3/05/2019

Moon landing - A picture does not lie



Watch this video of the first interview of the 3 astronauts that supposedly landed on the moon in June 1969. The commentary then was that they saw something strange on the moon, speculated that they saw aliens. Thus they were still in a state of shock, and did not know what to say and were not
in a state of excitement or jubilation that they had done something so great and important in their lives and for mankind. During the interview they looked so lost, uncertain, afraid of saying the wrong things, afraid of telling lies. Their facial expressions were that of 3 grown men made to tell lies in front of the camera and they were obviously very uncomfortable. According to the commentator, they were solemn, depressed and disturbed. Why?

This was what Aldrin said. 'what this country set out to do was something going to be done sooner or later...' What did he meant by going to be done sooner or later? He was vague and trying not to be specific.

Collins said this was the first time that man had the option of walking on this planet or other planet. Another diversionary statement from landing on the moon.

And Armstrong, he was not sure what to say and hesitantly said, 'It was...the beginning of... a new age...' Just look at his expression and the expression of all 3 astronauts and put them into context, that they did not go to the moon and was put in front of the camera to tell the nation and the world that they were really on the moon. That was more likely the truth than seeing aliens and that they were so disturbed and no longer felt that they had achieved a great feat for mankind. They did not look so like men who had achieved something great. The 'truth' or lie was all over their faces. They were ashamed of themselves having to tell lies in front of the camera.

Compare to the expression of someone who won an Oscar, or won the American Got Talent or a big race, these were faces of losers, of men made to tell lies. Their conscience were written all over their faces. They looked so sad and unhappy with what was going on. Anyone who did something wonderful, won a race etc etc would be full of joy, pride and jubilation written all over their faces. Not these 3 men 'that just returned from the moon'. There was no pride in them.

Go look carefully at the 3 minute video clip again and ask yourself what were written on their faces, what were in their minds? Why were they looking so sheepish and awkward?

And after the Americans claimed to be on the moon 7 or 8 times, there was no announcement of the Russians going to the moon successfully. But the Americans created another hoax, that they found a Russian moon capsule on the moon and a cosmonauts was found dead outside the capsule in a crater. And for some reason, the cosmonaut had removed his protective headgear that was found a distance away from his dead body. Why would the cosmonaut removed his headgear that would kill him instantly. And the best part, the Russians did not know or reported of this space landing.

The best the Russians did was a space walk and setting up the International Space Station. The Russians were ahead of the Americans in everything about space exploration, but lost out because they never landed on the moon. They even built space station and helped the Americans who claimed to have landed on the moon many times but have no functional and safe rockets to take Americans to the International Space Station.  Nothing odd about this?  

How many of you still believe in the American moon landing? Last year the Russians were trying to send a probe to the moon to verify if the Americans were really there. But this experiment has yet to be conducted.

PS.
In a 2015 article published in the Russian newspaper Izvestia, a spokesperson for the Russian Investigative Committee, Vladimir Markin, called for an international probe into the disappearance of film footage from the famous 1969 event, while querying the whereabouts of lunar rock samples collected by NASA up until 1972.

"We are not contending that they did not fly [to the Moon], and simply made a film about it," Markin wrote.

"But all of these scientific – or perhaps cultural – artefacts are part of the legacy of humanity, and their disappearance without a trace is our common loss. An investigation will reveal what happened."

Quote from Science Alert.

3/04/2019

Budget debate or talking for the sake of talking?

The Budget debate in Parliament just came to a close. As usual, some millionaires that were pricked by theirconscience tried to speak out for the poorer Singaporeans, asking the govt to spend more to make their lives a bit more bearable. But on the other side, some rich millionaires would parrot the perpetual position, cannot anyhow draw down on the reserves, wait reserves not enough big big trouble. Must protect the reserves to make sure got enough, and must keep on building more reserves.

Anyone see anything wrong with such statements by the cockeyed cocks in Parliament? It is easy to crow about these motherhood statements. Whatweis the point when the cocks are blind? Do the cocks know what they were crowing about? Do they know how much is the reserves? How many of you think the cocks know how much is in the reserves, or maybe they know the reserves is quite empty or nearly empty?

Does anyone know how much money is there in the reserves? Does the President know how much is in the reserves? I think we all know that President Ong Teng Cheong did not know. Does President Halimah know? As for her predecessors, did they bother to want to know?

Now, if the President is unlikely to know, do the ministers or cock MPs know? I bet they did not know. How many agree or disagree with me on this?

Ok, if one does not know how much is in the reserves, how could one be talking about drawing down too much or whether there is enough or not enough in the reserves? Maybe the reserves is already empty. Or maybe the reserves is so huge that it could last forever! The point I am making is that if one does not know, it is better to shut up and stop talking cock.

By the way, how much of our reserves is needed for it to be enough? Is there a definition or a formula. or is it just gasak butak, don't need to know what is enough, just keep adding and adding and adding, never enough? Just what is wrong with collecting more money, what is wrong with keep on adding more to the reserves? Saying this cannot be wrong, like holding the people's CPF on the allegation that they would spent all on Batam trips.

Listen already cannot tahan. Like shadow boxing. How much is really there in he reserves, how much is enough?

3/03/2019

SpaceX testing module to carry man to space

This is big news in the USA, and NASA is celebrating and hoping that this would be successful. And if so, the Americans could send man to space again, oops not again but for the first time. The SpaceX company, a private company, has successfully launched a rocket to space with a capsule containing a rubber man inside to test if it can carry man safely to space. NASA has given up all hopes of developing a  rocket that can send man to space safely without blowing up in mid air.

Wait a minute,  were we not told that the Americans went to the moon many time 50 or 60 years ago using their rockets? Why are they hoping that a private company can do it successfully for them today? Did they do it, done it before? Or they did not, they bluffed the whole wide world that they did it? Oh, they lost their technology and the notes and now dunno how to do it any more. Really ah?

For the last 4 or  5 decades the Americans have sheepishly been hitching a ride on Russian rockets to the International Space Station when they could not do so on their own. And these selfish and devious Americans even told the Russians not to allow the Chinese to go to the ISS. And quietly, after so many decades of inability, lack of ability, no talent, degenerating intelligence, they finally accepted the fate that they could not develop the know how of a safe rocket to space, they even closed down NASA without fanfare.

Now private companies are trying to do what the Americans, NASA could not do and they are praying that these private companies could be successful and allow them the bragging rights to shout, 'China stealing our technology', and of course, for the first time, to send men to space in their own rockets and come back alive,

The hard truth is finally out. The Americans did not have workable rocket and space technology to send men to space, how could they ever reach the moon and back? The moon landings were all hoaxes. What more do you need to call a hoax a hoax?

The Americans can no longer bluff about how superior is their space technology. The probes to Mars and the pictures from Mars could be hoaxes as well. Can't even go to the moon, can go to Mars?

3/02/2019

CPF - The ire and fury of the people

  • old man:
    We remember thees PAP MPs and don’t vote them in including all other PAP MPs. Time for us to fight back with our votes.
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • Please read::
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  • oxygen:
    MANY PAST THE AGE OF 70 are physically incapacitated to varying degrees – what is the use of returning their money to them past that age by installment under false pretense of nanny-look-after-the-kid hypocrisy that they would splurge all in Batam? So ladies cougar go to Bali and buy toy-boy for sex too?
    I HAVE COMPELLING APPREHENSION THAT THE PUBLIC MINDS quite justifiably, THINK CPF SCHEME IS A FRAUD. And this is not far from law and reality. Both in statutory and common law applications, there is NO SUCH A THING AS TRUSTEESHIP TO MORTALITY. You might as well tells us that your money is confiscated for undisclosed needs elsewhere (a secret of national interest confidentiality again or it is not in our interest to tell you???) bullsh*t.
    If the contrary is true, then fund management is the most lucrative business. Anyone with a licence to operate investment banking can solicit for public money, and once in the receipt of possession, then change the rule that investors CANNOT SELL OUT AND WITHDRAW THEIR MONEY until mortality hits. The offending investment bank as a legal entity exists in perpetuity – IT THEREFORE INHERITS PUBLIC MONEY SOLICITED AND OBTAINED IN CIRCUMSTANCES OF DECEIT AND LEGALISED FRAUD and keeps it as its own.
    IS THAT LAW OR INVESTMENT BANKING OR BOTH – if it is allowed to incubate to this degree of absurdity?


    Bastards Need To Be Cursed:
    These three bastards need to be cursed by all the other CPF members, especially those who want their money back from the Ah Long as early as possible.
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    We not suipid:
    Pap MPs may not get million dollars as politicians, but most of them hold well paying jobs or very profitable businesses. Their combined remuneration would be in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions. Impossible for them to understand and empathize with the common man who needs his CPF to live because his earning power has diminished with age.


    LIONS:
    . it is therefore .. rather automatic drawdown at 65 .. let old folk has a choice sounds logical .. afterall, many older folks believe they could live till 90 and beyond ..
    ==========================================================================
    90 N BEYOND?
    MEDICAL COSTS WILL KILL YOU BEFORE YOU REACH 80?
    ANYWAYS,by which time,they cannot enjoy themselves in ‘BATAM’?
    Most will be POPPING MEDICINE/PILLS instead of chewing a great steak?
    dont be fooled by the uncaring gahmen who care only for themselves???


    Biggest scam in SG:
    Dear Simon,
    We trublus are all equally fuming with anger.
    Like many have imagined and voiced out , i too feel something bad had gone wrong with the reserves…
    ..and President HY cant talk…already billued n silenced by her boss and mil$ salary.
    She forgotten she took an oath.
    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    LIONS:
    do the gahmen really care about ensuring our CPF is safe for our retirement?
    i say bullshits!
    they just want to ensure that older sgs n others are able to PAY THEM as and when due so like THE RUNAWAY MEDICAL FEES AT GOVT HOSPITALS?
    THIS GOVT IS TOTAL CRAP.
    it is only worried about its gang-member$ and that is clear to all.




    CPF is kosong already:
    those pap MPs are not in clown pap inner circle so for them to talk as if they know the truth is nothing but fake news.
    even our esteemed Mr Ong TC did not know how much is pap kitty even though he was the President.
    from normal human behaviour, as long as someone delays in repaying us our OWN money, it is not wrong to say that someone has already spent our money and is in difficult to repay us so come out with all manner of lies BS fake news to delay returning to us our OWN money.
    it is not wrong to say our OWN money has been squandered by the pap fools in gic temasick. these pap fools are proven to be spending dollars reaping cents. no need Cambridge economics degree also know CPF is kosong already.


    The above are comments in a post titled, 'The betrayer of CPF members', posted in the TRE by Simon Lim.

    As more and more seniors reached the ripe age of 65 and beyond, more would realise that every day is a bonus and it is pure stupidity to think that they could live for many more years and to deny them their hard earned life savings is a very cruel thing to do, and UNACCEPTABLE.

    They are very angry and would throw their votes for the opposition. From the sample comments above you can feel their anger in their bones.

    Temperature rising, Dad's Army furious and want their CPF money back! This is like the charge of the White Hair Brigade.  Stop scheming, when they scheme you scream.

3/01/2019

Retrenchment of DBS remisiers – The Story continues

The pitch for DBS remisiers to join other broking houses has gone up another level. Red carpets, refreshment, wines and generous hospitality came with offers to bring every DBS remisiers into their folds are a great contrast to the way DBS so casually wanted to retrench all its remisiers, offering
those that they found suitable, with good job fits, subject to market practices on retirement age, jobs they have not done for the past 20 or 30 years. Remisiers being offered new jobs would likely be treated like fresh graduates entering the job market. DBS has circulated a list of job vacancies and many remisiers found themselves out of circulation due to the qualifications needed. Needless to say, the older remisiers would be out of contention because of age. Some of the offers by the broking houses are just too good to resist and made the remisiers feel so wanted.

The remisiers have been with DBS for a very long time and DBS is home. Many have grown very fond of DBS and would not want to move to another broking house. Many would want to be with DBS till they are no longer contributing positively to the DBS bottom line when they have to part company with DBS unwillingly.

The remisiers are asking for a meeting with Piyush Gupta to discuss whether this restructuring could be modified and the remisiers could still stay with the DBS family and continue with their trade. The objective of the meeting is to seek an amiable settlement with both sides looking good, comfortable and honourable, with little acrimony after the retrenchment exercise. 

If this is not possible and does not fit into DBS’s plans for the future, maybe, in recognition of their long service and their contribution to DBS’s revenue in the past and present, and also for taking over their client base and the business developed over the years, DBS may think it is appropriate and fair to want to consider offering some kind of compensation to them.

The contribution of remisiers may be small today relative to DBS’s huge profits of billions every quarter, but still substantial. On the average, each remisier could have contributed at least a million or more to DBS revenue, easily more than $400m in total in the last 20 or 30 years. And this is all without taking a single cent from DBS as salary, no staff benefits, no annual leave, no staff insurance, welfare etc etc.

The client base and business conscientiously and tirelessly developed by the remisiers over the years cannot be worthless, unappreciated and NOT compensated. There is value in the client base and business. All the broking houses are eyeing DBS remisiers with great anticipation. Is it fair banking practice for DBS not to compensate the remisiers when taking over their client base and their business?

Would DBS live up to its reputation as a good employer, the best employer, a caring employer, and in all fairness, offer a compensation package to the remisiers due to this unilateral decision by the bank in the interest of the bank?

At the moment, other than the offer of trying to find employment for some younger remisiers, subject to job fit, DBS is not talking about any other form of compensation, just bye bye to the remisiers and wish them all the best in a new journey to nowhere. Some of the remisiers may have to call it a day. Some, if not able to find alternative employment or offers from other broking houses, may face joblessness, premature retirement, and even financial difficulties if they have families and children to look after.

The ball is now in the DBS’s court. Would DBS be so cold, heartless, mean and calculative to retrench all the remisiers that have contributed so much and for so many years to DBS with nothing but fresh air?  Did DBS remember that during hard times, when they needed remisiers, they paid remisiers to join DBS? DBS even paid the big remisiers just to retain them and not to join other broking houses. Now that the stock trading business is not desirable by DBS, is it fair for DBS to wipe its hands clean and tell the remisiers to go under the excuse of restructuring?

On another note, this retrenchment exercise would contribute to the unemployment statistics of PMEs when it is totally unnecessary but because DBS has a new business model that it claims does not need remisiers.

Is DBS a good employer, caring employer, the best employer? Is DBS a fair and honourable business partner? These questions would be answered by how DBS treats the remisiers that are in the process of being retrenched.

Would there be an amicable settlement with DBS and with the remisiers parting company with good feelings for DBS and goodwill, and with DBS living up to its reputation as a great and responsible company, a good business partner and a good  employer?


To be continued.