7/03/2021

The Singapore Fantasy

Singapore was colonised by the British and then the Japanese and then the British took it back. What it meant was that Singapore was just a loot of the empires. They fought and used force to occupy this little island and claimed it as their very own, just like they claimed Canada, the USA, Australia, New Zealand, the Falklands, and many islands and lands in Africa and Latin America, not to forget Japan and South Korea. It was forced occupation by guns, and many natives died as a result.  The colonial empires made this act of violence and crime against humanity as an act of glory. In those days, the killings and lootings were for their kings and queens.

Many natives then were still tribal societies and did not understand the meaning of nationhood, disorganised, poorly armed, were no match to the savages from Europe. And yes, I know you see the point, the white savages called the natives savages and brutally massacred and genocided them. There were many great examples in North and South America, Africa, India and Southeast Asia. Not sure if the survivors of the massacres and genocides could call themselves lucky for being alive as their forefathers were practically wiped off from the surface of mother earth.

In the case of Singapore, the story was slightly different. There were few inhabitants then.  The village chiefs were castrated by the white savages who then brought in more foreigners, today they would be called foreign talents, to populate the island and turn the natives into a minority and no longer meaningful anymore. Looks like history is being repeated by a new kind of savages. Would the Chinese be turned into the new minority?

The migrant Chinese, Indians and Indonesians did not really have much ill feelings for the British as they were foreigners and were grateful for the manual labour jobs that could give them 3 meals a day, much better than their impoverish motherland that were fully colonised by the white savages. The only colonial masters that they hated were the barbaric and cruel Japanese. OK, not all the migrants suffered the same fate under the Japanese and some even worked for and prospered under the Japanese by spying and squealing on their neighbours.

To cut the story short, the fantasy of the migrants was to have a job in the HMS, His/Her Majesty's Service, a clerk, cook or driver in the service of the Empire. The white savages were the Tuans, the Sahibs of the day. The fantasy was to be able to live like the white savages, dressed in white, smoke a pipe and carry an umbrella everywhere.

This fantasy continued even after independence. Even till recently, the fantasized life of Singaporeans is an Angmoh with a Chinese wife and a big house. You can see this message in Channel 5 and many of the advertisements about good living and lifestyle. Maybe it was because the producers of such programmes and advertising material were mostly Angmohs or bananas. Oh, the bananas, male and female, still think this is the fantasy to live for.

Lately, things have changed somewhat. The new fantasy is an Indian man with a Chinese wife. Even in some of the new programmes, you could see how Chinese women are paired with Indian men as couples or boy friends. Perhaps they have found out that the Angmohs were not that rich after all. Not easy to own a house or a car in Singapore for many Angmohs. Fair Indians, especially those from Northern India, are the new catch for Chinese women.

So Indians are the new fantasy. Dunno when this started or who started it. Must be the Indian fever. This is the new message even in advertisements. And now with the new witch hunt, the Singapore Inquisition, the status of Indian men would be protected, elevated and enhanced. 

I am waiting for a few TV serials to promote how Chinese Singaporean women found success in India and become the wives of new Maharajahs in India and returning to Singapore to live happily thereafter...or to live happily thereafter in India.

Welcome to the new Singapore Fantasy.

COVID-19: Singapore's Brilliant Vision To Outsmart The Various Variants Of Coronavirus

While the Delta variant is fast fueling the rise of new Covid cases across the globe, Singapore leaders want to stop counting Covid cases. The idea is like what Donald Trump has said when he was the US President: "Less counting means less cases reported." Therefore, logically, no counting means no cases reported. So, everything is just fine!

But that doesn't mean there are no cases of infections on the ground. It simply means that the cases have gone underground! Hidden. This ostrich mentality idea may just become the model for the rest of the world to follow. Brilliant!

The central idea is:

Say no evil, hear no evil; think no evil and everything will be just fine!

As countries around the world tighten restrictions once again to curb potential outbreaks of the Delta coronavirus variant, Singapore's super smart leaders are once again trying to outsmart the coronavirus by doing something other wise men fear to thread. Something unthinkable. Something only top notch scholars can phantom - a new vision, a new hope, for life to return to normal again (or abnormal again?).

The roadmap, proposed by three members of the Singapore's Covid-19 Tasked & Forced Team is basically:

1. No lockdowns
2. No mass contact tracing
3. No quarantine
4. Free travel
5. Resumption of large gatherings
6. Stop counting the daily Covid cases.

The proposal has been so cleverly thought out that no other radicals and innovative minds in the world could have done so. Praise the Lord! Hallelujah!

It is a total reversal of the so-called "Zero Transmission" model. This is a "Maximum Transmission" model. It will definitely bring the economy back to life again. This is good news. All other countries that are desperate for their economy to return back to life must follow this Super-Smart Singaporean model to outsmart the COVID-19 coronavirus. Whether Type Delta or Type Zulu, this Siper-Smart Maximum Transmission model can take all-comers. Never mind the number of casualties. Just don't report them. Nobody will be the wiser. So wonderful! Praise the Lord again!

Sure can win the Nobel Prize one! Why nobody ever think of it? The world must be in dire need of the kind of talents Singapore has. No wonder Singapore Ministers paid themselves out of this world salary!

Congratulations! And Good luck to you, Singaporeans! Hallelujah!Praise the Lord! Amen.


SSO - 30 June 2021.

7/02/2021

Singapore is bankrupt....of top talents


The dust has not yet settled on the appointment of Pillay Sandrasegara as the new CEO of Temasek Holding, and now another India Indian talent is appointed to be the Chairman of Singapore Pools.  Is this another new citizen? First class honours from the University of New Delhi, better than Cambridge, Oxford and JB, oops, MIT. It is looking like all the financial and money related top positions are helm by Indian talents. What is the agenda or game plan to put all the eggs in one basket? It does not need any intelligence to know that this is not right.

40 years of sending scholars to the best universities in the West could not produce any talent to fill such positions. What is wrong with the scholars, or the universities, or the degrees? One thing for sure, the universities are real and the certificates are genuine, not from degree mills. What is the message, or moral of the story? How many thousands of scholars have been sent and returned, and how many hundreds of millions spent and what is the result? Duds?

Only one word can describe this shit. UMBRAGE!

It is getting very clear that Singapore is bankrupt, bankrupt of talents, bankrupt of ideas. It is time that all the top leaders in govt, ministries and business be replaced by the top talents from India. The PM and ministers and Permanent Secretaries, the CEOs of GLCs, should all be removed and replaced by Indian talents. If they are seen as the best Singapore can depend on, something is seriously wrong.

Is the only way to save this clueless and empty of ideas Singapore? Looks like we are having duds in all the top positions and they could not find any Singaporeans that is good enough today because the duds look at every Singaporean as another dud.  So rightfully they should all be replaced by the real Indian talents they so highly regarded.

What do you think? 

PS.  When the duds, oops, I mean ducks, are looking for talents, they would see the duds no up, oops, I mean ducks. So a snake would look nicer and smarter.

National Security Questions That Need Answers

From the perspective of national security, these questions really bothers me no end over the last few years:

1. Why did the President of Singapore, Halimah Yacob approved one man to hold and helm two powerful ministries that are clearly in direct conflicts of interests (Ministry of Law formulates and issue laws and orders whereas Ministry of Home Affairs maintains law and order)?

2. Why did the PM advised the President to allow one Minister to be concurrently incharge of two ministries when there are so many spare ministers hanging around doing things of very little import?

3. Worst of all, the concurrent appointments are not temporarily held but have been stretched over a very long and significant period of time. Thereby entrenching the incumbent's power significantly and overwhelmingly. This is unnecessary and avoidable. Why allow one person to become so powerful?

4. As such, it seems the PM and President are powerless to appoint another Minister to hold one of the two Ministries being held by Mr Shanmugam, who has become too powerful for the good of Singapore and against wisdom. This careless deployment of personnel is not only out of the ordinary but also very disturbing and dangerous. This is easily preventable. Why allow the situation to be so?

I am sure many other fellow citizens must be asking the same or similar questions in one way or another, at one time or another. 

SSO

LAWRENCE WONG ON RACE

After weeks of drift and despair, this was a speech we needed to hear. There is still some way for the establishment to go — but then it wouldn’t be called the establishment if it were capable of radical quantum leaps.


Here is what I liked:


1. At last, a PAP leader expressed empathy for the lived experience of minorities, and asked the majority to be more sensitive: “So, it is important for the majority community in Singapore to do its part, and be sensitive to and conscious of the needs of minorities. This cuts across all aspects of daily life. It matters to someone who faces discrimination when looking for a job. It matters when someone feels left out when everyone else in a group speaks in a language that not all can understand. It matters to potential tenants who learn that landlords do not prefer their race. It matters to our students, neighbours, co-workers and friends who have to deal with stereotypes about their race, or insensitive comments.” The most universal and everyday of racial exclusions is the use of Chinese in work and social settings, so it was especially significant that the minister mentioned this. (Today and ST dropped this from their news reports, while CNA paraphrased the quote, which is why I've reproduced it above.)

2. While an announcement of policy changes was never on the cards for this occasion, the minister said more than once that all race-related policies, from the GRC system to HDB quotas, were open for discussion and periodic review. Is this enough? Well, if he does not have strong convictions that the PAP is more right than wrong, he would not be a PAP leader. That said, he was not excessively defensive, and showed a receptiveness to other points of view, especially in the Q&A.

3. He found a palatable way to urge minorities and antiracists to be patient if fellow Singaporeans still don’t get it. Too many establishment types – oddly obsessed with American culture wars and sounding as hysterical as Fox News – have been talking as if antiracists are a greater threat to Singapore than racists. Wong did none of that. He just made the reasonable point that if we are all in this together, we can’t leave behind Singaporeans for whom antiracist discourse is very new and alien. Call out racism. But play the ball, not the man. It reminds me of what a liberal Dutch cartoonist told me about why he chooses not to take cheap shots at the Right by, for example, comparing them to Nazis: “You can’t open someone’s eyes by slapping his face.”

4. While he appealed for care in the choice of means, he did not fudge about the ends: Singapore must be more equal. This wasn’t like the PAP’s atrocious split-the-difference approach to gay rights: liberals want this, conservatives want that, so let’s keep 377A but not actively enforce it. No, at no point did Wong suggest that racists and others who are comfortable with the status quo should be allowed to set the agenda. Racial equality is non-negotiable.

5. Wong made it clear that he welcomes civil society engagement on this issue. This is important because there are things that could be done for which we can’t expect the PAP to be at the cutting edge. Before the speech, I told myself that I’d give Wong an 8/10 if he announced an independent race commission to look deeply and holistically at this issue. I was not surprised he didn’t. But I was very happy that NTU sociologist Laavanya Kathiravelu, speaking on the IPS panel immediately after Wong’s session, proposed exactly this. It wasn’t picked up by the moderator for further discussion. But this is something that civil society should explore.

I’ve written (in PAP v PAP, co-authored with Donald Low) that the PAP also needs to review the LKY legacy and publicly disavow his more questionable statements about race. Realistically, though, for current PAP leaders to do so would be like the Chinese Communist Party taking Mao’s portrait down from Tiananmen next week when it celebrates its 100th birthday. We’d have to wait for a 5G or 6G PAP leadership to go anywhere near there.

What we can reasonably demand of 4G is that the PAP exercise better moral leadership on race. In 2019, Sudhir Vadaketh declared in a vodcast that he could no longer trust politicians to lead us on race. The problems that led him to this conclusion are probably still present. Major political movements, like religions, contain multiple conflicting tendencies. On Friday, Wong showed a side of the PAP leadership that many can get behind, or at least work with. Time will tell if it prevails. 

Anonymous