India has a lot of talents but somehow unable to use them at home to turn India into the next super power and still stuck in the mud as a slum country. Why is this so, why are Indian talents so successful overseas, in USA, UK and in Singapore, but would be unemployed and their skills untapped, unrecognised and unused in India? This is a paradox that only India and Indians could answer.
Let's look at the brighter side of this sub continent. Indians overseas are extremely successful in getting themselves hired and employed in top jobs in Fortune 500 countries. This is no mean feat. No other nationals could do this so successfully except the Indians. The overseas Indians may not have the talents to build up companies and big corporations on their own. Building big and successful companies is not their forte. But talking themselves into the top jobs of big and successful countries is something that overseas Indians are extremely good at. They are even able to convince the white supremacists to hire them to helm their top jobs and many senior management positions. And this phenomenon is not going to stop and would continue to grow and may see many top European and American and even Singaporean companies being taken over by Indian talents and run like Indian companies.
This exceptional talents of the Indians did not stop just at the corporate level and industries. The Indians are also talking their ways into top political jobs in the USA, UK and Canada. The mayor of London is an Indian, the next British PM is likely to be an Indian. Several Indians are in the current British cabinet. The defence minister of Canada is also an Indian. Such successes only show how good and easy for the Indians to penetrate into western establishments, including political offices to become their national leaders.
India must take note of this special achievement of overseas Indians and their ability to take over corporations and even govts. India should make special effort to institutionalise this trend by grooming more Indian talents to go overseas and take over corporations and even govts that are willing to be taken over by them. If the later is successful, India could recolonise Britain and the USA peacefully and become the world's Number One super power without firing a bullet.
Well done India and Indians. But please leave Singapore alone. Taking over Singapore is a piece of cake with many daft Singaporeans not knowing what is happening. Singapore is too small and not worth the effort even if some silly Singaporeans do not mind it being taken over by India and actually wanting this to happen. Let Singaporeans have some air to breath. We do not want to reach the point when 'We can't breath'. Have mercy on the daft Singaporeans, go take over the big countries like the USA, UK and Australia.
6/11/2020
CECA is not good for Singapore and Singaporeans
By A J Jennevieve and Misaki Tan posted in theindependent.sg
Singapore — Has CECA, the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement between Singapore and India, benefited the island nation?
This was one of the poll questions at the Progress Singapore Party web seminar on Thursday (June 4) which featured a panel of nine party leaders and members, led by PSP Secretary-General Dr Tan Cheng Bock. The two-hour discussion also touched on the Covid-19 crisis, HDB leases, the performance of Malays in school, CPF funds, retirement adequacy and healthcare costs.
The CECA poll showed that an overwhelming number of the respondents felt that the pact had not been beneficial to Singapore.
CECA guarantees Singapore and India access to each other’s markets and reduces or eliminates tariffs on imports into either country. This lowers the barrier of entry for Singaporean businesses to enter the Indian market and allows Singaporeans to purchase Indian products for cheaper.
However, another dimension of CECA is the increase in foreign workforce numbers, especially employment pass and S pass holders. A part of this number are Indian nationals who fill jobs as professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETs).
The Singapore government has given the assurance that CECA has been generating wealth for Singaporeans but there is uncertainty about this.
CECA guarantees Singapore and India access to each other’s markets and reduces or eliminates tariffs on imports into either country. This lowers the barrier of entry for Singaporean businesses to enter the Indian market and allows Singaporeans to purchase Indian products for cheaper.
However, another dimension of CECA is the increase in foreign workforce numbers, especially employment pass and S pass holders. A part of this number are Indian nationals who fill jobs as professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETs).
The Singapore government has given the assurance that CECA has been generating wealth for Singaporeans but there is uncertainty about this....
The above contains a list of questions that Singaporeans are very unhappy about with the CECA. What Singaporeans have been hearing are all the good things about CECA including creating good jobs for Singaporeans. On the ground everyone knows how many Singaporeans especially the PMETs were sacked and replaced by Indian nationals that are flooding the job markets here. And this is the main reason why Singaporeans are so angry with the CECA. And there is the very serious issues of pollution and harming the environment, a very heavy price to pay. And not to forget, the damages to our social fabric and losing our country to foreigners.
The govt sings one song, the people's chorus did not complement the song, in fact opposes the lyrics of the govt's song. How can the mismatch in perception be explained and for the people to know the true picture? Simple, just provide some statistics that this govt is so clever in doing. Statistics don't lie, so we hope the govt can show the people some statistics like how many Singapore businesses were set up in India and vice versa, and how many Singaporeans have gone to work in India and how many Indians are working in Singapore and how many jobs have the Indian businesses in Singapore created for Singaporeans, never mind, drivers and cleaners also can count. And also how many Indian nationals are employed by the govt, ministries, GLCs and Singaporean companies.
Make these data available and no one can then talk through their asses or be allowed to lie or make false allegations. The data must surely tell the truth and angry Singaporeans can then rest their cases if their perceptions are wrong. Hope these data are not official secrets that cannot be divulged or would take 56 man years to produce.
Boh how siow boh kong. Would the truth of how good this CECA is to Singapore and Singaporeans be told as it is so that no one needs to be guessing and getting angry for the right or wrong reasons? Or should Singaporeans continue to listen to motherhood statements without facts?
Singapore — Has CECA, the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement between Singapore and India, benefited the island nation?
This was one of the poll questions at the Progress Singapore Party web seminar on Thursday (June 4) which featured a panel of nine party leaders and members, led by PSP Secretary-General Dr Tan Cheng Bock. The two-hour discussion also touched on the Covid-19 crisis, HDB leases, the performance of Malays in school, CPF funds, retirement adequacy and healthcare costs.
The CECA poll showed that an overwhelming number of the respondents felt that the pact had not been beneficial to Singapore.
CECA guarantees Singapore and India access to each other’s markets and reduces or eliminates tariffs on imports into either country. This lowers the barrier of entry for Singaporean businesses to enter the Indian market and allows Singaporeans to purchase Indian products for cheaper.
However, another dimension of CECA is the increase in foreign workforce numbers, especially employment pass and S pass holders. A part of this number are Indian nationals who fill jobs as professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETs).
The Singapore government has given the assurance that CECA has been generating wealth for Singaporeans but there is uncertainty about this.
CECA guarantees Singapore and India access to each other’s markets and reduces or eliminates tariffs on imports into either country. This lowers the barrier of entry for Singaporean businesses to enter the Indian market and allows Singaporeans to purchase Indian products for cheaper.
However, another dimension of CECA is the increase in foreign workforce numbers, especially employment pass and S pass holders. A part of this number are Indian nationals who fill jobs as professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETs).
The Singapore government has given the assurance that CECA has been generating wealth for Singaporeans but there is uncertainty about this....
The above contains a list of questions that Singaporeans are very unhappy about with the CECA. What Singaporeans have been hearing are all the good things about CECA including creating good jobs for Singaporeans. On the ground everyone knows how many Singaporeans especially the PMETs were sacked and replaced by Indian nationals that are flooding the job markets here. And this is the main reason why Singaporeans are so angry with the CECA. And there is the very serious issues of pollution and harming the environment, a very heavy price to pay. And not to forget, the damages to our social fabric and losing our country to foreigners.
The govt sings one song, the people's chorus did not complement the song, in fact opposes the lyrics of the govt's song. How can the mismatch in perception be explained and for the people to know the true picture? Simple, just provide some statistics that this govt is so clever in doing. Statistics don't lie, so we hope the govt can show the people some statistics like how many Singapore businesses were set up in India and vice versa, and how many Singaporeans have gone to work in India and how many Indians are working in Singapore and how many jobs have the Indian businesses in Singapore created for Singaporeans, never mind, drivers and cleaners also can count. And also how many Indian nationals are employed by the govt, ministries, GLCs and Singaporean companies.
Make these data available and no one can then talk through their asses or be allowed to lie or make false allegations. The data must surely tell the truth and angry Singaporeans can then rest their cases if their perceptions are wrong. Hope these data are not official secrets that cannot be divulged or would take 56 man years to produce.
Boh how siow boh kong. Would the truth of how good this CECA is to Singapore and Singaporeans be told as it is so that no one needs to be guessing and getting angry for the right or wrong reasons? Or should Singaporeans continue to listen to motherhood statements without facts?
6/10/2020
Another racist shit stirrer
Singapore – A woman, whose comments on Facebook that she was called
“black” when she growing up have annoyed some people, has been strongly
urged not compare the situation in Singapore with that in the United
States.
In response to a post of a man sharing conversations with his daughter regarding discrimination, Ms Marie Sita noted that she too was called “black” when she was growing up because of her skin tone.
“Not only Chinese and Malay but also Chinese teachers” made fun of her, she said.
She felt that the topic of racism is not talked about enough in Singapore. “We will no longer be silenced or ignored,” she said and that the Government “must acknowledge” the issue. She added:
“Indians feel as discriminated and unjustified as ‘Blacks’ feel in (the) US.”
The only difference between the two countries, she said, is the US government having no control over its law-enforcers. “In Singapore, it’s no better from name-calling to job applications,” she added.
Members of the online community, annoyed by the comments, strongly urged her not to compare the minorities in Singapore with those in the US.
These are some of the responses to her comments.
The above are from www.theindependent.sg
In Singapore, often the Chinese majority are being attacked and accused of racism. The minorities are so nice, never called Chinese names, and that is why the Chinese never accused the minorities of calling them names and being racists.
Is that true? What to you think? If the Chinese were half as racists as the Americans, you think the minorities would be so bold and wild to attack the Chinese for being racists everyday with the slightest comment, or be cowered in fear like the blacks in the USA?
The govt must step in to stem out these wild allegations by racists pretending to be victims and being hurt for any little things on colours. If this is allowed to continue unchecked, then Singaporeans would have to live with another silly myth that this is a racist country.
Don't we have enough silly myths being perpetuated by the charlatans, ie the myths that foreigners are here to create jobs for Singaporeans, foreigners are talents, foreigners help us to grow our economy, without foreigners we would become a third world country, like them? The truth is that these foreigners would be jobless, unemployed if Singapore did not offer them a job here if they remain in their third world countries. Now because of these silly myths, the foreigners are looking down on Singaporeans, despising Singaporeans, bullying and attacking Singaporeans as if we owe them a living.
Stop all these silly myths and bring back some pride in being Singaporeans and not to be looked down upon by third world low lives.
If the majority keeps on keeping quiet and allowed the racists to attack them freely at the slightest excuses, then the attacks will keep coming at them. Do not take body blows quietly and let them pass. You are only emboldening them to attack you more. Speak out and put a stop to it. Or else like they said, 'see, they never say anything, so it must be true'.
In response to a post of a man sharing conversations with his daughter regarding discrimination, Ms Marie Sita noted that she too was called “black” when she was growing up because of her skin tone.
“Not only Chinese and Malay but also Chinese teachers” made fun of her, she said.
She felt that the topic of racism is not talked about enough in Singapore. “We will no longer be silenced or ignored,” she said and that the Government “must acknowledge” the issue. She added:
“Indians feel as discriminated and unjustified as ‘Blacks’ feel in (the) US.”
The only difference between the two countries, she said, is the US government having no control over its law-enforcers. “In Singapore, it’s no better from name-calling to job applications,” she added.
Members of the online community, annoyed by the comments, strongly urged her not to compare the minorities in Singapore with those in the US.
These are some of the responses to her comments.
The above are from www.theindependent.sg
In Singapore, often the Chinese majority are being attacked and accused of racism. The minorities are so nice, never called Chinese names, and that is why the Chinese never accused the minorities of calling them names and being racists.
Is that true? What to you think? If the Chinese were half as racists as the Americans, you think the minorities would be so bold and wild to attack the Chinese for being racists everyday with the slightest comment, or be cowered in fear like the blacks in the USA?
The govt must step in to stem out these wild allegations by racists pretending to be victims and being hurt for any little things on colours. If this is allowed to continue unchecked, then Singaporeans would have to live with another silly myth that this is a racist country.
Don't we have enough silly myths being perpetuated by the charlatans, ie the myths that foreigners are here to create jobs for Singaporeans, foreigners are talents, foreigners help us to grow our economy, without foreigners we would become a third world country, like them? The truth is that these foreigners would be jobless, unemployed if Singapore did not offer them a job here if they remain in their third world countries. Now because of these silly myths, the foreigners are looking down on Singaporeans, despising Singaporeans, bullying and attacking Singaporeans as if we owe them a living.
Stop all these silly myths and bring back some pride in being Singaporeans and not to be looked down upon by third world low lives.
If the majority keeps on keeping quiet and allowed the racists to attack them freely at the slightest excuses, then the attacks will keep coming at them. Do not take body blows quietly and let them pass. You are only emboldening them to attack you more. Speak out and put a stop to it. Or else like they said, 'see, they never say anything, so it must be true'.
6/09/2020
Want a hunting licence to hunt Niggers?
They could get a licence to hunt and kill negros by paying a small fee, perfectly legal to kill negros like wild animals. So what is the killing of George Floyd?
See how proud Derek Chauvin posed with George Floyd under his knee like a game he just shot and killed.
How many of you still think the white men are so kind, gentle and loving and so nice?
With the internet, all the shit and wickedness of the white men will be dragged out from the closet for display. The western media may not want to breath a word about them. But internet and social media will pour everything out for the world to see how evil they were.
How many silly Asians and bananas are still praying to the white gods, their peace loving gods?
Withdrawal from reserves must be put back. What about CPF?
One can understand why withdrawal from the nation's reserves during tough times need to be returned to keep the reserves healthy and strong. Some may think this is not necessary and to allow the reserves to be rebuild over time the natural way. To expect the reserves to be rebuilt and to return the sum withdrawn are two different things.
During this crisis, Heng Swee Kiat spoke about $52b being withdrawn from the reserves. How should this be returned to the reserves? $52b plus whatever that due from the country's surplus as before? If this $52b is treated as a separate and specific item to be returned in addition to the normal process of transferring surpluses to the reserves, this could become an additional burden on the tax payers. Would this lead to higher taxation to cover this hole? What the govt gave, the govt must take back?
What about individuals and their savings in the CPF? Must they return what they withdrew for housing and other essential expenses when they are nearer their death beds? The nation is a going concern, an entity that theoretically has a life span in perpetuity. In the case of an individual, every day or year passes, his remaining life span is shortened. An individual does not live in perpetuity and some may live a far more shorter life span than another. The argument or rational to keep building up the CPF with no limitation on the age of the individual is a very flawed policy.
CPF savings are meant to provide for retirement when one is no longer able to work due to age, to provide some form of income during the golden years of retirement. The concept is to save when young and spend when old. It is ridiculous to demand an aged individual to save more when he has very few years or days to live. There must be a cut of point when one does not need to put more money into the CPF. This includes returning what they withdrew for housing and others in his younger days.
The cut off point could be age and sufficiency of fund in the CPF. Under the present unthinking and one rule fixed all policy, many would die leaving behind a small fortune in the CPF. This is not the intended objective and also a very bad policy when the money saved by the individual could be put to better use when he is alive, to enjoy life better. It is his money to spend not to pass down to people he might not know or meaningless to him, or to the state. The people's life saving is not a debt to the govt.
There is no good reason to demand an old individual to continue endlessly to put money into the CPF without exception, without a cut off point. The policy makers may choose to look stupid and continue to bully the people into putting more money into their CPF indefinitely. The people affected must not choose to be stupid as well, to remain silent to allow this to go on unchecked. This is another form of discrimination ala white supremacy in the USA that was allowed to go on without any protest or objection. It does not need a George Floyd equivalent for a public outcry to demand for change to a stupid and unfair system.
Change is needed to allow the people to enjoy their savings while they are still alive and can use them. Money in the CPF is useless when the person is dead. No one lives forever. In fact after 60, one must expect to die any time, any day. How ridiculous it is to demand a 60 year old, 70 year old or older person to still put money into their CPF for retirement? This is another 'stupidity has no cure' mentality that must be checked.
You do not ask a 70 year old or 80 year old to save for the future! Assholes!
You do not ask a 70 year old or 80 year to put back what he used from his CPF to pay for his homes.
Twits!
During this crisis, Heng Swee Kiat spoke about $52b being withdrawn from the reserves. How should this be returned to the reserves? $52b plus whatever that due from the country's surplus as before? If this $52b is treated as a separate and specific item to be returned in addition to the normal process of transferring surpluses to the reserves, this could become an additional burden on the tax payers. Would this lead to higher taxation to cover this hole? What the govt gave, the govt must take back?
What about individuals and their savings in the CPF? Must they return what they withdrew for housing and other essential expenses when they are nearer their death beds? The nation is a going concern, an entity that theoretically has a life span in perpetuity. In the case of an individual, every day or year passes, his remaining life span is shortened. An individual does not live in perpetuity and some may live a far more shorter life span than another. The argument or rational to keep building up the CPF with no limitation on the age of the individual is a very flawed policy.
CPF savings are meant to provide for retirement when one is no longer able to work due to age, to provide some form of income during the golden years of retirement. The concept is to save when young and spend when old. It is ridiculous to demand an aged individual to save more when he has very few years or days to live. There must be a cut of point when one does not need to put more money into the CPF. This includes returning what they withdrew for housing and others in his younger days.
The cut off point could be age and sufficiency of fund in the CPF. Under the present unthinking and one rule fixed all policy, many would die leaving behind a small fortune in the CPF. This is not the intended objective and also a very bad policy when the money saved by the individual could be put to better use when he is alive, to enjoy life better. It is his money to spend not to pass down to people he might not know or meaningless to him, or to the state. The people's life saving is not a debt to the govt.
There is no good reason to demand an old individual to continue endlessly to put money into the CPF without exception, without a cut off point. The policy makers may choose to look stupid and continue to bully the people into putting more money into their CPF indefinitely. The people affected must not choose to be stupid as well, to remain silent to allow this to go on unchecked. This is another form of discrimination ala white supremacy in the USA that was allowed to go on without any protest or objection. It does not need a George Floyd equivalent for a public outcry to demand for change to a stupid and unfair system.
Change is needed to allow the people to enjoy their savings while they are still alive and can use them. Money in the CPF is useless when the person is dead. No one lives forever. In fact after 60, one must expect to die any time, any day. How ridiculous it is to demand a 60 year old, 70 year old or older person to still put money into their CPF for retirement? This is another 'stupidity has no cure' mentality that must be checked.
You do not ask a 70 year old or 80 year old to save for the future! Assholes!
You do not ask a 70 year old or 80 year to put back what he used from his CPF to pay for his homes.
Twits!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)