attached to the PLA Northern Theater Command recently organized sea mine countermeasure forces and explored new patterns of unmanned integrated minesweeping procedures with an exercise in the Yellow Sea, China Central Television (CCTV) reported on Tuesday.

The exercise, simulating a scenario in which hostile sea mines were spotted around friendly forces, tasked the detachment with clearing the area of the sea mine threat, CCTV reported.

 Anonymous 

PS. This is an act of war.

BRICS and SCO paying a heavy price for having a dark horse in them

 India is in the QUAD, formed in 2007, an anti-China outfit created specifically to counter China, several years after the formation of BRICS and SCO in 2001. BRICS and SCO partners had therefore been blindsided by including India, and indirectly the USA now has a foothold in BRICS and SCO via the backdoor, using India.

BRICS and SCO is now paying a heavy price putting their trust in India. Two snakes working together is a very dangerous proposition for the two organisation. Now that there is a thief in the house of BRICS and SCO, any safety measures undertaken is rendered impotent and any potential damage is hard to fathom.

India already let it known that it will be nothing more than a spanner thrower in the SCO, against anything to do with China and Pakistan.

The USA therefore had succeeded in planting a Trojan Horse in BRICS and SCO and India is already sabotaging the workings of the SCO spearheaded by Russia and China.

China should concentrate on developing the scope of co-operation with the five Central Asian countries, under the 5 + 1 grouping, and bring BRICS and SCO members into the grouping except India, the USA Trojan Horse. That may solve the Trojan Horse problem, unless there are other turncoats inside BRICS and SCO.

The earlier this problem regarding India is solved, the better for BRICS and SCO. 

Anonymous