7/07/2025

War reparation for Iraq, Iran and Gaza

 How much would it cost Iran to rebuild its nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the USA, facilities for civilian use, not in violation of any international law? Hmmm, funny, no one is thinking about this, not even the Iranians. They have accepted their fate, that being smaller and weaker nation, unable to fight for and defend their rights and interests, getting bombed and facilities destroyed, people killed, are just parts and parcels of weak states. Even if they dare to demand for compensation, for war reparation, the two terrorist states would simply ignore them. 

Compensation and war reparation are only for the victors to claim. The evil Brits and the 7 white men countries that invaded China, to force China to accept opium for trade, to drug the Chinese, all claimed big reparations against China, to the point of bankrupting China then. China, then under the Qing Dynasty, paid heavily for being invaded, bombed, killed, and looted, plundered, losing lands, and still had to pay war reparations to the invaders who demanded that China allowed them to sell drugs to the Chinese people. This was white men's Rules Based Order then, and also now.

If the bombing of Iran leads to an invasion and defeat of Iran, you can bet the American and Israeli terrorists would demand war reparation from Iran, for invading Iran. And no country would say this is unfair, not right. Even the UN would not say a thing. And the ICC and ICJ would rule everything against Iran and Iranian leaders. The Iranians would have to surrender with no conditions.

The same goes to Iraq. After the country was bombed and invaded, and semi colonised, with millions of Iraqi killed, millions became refugees, not a word about war reparation against the American terrorists for lying that Iraq had WMD. The whole world knows that it was a lie, the war was based on a lie, illegal. But so what? Who dares to claim from the world's number one terrorist state, the USA? The Iraqis should count themselves lucky that the American terrorists did not claim war reparation against them. But the Americans did take whatever oil they could lay their hands on, including the golds in the banks. This is their war reparation, taken quietly, and not wanting to talk about it, knowing that it is illegal and shameful and the whole world would object to it. But robbing and stealing from the Arab and Muslim states are second nature to the Americans and the West. And the western media would keep mum about it, the pro American Anglophiles too would not say a thing.

Then there are the ruins of Gaza and hundreds of thousands of Palestinian lives lost. Who is going to pay for it? Heheheh, not the Israelis or the Americans that provided all the bombs. No compensation from the American and Israeli terrorists for sure. But there is a small chance, if the American and Israel terrorists are kind enough, they may make the rest of the world to pay for it and claim credit for it, for helping to rebuild Gaza, using their own contractors and other people's money.

Praise the American and Israeli terrorists for their victorious wars against Iraq, Iran and Gaza. The whole world is giving their support and consent in silence including ASEAN.

PS. The latest on war reparation by MSN.

Trump reacts to claim Iran could force US to pay for strike damage.

Earlier this week, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres demanding both the U.S. and Israel be blamed for the recent 12-day Israel-Iran war. 'We officially request hereby that the Security Council recognize the Israeli regime and the United States as the initiators of the act of aggression and acknowledge their subsequent responsibility, including the payment of compensation and reparations,' he wrote.

While Trump celebrated what he called the 'complete obliteration' of the nuclear sites in Tehran, Iran was asking for relief elsewhere. Araghchi added: 'While the full scale of the losses is under assessment, several hospitals and relief centers were targeted in grave breach of international humanitarian law, a few energy installations were targeted with the aim of disrupting daily lives of civilians.'

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Respect for BRICS down the drain.

In Rio de Janeiro BRICS summit , Indian PM Modi strutted around like a proud peacock in the absence of Xi JinPing and Putin, leading the BRICS in their final summit statement to condemn recent bombing campaigns against Iran but dare not mention US and Israel directly to avoid angering Trump.

Anonymous said...

Xi and Putin deliberately watch from the sideline to see how this snake behaves in Brazil. Action will be taken soon, also in SCO. They cannot afford to have an American doggy spying against them and undermining what they are going to do.
The early inclusion of Indonesia is to replace India in BRICS.

Anonymous said...

The UN can't even take action for the illegal war against Iraq based on fictitious intelligence and fake evidence. The ICC does not even have the courage to take USA and UK leaders to task for all the lies, instead cowering under threat.

What is the ICC for except punishing the weak like Rodrigo Duterte. And Duterte's action while in office has nothing to do with crime against humanity. He was getting rid of drug lords operating in the country. It shows that the ICC does not walk the talk in their belief in justice, but its total uselessness.

And the UN is just a tool for the USA and the West to rubber stamp whatever they want to do.

Anonymous said...

Exactly. It is time for BRICS to be led by new leaders like Brazil and South Africa. BRICS should not expect Putin and Xi to remain forever to chart the course and direction of BRICS, as that would invite criticism. Right now, there are already criticism by India that BRICS is all about benefiting China. No country in BRICS wants that.

Now Indonesia is a big country going to have its voice heard. And it is up to the rest of BRICS to decide what they want to do with India if it still persists in its decision to sabotage the direction of BRICS. After all, BRICS was created to give small countries a voice in all things, not just only Russia and China forever calling the shots. BRICS is not the UN, with big donations entitling big donors a big and overwhelming voice. That should not be what BRICS is all about.

Countries in BRICS will know, as time goes by, what India is trying to do even by giving it a voice. India is not BRICS, just as the USA is not what global trade is all about. BRICS can do without India, as it has not contributed anything of benefit to the grouping thus far. As a perceived Trojan Horse for the Anglo-Saxon Whites, especially the USA, this does not escape the attention of Russia and China. And it is up to all members of BRICS to decide the fate of India if it goes rogue against the decisions of the majority.