Covid19 - A damning article about American conspiracy to wipe its debt owing to China

This is a damning and enlightening article about this Covid19 pandemic and about who is the actual owner of the Wuhan Lab, George Soros. This part needs to be verified. It also touched on how Bill Gates and Dr Fauci were using this lab to conduct their experiment on coronavirus that was prohibited in the US.  The picture gets clearer and dirtier with all the fingers pointing to you know who as the culprit behind this pandemic. 

Saturday, April 18, 2020

War "Talk" Against China is Crazy --- and Unjustified

By Anna Von Reitz

We have heard sabers rattling and all sorts of bombast against China coming from all sorts of sources and it needs to stop. 

Number One Reason? 

The Wuhan Bio-Tech Lab where all this started is owned by George Soros, a citizen of the United States.  Not a Chinese lab at all, even though Chinese scientists were working there. 

Number Two Reason? 

The "feedstock" for the development of the chimera strain corona virus also came from the US, and was most likely donated or sold into the development project by Dr. Anthony Fauci. The virus has HIV splices of genetic coding allowing it to produce Glycoprotein 120, which has been Fauci's "baby" since the 1980's.  

Number Three Reason? 

In 2014, the US stopped development of chimera viruses.  In 2015, Fauci diverted almost $4 million in NIH research funding to George Soros's Wuhan facility so the Chinese could continue development --- Fauci evaded US Law and misappropriated funds to do it.. 

Number Four Reason? 

Dr. Charles Lieber, a leading biological nanotech researcher and head of one of Harvard University's science programs was also deeply involved along with Chinese Grad Students.  If anything, it looks like the Chinese were  being manipulated by these schmucks who were finagling to keep on researching and developing bioweapons that they stood to profit from. When they could no longer do it here, they moved to China. This was a US Project that got moved to China, not a Chinese Project. 

Number Five Reason? 

The first person to develop symptoms of  "Covid 19" was a non-Com from Fort Detrick.  

Number Six Reason? 

This was obviously a set up with Bill Gates, WHO, the World Bank, and other investors and vaccine manufacturers.  Gates has heavily invested in virus development and vaccine factories, both.  He and Fauci are pals.  Both stand to make huge fortunes and gain immense political power if they can pull this scam off.  WHO is obviously complicit.  What kind of scientific or medical organization declares a pandemic based on 150 cases, and on top of it, fails to initiate any clinical process to identify the specific pathogen?  The World Bank is also obviously complicit -- inviting investors to put their money into  "Pandemic Bonds" just in time to collect on a staged pandemic.  

Number Seven Reason? 

This whole thing was hardly hitting the news before "the US, Inc." was in court, finagling and accusing China of being liable for all the economic damages caused by this phony pandemic, and that amount being sought just happened to be almost exactly the same as the US-China Trade Deficit.   Read that, the pikers caused this problem, blamed it on China, and have been trying to force China to pay them "reparations" for the damage they caused to everyone concerned.  

Number Eight Reason? 

Almost simultaneously, the new British 20 Pound Note was issued by the Government of Westminster, showing a cheesey photograph of the Queen and --- wonder of wonders ---- a holograph of a 5G tower,and right above it, the laboratory symbol for the corona virus.  The perky bastards fully admitted that they were the cause of the problem and the 5G connection, too, right there in front of God and everyone, in language nobody could miss or misunderstand.  They took credit for it.  So why on Earth is anyone looking elsewhere?  

Number Nine Reason? 

What did the Chinese gain?  Nothing.  They lost lives.  They lost trade.  They lost support from their own people.    What did "the US" gain?  A fleeting excuse to back-charge China for a well-earned Trade Deficit.  China is THEIR creditor, not ours. And we've made it clear that we are not paying their debts for them. Now we have to make it clear that we aren't going to war for them, either. 

Number Ten Reason? 

The Americans and the Chinese, both, are owed a whopping large amount of credit back from "the United States"---- which owes us somewhere around $25 trillion as unpaid "National Credit" and owes China nearly that much as an unpaid Trade Deficit. 

The Pikers cannot or will not pay their debts or deal honestly about the circumstance, so they planned first to attack and kill us via a civil war.  That plan was exposed and defeated, so now the weasels want to find an excuse to kill their other Creditors, the Chinese, ---- and get us to do it for them.

This is all about the US, Inc. and the USA, Inc. not paying their debts, and then plotting to strong-arm racketeer or murder their creditors ---and both the American People and the Chinese People have been in the cross-hairs for this malarky. 

Summation: 

The Chinese have, with 99% certainty, been targeted both as: (1) potential collaborators, and (2) victims of a giant con scheme designed to--- one way or another--- erase "the US" Trade Deficit with China. 

China had nothing to gain from dirtying itself by unleashing a bioweapon attack on the rest of the world.  That would be shooting its customers in the foot.  No, China had nothing to gain --- but the US and its British Siphons in Westminster stood to gain, and so did WHO and the World Bank and Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates and Bayer, Inc., and CDC (which is a private vaccine manufacturer), and George Soros and all the Dem Deep Staters could hope to blame all this on Donald Trump.  

Simple enough. 

We know who did this.  We know why.  There is no big mystery here.  There's just a failure to own up and face facts. It's easier to blame people who are innocent but different from us, than to face down the monster we have allowed to inhabit our own shores, walk down our streets, and sleep in our beds. 

If Americans go to war over any of this, we aren't going to march on Shanghai. Oh, no.  And we won't be tricked into bombing Berlin, either. 

The above article is reproduced from http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/04/war-talk-against-china-is-crazy-and.html

Sino Indian border brawl or ambush - A piece of rubbish reporting

Brutal details emerge of India soldier 'ambush' on contested border with China as Modi tries to calm tension.  Joe Wallen, The Telegraph.

As the sun began to set over the Himalayan peaks, Colonel Santosh Babu and his unarmed platoon of 50 Indian soldiers on Monday set off on a patrol across the strategically crucial Galwan Valley in Ladakh.

Their mission was probably the most important in recent Indian history - to ascertain whether Chinese troops had withdrawn, as per an agreement between senior army officers from the two nations, from territory which had previously been administered by India for decades.

Instead, to their surprise, what Colonel Babu's men found were temporary Chinese all-weather tents and roughly enemy 100 soldiers waiting at a location called Patrolling Point 14.

Despite being outnumbered, the Indian soldiers confronted the Chinese troops.  Some started to remove the tents, sparking a long and brutal man-to-man brawl that has brought the two superpowers to the brink of war. ...

“Just when the Indian soldiers, who were on patrol started removing Chinese tents and material, it evoked a violent response from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA)”.

As the fight continued, both sides called for reinforcements but Chinese troops again significantly outnumbered those on the Indian side, allegedly 500 to 100....

Indian Army sources told the Telegraph that 23 troops are now confirmed to have died but casualties will significantly rise, with 110 soldiers injured and  more troops still missing....

The Indian sources say China suffered 35 casualties during the clash, quoting U.S intelligence material, a development Beijing said it wasn’t aware of.


The above is the most unprofessional piece of reporting with hazy and garbled facts and fuzzy numbers. How did the reporter gathered these facts? From slippery tongue witnesses of course. Now wonder all the facts were so funny and illogical and the numbers as good as guess work.

Read this, the 50 Indian soldiers were on a survey mission. But they ended up removing the tents of Chinese soldiers while being outnumbered. How arrogant to start such an aggressive act, to walk into Chinese camp to remove the tents of soldiers of another country. Who did these Indian soldiers think they were? Such hostile acts would definitely invite retaliation from the Chinese side. And the Indian news all over are still claiming that they were provoked by Chinese soldiers. Isn't it clear who were the aggressors?  In this report the heading was 'ambush'. What utter rubbish!  Does the reporter know the meaning of ambush?

And look at the numbers, 50 Indian soldiers provoking 100 Chinese soldiers.  Though both called for reinforcement, with claims that there were 500 Chinese soldiers to 100 Indian soldiers, and only 23 Indian casualties against 35 Chinese casualties.  The numbers gets more confusing with the Indians claiming 110 soldiers injured and more are missing. How many more? It seems that this brawl would have involved at least a few hundred soldiers from the Indian side and 5 times more from the Chinese side. That would be around a 1000 men involved in the fight from an initial 50 Indians against 100 Chinese.

And the funny thing, the Indians did not know how many casualties were from the Chinese side but the Americans that were not there were able to provide the number of Chinese casualties. The Americans must be Gods, omniprescience, all knowing. And the Indians damn were bloody good fighters, outnumbered 500 to 100 but able to inflict more casualties on the Chinese side, and they were ambushed!

Slippery tongues indeed. Talk like real. What is real? Who started the fight or provocation? How come all the great fighting Indians landed up in the river but not the Chinese? Is the reporter saying that the Indian soldiers were all pushed into the river by the Chinese soldiers?

Sino Indian border fist fight

'India and China have never even agreed on the length of their "Line of Actual Control" frontier, and each side uses different frontier proposals made by Britain to China in the 19th century to back their claims....

"China, with its better infrastructure, with its better military capabilities, perhaps thinks that this is the time to push India, to see how far India will go," Pant told AFP.'  CNA

The above is reported in CNA on the recent border scuffle between Indian and Chinese soldiers. 20 Indian soldiers were dead and there were undisclosed casualties on the Chinese side arising from unarmed hand to hand combat between the two sides with no bullets fired. As expected, loud mouth India claimed at least 45 casualties on the Chinese side. Indians always win, like the Americans.

The AFP report is as usual seen from the western eyes, that India and China were using the 19th Century British proposal for negotiation. This is outright false and misinformation. China would never use a map arbitrarily drawn by a mad white man during the British Empire, scrawling whatever he liked as part of the British Empire as a basis for negotiation. China would not accept such nonsense from the British against its national interest. It is the Indians that are using this British so called maps to tell the Chinese that the disputed land belong to India because they think they have inherited the British Empire and whatever the Brits claimed to be part of their Empire.

And there were many instances of India pushing the barrier and crossing into Chinese territories to harass Chinese soldiers. Doklam was a good example of India attacking Chinese construction workers in the name of defending Bhutan's territory. And in this instance it was the Indians building roads into Chinese territory. The cocky and arrogant Indians think that they are more powerful and better equipped to defeat the Chinese soldiers, not like the AFP report above that China was pushing India with its better infrastructure and military capabilities. India is the aggressor, just like the 1962 border war but when got walloped, claimed to be the victim.

China has lost patience with the constant incursions, provocations and harassment of the Indian soldiers and have built up its forces in the region, and ready to take on the Indians if they continue to be reckless and adventurous.

The only way the Indians could win a war with China is a talking war. There is no way the Indian soldiers could match the might and military sophistication of the PLA. The PLA is the only military force that had fought the mighty Americans in a massive conventional war in Korea and won. And this was during a time when the Americans were at the peak of their military power while China was at its weakest, just coming out of a civil war with the KMT and the destruction by the Japanese in WW2.

India could not even win a war with Pakistan but daily telling the world how capable it is and how ready it is to fight and win a war with China. If China could thrash the Americans at its best, with basic small arms against air, naval and heavy artillery weapons from the Americans, what is there in the Indian military to fight against a China today with some of the best weapons and well armed and trained PLA?

The Indians better stop their nonsense and seek a negotiated border settlement with China than craving for another war with China when it would be simply a mismatch of military and economic strength. It would be suicidal for India to even think of launching a war with China.

Make peace and cooperate to grow and prosper with China is the best way out for India...and stop spouting nonsense about how superior India is vis a vis China. A slum country acting and behaving as if it is a super power.  The world is only talking about G2? Anyone heard of G3?

What are Singapore's intangible strengths?

SINGAPORE’S INTANGIBLE STRENGTHS

Noting the Future Economy Council, formed in 2017 and led by Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, had already been driving such preparations, Mr Chan highlighted the things that set Singapore apart – its intangible strengths.

He noted that while many investors have chosen to locate and expand their businesses in Singapore, this was not based on factors such as the availability of natural resources or cost.


“They chose us because of our strengths, which are not easy to replicate elsewhere. We are open, and connected with the world, we are trusted, we are united and stable as a society, and we have a skilled workforce,” he said.   CNA

Chan Chun Sing is flying Singapore's intangible strengths as the key reason why foreign investors chose to invest here. What then are these intangible strengths of Singapore? In short it is the system and the people. The system is created and developed and maintained by the people, a product of the people, the early Singaporeans, the Pioneer and Merdeka Generations.

What has happened to these generations of hard working and disciplined Singaporeans? They are ageing and passing away, and being replaced by funny and unpredictable third world wildlife that are pretending to be law abiding and hardworking and disciplined workers like our earlier generations. They are very nice....some said.  Just you wait. Just wait till they find their footings and be more familiar and confident of the environment and the timid kiasu, kiasi, kia cheng hu Singaporeans, and then only will their true colours emerged. Wildlife would be wildlife.  That is why they are kept in cages and not allowed to roam free. Even after years in cages, when released, they would return to their wild behaviour at the slightest opportunity.

If these wildlife and third world beans are that good, they would not be here, their countries would be just as good or better than Singapore. To believe that they are the talents to replace our hardworking and disciplined Pioneer and Merdeka generations is foolishness.

Our intangible strength has been compromised and would not be the same again. Remember what LKY said about the tenacity and vigorous of the culture of our early generations? What have they been replaced with, contentious, cheating, racist, lying, back stabbing third world work ethics and culture? Whatever work cultures or values the new wildlife brought with them will determine the intangible strength of Singapore for good or for bad as we go forward. Only the blind would not be able to see the stupidity of it all, like exchanging Singapore dollars for rupees and exclaiming very good and pretending to be happy about it while the smart ones are exchanging their rupees for Singapore dollars.

Is Singapore bringing in the right mix of people to strengthen its social fabric and the work ethics and talent of its workforce, or doing the opposite? What kind of intangible strength is Singapore hoping to develop under this stupid open leg policy for wildlife to come here to replace Singaporeans and calling them talents when they are armed with fake or funny certificates and CVs?

Is Singapore creating more low paying jobs for Singaporeans and high paying jobs for foreigners?

In the fourth of a series of National Broadcasts, Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday (June 14) that the Government will intensify its efforts to bring the best foreign talent to Singapore.

His comments come as Singaporeans, who were already worried about foreign competition, face an unprecedented loss of jobs in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Speaking about the Government’s plans to improve Singapore’s infrastructure for the next generation, Mr Chan said: “We will also intensify the efforts to attract the best ideas and talent to compete on our side, and complement our strengths.

“Initiatives like the Global Innovation Alliance connect us with talent hubs across the world. We will make ourselves a more attractive safe harbour for talent, ideas and intellectual property, to grow more businesses and create better jobs.”

The minister, who is also the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Second Assistant Secretary-General, added: “Competition is intense. Talented people, including our own, can go anywhere.”


Above is reported in www.theindependent.sg. Just a few days back the govt plastered the media with the message that Singapore is spending billions to create jobs for Singaporeans. But most of these jobs are trainee level jobs or relatively low paying jobs as there was not such remarks about jobs to attract talents. Now compare this with this nonsense about bringing in more foreign talents ie high paying jobs. Is the govt thus creating low paying jobs for Singaporeans and high paying jobs for foreigners?

Another question, if the foreign talents are brought in to fill high paying jobs, and the jobs are local in nature, ie local market, local customers, local competitors, is there a need to hire more talented foreigners for such jobs to compete with local talents to do jobs that operate in the local environment? If the jobs created are to compete in the international market for more business and revenue, that is understandable.

There is no need to hire super foreign talent to run chicken rice stalls to cater to domestic supply and demand, to compete against another local chicken rice stalls. Even if one is literally selling chicken rice overseas, who are the competitors for chicken rice? Singaporeans, not foreigners.  Foreigners wanting to eat chicken rice must eat Singaporean chicken rice.  Is this too difficult to understand? There is no need to hire foreign talents, to pay them million, to run the public transport system or taxi system when the business is the domestic market. Many businesses are domestic in nature and there is absolutely no need for foreign talents. Why need foreigners to run the postal system, why need foreigners to be our local bank managers, MRT, buses etc etc

I can't believe that we have fools that are so happy to hire foreign talents and pay them millions to operate in the local market to make money from the local consumers, to compete with other local businesses. Unless these foreign talents are to fight with the best in the world for international market and foreign revenue, what the fuck is there a need to hire such foreign talents and be paid in the millions?  Foreigners tua kee is it? Just because some demi gods said so, everyone blindly think this is the recipe for the well being of Singapore. There must be certain criteria and conditions to demand for foreign talents. Do not sacrifice the interests of Singaporeans by replacing them with foreigners.

Even the CEO job of a bank, if the business is local, does not require a foreign talent and paying multi million dollar salary when the job and pay could be given to a local talent.  Even if the business has some overseas offices, it does not necessarily require a foreign talent as the business is mainly for businesses operating from here, and the customers are from here and any business generated is due to comparative advantages, captured business and nothing really got to do with foreign talent and expertise.

It is so stupid to everyday yelling about hiring foreign talents and wasting taxpayers money when such money could be used to pay Singaporeans. Why don't the govt hire more foreign talents to take over the govt, in political appointments like ministers as well? How many of the foreign talents hired are actually running another chicken rice stall here? There is no need to have a gold plated chicken rice stall run by foreign talents and to charge more and the people paying more for another plate of gold plated chicken rice.

There are many myths that are just myths and must be discarded. And this fetish fad of hiring foreign talents must be reexamined to see if they really make sense and contribute to the productivity of the country, the interests of Singaporeans, and generating more revenue in terms of foreign revenue and not taxing more on the people.

Good jobs must go to Singaporeans, not foreigners unless there are exceptional reasons for doing so. No one must be allowed to sell out the interests of Singaporeans to benefit foreigners. We do not owe the foreigners a living. Think, don't just simply follow old mantras wholesale.

Singapore is for Singaporeans not foreigners. Think Singaporean first. And stop the crap of giving instant pink IC to foreigners and call them Singaporeans.