Many people go to church on Sunday. Some go to seek comfort
some to confess and some to repent. The recent uproar on the development of the
CPF schemes particularly on the retention of the people’s life time savings is
being felt the wrong way by many affected CPF members. Many in the social media
are speaking out on something they know isn’t right. And a young man, Roy
Ngerng, is now in hot soup for stating his case too strong and rubbing Hsien
Loong the wrong way.
The Govt has been making a lot of changes to the CPF schemes
on the ground that they are the elected representatives of the people, the
lawmakers and thus bestowed to the to make whatever changes they deemed
necessary, all legally under the law. No MPs or Ministers have spoken firmly
against the changes, presumably agreeing that there is nothing wrong with the
changes. No one questions the legality of it all, assuming that everything done
is legal as long as the Govt says so, absolutely legal.
From the aspects of ethics and morality, from the angle of
equity and fairness, from the point of social justice, is there no wrong about
keeping the people’s life time savings away from them and deciding what to do
with them without their consent and changing the date of withdrawal, with some
in the Medisave Minimum Sums that may not be withdrawal at all unless the
member is seriously ill or hospitalised. Otherwise the money would go to his
beneficiary without him enjoying it after saving it for a lifetime.
The silence or lack of objection by the Ministers and MPs is
as good as all agrees to the changes, all supports the changes and all does not
see anything wrong with all the changes. Many have voted to the changes, but
many changes were not even discussed or addressed in Parliament. Whether the
Ministers and MPs voted in support of the changes in the CPF Schemes or simply
abstained, without saying no to the changes when they can, they are all in it,
all in support of the changes, tacitly, reluctantly, grudgingly or willingly.
I am just wondering if any Minister or MP has any misgivings
about the changes to the CPF Schemes. Do their conscience prick them when the
people are kept away from withdrawing their savings on reaching the age of 55
and henceforth a higher age to be introduced over the years? Nothing wrong
about it, nothing wrong with the meddling of the people’s lifetime savings
against their wishes, without their consent? In all fairness and with one hand
touching the heart, does anyone of them think they have the right to mess around
with other people’s money, the money that people saved over a lifetime, to act
as if they are the guardian angels vested with the power to do as they want,
inventing more and more schemes while the people getting angrier and angrier?
Can these people sleep well? Or can these people say they
have nothing to do with the changes, that they too did not agree with the
changes? Can they be excused or be guilt free when they are the elected
people’s representatives and could do something about it but did nothing? All
87 MPs and Ministers are saying yes to all the schemes or not saying no while
they people’s money slips further and further from their fingers. It is perfectly ok to mess around with other people's life savings.
Kopi Level - Yellow