11/16/2018

Ong Ye Kung out of the PM race

‘Ong Ye Kung out of PM race, say PAP cadres
 

While Education Minister Ong Ye Kung was elected to the People's Action Party's new Central Executive Committee (CEC), he was not among those nominated by the outgoing CEC. Traditionally, the CEC’s nominations are seen as a reflection of the individuals’ standing within the PAP. Those who are in the list are seen as core party leaders. A cadre from East Coast GRC said: “The list of seven didn’t include Mr Ong, and that means he is out (of the succession race).” ‘
 

The above was reported in Todayonline. It must be deliberately let out. No one is allowed to say this to the media unless blessing is given. Ong Ye Kung is out, Tan Chuan Jin out, Heng Swee Kiat a doubtful starter, Ng Chee Meng also out, only Chan Chun Sing is left as the only contender for the next PM post. His assumption to be the next PM is as sure as the sun will rise. With Hsien Loong still holding on to the post of Sec Gen, it is likely that Chan Chun Sing would be elected as the Asst Sec Gen by popular votes of the cadres. The PAP has more or less elected the next PM for Singapore. They are presenting him to the people as their undisputed elect Dear Leader.
 

Everyone is anticipating that the PAP would call for a snap election next year with the WP still entangled in the lawsuit and the Singapore Harapan still waiting to come to life. There is no time to waste and 2019 looks like a good year for the PAP.
 

While many anti PAP camp commentators and the social media did not have much good things to say about Chan Chun Sing, this unassuming ex general appears to have something that the uninitiated are unaware of. For sure, the PAP and the inner circle of the PAP think very highly of him. All challengers to his rise to Premiership have been brushed aside and the path is clear of all obstacles for him to be the next PM.
 

The PAP is expecting Chan Chun Sing to lead the Party to another big victory and more good years for the PAP. Chan Chun Sing is now the undisputed 4G leader of the PAP and of Singapore, like it or not, agree or not, the people of Singapore will vote him to become the PM in the next GE. Oops, factually the people of Singapore vote the PAP to power and PAP makes Chan Chun Sing the PM, chosen by the PAP inner circle, not elected by the people directly. The people have no say on this.
 

Singapore should prepare to welcome their new Dear Leader.
_________________

11/15/2018

Till death do us part
The headline in yesterday’s Straits Times (14 Nov 2018) that leapt out at the eye was not “Till death do us part” but “Malaysia Cabinet agrees to scrap death penalty”.  That is indeed eye-popping stuff because it shows how close the enemy is at the gates. The enemy is of course what the Government sees as bleeding-heart liberals who have campaigned long and hard for the abolition of the death penalty - and against which the government has fought equally long and hard to turn away. For years, the Singapore Cabinet has defended capital punishment as a necessary evil, something they found no joy in doing but had to for the greater good. And they had a staunch ally in the Malaysian Cabinet who had no qualms - until now - about hanging people for apparently the same reason.
But amid the growing pressure to do away with capital punishment worldwide (only 52 countries enforce it now), our soulmates look all ready to cave in.  If the Cabinet decision is approved by the Malaysian Parliament, capital punishment will be replaced with a minimum of 30 years in jail.  Even so, the planned move may not be as straightforward as it seems. For starters, there is the question of whether the abolition will cover every crime in the book.  While de facto Law Minister Liew Vui Keong insisted that it would, Deputy PM Wan Azizah was less sure, saying that the government would review abolishing it for murder. Muddying the waters further was an online poll that showed 82% of 22,000 Malaysian netizens opposing it – upset by the death of a baby who was physically and sexually abused while in the care of a babysitter. DAP MP Ramkarpal Singh insisted that the death penalty should be allowed in murder cases involving child victims – and he is an advocate of abolition!
Their sentiments also mirror the conundrum facing the government and abolitionists this side of the Causeway. Abolitionists’ main arguments for abolition range from the inhumanity of taking a life to the irreversibility of the death penalty in the event of a wrong verdict, but not all of them are sure about  the wisdom of a blanket repeal. Take the case of Annie Ee, the intellectually disabled girl who was “tortured” to death by a husband and wife who were supposed to be her minders. Many netters were outraged that they got away with custodial sentences instead of being charged with murder which carries the death penalty. And what of more heinous crimes like mass murder? Should the murderer be shielded from death even though he had done the same to scores of innocent people in the most horrific way? We could go on that even if the murderer were put to death, one life for so many is scant justice to the victims and their families.
Indeed what lies at the heart of the conundrum is the sense of justice. At the end of the day, people must feel that justice has been served. If they feel that the law protects the perpetrator rather than the victim, then it is a failed law however one may argue from the humanitarian point of view. The sense of injustice coming from the knowledge that no matter how heinous the perpetrator’s crime, he will not have to suffer death, is a powerful one. This - plus the fact that he has a choice whether to do it while his victim doesn’t - is the reason behind the government bucking the global trend against the death penalty. And long may it continue.    

Who invaded, colonised and plundered Asian countries?

Many are still blinded by western media and propaganda and forgotten or are ignorant of the historical facts of western imperialists and colonialists crimes against Asia and its people. They are still speaking dearly of western morality and completely blank about the cruelties and savagery of the Europeans, including half white Japanese, in this part of the world. I find it important to refresh the memories of the Asians and those who have not read history of this part of the world and how the wealth of the region was transferred to build a prosperous Europe and contributing to the European Renaissance and prosperity.

I will make it very simple by asking a very simple question. Who invaded, colonised and plundered Asia?

1. China - invaded, semi colonised by practically every European power and Japan
2. Korea - invaded, colonised and plundered by Japan
3. Taiwan, China - invaded, colonised and ruled by Japan
4. The Philippines - invaded, colonised and plundered first by the Spaniards and then the Americans.
5. India - invaded, colonised and plundered by the Portugese and then the British.
6. Pakistan/Bangladesh - invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
7. Ceylon - invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
8. Burma/Myanmar - invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
9. Malaya -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
10. North Borneo, Sarawak, Brunei -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
11. Indonesia -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the Dutch.
12. Vietnam -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the French and then the Americans.
13. Laos -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the French.
14. Cambodia - invaded, colonised and plundered by the French.
15. Australia - invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.
16. New Zealand -  invaded, colonised and plundered by the British.

I would not touch on Africa and the Middle East but their stories are the same and the colonialists and imperialists that invaded their countries, colonised them and plundered their wealth are the same.

On glaring fact in the above is that NOT a single country was invaded and colonised by China. The history of Vietnam was slightly different as before the invasion of the Europeans, Vietnam was a fringe state of China until they fought and broke away to become a separate state in the 12th Century, if my memory is correct. Before that they were part of China, cultural, linguistically and ethnically not much different from China.

The big question, why are these countries everyday screaming fear that China is going to invade and colonise them? China at its peak in military power was in the Ming Dynasty when it sent several huge naval expeditions under Admiral Cheng Ho and sailing all the way to Africa. None of the Asian states was invaded or colonised. China did not have such a history and ambition to conquer and rule over other Asian countries, unlike Japan that wanted to rule the world or the European concepts of Doctrine of Christian Discovery and robbing the rest of the world.

The fear of China is actually a western propaganda, a western mischievous lie to frighten the Asian countries of a China threat and to divert their attention from the real western threat, of western colonialism and imperialism. The western Imperialism today is in the form of American Imperialism. It is still fighting wars everywhere and starting wars to impoverish and dominate over other countries, particularly in the Middle East and Africa. They wanted the Middle East to be in perpetual war and to be under their control. They tried in Korea and Vietnam and Afghanistan but lost.

The Americans are still trying and not giving up. South Korea and Japan are still semi colonies of the American Empire and the Americans would not go away without a fight. In the meantime the Americans and the West are spreading the lie that China is the next colonial power. If so, the small neighbouring states of China lie Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Laos etc would have been colonised. But no, Nepal and Bhutan are semi colonies of India. Myanmar, Laos and the rest of China's neighbours are independent countries.

Asian countries must know the history of western colonialism and imperialism and the invaders that had invaded and colonised them. China is only being made a scapegoat by the West to strike fear in the Asian countries of a non existence demon. Everything China does, like investing in Africa, building high speed railroads to facilitate trade and exchanges among countries would be demonised by the West as acts of colonialism. China came to offer to build roads, high speed trains, infrastructure, ports etc etc, but at a price no western country would offer, and a price that the countries negotiated and are comfortable with to sign the deal. Is this colonialism? When these countries failed to pay back, is it China's fault?

This western mischievous lie must be debunked and put to rest. The real invaders, colonialists and imperialists were and are the European countries, the USA and Japan. Period. Look at historical facts and the truth. The truth shall set you free.

The West did not stop at just smearing and demonising China. They engaged in a continuous campaign to suppress and oppress the Chinese Civilisation from becoming as good as them in all fields of endeavour, to make the Chinese Civilisation appearing like unthinking and untalented human beans. My article, Oppression of the Chinese Civilisation, posted here several years back, is still being circulated in emails among those who want to know the truth as to why the Chinese Civilisation was seen and treated as a pariah Civilisation by the West for the last 150 years.

China suffered 100 years of humiliation by the West after the Opium War ending in 1949 when Mao Zedong reunited a broken and bankrupt China. The 150 years of Oppression continues till today but ended when China risen as the new superpower in the 21st Century.  This does not mean that the West would end their oppression and suppression of the Chinese Civilisation.

The American Trade War is a continuation of this campaign. Why the Trade War when China's lofty ambition is Made in China 2025? In 2025, China wants to be number One in AI, robotics, space technology and all fields of endeavour. Is this a crime that justifies a Trade War? If it does, then anyone aspiring to be rich, to be a top scientist or engineer is committing a crime and needs to be put down.

This is how wicked and evil the American/western thinking is. No one can be better than them or surpass them. It is not that China is going to invade or attack America. China and the Chinese Civilisation just want to be better and live better, and this is not acceptable to the Americans. Some evil Americans even said that the Chinese people have lived a good life for too long, 30 years is too long, and they want to put an end to it by conducting a war with China.

The world must free themselves from the curse of the West and the Americans in particular. The American and western narrative of what is good and bad must be stopped. Because it is good and bad according to their definition and interest, not yours.

11/14/2018

The Jewish Problem And Its Ominous Impact on This World. PART Two

    After the founding of the Jewish Israel State in 1948, the Jews went on a warpath of aggression and expansion against Egypt, Jordan and Syria. It seized Sinai from Egypt, the Golan Heights from Syria and the West Bank of the Jordan River from Jordan. The Jews main supporter and master is America which has made Israel its watch dog or sheriff to look after American interest in the Middle East.

The Jews in Israel have very strong and close connections with the Jews in America and Europe and also in Canada and Australia. In America and Europe the elite Jews always somehow manage to get themselves into positions of power in both the private and public sectors. That explains how the Jews are able to exert such great power and influence incommensurate with their small numbers in population. However the problem is that the elites Jewish influence has always been malevolent and this post an ominous outrageous impact on the rest of the world.

The Jewish insidious impacts touch on almost every aspect of human society in the sphere of politics, war and military, finance, business, stock markets, banking and insurance, transport and industries, social and culture, the mass media viz TV and newsprint that they are able to exert so much power and influence.

The troubles cause by the elite Jews are outrageously humongous. The Jewish propensity to create all the ills and evils, the choas and instabilities, insurrections , upheavals and wars and destruction is really incredible. This could be due to the Jewish elites historical and herectical tendency of misanthropic behaviour. They constantly fabricate lies and fake news to instigate choas, instabilities and wars. This is reflected in their conspired wars with the Americans and the Europeans in Middle East wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon and Iran and in Ukraine.

The influence of Jewish elites is largely malevolent and unless this malevolent Jewish influence is dissolved the world will face a human catastrophy unfolding in geopolitics. The world had saved the Jews from extermination in Hitler's Germany concentration camps in World War II. Incidentally World War II was claimed to be instigated and fomented by the Jewish aristocrats of the Rothschild family and institutions. Why do the Jews return the human kindness and saving grace of the world with ill will and deep evil intent of fomenting wars and instabilities and financial debacle for others.

Millions have died from Jewish evil influence on world affairs. "This must be stopped to avoid a cataclysm of great dimensions. That of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups in the mass media world wide in Washington Post, New York Times, Wall street Journal, The Economist, Times, Newsweek, CNN, Fox News, Bloomberg, BBC and other Jewish control newsprint, magazines, periodicals and books."

The Jewish American politicians exert a great influence in the public agenda by addressing or ignoring certain topics . Yet it is befuddling that in the West especially in America "It is really quite extraordinary that one cannot be allowed to talk or discuss the bad influence that the Jewish elites have a hold on the world." However, many open and broadminded enlightened journalists have begun to ignore this taboo, hoping the world can avoid a major catastrophy by disclosing the the evil fatalistic influence of the Jewish elites.

The evil Jewish elites wear several different labels to cover their satanic identity. At any time they can be referred to as Zionists, global elites, globalists, neo-cons, liberal interventionists, the War Party, the Israel Lobby, the Deep State, the Shadow Government, the bankers, the New World Order, the bilderbergs, the anglo-zionists, The Rothschilds, the Illuminati and the Freemasons.

The Jewish elites bear a very strong hatred for Russia and China. "The extreme Jewish hostility to Russia and China is historical especially those from UK and US. The most vitriolic and obsessive Russia and China bashing journalists in the media are mostly Jews. The publications and TV media that push these writers most enertically are all Jewish owned."

The Jewish neo-conservative movement have hijacked US Foreign Policy and are harshest foe of Russia and China. "Their trouble making extends beyond Russia and China and are responsible for America's disastrous debacle in the Middle-East. The psychotically anti-Russian and anti-Chinese UN ambassadors of US are put there by the Israel Lobby and they answer not to their presidents but to their Jewish sponsors."

The biggest anti-Russian and anti-Chinese clique in US congress and the White House administration as well as in CIA and the Pentagon are mainly Jewish both in the past and present. Some of the notorious names are Schiff, Schumer, Cardin, Blumenthal, John Bolton, Peter Narvarro, Lighthiger,Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Dick Cheney, Irving Kristol and Donald Rumsfeld just to name a few. But these numbers pale in significance compare to the huge hordes found in the mass media.

These psychopathic Jewish elites have a tendency to see the world only in binary good-evil terms and a low tolerance for diplomacy but a readiness to use military force and an emphasis on US unilateral action.

CNN a deeply Jewish company has been pushing anti-Russian and anti-Chinese propaganda fiercely. Some of America's most influential liberal political shows are Jewish and they portray all the fake negative aspects of Russia and China. The Jewish owned magazines Newsweek, The New Republic, The Atlantic, and the Rothschild owned the Economist all pumped out stories full of lies to demonize Russia and China. They all adopt a very extreme journalistic hostility towards Russia and China which carries a very dangerous geo-political instigation for war and hostilities that may result in a nuclear holocaust for humanity.

There are definitely pernicious effects of the influence of the Jewish elites on many aspects of American and European society and politics as well as on world security. It is imperative to flush out the evil influence of the Jewish elites otherwise they will have a competitive advantage in portraying and advertising their subtle message of  aggression, war and hostilities against Russia and China. In other words they will then be given a free hand to drive the world to nuclear war and eternal end of mankind.

The question of the Jewish elites malevolence influence must be brought into the open and resolved. The Jews who are causing choas and trouble are the ones at the pinnacle of political and media power. We need to find out why this pattern of Jewish elites malevolence and evil influence keep on repeating itself throughout history.

The problem of Jewish elites evil influence extends to all areas of public life . They are famous in the phenomenon of social sex scandals across the board from Hollywood to entertainment. to media, to high places of power, and to Washington. Could this be due to powerful Jewish institutions, the media, the banks, the stock market, the movie studios, the music industry and other big business being in the hands of degenerates. "Evidence suggest that mush of human enterprise dominated and shaped by Jews is a bottomless pit of trouble with a particular penchant for mendacity and cyncism, hostility to non-Jewish values and in geo-politics a clear bloodlust."

The Jews have also hijacked American Foreign Policy resulting in endless wars and violence causing an unmitigated disaster killing millions and squandering trillions of dollars of tax payers funds over the last few decades.

The Jewish state of Israel brutal treatment of Palestinians is horribly inhuman and need to be stopped. The Palestinians rightfully need the solid support of all freedom loving and righteous people in the world.

The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Serbia, and Ukraine were all instigated by the largely Jewish dictated US Foreign Policy over the last couple of decades. In each of these cases one can see a tendency towards dishonesty.

The whole fake news phenomenon is fundamentally Jewish. It is the Jewish owned
American and European media which churned out an astonishing quantity of what can only be called lies. The Jewish dictated western foreign policy towards Russia, China, Iran Iraq, Syria, DPRK and Afghanistan will lead to nuclear warfare and the extinction of life on earth.

Sanity must prevail in order for the world to stay secure and survive. To achieve that the insanity of the evil Jewish elites malevolence influence must necessarily be demolished forever.

Southernglory1

Wednesday, 14th November, 2018



Tan Bah Bah – talking sense and nonsense

Desinicise Singapore, speak Bahasa and be more Asean, this is the heading of a ‘sense and nonsense’ post by Tan Bah Bah in theindependent. I am not sure whether he is saying he is talking sense or nonsense. The gist of his article is that Singapore must speak more Bahasa and be more like Asean. I am not sure if Asean means more Bahasa from Singapore’s frog in the well perspective or a baba’s perspective. Out of the 10 countries in Asean, only 3 countries speak Bahasa, ie Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. There are Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia and the Philippines that have their own national languages and are proud of their own languages and cultures. Would they want to speak more Bahasa to be more Asean, presuming that Bahasa is Asean?
 

Historically, the development of civilization is about survival of the fittest. When the Mongols and Manchus conquered and ruled over China, they tried to impose their culture and language on the Chinese. They failed and eventually embraced the Chinese culture and language. What is the moral of these two stories?
When the Europeans invaded and conquered North America, they did not try to be more Red Indians and to speak more Red Indian language. They made their languages, especially English the lingua franca of the USA. OK, this story is quite different as they terminated and ‘genocided’ the Red Indians to near extinction and became irrelevant as a civilization.
 

The rest of the world, especially the third world less developed countries, embraced English with gusto. Singapore is an exception as the migrants have very shallow roots and are very willing to discard their own culture and language, especially the babas, to take on a different personality and identity. The fact that China and the Chinese Civilisation were in eclipse, conquered and devastated by the West, with China becoming a bankrupt and pariah country, helped these babas to want to dissociate themselves from being Chinese more willingly, just like duckweeds. Duckweeds have short roots and would change their roots quite easily.
 

The English language triumphed and became the major commercial and national language in Singapore and also in India and many other countries. There is no denying that the Europeans, represented by the English Empire and the English language, were superior, modern and advanced in areas of science and technology, the arts, medicine, in govt etc etc. A useful and progressive language would always be attractive to the progressive who want to learn a foreign language. But many newly independent countries proud of their own nationalities and cultures, chose to abandon the English language to promote the use of their own languages. That is why within Asean, every state has its own national language while English is still promoted in some way as an international language of commerce.
 

Would the rest of the Asean countries be willing to want to learn a third language like the Bahasa for greater Asean identity? Would they be willing to put in the effort and would they be able to cope with this additional task of learning another language that is less functional and not really a commercial regional language, definitely not an international language? Singaporeans, the Chinese and especially the babas, could not even cope with learning the Chinese language that is culturally and intrinsically Chinese, but they could cope with Bahasa just to be more Asean from the perspective of a frog in a well?
 

By the way, Singapore has been trying to be more Asean at least in the choice of a national dress. Ong Teng Chuan tried to introduce the orchid shirt but it faded away. Singapore’s national dress is the national dress of Asean. Wherever our leaders go, they will wear the national dress of that particular Asean country. When they visit Malaysia and Indonesia, they will wear batik. When they visit the Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Thailand etc, they would choose their respective national dress. This is Singapore’s first step to desinicise and become more Asean.
 

Is Tan Bah Bah’s proposal making sense or is he talking nonsense?