Trump declared to the whole world, I will take Gaza, I will annex Greenland, I will invade Panama, I will make Canada the 51st state of USA, Mexico would be next. What are these aggressive remarks meant in international law, in international principles on state sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity?
These are arrogant violations of international laws and principles only rogues, gangsters and expansionist imperialist states would dare to utter and to want to execute. They affect the indepedence and well being of all nation states, big and small. Canada and Mexico are not small countries but under threats of aggression and seizure from the evil terrorist state of America.
What did the UN say on this? Did the UN say anything or lost its balls? What about principled Singapore, so happy to scream and yell at any violation of international laws and principles, even sanctioning Russia unilaterally without consultation with ASEAN and taking a position that ASEAN countries would not take?
Did Singapore stand up to howl and scoff at the blatant aggressive stance of the evil American Empire against the interests of small states and independent nation? Channel News America did not utter a word. I presume Singapore has no stand or refuse to take position on the aggressive American rogue behaviour, or quietly went to tell the Americans, hey, this is not right, or actually say nothing at all?
And what was the basis of the American terrorists in wanting to take over these independent states? Oh, it is in the interests of the USA's national security. If these states were to be taken over by China or Russia, then they would pose a threat to America. So it is better for America to take them over as part of the American Empire. How many people or leaders believe or subscribe to this rogue logic? This is evil Americans' force is right Rules Based Order in practice. It is based on rules written by the terrorist Americans, not based on international laws and principles.
How many silly leaders still believe that the American terrorists are for peace, respect sovereignty and independence of nation states, respect international laws and principles?
2 comments:
Someone has to tell Red Dot it has no leverage and no hands to play. Oops, sorry, someone from Taiwan did call Red Dot 'peesai' or nose shit years ago, LOL..
The principled one will say the Anerican is liberating the greelanders from Denmark & also protecting greenlanders from Russia invasion. Therefore it is justified.
Post a Comment