I thought I saw Janil making a presentation on Climate Change in
CNA. Indeed it was him. And he did a very good job as a TV presenter. He
must have put in a lot of effort and time into the programme.
Janil
is not only a minister, but also a doctor and now a TV presenter. What
other hidden talent has he got, still hidden and not known to the
public?
I hope CNA will make up to him for his good show with a
good pay or gratuity. He can't be putting so much time and effort for
nothing when he has a very heavy load as a minister. And CNA must not
forget to compensate the govt for his time and make good the equivalent
of his minister pay on a pro rata basis. This is only fair. His time is
very expensive.
Janil must be the most talented catch by the
PAP. With a loud hailer in hand, he could even be the super salesman in
Chinatown if he wanted to. Let's see who else would show his or her
untapped talent on TV or whatever acts they could put up with to share
their talents with the people. Sure the people would want to see a
different side or aspect of the MPs and Ministers and be impressed. I am
definitely very impressed with Janil's performance as a TV presenter.
Looks
like all the available talents in Singapore is with the PAP. No wonder
they are being paid in the millions or nearly there for the non
ministers. OK, I stand corrected in case I have insulted some for
earning less than $500k and fall into the mediocre category. I think
many MPs are also millionaires in their own rights. Think of the number
of directorships they are holding. Ok, count the opposition MPs out on
this.
In summary, I think all of them are getting more than
$500k in total annual income and surely cannot be in the mediocre or
average level of people.
Good show, multi talented super talents of Singapore. Would there be any magicians among them?
Recent
actions involving Australia and New Zealand reveal the country’s modus
operandi can be effective but will have broader, corrosive implications
for China, says Christian Le Miere....
A PATTERN OF COERCIVE DIPLOMACY
Beijing
uses a range of tools and tactics to divide and conquer. This consists
of economic and diplomatic levers to punish states that have
transgressed unwritten red lines and market-based enticements for
smaller, weaker states to cultivate influence.
Many such
tactics are not unique to China. It is commonplace for countries,
particularly larger ones, to sanction others in tits-for-tats to shape
behaviour and maintain state-to-state relations on an even keel in
protecting domestic interests and pursuing national goals.
But
Beijing is relatively unusual in the manner in which it undertakes this
coercion, using disproportionality, extra-legal processes, and
deniability....CNA
Why would CNA regularly put up such
silly articles written by the white men to demonise and attack China?
The divide and conquer strategy has been the hallmark of western
imperialism and colonialism for centuries when they divided and
conquered the whole world. Many countries are still under the controls
of the white men, including large swathe of land mass like the USA,
Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many parts of the world. No, not
true? Cannot see? These lands belong to the white men, they never
conquer them? Practically every country in the world was, and some
still, conquered by the white men.
Many countries in Latin
America, Africa, Middle East, Europe and Asia are living still under
this divide and conquer strategy. Japan and South Korea are still semi
colonies of the white men. Europe, with the EU countries in general and
Germany in particular, are still controlled by the American Empire.
Needless to say what is happening in the Middle East and Africa and
Latin America. No, no, not true? Come off it you silly twits. Open your
eyes and stop deluding yourself.
China conduct divide and conquer
diplomacy? Which country has China conquered? Fucking liars. China
dividing and conquering Australia and New Zealand? What the fuck are you
talking about? The current diplomatic rift with Australia is caused by
the Australians taking all kinds of punitive economic and political
measures and pot shots at China before China started to kick their arse.
China did not start this. China was happily trading with Australia for
decades, throwing billions of dollars into the Australian economy before
the current spat. There was absolutely no coercion or threats of any
kind from China. If Australia did not gang up with the USA to attack
China, would this happen, would China cut off trades with Australia,
stop buying Australian produce, coal, iron ore, wines etc etc?
Where
is this shit called divide and conquer Australia and New Zealand coming
from? Smoking too much grass or popping too much ice pills?
What
does this writer think of what the Americans are doing with their
warships all over the world and daily attacks against China?
What
would China perceive if Singapore's media continuously published such
silly biased western articles to attack China? Do the Singapore media
really think such silly articles are objective read for its readers?
Which
country has been conquered by China? I know that the USA, Canada,
Australia, New Zealand and many others around the world are conquered
and occupied by the Europeans till today. And many still in the process
of being conquered, occupied with American and European soldiers in
their land.
Think Iraq, Syria, Libya. Also think Germany, Japan, South Korea, Falkland, Hawaii, ....
China
is still trying to recover its lost territories in Taiwan and many
pieces of land on its borders and the South China Sea and East China
Sea. There were China's territories conquered by foreign powers and it
is China's legitimate right to take them back, not divide and conquer.
PS.
The main media are controlled and managed not by stupid people. Did
they not know the implications of publishing such hostile and negative
articles smearing China and what the Chinese govt would read of the
intent and agenda for doing such things?
The above 2 pics from NASA of Mars from its latest rover show a distinct curved horizon of Mars very similar in perspective of NASA pics of the moon. The size of the moon relative to the earth is a few hundred times smaller. Mars is about half the size of the earth. Pics taken at this angel and the distance to the horizon would not show such a big curvature unless taken from a very wide angel lens. Both pics do not look like taken from very wide angle lens.
This NASA is supposed to be a stitched panorama view from several pics, unless it is just one frame.
The above 2 pics are by China's probe Tianwen1. The top pic is taken from quite a distance from the surface of Mars and still not able to see the curvature of Mars, because Mars is too big, many times bigger than the moon. The lower pic is a closer view. Notice the texture of Mars' surface...does not look anything like on earth, especially the whitish elongated stuff.
The NASA pics look very earth like, like the surface of earth in some corners.
Now look at earlier pics of Mars from other Nasa rovers. Below are two parts of a panorama view of Mars. Notice the horizon was not curved.
China and the South China Sea will be in sharp focus when the US military reviews its missions around the world, according to the Pentagon.
US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin announced earlier this month that US President Joe Biden
had instructed the Pentagon to conduct “a global force posture review
of US military footprint, resources, strategy and missions”.
“We will consult our allies and partners as we conduct this review,” he said.
Get the latest insights and analysis from our Global Impact newsletter on the big stories originating in China.
Austin
has said China is “the chief pacing challenge” to the United States and
the Indo-Pacific area of critical importance to the US.
“And
that’s going to be a key factor in this global posture review that
[Austin is] going to do,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said on Friday. Yahoo News
Another article in Yahoo News is titled 'Can the US enlist the Philippines to help contain China in the Indo-Pacific?'
The
world has been used to the presence of American bases and aircraft
carriers all over as if it is a right, a normal. The Empire has been
accepted as the norm, unchallenged, unquestioned. Upsetting this
American dominance is unacceptable, even wrong to do so. American naval
strike force sailing into the South China, calling themselves freedom of
navigation when in reality is provocation, infringing into the rights
of China and other littoral states of the South China, threatening these
countries, did not ruffle any feathers. If China would to do so in the
Caribbean of near some American held islands, it would cause an
uproar. China is aggressive, the American military provocation is not,
is for peace, to protect the weaker countries from China, a country that
has not been in a war for 40 years and has not invaded any country. The
other, the evil Empire has been in continuous warfare, invading
countries and held in awe as a peaceful country. What is wrong with this
world?
What mission are the Americans talking about? Dominance of
the American Empire and control of the world or for peace? The second
few lines of Wendy Wu's article is clear, to stop the challenge from a
rising China. China is growing too strong for the Americans and
challenging its unchallenged dominance as the Empire. The threat of
China is not to the rest of the world but to the dominance of the
American Empire?
Why be afraid of China becoming the next
preeminent world power when it is peaceful, did not invade any country,
did not conduct wars, while the evil American Empire has been warring
every day of the year, threatening and oppressing weaker countries,
calling them enemies, making them enemies and making their people
suffered. China did not do any of these things. Who is the bully, who is
the aggressive power, who is threatening the weaker country? China does
not make any country its enemy. China would trade with any country
willing to trade with her.
The threat of China is only to the
American dominance. It has nothing to do, directly, with other peaceful
countries. The world could be a better place with a peaceful and benign
new power that did not believe in wars and invasion and threatening any
country.
The question in the other article, 'Can the US enlist the
Philippines to help contain China in the Indo-Pacific?' Why should the
Philippines want to be a part of the American Empire, to fight China, to
die for the American Empire? There are many Pinoys that think it is
alright to be part of the American Empire. But why want to fight and die
for the American Empire just to be ruled and bullied by the American
Empire?
Why not let the two contenders fight and sit on the
sideline to watch the show? Which other silly country is willing to
fight for he American Empire when they could be free from the control of
the Empire, to be treated equally, to be courted by both powers when
they balance out each other's might?
With China and American in
contention, the rest of the world can become freer. China is not forcing
them to choose. Only the evil American Empire is forcing them to
choose, because the evil American Empire cannot accept the rise of China
and looking over their shoulder and supporting weaker nations
suppressed and oppressed by the evil American Empire, not allowing it to
do as it pleases to hurt other countries.
How many silly
countries would still love to be controlled by an Empire and be coerced
to do things against their national interests? And to fight and die to
defend the American Empire?
The United States -- A Barbaric State PART ONE 1. The United States is a savage evil barbaric empire built on wars and genocide of native Americans and other countries. Thus it is an illegal and illegitimate unnatural country and should not be allowed to exist any longer.
2. It attacked and invaded Mexico from 1840s to 1890s and took away from Mexico the territories of Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, Nevada and Californnia a combine territory of 1.65 million square miles. The United Nations must help Mexico to liberate these territories. 3. From 1895 to 1905 it invaded and destroyed the Pacific Island kingdom of Hawaii killing more than two hundred thousand Hawaiian resistant fighters. Subsequently it swarmed Hawaii with hundreds of thousands of white immigrants mainly Anglo-Saxons from England. 4. The Anglo-Saxon white Americans had blue prints to expand more of its empire overseas. In 1898 under a fake promise to bring independence to Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Guam which were then under Spanish rule it got the natives to help the Americans in the wars against Spain. After dislodging Spain from these territories the Evil Empire refused to give the natives independence. Both the Cubans and the Philippinos then fought fiercely and bravely against the Americans hoping to drive them out of their countries. The savage white Americans brutally killed hundreds of thousands of Cubans and Philippino resistant fighters and subsequently made Cuba, Puerto, Philippines and Guam as its colonial territories.
5. In the 1870s imperial America led by Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan arrogantly stated that the Chinese are not qualified even to run and govern their own country. He said America must take over the ruling of China which with its large population will provide a ready vast market for American goods and products. America took part in the smuggling and trafficking of opium and heroin in China and carried on the illicit trade from the 1830s to 1930s. It joined the British in the two Opium Wars 1839-1842, 1856-1860, which England imposed on China. America arrogantly and shamelessly revealed that profits from the Opium trade was so huge that it enabled America to build the vast infrastructures of roads and continental railways, huge edifices or buildings and the cities of New York, Boston, Pensyllvania, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
6. China lost the first Opium War. England and each of its allies then imposed war indemnities on China and China had to pay each of the savage aggressors a few hundred million Chinese silver dollars which in today's terms mean a few billion dollars. They claimed the war indemnities were reparations for their losses in the Opium Wars against China. They attacked and imposed a war on China and instead of paying China for the great losses in lives and property destruction they extorted huge sums of money from China as war indemnities. Similarly China had to pay war indemnities to the Western powers in the Second Opium War as well as the attack on Peking in the Boxer Rebellion in 1900. Eight European countries inclusive of US and Japan burnt down the Summer Palace completely which they had already destroyed more than eighty percent in 1860s in the Second Opium War. They looted all the thousands of priceless antiques before burning down the Summer Palace.
7. The war indemnities impoverished China to bankruptcy that China was forced to borrow money from the British banks especially The Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank at very high interest to pay for the war indemnities. China continued to pay the war indemnities until Chairman Mao stopped the payment on the establishment of the People's Republic on 1st October, 1949.
8. The war indemnities had vastly enriched all the Western white countries and Japan beyond imagination. In the meantime China was being reduced to a pauper nation and a semi-colony of all the Western powers including Russia and Japan.
9. The white Anglo-Saxon Americans have always subscribed to the bellicose hawkish theory that it is natural for strong nations to subjugate and destroy weak nations. This is a savage theory of Charles Darwin's philosophic justification for imperial expansion through wars of aggression and genocide. In short the white people, the Europeans, the Anglo-Saxon British and white Americans have no qualms in practising the laws of the jungle of the wild beasts. As it is the US has been carrying out perennial wars of aggression and invasion in Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America. The United States has openly declared that it will carry out permanent wars to steal the resources of other countries and to sustain and maintain the vast American Pentagon Military Industrial Complex.
10. The white people especially the Anglo-Saxon white British and the white Americans are worst than the savage wild beasts like the lions, tigers, hyenas, leopards, jaguars and the wild bears. They are really exrtremely inhuman and should not be allowed to exist less they continue to kill and destroy all other weaker non-white people and countries. The non-white people and countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America must wake up to the perennial danger post to them by the West headed by the United States and should unite in unity and solidarity with China, Iran and India to take them down.
The United States is so evil and diabolitical in all its actions and deeds it should instead be called 'The Insane Devil States of America.'
