Me pro-China? I accept the label, says ex-foreign minister George Yeo as he weighs in on Sino-US tensions
Photo credit to Today Online.
This statement by George Yeo Yong Boon may seem to be just a casual remark but it is a big thing in Singapore, especially coming from an ex minister, a PAP minister. According to George Yeo, a Chinese must be a lesser Chinese in Singapore, meaning he has to keep his Chinese profile low, not to be exuberant about being a Chinese. A Chinese professing to be pro China is like using a megaphone saying 'I am Chinese' in Raffles Place. This is a no, no. I have never heard of any PAP minister mentioning 'pro China' casually in public. Even when Lee Kuan Yew was wearing his signature ethnic Chinese designed shirt in official functions, no one dared to mention it or whether he was making a statement, that he was a Chinese after all and proud of it.
Since his passing, no ethnic Chinese minister would dare to put on an ethnic Chinese shirt but happily putting on ethnic Malay or Indian dresses during their respective festivals. OK, some did put on during Chinese New Year festival. Even the beautiful and elegant cheongsam, a signature dress of Mrs Lee Kuan Yew, is hardly donned by the female PAP ministers or MPs, albeit a few did.
Something is puzzling. Is there an unwritten message that PAP ministers and MPs are to avoid or shun looking like Chinese or to mention that he is pro China? Or it is a fact that they are all not pro China but pro West, pro Americans, because Singapore is pro America? Oops, oops, Singapore is neutral, not pro America and definitely not pro China. OK, I will not dispute with anyone disagreeing with me on this point.
In the last 200 years, when the evil West invaded, destroyed and looted China to bankruptcy, and condemned China and Chinese as a no talent, useless and clueless subhuman, evil, hideous, no character, poor and despicable, a far change from the glorious days of Chinese Empires with 5,000 years of culture and literature and inventions, it was understandable to dissociate with China or being identified as a Chinese. When a country or civilisation is poor and destroyed, a country in disarray, poverty and illiteracy everywhere, everyone trying to eke out a living, it was difficult, very difficult to stand out and say I am Chinese, I am proud of my Chineseness and China.
Those sad and pathetic days of China and the Chinese Civilisation are passe. China is now a rich and prosperous nation state, vying to be the number one super power with America, and actually has surpassed the Americans in may fields. China is still calling itself a developing country but in many senses already a developed country. The per capita income may look low but in purchasing power terms, hundreds of millions of the Chinese are already middle class with more millionaires and billionaires than the Americans. China probably is the only major economy that can proudly claim to have wiped out poverty among its people.
Today, there is no shame to be called a Chinese. The smear and slandering by the white men to condemn Chinese as no talent and clueless subhuman have been smashed as a mischievous white myth. The Chinese people are as talented if not more talented than the white men. And they are very proud of being Chinese, proud of the achievements of their govt and CCP. It is glorious to be citizens of the next super power, the next biggest economy, the most advanced nation in science and technology etc etc.
And yes, I have yet to see a proud and confident Chinese PAP minister or MP identifying himself as a Chinese or like George Yeo, not fighting the label of being pro China. Of course he qualified himself by asking others to judge him after reading his books. Maybe he is still more comfortable being a baba or a banana, being a lesser Chinese. But by not feeling defensive when labelled as pro China, is already a big step forward for an ex PAP minister. I have not read his books. It may turn out that he is still pro America. This is serious stuff. In the USA, the political career of a politician would be finished if he called himself pro China. Not sure if this is also the case in Singapore.
Any PAP minister or MP dares to say he is pro China? Or is it an official but unspoken policy not to have this mentioned? I am still waiting for the day when an ethnic Chinese minister or MP would be comfortable to identify himself as ethnic Chinese and pro China. This is the 21st Century. But the mindsets of the 60s and 70s are still the predominant consideration in the calculus of the ethnic Chinese politicians. It is easier to be pro Americans than pro China.
During LKY's days, Singapore always deferred to the sensitivities of the neighbouring countries, and was the last to officially recognise China, after all the neighbouring states had done so. Today, some of the Asean states are more closed to China diplomatically and strategically than Singapore. Indonesia and Malaysia's economies are increasingly more integrated with China than Singapore. Hardcore pro America Philippines is openly pro China for a change. Asean used to be taken for granted as pro America but now stubbornly neutral.
The Chinese politicians of Singapore are queer when China is concerned. Being too close to China or to be seen as pro China is taboo, like a disease. It is alright to be pro America. Better to be seen or called a baba or banana than to be called a Chinese. The Chineseness is unspoken and not to be mentioned. Very sensitive.
And, Singapore is a Chinese majority nation state. Is it? If the babas and bananas are not Chinese (OCBC), or would not called themselves Chinese but lesser Chinese, is Singapore a Chinese majority state? Would it be more appropriate to call Singapore a baba/banana majority state?
What do you think?
PS. According to Singlish Dictionary, OCBC means Orang Cina Bukan Cina or Chinese but not Chinese.