Asean to meddle with the internal affairs of Myanmar?

SINGAPORE: Hopes are high that Jakarta - which had steered the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) expertly when it had last chaired the grouping - would pull its weight and rally its ASEAN colleagues to muster up a creditable response to the Myanmar crisis.

There are high expectations about how Indonesia would propose to implement the 2022 ASEAN Summit’s “Review and Decision” on the 2021 Five-Point Consensus (5PC) on Myanmar. ...

The readout from the retreat did not divulge details on any of the above. Instead, the meeting’s key emphasis was on the need for a united approach to Myanmar - underscoring the divergent views among ASEAN member states on what constitutes constructive approaches to the crisis in Myanmar.  CNA

The above article in CNA is an overt sign that Asean is increasingly being nudged by the western narrative and intent to meddle and interfere with the internal affairs of a member state, Myanmar. Despite the clear cut policy statements in Asean's Constitution, many Asean leaders are gradually being influenced by the dominating and coercive behaviour of the Americans that it is their right to interfere with what is going on in Myanmar. The objectives and aspiration of the founding fathers of Asean is to remain neutral and free from big power influence and coercion, and to create a conducive environment in Southeast Asia for trade and cooperation among its members. It was never intended to be operated like a gangster organisation with the power to mess around with the internal affairs of its members.

This change of mindset, with several Asean leaders behaving like the Americans, like the knows all, smart Alec, and arrogant self righteousness, that they know better and are better qualified to impose their views on fellow member state, is gaining traction, albeit subtlely and some being dragged into such arrogant and abusive behaviour unconsciously. And many have forgotten that their own internal affairs and politics are far from reproach. Several Asean countries' internal politics are ripe for interference if this new mindset becomes a precedent for Asean, that it is the right of Asean members to dictate and mess around with the internal affairs of another member.

Does any Asean member state think that they would not fall into the same state of affair and let every Asean states to tell them what to do, how to govern their countries, with the nose in the air? What is wrong with Asean? Is Asean going to become another mini America, a sheriff in the making, to rule and control its members? If this is going to be the case, Myanmar may be the first to exit Asean and eventually more will exit Asean. 

Is Asean on the path of self destruction by misbehaving like the gangster Americans, thinking that they are smart and smug to tell each member what to do and how to govern their own countries?  Who is behind this transformation of Asean to become another mini mischievous god?

PS. In a way Asean is starting to behave like it is a righteous empire. Only difference is that it cannot bully non member countries but can bully its own member countries, especially those that are not favoured by the Americans. Is Asean unwittingly or willingly attacking its own member countries under the behest of the Americans, under the fake beliefs of defending democracy and human rights?

Soros and his crimes

Soros and his groups play the long game. For example, his “Open Society” group brags about how it has spent billions of dollars in Ukraine since the 1990s.

A characteristic of his movement is the use of colors — like:

“Rose Revolution” in Georgia in 2003

“Orange Revolution” in Ukraine in 2004

“Tulip Revolution” in Kyrgyzstan in 2005

In each of the above cases, when a pro-Russia leader won the election, Soros turned on his useful idiots and provocateurs, who started large protests. Then, the US/EU governments would cry crocodile tears about human rights, freedom, and democracy. US/UK media operating in those countries would carry out intense propaganda campaigns about corruption. Then the governments were forced to hold another election, in which the pro-US leader won by a small margin.

The interesting and obvious phenomenon is that when a pro-US government is established, Soros quietly shuts down all his “grassroots” organizations. All those protesters and influencers quietly vanish in thin air. Thus, the people are left with the same corrupt system but with different or worse rulers.

Take Ukraine, for example. In 2004, Ukraine became slightly pro-US after the first color revolution; and in 2014, Ukraine became a total American puppet. What did the Ukrainian people gain? In 2021, before the war started, the average pension in Ukraine was just $150 a month. Ukraine was still the poorest country in Europe. Worse, the Ukrainians got a comedian president, rule by the same oligarchy, Nazism, civil war, Russian invasion, millions of people turned into refugees, and utter destruction of the entire country.

While the US has groups like the National Endowment of Democracy (NED), people like Soros are even more effective. Why? It gives US deep state "plausible deniability" -- "Hey, he's just an individual, not the US government."

For Soros, he enjoys immense power — to manipulate millions of people and overthrow governments. Of course, the new puppets installed in these countries will let Soros and his financial buddies in New York and London make enormous amount of money through various “reforms” such as privatization. So, for example, Soros’ hedge fund would be able to buy a natural gas field, a bank or an airline for pennies on the dollar. The investment money belongs to other oligarchs and financial institutions in the US/Europe, and Soros gets a juicy commission. This strategy of OPM — Other People’s Money — is more discrete and smarter than Soros himself becoming the owner of a new bank or an airline — then, even the average useful idiot of the color revolution will be able to connect the dots.

For example, after the fall of the USSR, vampires like Soros descended upon Moscow, handpicked Russian oligarchs and politicians— based on their loyalty to US/EU, and looted hundreds of billions of dollars.

George Soros is part of the US/EU Deep State — a group of elites from the foreign policy establishment, Wall Street, military, spy agencies, and the media.

Thus, it’s not just BBC or Hindenburg or Soros attacking India. The entire Western establishment is targeting India.

And the attacks are not going to stop, unless the Modi government gives into the US demands. And what does the US want?

Stop buying weapons from Russia. Instead buy US weapons.

Allow US military bases in India.

Stop helping the expansion of BRICS, especially with the addition of Saudi Arabia and Iran. (This threatens the petrodollar hegemony).

Be more anti-China. (Recently, the Indian government has been trying to downplay and tensions with China. When there were some border conflicts, it was the British media that leaked the news. Also, India-China trade has been booming. It looks like the Modi government realizes its mistake of over-hyping anti-China sentiments).

Allow privatization of India’s financial sector — let US giants buy shares in Indian banks, insurance companies, stock market exchange etc.

Anonymous 

Understanding America’s Overt Regime-Change Ops

 

A quick history lesson here is important. During the Cold War, the CIA blatantly assassinated many leaders of sovereign nations all over the world to “stop the spread of communism.” The real reason was, of course, to extend American hegemony globally and ensure cheap supplies of raw materials as well as open markets for American products.

However, by the 1970s, a lot of allies started to complain, since murdering political leaders was a bit too much even for the co-conspirators and obedient puppets of imperialism. Thus, in the 1980s, the US polished its regime change operations and came up with the idea of revolutions through propaganda and soft power. This was the result of people like George Soros and a myriad of organizations like NED and NDI.

Thus, the US shifted many of its operations from covert to overt. Rather than knife-and-dagger, try to overthrow leaders openly!

In 1991, Allen Weinstein, the founder of NED, admitted that, "A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA."

The goal was to spend billions of dollars in “NGOs” in developing countries, especially those that are resistant to American influence. In an Orwellian fashion, these “non-governmental” organizations are funded and directed by the US government! The term “NGO” just means that they are free from the governments of the countries where the NGOs are located.

These NGOs create a vast array of groups including those that promote “journalism,” “free speech,” “women’s rights,” “environmentalism” etc. Plus, to give some legitimacy, they also groups that allegedly help fight poverty or illiteracy. However, all their actions are focused on promoting pro-American sentiments and Western corporate interests. The leaders of these groups can make a lot of money and enjoy celebrity status. They can attend workshops in Europe, get to testify before the US Congress, write articles for the NY Times, appear on CNN etc. If they are really good, like that North Korean defector Yeonmi Park, they can make $10,000 a speech, making up absurd stories.

You can see these US/EU-funded fake NGO groups now, in 2023, in Myanmar, Thailand, Belarus, Kazakhstan etc. For more than two decades, they were busy in Hong Kong, until they were completely dismantled by China two years ago. The separatist movement in the Xinjiang-Uyghur region is also fueled by the same people. Other places that were recent victims of US-led protests include Venezuela, Syria, Libya, Cuba and even the so-called Arab Spring.

In Ukraine, they started in the early 1990s and lasted until 2014, when the Nazi-led and US-orchestrated Maidan Coup overthrew a democratically elected leader. Since then, the Ukrainian NGO groups have shifted their energy to 100% anti-Russian propaganda.

George Soros, the General of Color Revolutions

While the US government funds groups like NED and NDI to create chaos in not-so-subservient nations around the world, these groups still had direct links to the US government, which was embarrassing at times. Thus, the US deep state picked George Soros as its henchman or general. He was a Jewish immigrant from Hungary, had strong anti-Russian and anti-communist feelings, and was the perfect pick.

With Wall Street’s help, the CIA made him a billionaire. With insider information, Soros made his first billion by shorting the British Pound in 1992. Then, subsequently, he made more billions during the Asian financial crisis, Russian crisis, and Mexican crisis during the late 1990s. Get rich by destroying others!

Anonymous 

Ukraine War - A strategic masterpiece by the Americans

 Many are looking at the Ukraine War from the conventional perspective. It is a war between two sides and one side is good, one is bad, and one would end up the winner. But looking at it from another perspective, the depopulation of mother earth, I think the Americans are doing the right thing. The world is over populated and tough actions are needed to reduce the world population. Bill Gates and Soros are doing their jobs in this direction. The Ukraine War is another way to achieve the same goal

One good point about the Ukraine War is that it is more selective and targeted in the solution. What Gates and Soros are doing is a bit indiscriminate, using a broad brush to wipe out people of all races in one sweep. The Ukraine War does it a bit differently. The Americans are destroying the warmongering blue eyed blonds, the most warlike and dangerous specie of mankind. If the Americans would be allowed to have their ways, Europe would be less populated and with lesser blue eyed blonds by the time this war ends.

Let the Ukraine War go on not only to the last Ukrainians, but to the last blue eyed blond European. There will then be lesser warmongering blue eyed blonds to go around the world to start wars and to invade countries of the non whites. The Americans are doing a great service towards peace and to save the world. This time it is real, for peace. You can only appreciate the outcome by seeing how aggressive, intense, enthusiastic and perverted the Europeans are in wanting to escalate this war at all costs with no regards to its consequences.

With lesser of the warlike blue eyed blonds left in Europe, it would be easier to repopulate Europe with the refugees from the Middle East and Africa. Very likely they would be encouraged to go forth and multiply as Europe would need more people to replace the blue eyed blonds that were taken out in the war. The surviving blue eyed blondes would need to find their mates from the Middle Eastern and Africans men that are in Europe. The next generation of Europeans would be less white and no longer have blue eyes, and less warlike than the blue eyed blonds.

Europe would become a more peaceful region in a generation or two. This is the masterpiece of the Americans. Great works are made in this way, unintentionally, like the breeding of the best physical specimen of the human race in America. This experiment in Europe would end up with a new human specie that is less warlike, less aggressive than the blue eyed blonds.

Well done, America.  The rest of the world must thank the Americans profusedly for this masterpiece. But do not get involved to mess up the great plan of the Americans. This is the best thing the Americans have ever done, for once, and for the better of all human beans.

PS. In a way, if Singapore were to replace its no talent and lazy Singaporeans with talented foreigners. Singapore would also become more progressive and competitive with a new generation of talented citizens.  Social engineering?  And all the countries of the world can learn from this Singapore experiment and become more successful by replacing their no talent natives with top talents from the rest of the world.

What do you think?

Covid19 - What Pfizer said about the Covid vaccine fraud?

 

A 2 min clip on how Pfizer tried to defend itself on its fraudulent vaccine. It was not to be blamed. Blame the stupid govts that bought into its fraudulent vaccine. If what Pfizer said is true, must be or else they would not have admitted it, then the American govt, European govts and their crony govts are so easily duped by them to by into their fraud.  They cannot be coerced by the Americans to buy into the Pfizer fraud, could they? More than half of the world's population stupidly, foolishly, consumed the Pfizer fraud like mindless sheep.

Only China and developing countries that used non mRNA vaccines are spared and saved from the Pfizer fraud. India is partially saved as they turned to Ivermectin half way.

This is the hoax of the Century. So many willing parties.  And many still in a state of denial and still pushing for more boosters...and a crime against humanity.