Wolf Warrior Diplomacy too rough for the West to handle?

A speech by vice-minister of foreign affairs Le Yucheng at a Beijing forum over the weekend looks to be one of the most important references in gauging the guiding principle of future Chinese diplomacy.

Le addressed a key talking point regarding China’s international relations – its “wolf warrior” style of diplomacy. To many analysts and experts, including scholars within China, Beijing’s diplomatic apparatus is sometimes too confrontational to be constructive – there must be more sophisticated ways to engage than yelling at each other in the public domain.

The argument often goes that, if China wants to win respect in the international community, Chinese diplomats must be, well, more diplomatic. As such, the recent quarrel with Canberra seems unnecessary.

The above is from a post in SCMP by Zhou Xin. The argument, China is undiplomatic, not diplomatic enough, China is yelling, China needs to be more diplomatic. How true or justifiable are these comments? 

Just compare to what Trump and that ugly fat slob called Pompeo and their diplomacy or undiplomacy, what China is doing in reaction to these thugs is child play. China has been on the receiving ends for centuries, derided by the West, oppressed by the West, contained and isolated by the West, demonised and smeared by the West. Till today, and everyday, the West is still attacking China daily using all kinds of lies and disinformation.

Why is it that no one is commenting or critising the rogue and aggressive and lying behaviours of the West, the regular provocations and intrusions into Chinese territorial waters in the South China end, challenging the Chinese navy to a war? In the case of the silly brat called Australia, the 14 sins of Australia were accepted as normal behaviour against China when what China did was to trade and to invest in Australia, sending billions of dollars to Australia, did nothing to criticise or attack Australia.  The same also applies to the evil Empire. China is playing by all the rules set up by the West, in the WTO, but being accused of violating these rules when the Americans violated everyone one of the rules it set up to contain China and disadvantaged China.

Who is or are the real rogues in international relations and diplomacy? China's wolf warrior diplomacy is a response to the rogue and aggressive behaviours of the West. China does not engage in such diplomacy only till now.  The aggressors and rogues were the West led by the Americans and Australia. 

When they attacked China on a regular basis is a given, a normal behaviour and China has to accept the beating and not to retaliate.  When China hits back, it is unacceptable. What kind of rubbish logic is that? When you hit at China, you must be prepared to get a black eye in return. There is no such thing as a one sided diplomacy of aggression.  This is passe when China was weak and cannot hit back. Its embassy in Belgrade got hit by cruise missiles for no reasons killing several diplomatic staff. It is the victim of American unilateral trade war initiatives and all kinds of abusive attacks and prohibitions, tariffs, bans etc etc. 

SCMP, please grow up and stop accepting the bashing of China as a norm and agreeing that hitting back by China is unacceptable. China is no longer the Sick Man of Asia, to be kicked around by the West and still has to say thank you and sorry. When the rogues kick you, you have all the rights to kick back. Unless you are still living in a white man's world, under the rule of the evil American Empire and has to move around with your heads bent in the presence of white men.

Look at it the other way, if China were to do to the Americans and Australians what they were doing to China, would China expect them to sit idle and not reacting? They will hit back at China hundred times more than wolf warrior diplomacy. Just try sailing your warships into American islands to provoke the Americans using the scam called freedom of navigation or fire a cruise missile into an American embassy and see what happen.

China must be prepared to take the evil Americans head on, tic for tac, or forever be oppressed and ridiculed and attacked by them and still be called aggressive and belligerent. The evil Americans only respect one thing, might, military might is right.

What shall we call fat slob Pompeo's lying and gangster diplomacy? Wild Boar Diplomacy? China has called it 'Mad Dog Diplomacy'.

Huawei - Who is spying and monitoring your comms?

The Americans have been attacking Huawei furiously that its 5G network is comprising the security of user countries but till now has not a single proof of this. Britain and Germany have done their due diligence and came out with nothing on this to find Huawei guilty of this accusation. More than 170 countries are now using Huawei 5G and have no security problem with Huawei equipment. 

Who do you think is spying on you, listening on your comms and monitoring on you? Ask Julian Assange and Edward Snowdon. What was the new security laws after 911 in America about telco companies obligation to provide information to the American intelligence organisations?

There is one big reason, other than losing out in its technology and competition with Huawei to want to cut Huawei off from American soil, and this is the inability to monitor and spy on the users by the Americans.

Huawei is actually the safest equipment from spying and monitoring by undesirable agencies. It has been proven by many testings and checks by national intelligence agencies that Huawei equipment is safe and not as alleged by the Americans. To be free from American spying and monitoring, the safest equipment to use is, yes, Huawei 5G. 

This is what makes the Americans furious and so angry with Huawei 5G. Use Huawei 5G for your own safety and protection. The Americans can't get you, can't spy on you.

Income inequality or something more to it?

 

Singapore — There has been much concern about the plight of a frail, elderly cardboard collector after a photo was posted on social media on Monday (Dec 7) showing a luxury car reversing dangerously close to her.

Facebook user Vladimir Guevarra saw the woman stacking cardboard on a trolley as he was cycling along Eng Hoon Street in Tiong Bahru sometime last week. The pile of cardboard that had been collected was nearly as tall as the woman.

Just as he thought the woman was “too old and frail to be doing this”, he noticed that she was unaware that a Porsche SUV was reversing towards her....

He added: “I was stunned over how big her stack was, and I wondered how much — or how little — money she’d get for re-selling that, presumably, to a recycling shop.”

Using the hashtag “rich poor divide”, he wrote: “I approached her just to check she’s ok. Boy, she looked tired. I gave her the cash in my pocket and told her to have some dinner. SG friends, in case you see her, perhaps social services can help (?) She looked too old, and shouldn’t be doing this.”

 

The above is posted in theindependent. The stark harsh reality of Singapore is clearly described by the picture above. How old do you think this old lady is? 90? What do you think she is doing? Should she be doing this or be taken care of in her last few years of existence? 

That pile of cardboard, and a rubbish bin, beside that $400,000 Porsche, how much was the cardboard worth? $3?

Singapore is such a rich country, throwing millions and millions away in bad investment without blinking an eye, $460m to save a failing Indian bank and its hundreds of thousands of customers that have nothing to do with us. And we have this very very senior citizen struggling to earn a few dollars at an age that taking a step is difficult and a big effort to do so. She is not the only senior citizen doing this.

What kind of society have we become? Where is the compassion of our millionaire, multi millionaire politicians? Throwing millions, hundreds of millions, billions, to foreigners and so miserly to our senior citizens, our children in need of financial assistance. What the fuck?

Wait a minute, look at that poor dog and poor cat, so poor thing, let's do something about it. Cuddle, cuddle, cuddle, kiss, kiss, kiss.....

Random Thoughts Of The Day

  1984 George Orwell said... Random Thoughts Of The Day

1. Intimidation:

Intimidation is a form of indirect corruption. The suing of opinion-influencers, such as bloggers, is a form of intimidation not only upon the individuals concerned but also upon the larger masses in the cyberspace of this Information Age. Such intimidation must not be condoned nor upheld in a non-corrupt Court of Laws.

This is not only an archaic practice which should have been sent to the domain of the Dodo Birds long ago, but also a form of indirect corruption that falls into the category of Ill-will.

And ill-will is very ugly. It does not speak well of the one who harbours the ill-will. It also affects those who are associated with the deed involved. For example, if you asked me to murder your wife's secret lover, than I have become an accessory to your ill-will if I carry out what you had wanted me to do, irrespective of whether you have communicated with me directly or through a third party.

The fact that it is still being practice shows that Singapore is still very backwards and that Singaporeans are being led by people who are highly insecure, overly sensitive and thin-skinned, and have the tendency to behave like military dictators who are unable to take "No" for an answer. Such dictators simply detest criticisms and dissents. That's why they need "Yes-Men" around them all the time.

2. Defamation:

Is there such a thing as defamation?

Before we talk about defamation, we have to understand what fame is. What is Fame?

Fame means popularity. Popularity means many people know who you are and what you stand for. Some may have good opinions about you, while some may not. Some may be having varying opinions about you - sometimes good and sometimes bad and some may have fixated stereotype opinions about you for various reasons.

If you do not have fame at all, then you cannot be defamed. It's just like if you do not have any money, how can someone take away your money. Simple as that. Agree? Of course, you cannot disagree with that.

If you are very famous, you already have fame. So how can anyone defame you? It is not like you are sitting on the throne like a king and someone comes along and dethrone you. The fame you have acquired stays with you throughout your lifetime. Nobody can take it away from you. So how can someone defame you at all?

Therefore, either way, whether you have fame or do not have fame, you cannot be defamed.

Then what re defamation lawsuits all about?

My answer is: To keep the lawyers employed and to make the courts busy, as if they are not already too busy.

3. Why sue the whistle-blower instead of the main culprit?

The answer given boils down to convenience and probability of winning the case.

If I were to sue someone in another country using another country's legal system, it is very inconvenient for me and it may drag on and on for a long time. And also my chances of winning the case is very slim. But if I do it in my own courtyard then I have a good chance of success because of indirect influence due to my stature, my position and whatever powers I may wield at the moment.

But that's very unfair, is it not?

There is no such thing as fairness in the business of winning. It is just like Donald Trump's "Art Of Rob, Borrow or Steal" that is being practised all the time. 

1984 - George Orwell

Great culture of the most elite Australian military personnel

 

Quoting from an article in the Australian Guardian and substituting China for Australia and vice versa, this statement makes more sense.

'We can summarise the moving parts in this way.

Given the human rights atrocities that occur on the watch of the authoritarian regime in Canberra, Australia is in no position to criticise China for its record in Hong Kong. If Australian forces faced similar allegations, nobody would ever know about it, because truth isn’t tolerated by the Australian govt.

But Australia also needs to remember this: something went badly wrong in the culture of our most elite military personnel. We need to understand what, and why.'

What is this culture of the most elite personnel? Let me see....ok, here it is. 'As well as the alleged murders and two instances of “cruel treatment” carried out by 25 Australian perpetrators either as principals or accessories, included in Brereton’s catalogue of horrors was a practice known as “blooding”.

Junior soldiers were allegedly required by their patrol commanders to shoot a prisoner in order to achieve their first kill. Brereton says this apparently normalised culture of extra-judicial killing was “reinforced with a code of silence”. 

 Wow, wow, great Australian culture, must have inherited from the days when they invaded Australia and massacred the native aborigines...like this  “members from the SASR were driving along a road and saw two 14-year-old boys whom they decided might be Taliban sympathisers. They stopped, searched the boys and slit their throats.”

The Australians military has great culture and traditions and proudly telling the world about it. Somehow the Americans, the British fighting in Afghanistan did not have such great culture, or was it that their 'reinforced code of silence' was more effective and no one squealed?

It is looking like only the Australian soldiers were the bad guys standing up like sore pricks to be recognised. The rest, especially the Americans and British, were so angelic, pure as white, no dirt on their beautiful white skins, definitely no blood in their hands, no throat slitting of young Afghan boys.

The Australians have a lot to learn from the Americans and the Brits. Wait a minute, did not the British and Americans trained the Australian Special Forces, sharing the same doctrines and modus operandi and warrior codes?

PS. Shouldn't this culture be kept hush hush, not to be told so that no one will know about it, about blood letting and first kill, a secret warrior code? Now who is the idiot that revealed this to the public and to the world? If no one exposed this great culture, no one would know and no one is wiser.