adjunct article to "Sino-Indian claims, what is the truth."

 Here is a little background facts to Sino-Indian claims. 

In the 1760s to 1780s England and France fought fiercely to control India as a colony. England evolved as victor and France was booted out of India. At that time India consisted of over a hundred small independent states with over a hundred twenty different local languages. England was able to exploit the differences among the different weak states  and took easy control of them under British rule which amalgamated them together under a unitary political unit of British India. Then all these small Indian states were unified by the British which intriduced the Englis Language as the official language,  the lingua franca of British India. So this is one beneficial facet of British rule.

At this period of time practically all the western European countries were fiercely spreading far and wide across the seas to grab lands and territories from defenseless natives. Russia another European country was spreading its claws and pincers across continental Asia into China and the Far East. Russia was also spreading south into Chinese Xinjiang in which Tibet lies further to its south. England was apprehensive of the Russians and so it took a forward policy of acquiring parts of Tibet to forestall Russian incursions into Tibet. England took Aksai Chin in South Western Tibet and large chunks of South Eastern Tibet including the province of Tawang in which present India now renamed it as Utter Pradesh. China had from the very bdeginning protested against the British illegal grabbing of Chinese lands. There were frequent negotiations from time to time between England and China for the return of these stolen lands from China. But the British intentionally dragged and stalled the negotiations to no conclusions. The reason is clear for the British had no intention to leave India. However after the Second World War in 1945 British occupation of India was so untenable because England was impoverished nd bankrupt. It was forced to grant India independence in 1947 before settling all the border issues with China.

Following India's independence India did not want to negotiate with China for the return of Chinese lands illegally taken by the British. India intend to inherit the mantle of British imperialism. In fact  in the 1950s Nehru and some Indian politicians and the Indian military were deliberating of occupying  Tibet as an Indian colony. It was so preposterous of the Indians that they provoked the Sino-India border war in 1962 thinking that it could defeat a very weak China which just evolved from decades of Western invasions and the Second World War cum the Korean War 1950-1953 imposed on China by the Americans and its 25 allied countries.

So the present China-India border issues is actually the seeds of divide and rule planted by the British. Nevertheless China was prepared to negotiate with India on a give and take basis just as it had settled all border isuues with all other 14 Chinese neighbouring countries. However a recalcitrant India would have none of that for it stubbornly  insist on retaining the stolen Chinese territories thus assuming the mantle of British imperialism. Hopefully in future reasons will prevail and the Sino-India border issues will be settled amicably. Otherwise the evil United States and its Western hoodlum allies will exploit and instigate an open warfare between India and China to the benefit of the Americans.

Southernglory1

Wednesday, 13th September, 2023