While the British Museum’s trustees are free to talk to whomever they please, the office stressed “we have no plans to change the law, which prohibits removing objects from the museum’s collections…apart from certain circumstances. Our position on that hasn’t changed.”....
The British Museum attempted to bridge the gap with its own statement released over the weekend, declaring: “We operate within the law and we’re not going to dismantle our great collection, as it tells a unique story of our common humanity.” However, it said, the museum wants “a new Parthenon partnership with Greece.”
(What a joke? Only shameless white men could use such convoluted reason to justify an act of theft. When one is the empire, all powerful, one can talk all kinds of rubbish and get away with it. Be careful when you lose your power and no longer in charge. RB)
There were negotiations to return the loot, the Greek Parthenon Marbles, to Greece. The Brits know very well that practically every exhibit or piece of art in the British Museum was stolen by the Brits from their colonies. Not only that, practically every piece of precious stone and jewelry in Buckingham Palace is also looted from the countries of the world. The Brits know that this is unlawful, against the laws of civilised nation states, against all moral standards of man. So they have to and must return, now or later. But they chose not to return and falling back on their laws. This is an example of the treacherous concept of Rules Base Order. When things are against them, they simply write a law to cover their asses. Utterly rubbish!
The above is quoted from RT.
There were negotiations to return the loot, the Greek Parthenon Marbles, to Greece. The Brits know very well that practically every exhibit or piece of art in the British Museum was stolen by the Brits from their colonies. Not only that, practically every piece of precious stone and jewelry in Buckingham Palace is also looted from the countries of the world. The Brits know that this is unlawful, against the laws of civilised nation states, against all moral standards of man. So they have to and must return, now or later. But they chose not to return and falling back on their laws. This is an example of the treacherous concept of Rules Base Order. When things are against them, they simply write a law to cover their asses. Utterly rubbish!
Which is more righteous, more ethical and moral, to return the stolen goods or to obey the questionable British law that said items in the museum cannot be removed?
This so called Rules Based Order can only last as long as they are still powerful, militarily, just like the days of gun boat diplomacy. The one that carried the biggest gun called the shot, set the law. Once Little Britain is torn apart, loses its ability to defend itself, this Rules Based Order would be flushed down the toilet. No one would believe in this stupid concept which is to protect their own interest and own ass.
The world has had enough of the white man's rule, white man's empires that invaded, massacred and looted the rest of the world. The rest of the world is waiting for the collapse of the western civilisation and to take back everything stolen by the white men during the era of military conquest and colonialism. Once the rest of the world has united themselves as a formidable force to take on the white men, then the table would be turned against the supremacy of the white men and their outrageous and hideous Rules Based Order. It would be an international order and the laws would be decided by the rest of the world, not by the white men.
The creepy Sunak, a coloured man thinking and behaving as if he is whiter than white and citing white man's hypocrisy to bully the coloured people, for the interest of the white men, is simply a silly ridiculous joke. He forgot about the diamonds on the British crown stolen from India?
PS. Does the Rules Based Order support theft of properties as legal or that stolen properties must be returned to their rightful owners? What about returning stolen lands to their original owners, like the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Falklands, Hawaii etc etc?
PS2. The so called law quoted by the Museum Trustee, are they state law or Museum's internal regulations? Even if they are state laws, can this supercede and override national legislation on theft and robbery? If there is a conflict, which law should take precedent? White men speak in fork tongue. Oops, it is black man spoke in fork tongue.
