Everyone is in anticipation of the next General Election
that could be called anytime now, if not in 2015 then must be in 2016. All the
political parties have been busy making plans and arrangements and strategising
on how to engage in this once every 5 year battle for the right to form the
govern and run the country. PAP, being the ruling party and the one in the know
on when the election would be called, is in the best position to execute its
election plans as it is calling the shot. Everyone is watching and second
guessing what is in the mind of the PAP and the election date that is closely guarded.
Their best hope is to watch the moves of the PAP, what they are saying and
doing, to have a feel of when the GE will be called. And there are many signs
surfacing over the last few months.
The latest political move is the letter by Chan Chun Sing to
the Huffington Post attacking the Post for allowing Chee Soon Juan’s letters to
be published. What is more important is the text of the letter, what it said
and what are the implications. Chee Soon Juan is going to play a central figure
in the next GE if he is qualified to contest and all the big guns of the PAP
will be trained at him. This letter is perhaps the first cannon shot fired
ahead of the GE and would set the tone of the debate, the mood, tactics and
rules of engagement.
Taking the hints from this letter, the PAP has in a way set
the standard of what can be said, what would be said, and what is fair game.
Let’s take a look at the content of the letter, I have deleted the less
relevant to allow the key items to stand out.
Dr Chee has stood for elections thrice – and lost badly all three times, once receiving just 20 per cent of the vote.
The party he now leads, the Singapore Democratic Party, was once the leading opposition party in the country. …
Indeed, it was Mr Chiam who brought Dr Chee into the SDP in 1992. He mentored the younger man and promoted him. Dr Chee then proceeded to betray Mr Chiam, isolate him and force him out of the SDP, ….
In 1993, Dr Chee was dismissed from the National University of Singapore for misappropriating research funds and for other serious misconduct, including surreptitiously recording conversations with university staff.
He has been sued for defamation not only by ruling party politicians,…
And in 1996, Dr Chee and three of his associates were convicted of perjury by Parliament tor submitting false statements to a Special Parliamentary Committee. … It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure – not because he was persecuted,… voters do not regard its leader as an honourable man.
Dr Chee was disqualified from contesting the last two General Elections because he was declared a bankrupt in 2006 for failing to pay damages for libel to former Prime Ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong. ….
Sincerely,
Chan Chun Sing
Minister for Social and Family Development, Singapore”
Some commentators have called this name calling or character
assassination. (Full test of the article is available in all the main media and
also at TRE). The letter was about Chee Soon Juan as a person and his character
in question. It was about him as not honourable, a bankrupt, ungrateful, and
misconduct. It related his affairs and encounters with politicians, govt
officials and his employers that are negative.
As they said, food for the gander is food for the goose. Are
these the lines drawn by the PAP as acceptable fodder for the GE campaign
whereby political parties can dig out everything they could find about their
political opponents and to use them freely in name calling and character
assassination to win the votes? These were thought to be the OB
lines in the past where anyone crossing them would be condemned as mean, unethical,
hitting below the belt, dishonourable or unacceptable.
Now that Chan Chun Sing, signing off as the Minister for Social and
Family Development and using them to attack a potential political opponent,
does it signal to the opposition parties that they can do likewise? Of course
they need to say things that are factual or risked being sue for defamation.
Maybe immortals are flawless and blameless and there is nothing that the opposition
parties could find to use in the GE. That may give Chan Chun Sing and the PAP
the confidence that they could widen the OB markers to accommodate
more juicy stuff and the washing of dirty laundry during the heat of the
election rallies.
The election rallies are going to be very interesting and
going to be very well attended when all kinds of personal information would be
aired to down an opponent. Insults, insinuations, name callings, sneerings,
badmouthing, exposing personal gaffs etc etc are permissible? It would be good
if the rallies could be put on live telecast. One thing for sure, youtube and
webcast, mobile videos etc etc would be made available in all the blogs and
websites to share the good stuff and great stuff of the election one upmanship,
with many red faces to show.
This GE election rally must be something to look forward to,
could be more exciting and part of the SG50 celebration.