After I posted an article questioning the success of Indian sneak attack on PLA positions in the Spangur Lake region and saying that the Indians have no pictures to show, the below picture is going viral in Indian social media, giving the impression that Indian soldiers have done it, captured Chinese position. But eurasiantimes.com has a followed up to this fake photo by showing the original photo and how the background was superimposed onto an old photograph in another area.
What more is needed to talk about Indian lies?
Published 15 hours ago on September 19, 2020
By Smriti Chaudhary
An image of the Indian Army soldiers near the sacred Mount Kailash is being shared on social media which is getting viral. Has the Indian Army captured the Kailash mountain which the Chinese occupied in the 1962 Indo-China war?
This is what Indian social media are spreading and getting many Indians to believe and to cheer their great success in the sneaky attack on PLA positions in Ladakh on 29/30 August 2020. They needed something to show, to prove that their lies are real.
And this is the original photo to expose the lies. When India has to resort to such lies, how much of what they said and claimed are truth is questionable. Living in self deception and own lies and feeling good is good for the Indian psyche and blind followers and hawkish nationalists.
Below are more proofs of Indian lies and deceit to incur across the LAC but spreading lies of China wanting to expand into Indian territory from eurasiantimes.com.
Published 23 hours ago on September 19, 2020
By Smriti Chaudhary
'The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) may be actually eyeing the Depsang plains while creating a diversion in Pangong Tso and Galwan.
Several Indian media reports have cited top security officials revealing how the Chinese troops have been blocking the Indian soldiers to patrol the points in Depsang plains.'
This statement clearly exposed the lies and intent of the Indians. They accused China of eyeing the Depsang plains and exposing their aggressive activities, ie patrolling across the LAC. The Chinese are forced to stop them from crossing the LAC, so with their provocative patrolling inviting Chinese response, they used the response to accuse China of wanting to move into the Depsang plains on the Indian side.
Here are more points from Smriti Chaudhary's article on the aggressive Indian patrolling and why China has to stop them.
'For the last five months, PLA has been blocking Indian troops at the bottleneck to patrol these points. “He (PLA) has not come and permanently sat down at Bottleneck. Whenever we go, he comes and blocks us… blocking each other, a game that has been going on in a number of areas.
We have not lost access. If we want, we can go tomorrow also. But I (Indian Army) do not want to create another flashpoint right now,” the officer told Indian Express.'
The PLA only stopped the Indians from intruding into their area of control and when the Indians moved back, the PLA moved back as well. The moving back of the PLA showed clearly that they did not intent to stay but only to stop the Indians from their aggressive patrolling to change the status quo.
Another lie. 'The PLA activity in Depsang plains invokes the memories of the 1962 war when the Chinese occupied all of the Depsang plains. More recently, in April 2013, the PLA crossed the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the plains to pitched tents on the Indian side for about 21 days until the pullback. The standoff was resolved using military and diplomatic channels and the status quo was restored.'
The PLA pitched tents on their side of the LAC. It was a silly and cocky Indian colonel that led his men into the Chinese camp to pull down the tents, leading to a fist fight with the Chinese driving them out and throwing them into the river, and 20 Indian soldiers died for the stupidity and aggressiveness.
Modi and many Indian leaders confirmed that PLA did not cross the LAC. It was the Indian soldiers that crossed and paid the price for their transgression across the LAC. If this was on the Indian side of the LAC you think Modi would keep quiet and let it settled or the Indian hawks would let it rest, killing Indian soldiers on the Indian side of the LAC?
And another fake news and disinformation from American media reported in eurasiantimes.com.
Asia Pacific
China’s Border Adventurism Against India Has ‘Unexpectedly Flopped’ – US Media Reports
Published 6 days ago on September 14, 2020
By EurAsian Times Desk
'As India and China have agreed to a five-point consensus, Indian news agency PTI quoting US magazine Newsweek writes that Chinese President Xi Jinping is the “architect” of recent hostilities against India and by doing so he has endangered his future with the high-profile intrusions into Indian territory that “unexpectedly flopped” in the face of a fierce fightback by the Indian Army.'
It was all Indian intrusions and preemptive strikes against the PLA, with the intrusion in the Galwan Valley and the pre emptive strikes in the Spangur Lake area with confirmation from India media. But where are the evidence of Chinese intrusion across the LAC except accusations by the Indians and the western media. Where are the proof, where have PLA crossed the LAC? Modi confirmed the PLA has never crossed the LAC and has remained on the Chinese side.
Keep on lying and keep on spreading fake news and disinformation against China and smearing China.
The biggest Indian lie of all time is that China is going to invade India. What for? Why would China want this piece of shitty country? In 1962, after the Sino Indian Border War, China captured a lot of land from India. The whole of Arunachal Pradesh was in Chinese control. But China withdrew to the McMahon Line and literally returned the whole state to India, which China has claimed as belong to China.
And on the western front, China pushed back the Indians to status quo at the current LAC that was China's position since 1959. For more than 50 years, China has maintained the PLA along these two fronts without crossing the LAC. It was the Indians that have been crawling inch by inch towards and LACs and are now on the LACs using the lie that China was planning to invade China. If China wanted to, it would not have withdrawn after the 1962 War or would have marched into India long ago, no need to wait till now.
It is the treacherous Indians that are the aggressive party, moving their troops forwards and now launched a pre emptive strike in Ladakh like in Doklam, like in 1962, meaning Indians struck first. Now they are crowing victory like in 1962, simply because they struck first and China has yet to hit back.
They are insulting the PLA as incompetent, unable to detect the sneak attack. The Indians did not understand why the Chinese outposts were empty, no soldiers and no equipment. They walked in without having to fire a bullet. Why? If the Chinese were caught sleeping, they would be taken as prisoners of war by the Indians.
And they are continuing with the lie that China wanting to move into India when the PLA have been staying put in their positions on its side of the LAC. Now after seizing some Chinese outposts and feeling guilty, it is panicking and calling for American help, expecting the Chinese to strike back to retake what the Indians have taken. This is the truth, and the PLA is planning to retake the lost positions, not to invade India, just to return to status quo.
The PLA is bringing their troops to the area of conflict and will launch a counter strike like in 1962. And these sneaky Indians are claiming that they are well prepared with all their troops in position, an admission that they have planned for this war. China is only reacting now to take on the Indians.
The Indians are learning from the evil Americans, start a fire and accuse China of lighting the fire, like in the South China Sea, being the aggressive and provocative party, raising tension and blaming China for it.